By Dr. Hanneke Eggels MA,  author.

Ever since the eighties and being a PEN member I published my bilingual books of poetry  on social issues related to politics and peace. The Dutch minister of Culture presented my  ‘MIR’ – Russian for ‘peace’ – during Days of Dutch Culture  in 2003 to her Russian colleague  as the first book of poetry of a living Dutch poet translated in Russian language. All so long ago, those were the days….. As a kind of  peace poet I always felt inspired by human rights to denounce great and small themes. Before  Oprah’s book club  I already gave lectures on Nobel laureates in  reading circles, discussing their human rights. 

Recognizing the strong link between literature and politics, since many peace activists have used poetry as an effective means to communicate their ideas to a world wide audience,  the Peace Palace library in The Hague invited me to write poems for her international website too,  but my first poem as a  her peace poet during the Centenary (2012-2013) was published  on X-mas day  on the international website of the prestigious palace,  and  four more poems followed as a gift. 

On Bertha von Suttner

Celebrating the Centenary the Dutch town of international peace  The Hague donated an enormous  bell for the carillon.  Her gift inspired me to write another poem ‘Bertha’s bell in GMT’, about the first female Nobel Peace laureate:  Why she? Well, to me Bertha was a ‘small’ role model  being a female author on human rights a century ago!    Author and peace activist Bertha von Suttner received the  Nobel Peace Prize in 1905 for the book   Lay Down Your Arms! 

The book was published in 1889 in German  and became very quickly successful,  both because of its look at war and peace and because it addressed the issue of women in society. Three years later, it was published in English and has been translated into a total of sixteen languages. Until the publication of  All Quiet on the Western Front in 1929, Die Waffen nieder! (Lay Down your Arms!) was the most important German  literary work concerning war. Von Suttner chose to write a novel instead of a nonfiction book because she believed that the novel form would reach a wider audience. 

In all poetic freedom I framed and labelled the donated bell – ‘Bertha’ – in a greasy wink  to  her book Die Waffen nieder ‘.  For Dicke Bertha  became the nick name of a German  howitser in the First World War.  The German factory  Krupp from Essen  demonstrated   Kurze Marine Kanone L/12  for the first time in 1893. The story goes that the howitser cannon is named after  Bertha Krupp, owner of the company Krupp AG,  but another explanation is the reference to  the obese Austrian pacifiste Bertha von Suttner. Anyway, my bold metaphore  in the  frame  of  ‘Bertha’s bell in GMT’ became my spiritual gift for the Peace Palace.  In a synesthesia  the reader  hopefully will hear and experience Bertha’s bell  in a declaration of  time in GMT  both on the ground and sea,  as a  token of peace in the future. 

A hundred quotes

 “A clever skill to catch a political topic  in a poetic image”

(Professor Abram de Swaan) 

The library of the Peace Palace  had already extended her collection of poetry with several books of my poetry. Moreover we discussed  my lectures and archives on Nobel laureates,  preparing my new book ‘Rapiarium’ with 100 quotes on Nobellaureates.  I  suggested to programme a special website on Nobel laureates too. From 2013 the library which world wide is known on her prestigious collection in the field of international rights and peace, gave attention to the first female Nobel Peace laureate in a master class and lecture , while publishing ‘Bertha’s bell on GMT’ on their website and newsletter to  3500 readers in 2016.

The interview The Power of Poetry contemplated the special link between poetry, international peace and international justice. http://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/2012/10/the-power-of-poetry . The library has a separate hit on poetry, containing in total 57 books and articles, the poems of  Hugo Grotius  and my poem on   Bertha von Suttner too.

Note 1

Bertha’s bell in GMT:  Nobel  laureate for Peace  Bertha von Suttner. Austrian peace activist (1843-1914). The Hague’s Centenary gift: an enormous bell for the carillon of the Peace Palace  in 2012. The life expectancy for new-born girls in 2013 is 100 years. The title of a book by Nobel laureate Ernest Hemingway: For whom the bell tolls. Title of a book by Thomas Hardy: Far from the madding crowd. The poem was published to commemorate   the birthday of Bertha von Suttner on www.peacepalacelibrary.nl in June 2016. 

Note 2

In 2013 Bertha von Suttner became the first woman in history to be honored with a buste inside the Peace Palace. During the late 19th century, Bertha von Suttner, an Austrian author and peace activist, was one of the most prominent members of the international peace movement. In 1905, she became the first female recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. Around the same time, she played an important role in the coming into existence of the Peace Palace. Hamann, B., Bertha von Suttner: ein Leben für den Frieden’, München, Piper, 1986.

About the author:

Hanneke Eggels (*Amsterdam) is an independent poet and philosopher with a contemporary and socially-critical view. Sentiment is the arch-enemy of poetry, according to her. She transforms myths from the past to modern  ways of thinking and puts political currents in national and  international context. Her theme is on international level and she spreads a humanistic view.

About her books:

Nice. Gedichten/Poetry on human rights. Paperback, 66 pages. ISBN 978 94 91206 09 2. Cour de Culture Publishers 2017. ISBN e-book 9789081524902 

Rapiarium. Lezen met de pen. 250 citaten van schrijvers, dichters en denkers, incl. 100 citaten van  Nobellaureaten. Cour de Culture Publishers 2019. ISBN 9789491206115. 

—————————————-

(In the picture: Drs. Hanneke Eggels next to buste of Bertha von Suttner in hall of the Peace Palace The Hague,  remembering her birthday in 2016) 

By Abraham Telar Kuc. The Nile River is the longest river on the earth, with eleven nation states sharing it and over 487 million people or about 20% of the African population living in the basin countries and they depend partly or fully on the Nile for their daily water use, foods and other economic benefits. The river drains 10 % of the African continent or an area greater than 3,176,541 km2, and its divided to ten different sub-basins with two main feeding sources’ the White Nile and the Blue Nile, which making it one of the worlds largest and complicated international trans-boundary river basins (1). It’s very clear that the long and current regional disputes over the Nile’s waters between the upstream and downstream countries specially Uganda, Ethiopia and other upstream nations who are been the forehead leading the campaign for the lifting of colonial era treaties regarding Nile waters allocutions, governance, management, economic use and other Nile related issues and they been demanding renegotiating Nile river basin for fair shares and equal benefits and which they did in 2010 by reaching and signing of (Cooperative Framework Agreement or Entebbe agreement) to replace all the European colonial agreements, meanwhile the two downstream countries Egypt and Sudan in the other sides refusing to renegotiate or sign the Entebbe treaty and insists on maintaining the colonial era treaties  or what they called “the historical rights” which gave the lion’s share of the Nile waters and the absolute veto to only two Nile countries and ignored the rights of other Nile’s nations. Egypt and Sudan for years been using what they called “the historical rights” guaranteed by the colonial era agreements and their diplomatic influence to block international development funds and loans a policy which its aims only to prevent the upstream nations from establishing or constructing any developmental or economical projects on the Nile River, while Egypt is warring about the potential impacts which could effect its water security level as a result of any construction on the Nile river, the other Nile Basin nations said they are addressing the undergoing social, economic and environmental changes plus the population in the region is growing rapidly which will need more access to Nile basin resources in aim to provide water, food and energy to their people(2). The looming conflict in the Nile Basin region over water recourses governance, allocutions and economic use has been a major security threat to the regional and international peace and stability, the risks of militarizing the Nile water dispute among the basin countries has been a growing serious security threat to the basin region as a result of lacking of middle point agreement on how to share, mange and benefit from the longest river fairly and equally. (3)(4)(5)(6) In past years the downstream nations had already unilaterally constructed dams, used Nile waters for irrigation, industrial and other projects and with the upstream nations complaining about those unilateral projects done by the downstream nations and the none cooperative method and approach of Egypt and Sudan and as an outcome of years of disagreement over the Nile water issues and unilaterally decisions and actions taken by the individual countries claiming the Nile River waters and only favoring their own benefits over other Nile nations. The Entebbe Agreement came in to escalate the none cooperation situation more by geo-politically shifting the control of Nile basin waters away from the downstream nations and gave the upstream countries a legal frame to construct dams, establish different projects and increase their water use for different propos. (7) With some countries see themselves as victims of other Nile countries who had taken an advantage of certain period of time or situation that they were in, which let some of them to see no benefit now in been cooperative with the others concerning the Nile related issues and looks only at their national interests, but still the diplomatic dialogue and inclusive negotiations between the Nile basin nations is the only way forward to build confidence, trust and cooperation for sustainable future of the Nile and mutual and shared benefits for basin members countries. A positive engagement between the Nile basin members now can be observed in some steps taken by the countries were technical dialogue and diplomatic approach has increased the sharing of technical and hydrological data between the basin members countries, capacity building workshops and inter-nations trainings and seminars for technicians, policy and decision makers, government officials, diplomats, scientists, researchers, journalists, local and global think-tank institutions, NGOs, regional and other international stakeholders had really helped in easing the interstate political tensions and putting concord foundation for more regional cooperation which will contribute to a better understanding, enhancing the diplomatic relations  and cooperation among the basin nations. To have a sustainable Nile Basin with equal benefits, comprehensive cooperation, joint management, and effective partnership the diplomatic approach and inclusive negotiations is the only solution to overcome years of mistrust and stand off in the Nile Basin region. *References: – 1- http://www.nilebasin.org/media-center/maps. 2- Dr. Aleu Garang Aleu, Khartoum 2010. The Legal System of the Nile Basin: The impact of South Sudan independence on the Nile water distribution and system management, 3- Aljazeera News, Ethiopia discards Egypt threats over Nile dam, 12 June 2013, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2013/06/20136128306931161.html 4- BBC News, Egyptian warning over Ethiopia Nile dam, 10June2013,https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-22850124 5- Aljazeera News, Egypt to ‘escalate’ Ethiopian dam dispute, 21April2014, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/04/egypt-escalate-ethiopian-dam-dispute-201448135352769150.html. 6- Heba Salehand John Aglionby, Cairo and Nairobi, DECEMBER 27, 2017,Financial Times Egypt and Ethiopia clash over huge River Nile dam, https://www.ft.com/content/58f66390-dfda-11e7-a8a4-0a1e63a52f9. 7- Dr. Aleu Garang Aleu, Khartoum 2010. The Legal System of the Nile Basin: The impact of South Sudan independence on the Nile water distribution and system management, …………………………………… The author is a Journalist, Blogger, TV Producer, Cultural, Political and Youth Activist, postgraduate student of Diplomacy and International Relations at the Institute of Peace, Development and Security Studies- University of Juba; and working currently with South Sudan Broadcasting Corporation and be contacted through E-mail:telar.abra@gmail.comor tell No: +211912577222                                        

New memo series provides authoritative legal and case study analysis for why starvation can and should be prosecuted as an international crime.

In the picture Catriona Murdoch.

Boston, MA/The Hague, The Netherlands – June 18, 2019 – Global Rights Compliance (GRC) and the World Peace Foundation (WPF) at The Fletcher School (Tufts University), partners in the project “Accountability for Starvation: Testing the Limits of the Law” have published a series of memos documenting how existing international law might apply to starvation conditions, and why it should be applied to Syria, South Sudan and Yemen (forthcoming).

“Mass starvation is not a natural phenomenon nor is it a haphazard by-product of war,” explains Alex de Waal (WPF), “it is the foreseeable result of intentional actions and should be treated as criminal. This memo series provides the legal and case-specific analysis that establishes how and why accountability for starvation can be pursued.”

“We are at the start of a long road to the effective criminalisation of starvation. While starvation has not yet been prosecuted by an international court,” explained Wayne Jordash Managing Partner of GRC, “there is no legal reason to believe that these challenges of prosecuting starvation are insuperable or even more significant than in the average international criminal law trial.”

“The Crime of Starvation and Methods of Prosecution and Accountability,” by GRC, offers unique insight into why the Rome Statute should be amended, as proposed by the Government of Switzerland, to allow starvation to be prosecuted in non-international armed conflicts. The authors also analyse the elements of the crime of starvation through the relevant international legal frameworks, including International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and International Criminal Law (ICL). It further clarifies the applicable legal framework, detailing how the conduct of warring parties and individuals may constitute a starvation violation.

In addition to the Legal Paper they are releasing two case of study papers analysing starvation violations in specific contexts of Syria and South Sudan. The Syria policy memo by Mohammad Kanfash and Ali al- Jasem, from partner organization, Damaan Humanitarian Organization, analyses patterns of starvation crimes in the war in Syria. With focus on Eastern Ghouta, Aleppo, Deir Alzor and penal starvation, the report documents how segments of the population in what was previously a middle-income, food- exporting country, become exposed to starvation conditions. It addresses the patterns of siege and how the government’s ‘kneel or starve’ strategy repeatedly throughout the war brought entire civilian populations to the brink of starvation.

The South Sudan policy memo by Tong Deng Anei, Alex de Waal and Bridget Conley of the World Peace Foundation demonstrates how both government and opposition forces used starvation tactics, causing hunger, disease, social breakdown and heightened mortality. Humanitarian aid was also blocked, stolen and manipulated, and aid workers were attacked and killed. With focus on Unity State, Wau/Baggari (Western Bahr al Ghazal State), and Yei (Central Equatoria State), the memo details how conflict actors’ decisions created famine or near famine conditions.

A third case study, of Yemen, is forthcoming. This memo series is timely: as the conflicts in both Syria and South Sudan appear to be winding down, the effects of using starvation as a weapon of war continue to impact millions. In Yemen, the use of starvation persists, impacting enormous segments of the civilian populations. Further, in May 2018, the United Nations Security Council affirmed that “starvation of civilians as a method of warfare may constitute a war crime” (UNSC Res. 2417).

This seminal report contributes to the goals of “Accountability for Starvation: Testing the Limits of the Law” project, which seeks to identify how international law may be used to advance the prevention, prohibition and accountability for mass starvation.

Contacts:

Bridget Conley and Catriona Murdoch. World Peace Foundation Global Rights Compliance. Somerville, MA, USA The Hague, The Netherlands. Bridget.conley@tufts.edu catrionamurdoch@globalrightscompliance.co.uk/ 617-627-2243 +31 (0)611232482

About Wayne Jordash and Catriona Murdoch at Global Rights Compliance: Wayne Jordash QC is an internationally recognised expert in the global network of international tribunals and courts and international humanitarian law (‘IHL’) and the managing partner of Global Rights Compliance. He is ranked as a leading silk in both the Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners, where he was recommended as “one of the world’s leading international criminal lawyers”. Catriona Murdoch leads the “Accountability for Mass Starvation: Testing the Limits of the Law” project and is an international criminal and human rights law expert. Called to the Bar of England and Wales she is ranked as a leading junior in both the Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners where she was recommended as “star of the future”. International legal advisory firm, Global Rights Compliance, specialises in services associated with bringing accountability for violations of IHL and international human rights law.

About Alex de Waal and the World Peace Foundation at The Fletcher School: Alex de Waal is Executive Director of the World Peace Foundation and a Research Professor at The Fletcher School. Considered one of the foremost experts on famine, his scholarship and practice has also probed humanitarian crisis and response, human rights, the Horn of Africa, HIV/AIDS and governance in Africa, and conflict and peacebuilding. The World Peace Foundation is an operating foundation affiliated solely with The Fletcher School, that provides intellectual leadership on issues of peace, justice and security.

Women members of a agricultural cooperative for women, after finish the work in the field. The women of Inhanrrime are organized for stimulate the female develop. Photography by Jose Cuesta.

Text and pictures by Jose Cuesta.

In Africa, more than 70 percent of people live in rural areas and depend on agriculture and livestock for their food and sustenance: most of the work in these fields is done by women.

According to a report by the United Nations, women’s economic activity represents a large part of the workforce engaged in agriculture (70 percent), livestock (50 percent), and trade (50 percent), as well as the totality of the food processing sector. 

Women are the backbone of African society, although they rarely appear on the front pages of newspapers or in news headlines. Daughters, mothers, wives or grandmothers support the family and the tribal economy.

On their shoulders lies the responsibility of transporting water from the wells, generally far away, carrying the wood, feeding the children and monitoring their health, as well as many other responsibilities.

Moreover, their memory stores and relays the traditions that pass from one generation to the next one, thus strengthening the social and cultural cohesion of the communities.

Since dawn they work tirelessly to maintain their homes. However, their role in the tribe is generally considered peripheral. They often have no voice when it comes to economic or family matters, and only a few gain recognition for their public or political activities.

Women are the basic and essential pillar of the subsistence economy. From Morocco to South Africa, women are the true driving force of a society that often relegates them to the care and work of the land.

To them: farmers, merchants, housewives, fisherwomen … who sustain life and who put their body and their strength so that we can move towards a better world.

By Prof. Anis H. Bajrektarević. Does our history only appear overheated, but is essentially calmly predetermined? Is it directional or conceivable, dialectic and eclectic or cyclical, and therefore cynical? Surely, our history warns. Does it also provide for a hope? Hence, what is in front of us: destiny or future? One of the biggest (nearly schizophrenic) dilemmas of liberalism, ever since David Hume and Adam Smith, was an insight into reality; whether the world is essentially Hobbesian or Kantian. As postulated, the main task of any liberal state is to enable and maintain wealth of its nation, which of course rests upon wealthy individuals inhabiting the particular state. That imperative brought about another dilemma: if wealthy individual, the state will rob you, but in absence of it, the pauperized masses will mob you. The invisible hand of Smith’s followers have found the satisfactory answer – sovereign debt. That ‘invention’ meant: relatively strong central government of the state. Instead of popular control through the democratic checks-&-balances mechanism, such a state should be rather heavily indebted. Debt – firstly to local merchants, than to foreigners – is a far more powerful deterrent, as it resides outside the popular check domain. With such a mixed blessing, no empire can easily demonetize its legitimacy, and abandon its hierarchical but invisible and unconstitutional controls. This is how a debtor empire was born. A blessing or totalitarian curse? Let us briefly examine it.  The Soviet Union – much as (the pre-Deng’s) China itself – was far more of a classic continental military empire (overtly brutal; rigid, authoritative, anti-individual, apparent, secretive), while the US was more a financial-trading empire (covertly coercive; hierarchical, yet asocial, exploitive, pervasive, polarizing). On opposite sides of the globe and cognition, to each other they remained enigmatic, mysterious and incalculable: Bear of permafrost vs. Fish of the warm seas. Sparta vs. Athens. Rome vs. Phoenicia… However, common for the both was a super-appetite for omnipresence. Along with the price to pay for it.  Consequently, the Soviets went bankrupt by mid 1980s – they cracked under its own weight, imperially overstretched. So did the Americans – the ‘white man burden’ fractured them already by the Vietnam war, with the Nixon shock only officializing it. However, the US imperium managed to survive and to outlive the Soviets. How? The United States, with its financial capital (or an outfoxing illusion of it), evolved into a debtor empire through the Wall Street guaranties. Titanium-made Sputnik vs. gold mine of printed-paper… Nothing epitomizes this better than the words of the longest serving US Federal Reserve’s boss, Alan Greenspan, who famously said to then French President Jacques Chirac: “True, the dollar is our currency, but your problem”. Hegemony vs. hegemoney.  House of Cards Conventional economic theory teaches us that money is a universal equivalent to all goods. Historically, currencies were a space and time-related, to say locality-dependent. However, like no currency ever before, the US dollar became – past the WWII – the universal equivalent to all other moneys of the world. According to history of currencies, the core component of the non-precious metals money is a so-called promissory note – intangible belief that, by any given point of future, a particular shiny paper (self-styled as money) will be smoothly exchanged for real goods.  Thus, roughly speaking, money is nothing else but a civilizational construct about imagined/projected tomorrow – that the next day (which nobody has ever seen in the history of humankind, but everybody operates with) definitelly comes (i), and that this tomorrow will certainly be a better day then our yesterday or even our today (ii).  This and similar types of social contracts (horizontal and vertical) over the collective constructs hold society together as much as its economy keeps it alive and evolving. Hence, it is money that powers economy, but our blind faith in (constructed) tomorrows and its alleged certainty is what empowers money.  Clearly, the universal equivalent of all equivalents – the US dollar – follows the same pattern: Strong and widely accepted promise. What does the US dollar promise when there is no gold cover attached to it ever since the time of Nixon shock of 1971?  Pentagon promises that the oceanic sea lines will remain opened (read: controlled by the US Navy), pathways unhindered, and that the most traded world’s commodity – oil, will be delivered. So, it is not a crude or its delivery what is a cover to the US dollar – it is a promise that oil of tomorrow will be deliverable. That is a real might of the US dollar, which in return finances Pentagon’s massive expenditures and shoulders its supremacy.  Admired and feared, Pentagon further fans our planetary belief in tomorrow’s deliverability – if we only keep our faith in dollar (and hydrocarbons’ energized economy), and so on and on in perpetuated circle of mutual reinforcements.  These two pillars of the US might from the East coast (the US Treasury/Wall Street and Pentagon) together with the two pillars of the West coast – both financed by the US dollar and spread through the open sea-lanes (Silicone Valley and Hollywood), are an essence of the US posture.  This very nature of power explains why the Americans have missed to take our mankind into completely other direction; towards the non-confrontational, decarbonized, de-monetized/de-financialized and de-psychologized, the self-realizing and green humankind. In short, to turn history into a moral success story. They had such a chance when, past the Gorbachev’s unconditional surrender of the Soviet bloc, and the Deng’s Copernicus-shift of China, the US – unconstrained as a lonely superpower – solely dictated terms of reference; our common destiny and direction/s to our future/s. Winner is rarely a game-changer  Sadly enough, that was not the first missed opportunity for the US to soften and delay its forthcoming, imminent multidimensional imperial retreat. The very epilogue of the WWII meant a full security guaranty for the US: Geo-economically – 54% of anything manufactured in the world was carrying the Made in USA label, and geostrategically – the US had uninterruptedly enjoyed nearly a decade of the ‘nuclear monopoly’. Up to this very day, the US scores the biggest number of N-tests conducted, the largest stockpile of nuclear weaponry, and it represents the only power ever deploying this ‘ultimate weapon’ on other nation. To complete the irony, Americans enjoy geographic advantage like no other empire before. Save the US, as Ikenberry notes: “…every major power in the world lives in a crowded geopolitical neighborhood where shifts in power routinely provoke counterbalancing”. Look the map, at Russia or China and their packed surroundings. The US is blessed with neighboring oceans – all that should harbor tranquility, peace and prosperity, foresightedness.   Why the lonely might, an empire by invitation did not evolve into empire of relaxation, a generator of harmony? Why does it hold (extra-judicially) captive more political prisoners on Cuban soil than the badmouthed Cuban regime has ever had? Why does it remain obsessed with armament for at home and abroad? What are we talking about here – the inadequate intensity of our confrontational push or about the false course of our civilizational direction?   Indeed, no successful and enduring empire does merely rely on coercion, be it abroad or at home. However, unable to escape its inner logics and deeply-rooted appeal of confrontational nostalgia, the prevailing archrival is only a winner, rarely a game-changer.  To sum up; After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Americans accelerated expansion while waiting for (real or imagined) adversaries to further decline, ‘liberalize’ and bandwagon behind the US. Expansion is the path to security dictatum only exacerbated the problems afflicting the Pax Americana. That is how the capability of the US to maintain its order started to erode faster than the capacity of its opponents to challenge it. A classical imperial self-entrapment!! And the repeated failure to notice and recalibrate its imperial retreat brought the painful hangovers to Washington by the last presidential elections. Inability to manage the rising costs of sustaining the imperial order only increased the domestic popular revolt and political pressure to abandon its ‘mission’ altogether. Perfectly hitting the target to miss everything else … ** ** When the Soviets lost their own indigenous ideological matrix and maverick confrontational stance, and when the US dominated West missed to triumph although winning the Cold War, how to expect from the imitator to score the lasting moral or even a momentary economic victory? Neither more confrontation and more carbons nor more weaponized trade and traded weapons will save our day. It failed in past, it will fail again any given day.  Interestingly, China opposed the I World, left the II in rift, and ever since Bandung of 1955 it neither won over nor joined the III Way. Today, many see it as a main contestant. But, where is a lasting success? Greening international relations along with greening of economy (geopolitical and environmental understanding, de-acidification and relaxation) is the only way out. Historically, no global leader has ever emerged from a shaky and distrustful neighborhood, or by offering little bit more of the same in lieu of an innovative technological advancement. Ergo, it all starts from within, from at home. Without support from a home base, there is no game changer. China’s home is Asia.  Hence, it is not only a new, non-imitative, turn of technology what is needed. Without truly and sincerely embracing mechanisms such as the NaM, ASEAN and SAARC (eventually even the OSCE) and the main champions of multilateralism in Asia, those being India Indonesia and Japan first of all, China has no future of what is planetary awaited – the third force, a game-changer, lasting and trusted global leader.  ———————- About the author: Prof. Anis H. Bajrektarević,  is chairperson and professor in international law and global political studies, Vienna, Austria.  He has authored six books (for American and European publishers) and numerous articles on, mainly, geopolitics energy and technology.  Professor is editor of the NY-based GHIR (Geopolitics, History and Intl. Relations) journal,  and editorial board member of several similar specialized magazines on three continents. His 7^th book, ‘From WWI to www. – Europe and the World 1918-2018’ has been just realised.