Erdogan’s open wounds and his strategic mistake

By Eleni-Vasiliki Bampaliouta.

It is the first time in at least modern history that Turkey has achieved the impossible: gaining so many enemies and dislikes from third countries. Exceeding all expectations and realistic estimates, the neo-Ottoman Turkey of the Islamic government of AKP and Erdogan deservedly won with its sword, the dislike of a large portion of Western as well as Arab / Muslim states. Greece, Cyprus, France, Austria, Armenia, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Armenia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, until recently India, Kurds but also much of the EU and forces within Washington seem to perceive and worry about role of the Erdogan government.

With each of the above powers, Turkey has points of friction and controversy, which may stem from different interests and causes, but all flow into one bed: The Ottoman Empire that Erdogan envisions reviving.

 Today’s Turkey has only managed to sink its economy and end up with “friendships” that may create more problems for it than offer solutions.

Greece-Cyprus

The current rivalry between Turkey – Greece and Cyprus is certainly rooted several centuries before, already from the time of the Eastern Roman Empire, to continue in the 400 years of Ottoman slavery and the great Uprising of ’21, the unfortunate Greek-Turkish war, the Asia Minor Catastrophe in ’23 and the Attila operation in Cyprus in 1974. The rivalry for the maritime zones of the Eastern Mediterranean is the last episode of this conflict.

France

The escalating Turkish-French rivalry is essentially about sovereignty in the Eastern Mediterranean. The power vacuum left by the gradual withdrawal of the Americans, combined with the weakness of the British, left room for third countries to expand their sphere of influence, with Russia consolidating a naval presence in Syria and Turkey finding an opportunity for maritime expansion. France has always had vital interests in the Mediterranean, especially with countries in the Middle East and North and Sub-Saharan Africa. The French aeronautical deployment in the region and the conclusion of military alliances with Cyprus and Greece are part of the halting of the effort to transform the Mediterranean into a Turkish lake.

Israel

Israeli-Turkish relations have always been a function of developments on both the Arab-Israeli front and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Despite traditionally good trade and political ties, bilateral relations between Israel and Turkey deteriorated during the AKP government and its contradictory stance on Israel in Lebanon’s second war and Israel’s policies in Gaza. The rupture came with the Mavi Marmara flotilla incident in 2011 and, despite partial reconciliation in mid-2016, little has been done since then to heal wounds. There are still terrible obstacles between the two countries, mainly the deep mistrust between the current political leadership in each country and fundamental differences in the Palestinian issue and the status of Jerusalem. Israel’s efforts to expand defense and energy cooperation with Cyprus, Greece and Egypt as a counterweight to Turkey and support for the Kurds have further damaged relations between the two countries.

Egypt

Following the uprisings in the Arab world in 2010 – the so-called “Arab Spring” – the Islamist government in Ankara openly supported the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi. However, with his ousting in a military coup by General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Erdogan’s neo-Ottoman dreams were shattered, as he lost significant political foothold on the Egyptian geopolitical chessboard. The al-Sisi government’s subsequent rapprochement with Cyprus, Greece and Israel and the establishment of the East Med Gas Forum, which excluded Ankara from talks on the commercial exploitation of deposits in the Eastern Mediterranean, widened the interest gap. The signing of an EEZ partial demarcation agreement between Greece and Egypt further angered Ankara, which revealed this week that it had offered Cairo an EEZ agreement with greater benefits, which it rejected.

The Arab League denounced Turkish interventions in Arab countries (Syria, Libya and Iraq) and called on the Turkish side “not to interfere in the internal affairs of Arab countries and to stop its provocative actions that will sabotage the confidence and security and stability of the region “. Qatar, Libya, Somalia and Djibouti, however, abstained from voting on the declaration.

Saudi Arabia – UAE – Bahrain

The tension in relations between Turkey and the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia largely reflects the struggle for sovereignty in the Arab world and the Middle East.

By supporting the “Arab Spring” and the Muslim Brotherhood, Turkey hoped to undermine the monarchies in the Gulf countries. The Muslim Brotherhood poses a major threat to Gulf regimes and has found refuge and protection in Turkey.

Austria

The Austrians never forgot that after the fall of Byzantium (1453) the Ottomans besieged the walls of Vienna in 1529, threatening to invade the heart of Europe. The horrors of the Turks have remained indelible in the memory of Europeans until today. The victory of the besieged was of the utmost importance for Europe, because the expansion of the Turks was stopped for a century and a half, until they reappeared. After Erdogan’s conversion of Hagia Sophia, Libya and the invasion of northern Iraq, he noted that “Turkey is simply not a reliable partner of Europe.” Austria is one of the countries in favor of suspending accession negotiations with Turkey.

India

Turkey’s long-held Islamic hand reaches as far as India, as, according to Indian reports, Ankara is said to be behind efforts to build Islamist nuclei in the country. Turkey’s attempt to extend its influence to Muslims in Southeast Asia is part of its rivalry with Saudi Arabia for hegemony of the Islamic world. The Erdogan government also funds religious schools in India.

Another concern of the Indian authorities is located in the south and specifically in the coastal state of Kerala, where an extremist Islamist organization has been funded for some time by Turkey and Qatar. It is also reported that Turkey and Pakistan, through Qatar, are funding the preacher Zakir Naik, who is accused of radicalizing Muslims.

Armenia

Turkey is unhappy with Armenia’s support for Cyprus and Greece over their rights in the Eastern Mediterranean and allegations against Ankara’s irregular actions. Turks and Armenians have had open accounts for more than a century.

 The Armenian Genocide and Turkey’s refusal to recognize this crime against humanity is the most serious thorn in the relations between the two. Recently, Azerbaijan and Armenia accused each other of violating the fragile ceasefire along their borders with bloody incidents lasting days. Turkey was one of the first countries to support Azeris’ attacks on Armenian positions. The two countries are conducting joint military exercises, a fact that worries Armenians, who have never forgotten Turkish barbarism.

 China

In addition to the aforementioned countries, other groups of countries, such as the Kurds, are waging dislike and hatred towards Erdogan’s Turkey, which is waging a long struggle for self-determination. Also, Bashar al-Assad’s Syrians and large groups in Lebanon and Libya, even in traditionally pro-Turkish countries such as Germany, are now beginning to realize that the Turkish model they hoped to apply to other Muslim countries now belongs. in the realm of fantasy. Foreign Affairs analysis that Erdogan is turning Turkey into a Client State of China opens another big chapter, touching on the sensitive strings in US circles, who are beginning to realize the need to change the AKP’s relationship with Turkey.

About the author:

Eleni-Vasiliki Bampaliouta â€“ Experienced journalist  and writer, specialist in politics and diplomacy, extended list of interviews to top politicians from Europe, Africa and Middle East. Permanently working in Politic.gr, London Greek Radio and Epikaira. Press manager of the International Association for Greek Philosophy.

  • twitter: @babalioutaeleni
  • linkendin: eleni vasiliki bampaliouta
  • skype: elena_babaliouta

Fatou Bensuda press briefing in Khartoum

Statement of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Fatou Bensouda, at a media briefing in Khartoum, Sudan: “There is an urgent need for justice in Sudan. Sustainable peace and reconciliation are built on the stabilizing pillar of justice.”

The Prosecutor expressed: The victims in Darfur have waited far too long to have justice. Through this historic visit, we hope to mark a new era of cooperation between my Office and Sudan towards greater accountability for atrocity crimes. The ICC was established as an independent and impartial international court to deal with atrocity crimes, namely: war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression.

My role as Prosecutor is to bring to justice those responsible for atrocity crimes, and by doing so, to seek accountability and hope to prevent future crimes.

The ICC is at the heart of what we call the Rome Statute system of international criminal justice. The ICC is a court of last resort. This means that national justice systems have the primary responsibility to investigate and prosecute individuals who commit such crimes. If this does not happen, then the ICC is there as a fail-safe judicial mechanism.

In this way, my Office conducts investigations and prosecutions into atrocity crimes around the world. Politics do not influence any of my independent and impartial decisions. All my actions are based on the law – the Rome Statute of the ICC – and the objective evidence collected by my investigators. I will go wherever the law provides me with the power to go and follow the evidence wherever it leads me in the pursuit of justice for the victims. Thus, the goal of the ICC is to contribute to ending impunity – in other words, to make sure that no one, irrespective of status or rank, can avoid accountability for atrocity crimes, no matter how long it may take.

This is how international justice can contribute to protecting future generations from the scourge of lawless wars and conflict, and prevent human suffering.

My Office has been investigating the Situation in Darfur, Sudan since 2005, when the United Nations Security Council through Resolution 1593 (2005), triggered our jurisdiction by referring the situation to the Prosecutor of the ICC.

Much has happened since then. As we continue our investigations today, it is important for our work at the ICC, and especially the affected communities of Darfur, that the Sudanese authorities extend their full, sustained and tangible cooperation to my Office.

In Khartoum this week, I have engaged in productive meetings with the highest officials of the Government of Sudan and other important stakeholders. My programme included notably, meetings with H.E. Prime Minister Abdallah Hamdok; H.E. Mr Omer Gamaruddeen Ismail, Minister of Foreign Affairs; H.E. Mr Nasredeen Abdelbari, Minister of Justice; and Prosecutor General of Sudan, Mr Tag el-Sir el-Hibir, and representatives of the Sovereignty Council of Sudan, Lt. General Abdel Fattah Abdelrahman al-Burhan and General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo as well as and Mr Mohamed Hassan Altaishi.
I also held fruitful discussions with representatives of civil society organisations, international bodies, and diplomatic corps in Khartoum. Through you, the media, I am pleased to also address the public and affected communities.

These meetings have enabled me and my team to explain ICC proceedings, and the status of our cases in connection with the Situation in Darfur, Sudan and to chart a course for effective cooperation to bring the suspects against whom ICC warrants have already been issued to justice.

My meetings with the authorities have laid the foundation for cooperation between the ICC and the Sudanese national authorities.

This first historic visit to Khartoum after more than a decade provided an opportunity for Sudan’s Transitional Government to demonstrate its commitment to justice, accountability and the rule of law.

I am encouraged by the frank, open and constructive exchanges we have had. I particularly welcome the assurances of support and cooperation expressed to me by the authorities during this visit, including from H.E. Prime Minister Hamdok, committing Sudan to achieve justice for atrocity crimes, and to fully collaborate with my Office for this purpose.

We must now follow through and build on the promising discussions of this past week with concrete action. A Memorandum of Understanding on the modalities of cooperation, technical visits, and immediate access to Sudan by our investigators, amongst other action points were discussed, and we look forward to making timely progress on all of these items.

We count on Sudan’s tangible and timely cooperation as well as continued constructive engagement with my Office.

We stand ready to assist Sudan towards the goal of achieving accountability for atrocity crimes committed in Darfur.

I want to seize this opportunity to assure the people of Darfur that my Office continues to work hard on the Darfur situation. I solemnly call upon all affected Darfuri communities and those who have dedicated themselves to the cause of these communities, to come forward and contact my Office with the accounts of their sufferings, with the stories of what they have witnessed and what they have endured. With their evidence, we can contribute to bringing the long awaited justice to the victims in Darfur. My Office, together with colleagues in the Registry of the Court will soon embark on outreach activities to further explain the work of the ICC and its processes.

I wish to also add that I welcome the Juba Peace Agreement, officially signed on the 3rd of October 2020 between the Sovereignty Council and the Sudan Revolutionary Front and other movements, with a view to bring justice to the victims of atrocities that have occurred in Darfur and to build sustainable peace in Sudan. I also welcome the importance the Peace Agreement affords to the ICC, and the emphasis placed on cooperation between Sudan and the Court in relation to the five ICC suspects.  I am encouraged by the assurances given by the authorities that full effect will be given to these references, and that justice will play a central role in Sudan’s transition and the particular importance of the ICC in this ongoing process.

The focus of my investigation is on crimes allegedly committed by these five ICC suspects between 2003 and 2004, 2007, and as far as Mr Al Bashir is concerned up to 2008.

In June of this year, the alleged militia leader, Mr Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman aka Ali Kushayb was transferred to the Court following his voluntary surrender. The ICC has outstanding arrest warrants against Messrs Omar Al Bashir, Ahmad Harun, Abdel Raheem Muhammad Hussein, and Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain. These suspects are still wanted for the atrocity crimes listed in their ICC warrants of arrest. They must all face justice without further delay. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the Sudanese authorities to ensure we make progress on these cases with full respect for our respective roles and mandates and the principle of complementarity.

The opportunity to prosecute other alleged suspects in the Darfur situation at the national level is possible through the Darfur Special Court, as provided for in the Juba Peace Agreement. This would be a positive step in terms of burden-sharing between the ICC and the Sudanese courts.

Now that the channels of communication are open and a spirit of cooperation guides our discussions with the Sudanese authorities, we are open to exploring the possibilities in full compliance with our obligations under the Rome Statute, and guided by our unflinching commitment to achieving justice for the victims in Darfur.

In conclusion, I would like to thank the Sudanese people, the Government of Sudan and other stakeholders for the warm welcome extended to me and my delegation during this visit. I am also grateful for the logistical support and the security arrangements put in place in connection with this visit.

Fighting against impunity for the atrocity crimes committed against the people of Darfur is a joint responsibility. There is an urgent need for justice in Sudan. Sustainable peace and reconciliation are built on the stabilizing pillar of justice.

Termination of UN Security Council Provisions on Arms Restrictions and Travel Ban

In the picture His Excellency, Dr. Alireza Kazemi Abadi, Ambassador of Iran. Photography by Catherine Dailey.

The Embassy of the Republic of Iran in the Netherlands as issued a statement pertaining to, the  Termination of UN Security Council Provisions on Arms Restrictions and Travel Ban 18 October 2020.  In part the statements read:

“Today is a momentous day for the international community, which in defiance of the U.S. regime’s efforts, has protected UN Security Council Resolution 2231 and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

As of today, all restrictions on the transfer of arms, related activities and financial services to and from the Islamic Republic of Iran, and all prohibitions regarding the entry into or transit through territories of the United Nations Member States previously imposed on a number of Iranian citizens and military officials, are all automatically terminated.

In one of the JCPOA’s innovations, the definitive and unconditional termination of arms restrictions and travel bans requires no new resolution, nor does it require any statement or any other measure by the Security Council. The lifting of arms restrictions and the travel ban were designed to be automatic with no other action required.

The very same procedure is applied for the termination of missile-related restrictions in the year 2023, and the subsequent conclusion of “consideration of the Iranian nuclear issue” in the Security Council in the year 2025.”

WFP’s David Beasley on trip in Copenhagen

David Beasley – Picture through Wikipedia, Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.

Monday, 19 October 2020, Copenhagen, Kingdom of Denmark: HRH The Crown Princess (Mary), Countess of Monpezat, encountered David Beasley, Executive Director for the World Food Programme (WFP) as well as Rasmus Prehn, Danish Minister for Development Cooperation, and had the opportunity to warmly felicitate the WFP on being awarded this years’ Nobel Peace Prize.  

WFP was recognised  for its efforts to combat hunger, to create better conditions for peace in conflict-affected areas, and for its work to prevent hunger from being used as a weapon in conflicts. During the reunion the Danish partners were briefed about the millions of people forecast to face extreme food insecurity in the coming years, primarily owing to conflict and migration.

The Danish Crown Princess and Minister for Development Cooperation Prehn learnt more about WFP’s strategic plans and work, which is strongly supported by Denmark, during their meeting.

For further information
UN World Food Programme: https://www.wfp.org

Nicholas O’Brien encounters Hamburg’s Almut Möller

0

State Counsellor Almut Möller and Ambassador Nicholas O’Brien – Picture by Hamburger Senatpressestelle.

Friday, 16 October 2020, Representation of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg to the German Federation, Berlin, Germany: Hamburg’s State Counsellor Almut Möller, Plenipotentiary to the German Federation, the European Union and for Foreign Affairs received the Irish Ambassador to Germany, Dr. Nicholas O’Brien. 

The two dignitaries met in order to become acquainted to each other, and discuss matters of bilateral relevance for their states, namely the current situation regarding Brexit, in particular all the issues surrounding the borders vis-Ă -vis the EU, and the Republic of Ireland. Additionally the level of cooperation between Ireland and Germany and specifically, trade and cultural ties with Hamburg were discussed. 

Ambassador Dr. O’Brien is due to meet the First Mayor of Hamburg, Dr. Peter Tschentscher in the near future. 

For further information 
Irish Embassy to Germany: https://www.dfa.ie/irish-embassy/Germany/
Ambassador Dr. O’Brien on Diplomat Magazine: http://www.diplomatmagazine.eu/?s=O%27Brien

Saxony becomes the first cultural destination of the ITB Berlin in 2021

Saxony celebrates a real première at the ITB Berlin 2021: The German state was appointed “Official Cultural Destination of the ITB Berlin 2021”, and one year later becomes the host country of the world’s largest travel trade fair. 
“The new concept of the cultural partnership is tailor-made for Saxony. This title is associated with a special opportunity to draw attention to Saxony as an outstanding world-class cultural and city travel destination in combination with unmistakable experiences of nature. In a way, we are offering the national and international trade public a foretaste of 2022, when Saxony will be the official ITB host country,” said Barbara Klepsch, Minister of State for Culture and Tourism in the Free State of Saxony. Originally, this status was already planned for 2021. 

Next year, the Tourismus Marketing Gesellschaft Sachsen GmbH (TMGS) will present Saxony as the official cultural destination of the ITB Berlin and offer insights into Saxony’s rich cultural offerings with various events and activities.

“Whether on the big stage at the ITB Live Podcast Show in the Palais am Funkturm, in the closing show ‘Sinnesrausch’, or at various locations inside and outside the Berlin Exhibition Centre, we want to advertise for travel to our beautiful country under the motto “SAXONY – FEEL THE ART BEAT“. At the trade fair stand itself, the proximity of art and culture to nature will be palpable and the theme of water landscapes will create a flowing connection to the unmistakable cultural landscape.    

For further information 
Saxony, land of culture: https://www.kulturland.sachsen.de/index.html
About Saxony by Premier Michael Kretschmerhttp://www.diplomatmagazine.eu/2018/03/03/a-millennium-of-innovation/

Barbara Klepsch Picture by Sächsiche Staatskanzlei, Pawel Sosnowski.

Hamburg welcomed Sri Lankan top envoy Unambuwe

0

State Counsellor Almut Möller and Ambassador Manori Premila Unambuwe – Picture by Hamburger Senatpressestelle.

Tuesday, 13 October 2020, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Germany: Hamburg’s State Counsellor Almut Möller, Plenipotentiary to the German Federation, the European Union and for Foreign Affairs received at the historic City Hall the recently accredited Ambassador of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka in Germany, Manori Premila Unambuwe, for a conversation on strengthening bilateral economic and cultural ties. 

Ambassador Unambuwe likewise represents Sri Lanka as non-resident ambassador to Switzerland, Croatia, Montenegro and North Macedonia with a chancellery located in Berlin, Germany.  She holds an MBA in Business Administration and Management from the Australian Institute of Business headquartered in Adelaide, South Australia. 

Previous to her ambassadorship Ambassador Manori Unambuwe was Director of Information and Communication at the Technology Agency of Sri Lanka in Colombo. On 20 August 2020, Ambassador Manori Unambuwe presented credentials to Federal President, Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier at Bellevue Palace located in Berlin-Tiergarten.

For further information 
Embassy of Sri Lanka to Germany, Switzerland, Croatia, Montenegro and North Macedonia: https://www.srilanka-botschaft.de

New Austrian representation to the OPCW

On September 23 – H.E. Ms. Astrid Harz, Ambassador of Austria to the Kingdom of The Netherlands met H.E. Mr. Fernando Arias, for an inauguration visit with the Director General of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)). She also presented him with the power of attorney by which she was appointed Permanent Representative of Austria at the OPCW and its Executive Board.

“International cooperation in the field of disarmament is one of Austria’s foreign policy priorities. Therefore, we will continue to fully support the important work of OPCW to achieve our common goal of a world without chemical weapons.” Said Ambassador Harz.

Migrant workers’ perspective central in multifaceted event on conditions in Dutch agriculture

0

Poor and precarious working conditions of migrant workers in Dutch agriculture are not the exceptional result of rogue employers’ illegal practices, but sanctioned by legislation and collective labour agreements. This was a key message of the ISS study ‘Migrant Labour in Dutch Agriculture: Regulated Precarity’ presented during a public event on 8 October 2020 in CafĂ© UtopieOpens external, The Hague (and onlineOpens external). 

Speakers from government, the trade union movement and the agricultural sector commented on the study presented by the authors Karin Astrid Siegmann and Julia Quaedvlieg

The candid debate was opened by a keynote by Jaap Uijlenbroek, representing the Aanjaagteam Bescherming Arbeidsmigranten (Migrant Workers Protection Taskforce – established by the Dutch government in May 2020) and by reading out a letter by a Polish migrant farmworker. The worker described the poor working and living standards that he has endured since moving to the Netherlands. This opening reflected the central role of workers’ own perspectives in the study which are often missing in policy and media discourses. 

The renewed attention to migrant workers’ precarious conditions under the COVID-19 pandemic has opened a window of opportunity for intervention to move from precarity towards decent migrant work in Dutch agriculture. The authors introduced concrete policy recommendations arguing, among others, that innovative models of outreach to and organizing of migrant farmworkers through cultural mediators form the basis to strengthen migrant workers’ economic, legal and social position.

The policy brief (final version forthcoming) that was discussed during the event is based on the Netherlands chapters of the comparative study ‘Are Agri-Food Workers Only Exploited in Southern Europe? Case Studies on Migrant Labour in Germany, the Netherlands, and SwedenOpens external‘ and the supplementary report ‘COVID-19, Agri-food Systems, and Migrant Labour’ authored by Karin Astrid Siegmann, Tyler Williams and Julia Quaedvlieg.

A virtual celebration of the International Day of Non-Violence 2020

By Sheila Turabaz.

Remembering Mahatma Gandhi and his tireless spirit for bringing about positive change through non-violent resistance.

On the 2nd of October 2020, the Stichting Standbeeld Mahatma Gandhi, with the support of the Embassy of India and the Municipality of The Hague, observed the International Day of Non- Violence, which coincides with Gandhi’s 151st birthday, through broadcasting online a compilation of live and pre-recorded speeches made by various dignitaries, among those a speech was given by the Dutch Minister of Justice & Security, Mr. Ferdinand Grapperhaus, by the newly appointed Mayor of The Hague Mr. Jan Van Zanen and by the Ambassadors of India’s neighbouring countries, Afghanistan H.E. Mr. Mohammad Asif Rahimi
and Bangladesh, H.E. Mr. Riaz Hamidullah.

This year’s modest celebration is a striking difference compared to last year’s celebration at the Peace Palace and the Grote Kerk, which gathered hundreds of people of different nationalities (including many diplomatic representatives and hundreds of school children), who participated in the memorable “Gandhi March for Non-Violence” throughout The Hague.

The message however, remains clear and urgent in the particularly challenging circumstances the world finds itself in. The UN Secretary-General Mr. AntĂłnio Guterres called for a global ceasefire in his annual address to the international community: “On this year’s observance, we have a special duty: stop the fighting to focus on our common enemy: COVID-19. There is only one winner of conflict during a pandemic: the virus itself. As the pandemic took hold, I called for a global ceasefire. Today we need a new push by the international community to make this a reality by the end of this year .”

The Chairman of the Stichting Standbeeld Mahatma Gandhi, Mr. Ram Lakhina reiterated the enduring relevance of the “Ghandian” philosophy and the work of his foundation: “Conflicts are an inevitable part of the human condition. Gandhi taught us that that the best way to resolve conflicts is through dialogue and peaceful means. Our purpose in organizing this program is to create greater awareness in resolving social and political conflicts. The Stichting Standbeeld Mahatma Gandhi was established 30 years ago to highlight Gandhi’s contribution to the world and to create awareness about his philosophy about non-violence resistance against oppression and for social and political change through peaceful means .”

Perhaps the most resonating, personal speech was given by Minister Grapperhaus, who gave this year’s keynote address. He opened his speech by quoting “Across the Universe” released by The Beatles in 1969:

“Jai guru deva om”, (…) this Sanskrit phrase means something like glory to the shining remover of darkness or simply “hail to the divine guru .” If I would sing those words, many of you would recognize them straight away. It is the mantra that is repeated in the Beatles’ song, “Across the Universe .” I am a big fan of the Beatles, and as a 10 year old, I sang along enthusiastically, without knowing what the words meant. It was only until much later that I realized what richness laid behind them. I am not especially religious, but now, 50 years on, I find that the philosophy at the heart of Hinduism largely matches my own world view. The way I approach my work and my outlook on life.

Today is Mahatma Gandhi’s birthday and the International Day of Non-Violence. (…) Freedom is not worth having if it doesn’t include the freedom to make mistakes, so said Gandhi, but he added, significantly, the important thing is to learn from them. I learned about Gandhi’s ideas towards the end of my primary school. I was brought up a Roman Catholic but was always taught to be open to other beliefs. I liked the fact that Gandhi took the same approach. You can only grow as a person, if you put yourself in other people’s shoes. Gandhi was a striking individual. Small, fragile-looking, with those iconic glasses. And the man who brought the British Empire to its knees. He showed that you could defeat a violent oppressor by means of peaceful protest, patience and dialogue. Since his death, the world has changed.

Two countries where Gandhi lived, India and South Africa had been transformed beyond recognition. Europe meanwhile has enjoyed an incredibly long period of peace. The Soviet Union has fallen apart and China has become an economic powerhouse. In most places but not everywhere alas, the world has become undeniably more prosperous, more democratic and more humane. At the same time, we are seeing greater self-assurance among people who although they live in freedom, feel discriminated against, who feel they don’t get a fair chance when they apply for jobs, who feel they are singled out for rougher treatment by the police, who question traditions, and there is growing unease in society, a new polarization, amplified by social media.

Organizing a protest was never so easy, the distance between ordinary people and authority has never been so small. I am curious about how Gandhi would have viewed all of this. Would he have applauded it or condemned it? Would he have been on Twitter? Would he have been described as “woke” or a “snowflake”? In fact, Gandhi is not immune to the upheaval of the modern world. We saw that this year, 72 years after his death when his statue in Amsterdam was dogged with graffiti. This act shocked the Indian community, and not only you. For many Dutch people, the attack on the statue amounted to an attack on the principles of peace and non-violence. (…) Not long after the statue was vandalized, I spoke with members of the Indian community and shared my concerns. Just like Gandhi, a large section of your community has literally come a long way.

The Indian community is one of the best-integrated communities in the country. Partly thanks to your approach in life. Modest, positive and forward- looking. Not looking back with feelings of jealousy and resentment. As Gandhi said, an eye for an eye will make the whole world blind. Paradoxically, the incident with the statue shows that Gandhi’s teachings are still alive and well. The outgrow that followed shows how firmly the principles of non- violence is anchored in our society. It also reminds us that we must cherish that principle. And on a special day like today, celebrate it (…) .”

Gandhi statue in Amsterdam.

H.E. Mr. Venu Rajamony, the Ambassador of India, spoke about the many efforts made by the Government of India to promote the message of Mahatma Gandhi, as referred to by the Ambassador as “the Greatest of Apostel of Peace and Non-Violence the world has seen”, through outreach programs and events.

The Ambassador also compared the current global pandemic with the Spanish Flu in 1918, which had severely affected India back then, including Gandhi and his family: “What the Pandemic has taught all of us in today’s world, is how mistaken we have been in neglecting the importance of health. We do not have vaccines, we do not have medicines, we do not have medical equipment in many of our countries while millions and millions of dollars and wealth of all kinds have been wasted on building arms, on building armies, on creating monuments to boost the egos of leaders, while the most important, most basic requirement of health has been neglected by governments all over the world. If Mahatma Gandhi would have been alive this would have been something he would have spoken most loudly about. This was something he held very close to his heart all along.”

Moreover, the Mayor of the Hague, Mr. Jan van Zanen underlined his commitment to preserving the Hague’s reputation as Multicultural City of Peace and Justice: “The Hague has for centuries been a home for people of all the lands. (…) Men and women, believers and non-believers, Christians and Muslims, Hindus and Jews. As Mayor, I want to do to everything in my power to encourage contact between all these different people and groups in the city. (…) Many people are working in The Hague (who are) working to build bridges .”

The Ambassador of Bangladesh, H.E. Mr. Riaz Hamidullah, mentioned the relevance of Gandhi’s philosophy to the contemporary Sustainable Development Goals: “Through all that he spoke about or did, or stood for throughout his life, he actually laboured to in calculating in the mind of the individuals a culture of peace through education, sustainable economic and social development, respect for all human rights, equality between women and men, democratic participation at every possible tier, harmony, tolerance and solidarity.

Last year I had the privilege to be witness to the deliberation on the Culture of Peace Manifesto in New York. They ask every individual anywhere to pledge: “in my daily life, in my family, my work, my community, my country and my region, to respect the life and dignity of each human being without discrimination or prejudice. Practice active non-violence, rejecting violence in all its forms. Share my time and material resources, in the spirit of generosity to put an end to exclusion, injustice and political and economic oppression. Defend freedom of expression and cultural diversity. I believe this is where Gandhi’s philosophy connects eminently with the 18 Sustainable Development Goals Charter, which all leaders have signed in 2015.”

The newly-accredited Ambassador of Afghanistan, H.E. Mr. Mohammed Asif Rahimi, expressed his strong desire for sustainable peace in Afghanistan through international co-operation and partnerships. Afghanistan is currently facing multiple crises, among those the effects of global warming and climate change, deep-seated terrorism and the COVID-19 pandemic: “Though we are indeed facing multiple drivers of turmoil, all at once in our country and region, above all, our most urgent and important priority is peace. The role of the global community and our international partners and allies will continue to be extremely important, as the delegation of the Government of Afghanistan now negotiates with the Taliban in Doha, Qatar .” (…)

The people of Afghanistan already expressed a clear and urgent priority: a ceasefire. I would like to take this opportunity to call for the help of the international community, to achieve the result of a sovereign, united and democratic Afghanistan. A country that will be at peace with itself in the region, and will be capable to preserve and expand the gains of the last 19 years, and become an example of how unity can overcome the turmoil and uncertainty that defines our world today.”

Following the speech of the Afghan ambassador, the Deputy Mayor of The Hague and the city’s Alderman for Social Affairs, Mr. Bert van Alphen recited a fitting poem about the sense of urgency to respect fellow humans, to preserve the planet, learn about peace instead of violence and to “risk one’s neck for another era and new morals .”

The final part of the event included the inauguration of a Mahatma Gandhi Room at the Faculty of Public Management, Law and Safety of The Hague University of Applied Sciences, adorned with quotes by Gandhi to inspire the students. The initiative was taken by Ms. Elizabeth Betlehem, International Public Management lecturer and Mr. Ram Lakhina.

H.E. Mr. Eric Niehe, former Ambassador of The Netherlands to India offered his closing remarks, thanking the esteemed speakers and the viewers for attending this very first virtual commemoration.