Paul Gicheru makes first appearance before the ICC

Confirmation of charges procedure to be conducted in writing

In the picture, Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020 ©ICC-CPI

On 6 November 2020, Paul Gicheru appeared before Pre-Trial Chamber A of the International Criminal Court (“ICC” or “Court”), composed of Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou, as decided by the President of the Pre-Trial Division in accordance with rule 165(2) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (the “Rules”). Mr Gicheru is suspected of offences against the administration of justice by corruptly influencing witnesses of the Court.

The hearing was held in the presence of the Office of the Prosecutor. Mr Gicheru, who represented himself at this hearing, appeared via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre.

The Single Judge verified the identity of the suspect, and ensured that he was clearly informed of the offences against the administration of justice he is alleged to have committed and of his rights under the Rome Statute of the ICC in a language he fully understands and speaks. 

The confirmation of charges procedure will, in principle, be conducted in writing pursuant to rule 165(3) of the Rules. The Single Judge set provisional dates for the procedure. The Prosecution is to file its document containing the charges by 12 February 2021. The Defence may file a list of evidence by 26 February 2021. The parties shall then file written submissions by 15 March; the Prosecution can file its reply to the Defence submissions by 22 March, and the Defence can reply by 29 March 2021.   

Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou of Pre-Trial Chamber A during the initial appearance of Paul Gicheru on 15 June 2020 ©ICC-CPI

The purpose of the confirmation of charges procedure is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to establish substantial grounds to believe that the person committed each of the offences against the administration of justice charged. If the charges are confirmed, totally or partly, the case will be transferred to a Trial Chamber, which will conduct the subsequent phase of the proceedings: the trial.

 3 November 2020, Paul Gicheru was surrendered to the custody of the International Criminal Court (“ICC” or “the Court”) by the Dutch authorities and arrived at the Court’s detention centre in The Netherlands.  Mr Gicheru, a lawyer formerly based in Kenya, is suspected of offences against the administration of justice consisting in corruptly influencing witnesses of the Court.

Mr Gicheru surrendered to the authorities of The Netherlands on 2 November 2020, pursuant an ICC arrest warrant issued in 2015. He was transferred the next day to the ICC custody after the completion of the necessary national arrest proceedings.  

Initial Appearance of Rexhep Selimi at the Kosovo Specialist Chambers

Public Hearing: Initial Appearance of Rexhep Selimi in the Case of Specialist Prosecutor Vs. Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Rexhep Selimi and Jakup Krasniqi

On 11 November 2020 at 11:00, the Initial Appearance of Rexhep Selimi will take place in the courtroom of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers (KSC) in The Hague.

The indictment against Rexhep Selimi was confirmed on 26 October 2020. He was arrested by the Specialist Prosecutor’s Office on 5 November 2020 and transferred to the Detention Facilities of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers in The Hague on the same day.

The indictment charges Rexhep Selimi, under various forms of criminal responsibility, with war crimes and crimes against humanity under international law.

The Initial Appearance of Rexhep Selimi will be a public hearing. During an Initial Appearance the Pre-Trial Judge makes sure that the rights of the Accused, including the right to legal representation, are respected, and that the Accused understands the charges against him. The Initial Appearance can be viewed online with a short delay at https://www.scp-ks.org/en/streaming.

Oath of office for Tanzania’s Dr. Magufuli

Thursday, 5 November 2020, Mombasa, United Republic of Tanzania: Sitting president Dr. John Magufuli from the Chama Cha Mapinduzi political party was sworn in for a second term as Rais wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania, that is, head of state and government of the Tanzanian union government. The ceremony took place at Ikulu (White, or State House) located in Dar es Salaam, albeit the country’s formal capital is Dodoma City. 

President Dr. Magafuli was the indisputable victor after the general election held on 28 October, gaining 84.40% of the cast ballots. 
Presidential terms are limited to five years wherein the president serves as head of state, of the executive branch of the government of Tanzania as well as supreme commander of the Armed Forces.

He is deputised by a Vice President, the incumbent being the first female one, Samia Suluhu

President Dr. Magufuli won out his initial presidency on a platform of reducing government corruption and spending while also investing in Tanzania’s industries in 2015. He has been active in Tanzanian politics since the 1990s. 

For further information 
Presidency of Tanzania: https://www.ikulu.go.tz

President Dr. John Magufuli – Picture by Issa Michuzi, issamichuzi.blogspot.co.uk through Wikipedia Commons.

200 Years After the First Raising of the Argentine Flag in Malvinas

0

By H.E. Mr. Felipe Solá, Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship of the Argentine Republic

November 6th 2020 marks an anniversary of great relevance in the protracted sovereignty dispute over the Question of the Malvinas Islands: on this date, two hundred years ago, David Jewett took possession of the Malvinas Islands, raising the Argentine flag in the Islands for the first time.

At the time of the May Revolution, the Malvinas Islands –which had been disputed between Spain, France and Great Britain in the 18th Century- were under the sovereignty of the Spanish authorities, which had an exclusive, effective and uninterrupted possession, unchallenged by Great Britain or any other foreign power. As successor State of Spain, those sovereignty rights passed on to Argentina.

The Spanish presence on the Islands came to an end on February 13 1811, when the last Governor of Malvinas during the viceroyalty times withdrew from the Islands, in the context of the conflict with Buenos Aires’ Primera Junta.

In spite of the Spanish withdrawal, the Malvinas Islands did not remain unoccupied or forgotten. A fluid circulation of goods, capitals and people continued to develop with the archipelago, thanks to its natural resources: sea lions and elephant seals, whales and wild livestock. British, North American, French and Argentine ships exploited those resources and used the islands’ and continent’s shoreline for docking, hunting and dressing stations. These activities drew the attention of Buenos Aires’ authorities, which, since 1813, had issued fishing permits, established regulations to prevent the depredation of resources and controlled the establishing of any permanent settlement in the region.

It is in that context that the raising of the national flag and the presence of David Jewett, a United States’ national at the service of the Argentine Navy, gains special relevance.

Since the outset of the independence process in Latin America in 1810, the new national governments had to fight the royalist power that opposed them from sea and land. David Jewett, as many other North American and European sailors, would join the fight at the service of the United Provinces, until 1817.

In January 1820, the Supreme Director of the United Provinces, José Rondeau, named David Jewett as ‘Army colonel at the service of the navy’, with all the attributions and prerogatives it entailed. He set sail on January 20 towards the South Atlantic in command of the frigate “La Heroína”, which was recognized by the Argentine government as a state warship.

By the end of October 1820, ten harsh months later, he reached Puerto Soledad in the Malvinas Islands, where he found vessels of different origins that called at that port temporarily as part of their hunting and fishing trips in the region.

On November 2nd, Jewett sent the other captains a circular informing them that he had been commissioned by the Government of the United Provinces to take possession of the archipelago and invited the other captains to meet him. He also pointed out that, in compliance with the rules set out by the authorities of Buenos Aires, he would seek to prevent the destruction of the Islands’ resources. On November 6th 1820, a ceremony was held where Jewett took possession of the Islands. According to witnesses like British captain James Weddell –who comments on it in his famous ‘A voyage to the South Pole (1822-1824)- and Frenchmen Louis Freycinet, colonel Jewett raised the Argentine flag, read a proclamation and fired 21 cannon shots in the name of the government of Buenos Aires, before the crews of the ships anchored at Puerto Soledad.

Three days later Jewett delivered to the captains present a circular in which he gave an account of the taking of possession of the Malvinas Islands on behalf of the Supreme Government of the United Provinces of South America, and of his willingness to act with justice and hospitality towards foreigners, also requesting that this information be communicated to other vessels.

The circular had a great repercussion in the international press. On August 3, the British newspaper The Times published an article in which it presented Jewett’s act as an act of sovereignty, as did the newspaper El Argos de Buenos Ayres in November.

While news of the events that took place in the Malvinas Islands continued to spread, Jewett stayed on the Islands for several months. He exercised his authority during his stay and until February 1821, when he requested the authorities of Buenos Aires to relieve him of his command. Guillermo Robert Mason was appointed as the new commander of La Heroína.

The solemn taking of possession of the Malvinas Islands was an official and public act which demonstrated the effective exercise of Argentine sovereignty -inherited from Spain-, received wide attention and was not contested by the United Kingdom (nor did it do so in 1825, when it recognized the United Provinces of the River Plate as an independent State by means of the Treaty of friendship, trade and navigation), or any other foreign power. This significant act is a fundamental link in the long chain of measures that, beginning with the first national government and ending with the forced removal of the Argentine authorities from Puerto Soledad in January 1833, demonstrate the young Argentine State’s continued and effective occupation and exercise of sovereignty over the Malvinas Islands.

This usurpation, which took place in times of peace, without a declaration of war, has never been consented by Argentina. Since then, and for the following 187 years, different Argentine governments have permanently claimed for the restitution of the full exercise of sovereignty over the Islands.

The international community’s support has been fundamental in this claim. The unanimous and early pronouncement of the Latin American countries in favor of the Argentine position was followed by those of other regional groups, as the international community organized in different multilateral forums. This support allowed the United Nations to adopt different resolutions directly or indirectly related to the Malvinas Question, which comprises the sovereignty dispute over the Malvinas Islands, South Georgias and South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding maritime areas.

Seychelles merges foreign and tourism portfolios

Sylvestre Radegonde  – Picture by Seychelles News Agency through Wikipedia Commons licence

Tuesday, 3 November 2020, Republic of Seychelles: State House announced the appointment of Sylvestre Radegonde as the novel Chief of Diplomacy and Minister of Tourism. 

Radegonde is a career diplomat who until recently was the chef de mission in France with concurrent accreditations to Monaco and Russia. He has likewise served in the United Kingdom, Malaysia, Belgium and Luxembourg. 

Minister Radegonde was sworn into office by President Wavel Ramkalawan on the morning of Monday, 16 November 2020 at State House in Victoria.  Speaking to the press after the ceremony, Minister Radegonde as the new Minister for Foreign Affairs and Tourism, with over 25 years of experience in Diplomacy said he was not expecting to be appointed as a Minister and that he is nonetheless prepared to impart his knowledge and experience for the benefit of the country. 

For further information

 
About Minister Radegonde: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvestre_Radegonde

Seychelles Tourism: https://www.seychelles.travel/en/

Swearing-in ceremony: http://www.statehouse.gov.sc/news/5006/two-new-ministers-sworn-into-office

New Zealand sworns in ethnic Maori foreign minister

Honorable Nanaia Mahuta – Labour candidate for Hauraki-Waikato in the 2020 New Zealand Election, Picture by NZ Labour Party.

Friday, 6 November 2020, Wellington, Dominion of New Zealand: The Honourable Nanaia Mahuta, a Labour MP has been sworn in at Government House by the country’s Governor-General Dame Patsy Reddy, as the country’s twenty eighth foreign minister, a portfolio that is held for the first time by a woman.   

Mahuta made headlines in 2016 after becoming the first female MP to wear a amoko kauae, that is, a traditional tattoo on her chin, during a parliamentary session. Moko are immesely symbolic, for they  represent information about a person’s ancestry, history and status. There are also sacred protocols around tā moko– the act of applying a moko to a person. Historically, moko were applied with chisels but now tattoo machines are often utilised.  

Minister Mahuta (b. 21 August 1970 in Auckland) was firstly elected to parliament in 1996, and has previously held a various portfolios, including the minister of local government and Māori development. She is related to the late Māori queen, Te Arikinui Te Atairangikaahu, and the current Māori monarch, Kingi Tuheitia. The Kīngitanga, or Māori King movement, dates back more than 160 years and is a significant political presence in New Zealand.

For further information 
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-cabinet-focused-covid-19-recovery?fbclid=IwAR0udjVlkMFDFSwdBf9b3fE7WTW0dfYjCMIS7-hWuqlek9vR4WHjHN01gek

Malbec World Day 2020

The Argentinian Embassy in the Netherlands could not skip the tenth edition of the Malbec World Day and will be celebrating it from 14 to 21 November at various wine specialty stores, shops and liquor stores in the Netherlands. The national pride of Argentina will be te center ofthe attention.
Malbec World Day is celebrated in memory of the day in 1853 when statesman, writer and President Domingo Faustino Sarmiento officially made it his mission to transform Argentina’s wine industry. He gave Michel Aimé Pouget, a French agronomist and soil expert, the task of bringing over new vines and creating the first Quinta Agronómica Mendoza (School of Agronomy), a space for education and research. Amongst his selection was Malbec, a grape of untold promise.

With the help of Italian and French immigrants, the wine industry grew exponentially and with it, Malbec, which quickly adapted to the various different terroirs, and developed with far better results than in its region of origin. If you ask wine lovers where the malbec wine comes from, they will say: “Argentina!” Hardly anyone knows that the grape originally comes from the south of France. Thus, over time and with a lot of hard work, it emerged as the flagship grape of Argentina.

After decades of hard work, determination and agricultural and viticultural know-how, Malbec has achieved worldwide recognition.

Argentina is now the main producer of Malbec in the world. With 109,686 hectares, Malbec represents 38.6% of the total red varieties and 22.4% of the country’s total cultivated area in 2020. It is the variety that has grown the most in area: by 171 percent since the year 2000!

Argentine producers are continuing to surprise the world by reinventing Malbec, cultivating it in the most extreme conditions of altitude and latitude. Malbec is Argentine and, at the same time, universal: it continues to transcend borders with force.

Celebratory events are held in more than 70 cities in 54 countries to mark the Malbec World Day.

So celebrate Argentina wine industry from 14 to 21 November and open a tasty Argentinian malbec!

Contact the Embassy of Argentina in The Hague to know more about participants wine shops during the week of 14 to 21 November. Interested in an extensive Masterclass online about Argentinian wines: send an email to Sección Económica y Comercial-Embajada Argentina  comercial_epbaj@mrecic.gov.ar.

This celebration has the support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship and the Argentine Wine Corporation (COVIAR), and is part of the Argentina 2020 Strategic Wine Plan.

So celebrate with Argentina from 14 to 21 November and get a delicious Malbec from one of the following wine shops:

  • Winery Wooning
  • C’est Le Vin
  • Wine store Den Toom vof
  • Not Only Tinto
  • Robbers and van den Hoogen
  • Winery Ten Bilt
  • Wine Cellar
  • Listing Drinks wholesaler / Wijnhandel Dikkers
  • Wine & wonder
  • Henri Bloem Apeldoorn
  • Lords of Wine
  • Siersma Wine advice
  • Van Erp Roden
  • K’s wine and food
  • Your Liquor Maaike
  • Your liquor store Stiekema
  • Your liquor store Dronten South
  • Your liquor store of Gils
  • Graaman liquor store
  • Parkzicht liquor store
  • Liquor store Pinotage
  • Liquor store Bas
  • Liquor store de Dijk
  • Mezze Delicacy
  • The Cheese Heroes
  • Jos Rijnaarts
  • Tamis Wines
  • Van Gelderen Wijn Helders’ Beverage specialist

Health and Hubris

By Barend ter Haar.

Which country has the world’s best health care? Is it the Netherlands, as stated by Ezekiel Emanuel in the New York Review of Books?[1] Or is it the United Kingdom “followed closely by Australia and the Netherlands” as claimed by the Commonwealth Fund? [2]

The United States, “which fails in almost every category”, dangles in both lists at the bottom, but, according to the Global Health Security Index, when it comes to preparedness for epidemics and pandemics, it comes first, followed by the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.[3]

If these three countries were indeed better prepared for a pandemic than other countries, one would expect to see that reflected in the number of victims of the current pandemic. However, there are few countries in the Western world that have fared worse than these three. 

Columbia University’s National Center for Disaster Preparedness estimated that at least 130,000 and possibly 210,000 fewer people would have died of the virus in the United States had the government acted earlier and better.[4] With more than 46,000 deaths, the United Kingdom has the highest death toll in Europe, more than four times as high as that of Germany (which has more inhabitants). 

According to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, an agency of the EU, the number of confirmed Covid-19 cases in the Netherlands during the last two weeks of October was 129,284, higher than the number of cases in that period in Canada, Cuba, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, China, Singapore, Vietnam, Thailand, Taiwan, Greece, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Ireland, Denmark, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania combined.[5]

How come the countries best prepared for a pandemic are doing so badly when a pandemic actually arrives? In an article in Nature, the American anthropologist Martha Lincoln suggests overconfidence and ‘exceptionalism’ as explanation.[6] Countries that consider themselves as something special will be less likely to learn from other nations and are therefore doomed to learn the hard way that the Covid-19 virus does not respect their special status. 

“The pandemic”, she writes, “provides a natural experiment on the public-health effects of hubris”. Examples of such hubris are the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union and the withdrawal of the United States from the World Health Organization. 

Does her diagnosis also apply to the Netherlands?  Were the Netherlands too confident that other countries could not teach her anything and therefore lost precious time in fighting the virus? The answer seems obvious.


[1] See: Health Care: The Best and the Rest:  https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/10/22/best-health-care

[2] https://www.commonwealthfund.org/chart/2017/health-care-system-performance-rankings

[3] https://www.ghsindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2019-Global-Health-Security-Index.pdf

[4] https://ncdp.columbia.edu/custom-content/uploads/2020/10/Avoidable-COVID-19-Deaths-US-NCDP.pdf

[5] See https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases The number of confirmed cases:  Canada 37893, Cuba 683, Australia 211, New Zealand 74, Japan 8329, South Korea 1403, China 374, Singapore 102, Vietnam 53, Thailand 101, Taiwan 20, Greece 12746, Sweden 19679, Norway 3427, Iceland 868, Ireland 13632, Denmark 10784, Finland 2777, Estonia 754, Latvia 2475, Lithuania 6782.

[6] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02596-8

Undersecretary Eduardo Malaya nominated as Philippines’ new ambassador to The Netherlands

By Anton Lutter.

The President of The Philippines Rodrigo Roa Duterte has named Jose Eduardo Malaya to be the new ambassador posted in The Hague. His nomination is pending before the Commission on Appointments of the Philippine Senate. He will succeed Ambassador Jaime Victor Ledda, who just before his recent return to Manila, was awarded the Knights-Grand Cross in the Order of Orange-Nassau.

Ambassador J. Eduardo (Ed) Malaya is a foreign affairs career official with over three decades of experience. Currently he’s the DFA (Department of Foreign Affairs) Undersecretary for Administration in Manila. Before being appointed to that position in 2019, Mr. Malaya, who’s considered a legal heavyweight, was Assistant Secretary at the Office of Treaties and Legal Affairs. Previously he was ambassador to Malaysia from September 2011 to March 2017 following his position as Foreign Affairs spokesman and concurrently Assistant Secretary of Legal Affairs from February 2009 to September 2011. Earlier he was Assistant Secretary of Policy Planning at DFA from March 2007 until January 2009. He served at Philippine missions in New York, Brussels, Chicago and San Francisco.

Mr. Malaya is the author/editor of several books: “Frontlines of Diplomacy: Conversations with Philippine Ambassadors” (Anvil Publishing, 2011); “Philippine Treaties Index, 1946-2010” (Philippine Foreign Service Institute, 2010); “So Help Us God: The Presidents of the Philippines and their Inaugural Addresses” (Anvil Publishing, 2004), “Philippine-Malaysia Agreements (1962-2014): Cornerstones of a Partnership” (2015). “Frontlines of Diplomacy” was a Finalist for the 2013 National Book Awards (Professions Category) under the auspices of the National Book Development Board and the Manila Critics Circle. 

Furthermore, he published: Forging Partnerships: “Philippine Defense Cooperation under Constitutional and International Laws” (University of the Philippines Law Center, Quezon City, 2016); Stewards of the Nation: Aguinaldo to Duterte and their Inaugural Visions (Anvil Publishing, 2018), which is an expansion of the 2004 publication. In 2018 when he visited The Netherlands he donated his books to the library of the Peace Palace, hoping that” ‘these books will reflect the vibrancy of diplomatic engagements and the ferment of international law discourse in the Philippines and relatedly in the Asian region’. ‘It is hoped that the above-said materials will be helpful to researchers and students of the law’.

Ambassador Malaya studied economics (BA with honors) and law (Juris Doctor) both at the University of the Philippines. Married to Rena Cristina Koa-Malaya MD, an obstetrician-gynecologist, he has three children – Mark Edward, Jana Ariana and Adrian Edward. He was awarded the Order of Sikatuna, rank of Datu (Grand Cross-Gold Distinction), in 2010 by President Arroyo and the Order of Mabini (Gwad Mabini) in 2016 by President Benigno S. Aquino III.

200 Years After the Raising of the Argentine Flag in Malvinas

0

By H.E. Mr. Felipe Solá, Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship of the Argentine Republic.

November 6th 2020 marks an anniversary of great relevance in the protracted sovereignty dispute over the Question of the Malvinas Islands: on this date, two hundred years ago, David Jewett took possession of the Malvinas Islands, raising the Argentine flag in the Islands for the first time.

At the time of the May Revolution, the Malvinas Islands –which had been disputed between Spain, France and Great Britain in the 18th Century- were under the sovereignty of the Spanish authorities, which had an exclusive, effective and uninterrupted possession, unchallenged by Great Britain or any other foreign power. As successor State of Spain, those sovereignty rights passed on to Argentina.

The Spanish presence on the Islands came to an end on February 13 1811, when the last Governor of Malvinas during the viceroyalty times withdrew from the Islands, in the context of the conflict with Buenos Aires’ Primera Junta.

In spite of the Spanish withdrawal, the Malvinas Islands did not remain unoccupied or forgotten. A fluid circulation of goods, capitals and people continued to develop with the archipelago, thanks to its natural resources: sea lions and elephant seals, whales and wild livestock. British, North American, French and Argentine ships exploited those resources and used the islands’ and continent’s shoreline for docking, hunting and dressing stations. These activities drew the attention of Buenos Aires’ authorities, which, since 1813, had issued fishing permits, established regulations to prevent the depredation of resources and controlled the establishing of any permanent settlement in the region.

It is in that context that the raising of the national flag and the presence of David Jewett, a United States’ national at the service of the Argentine Navy, gains special relevance.

Since the outset of the independence process in Latin America in 1810, the new national governments had to fight the royalist power that opposed them from sea and land. David Jewett, as many other North American and European sailors, would join the fight at the service of the United Provinces, until 1817.

In January 1820, the Supreme Director of the United Provinces, José Rondeau, named David Jewett as ‘Army colonel at the service of the navy’, with all the attributions and prerogatives it entailed. He set sail on January 20 towards the South Atlantic in command of the frigate “La Heroína”, which was recognized by the Argentine government as a state warship.

By the end of October 1820, ten harsh months later, he reached Puerto Soledad in the Malvinas Islands, where he found vessels of different origins that called at that port temporarily as part of their hunting and fishing trips in the region.

On November 2nd, Jewett sent the other captains a circular informing them that he had been commissioned by the Government of the United Provinces to take possession of the archipelago and invited the other captains to meet him. He also pointed out that, in compliance with the rules set out by the authorities of Buenos Aires, he would seek to prevent the destruction of the Islands’resources. On November 6th 1820, a ceremony was held where Jewett took possession of the Islands. According to witnesses like British captain James Weddell –who comments on it in his famous ‘A voyage to the South Pole (1822-1824)- and Frenchmen Louis Freycinet, colonel Jewett raised the Argentine flag, read a proclamation and fired 21 cannon shots in the name of the government of Buenos Aires, before the crews of the ships anchored at Puerto Soledad.

Three days later Jewett delivered to the captains present a circular in which he gave an account of the taking of possession of the Malvinas Islands on behalf of the Supreme Government of the United Provinces of South America, and of his willingness to act with justice and hospitality towards foreigners, also requesting that this information be communicated to other vessels.

The circular had a great repercussion in the international press. On August 3, the British newspaper The Times published an article in which it presented Jewett’s act as an act of sovereignty, as did the newspaper El Argos de Buenos Ayres in November.

While news of the events that took place in the Malvinas Islands continued to spread, Jewett stayed on the Islands for several months. He exercised his authority during his stay and until February 1821, when he requested the authorities of Buenos Aires to relieve him of his command. Guillermo Robert Mason was appointed as the new commander of La Heroína.

The solemn taking of possession of the Malvinas Islands was an official and public act which demonstrated the effective exercise of Argentine sovereignty -inherited from Spain-, received wide attention and was not contested by the United Kingdom (nor did it do so in 1825, when it recognized the United Provinces of the River Plate as an independent State by means of the Treaty of friendship, trade and navigation), or any other foreign power. This significant act is a fundamental link in the long chain of measures that, beginning with the first national government and ending with the forced removal of the Argentine authorities from Puerto Soledad in January 1833, demonstrate the young Argentine State’s continued and effective occupation and exercise of sovereignty over the Malvinas Islands.

This usurpation, which took place in times of peace, without a declaration of war, has never been consented by Argentina. Since then, and for the following 187 years, different Argentine governments have permanently claimed for the restitution of the full exercise of sovereignty over the Islands.

The international community’s support has been fundamental in this claim. The unanimous and early pronouncement of the Latin American countries in favor of the Argentine position was followed by those of other regional groups, as the international community organized in different multilateral forums. This support allowed the United Nations to adopt different resolutions directly or indirectly related to the Malvinas Question, which comprises the sovereignty dispute over the Malvinas Islands, South Georgias and South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding maritime areas.