The Embassy of Japan, conferral of the Order of the Rising Sun

0
Mrs Midori Inomata, Dr Joop A Stam and spouse with His Excellency Ambassador Hiroshi Inomata. By Roy Lie A Tjam. Japan – Nippon, the land where the sun rises. The Ambassador of Japan in the Netherlands H.E. Hiroshi Inomata hosted a Ceremony of Conferment at his Residence in honour of Dr Joop A. Stam, Professor Emeritus of Erasmus University Rotterdam and the University of Twente. After warmly welcoming his guests Ambassador Hiroshi Inomata proceeded with the ceremony of Conferment. Dr Stam received the ‘the Order of the Rising Sun, Gold Rays with Neck Ribbon’ in recognition of his outstanding contribution in developing Japanese studies and promoting a better understanding of Japan in the Netherlands. Dr Stam commenced his speech of acceptance by thanking His Majesty for elevating him to this high position. Dr Stam stated he wishes to thank all who have been instrumental in making all of this happen. Among them the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Japan, the Embassy in The Hague and the numerous others. Stam went on with what he described as a Roots and Wings. His roots are in the northern Province of Friesland. He has a strong sense of right and wrong. His academical formation at Leiden university gave him wings which enabled him to explore the world. When Joop Stam arrived in Japan in 1969 he was unknown, however, everybody knew Anton Geesink. His new understanding of Japan came through several business types of research. Japan will always be part of me, after all, its there where I met my wife he added. A former student of the Erasmus University proposed a toast. He too studied in Japan but didn’t marry a Japanese. His wife is Italian. The crowd roared when they heard of Joop having acting skills and even acted in a Japanese drama. The reception was a kind of Erasmus old boys reunion. Also present were Prof. Dr. Bert van der Knaap, Erasmus School of Economics and Prof. Dr. Ben Bakker. Ambassador Hiroshi Inomata, proposed a toast and invited the guests to enjoy the light meal specially prepared for them.  

A speech for our King in Westminster Hall

0
By Barend ter Haar. In the autumn of 1688, a relative of mine, William of Orange, assembled in Holland a fleet of almost 500 ships with 40.000 men aboard to invade England. In November he disembarked in Devon and in December Dutch forces entered London. For the next thirteen years William III was not only Stadtholder of Holland and Zealand, but also King of England, Scotland and Ireland. The contrast between the arrival of William III in London and the way Queen Máxima and I are received on our State Visit is enormous. I am happy to say that in the meantime British hospitality has greatly improved (and so have, I admit, Dutch manners). However, the similarities between 1688 and 2018 are much larger that they may seem to be at first sight, because the future of democracy was at stake then and is at stake now. In 1688 England stood before the choice between parliamentary democracy and absolute monarchy and between freedom of speech and the right of the government to decide what its subjects were allowed to say. The Glorious Revolution did not yet establish liberal democracy as we now know it, but it made big steps in that direction by recognizing the crucial importance of the rule of law and freedom of speech. The Glorious Revolution and its Bill of Rights set an important example, first for the countries of Western Europe and North America and subsequently for the rest of the world. Nowadays, 330 years later, most countries pay at least lip service to democracy, although several of them, even in Europe, still have difficulty in accepting that the rule of law and freedom of speech are essential parts of it. Now again the world is fascinated by what is happening in England. During my lifetime the United Kingdom was a shining example of a country that managed to combine a strong commitment to human rights, democracy and international cooperation with a crucial role in the development of European cooperation. I do not have to tell you that the great challenges that confront humanity, from environmental pollution and climate change to dual-use technology (that can both be used for the benefit of mankind and for its destruction), can only be addressed successfully if we cooperate regionally and globally with a determination and commitment that the world has not seen before, at least not in peacetime. However, such international cooperation is tiresome and frustrating. Countries put their own interests first. That is perfectly understandable, but it does not mean that it is wise to ignore the interests of others. It took Europe two world wars to learn that lesson and to recognize that everybody is better of when countries take the interests of other countries into account and put common interests above individual interests. It is no exaggeration to say that everywhere in the world the European experiment is followed with great interest. Will it succeed? Or will the temptation to deceive voters with nostalgic dreams of national independence be too strong? Will the European project break down when countries withdraw behind their borders, hoping that, at least for some time, disasters will hit others but not them? Or will the Western democracies prove able to address their problems together? How will, in that context, the world look at the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from Europe? What does it mean for the future of democracy? Does democracy mean that a single referendum can force a government to break down the trust and solidarity that was build during half a century of cooperation? Does democracy mean that a government should blindly follow the whims of its electorate? If this is democracy, is democracy compatible with the close international cooperation that is needed to address the challenges of our time? When the United Kingdom applied for membership of the European Communities and France vetoed it, the Netherlands did not give up. For more than ten years, the Netherlands remained the strongest advocate for British membership, because we were convinced that the United Kingdom is a crucial part of Europe and an indispensable ally in the defence of human rights, rule of law and democracy. That is why we are so amazed and dismayed by your decision to withdraw from the European Union. Like in 1688, the future of democracy is at stake. We need you at the table in Brussels to defend freedom and democracy both within Europe and abroad. Like fifty years ago, we will not give up until you are back were you belong, in the heart of Europe.    

Hong Kong feast straight out of a martial arts classic

0
On the picture, chefs and students of Hong Kong’s Chinese Culinary Institute turned the gastronomic fancies of Jin Yong’s novel “The Legend of the Eagle-Shooting Heroes” into reality. The ham used to make “Twenty-four Bridges of Moonlight” can be seen in the centre of the picture. Any kind of food, it would seem, can be found in culinary paradise Hong Kong, from Michelin-starred restaurants to tasty and authentic street food.

 

The 2017 guide references 49 different cuisines and 61 starred-restaurants, including six awarded three stars, a rich offering indeed for a territory 30 times smaller than Belgium. Only a selected few food fanatics would be zealous and bold enough to attempt recreating in real life the fanciful and extravagant dishes that existed only in fiction, and this has never been done outside Hong Kong. When the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in Brussels (HKETO, Brussels) decided to crown its 2017 celebrations to mark the 20th anniversary of the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region with a martial arts-themed gala dinner, with dishes inspired by Jin Yong’s classic, The Legend of the Eagle-Shooting Heroes, Hong Kong’s Chinese Culinary Institute (CCI) was quick to accept the challenge. Founded in the year 2000, the CCI is the biggest educational institution in Hong Kong, offering programmes for both beginners and for professionals wishing to upgrade their skills. They can learn the main Chinese regional styles of cooking, each with its dedicated kitchen and served in the institute’s own restaurant. Particular emphasis, of course, is placed on Hong Kong’s own Cantonese cuisine, renowned for its delicious and endlessly varied dim sum dumplings. Such is the institute’s reputation for excellence that once they graduate, students are quickly snapped up by restaurants and hotels in Hong Kong and the region – the CCI boasts a 96% employment rate. With its practice of encouraging a creative approach and a modern interpretation of classic dishes, the CCI was excited rather than daunted by the challenge of turning the gastronomic fantasies of Jin Yong’s masterpiece into reality. CCI chefs, assisted by their students, used their skills and talent to create and cook an eight-course feast of aromatic dishes with poetic references, served at two gala dinners hosted by HKETO, Brussels, one in Paris on 19 October and the other in Brussels on 24 October 2017. This is how one of these culinary delights, so delicious that it earned its name from a line of a Tang poem – “Twenty-four Bridges of Moonlight”, is made. Twenty-four holes are scooped out of a Jinhua ham, which are then artfully filled with 24 little spheres skillfully carved from a piece of tofu. Bound and steamed, the ham produces a wonderful, savoury taste, absorbed by the tofu. Having served its purpose, the ham is then discarded, and the 24 white moon-like spheres can be served. This was just one of the dishes cooked by the book’s heroine, Huang Rong, for renowned martial arts master Hong Qiqong. Knowing he was a gourmet in constant pursuit of sensual enjoyment, she used her remarkable cooking talents to tempt him to agree to teach her lover Guo Jing the 18 powerful kung fu moves known as “The Art of Taming Dragons”. The story is as familiar to Hong Kong and other Chinese people, growing up reading Jin Yong’s books and watching the many television series and films derived from them, as the tales of King Arthur and the Round Table are to people in the West. The enjoyment of guests at the gala dinners was further enhanced by the expert performances of martial arts athletes from the Hong Kong Wushu Union, all gold medallists in various competitions. Special Representative for Hong Kong Economic and Trade Affairs to the European Union, Ms Shirley Lam, introduced some of Hong Kong’s achievements over the past 20 years. She told guests, who included members of the diplomatic corps, the European institutions, the Belgian government, business people, academics and the media, that Hong Kong enjoys a unique advantage under “one country, two systems”. “We benefit greatly from strong links with the Mainland of China and, at the same time, we retain our separate legal, financial and economic systems. We have used our experience and skills in doing business with the outside world for over half a century. Our international outlook and connectivity and the high degree of autonomy we enjoy has given us an edge”. Ms Lam said that the best is yet to come for Hong Kong, as the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government continues to strive to make the city even more competitive and connected. “Our Chief Executive Mrs Carrie Lam, in her first Policy Address delivered on 11 October, outlined a full range of proposals to promote and facilitate Hong Kong to be an ideal place for companies to expand their business, and also a more liveable and smarter city for our people and visitors.” Ms Lam also spoke about the new measures to make the tax system even more business friendly, the Government’s strategy to boost innovation and technology development, mega infrastructural projects that are underway and the unique opportunities Hong Kong will enjoy under the Belt and Road Initiative and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Bay Area development. ———– More information at www.hongkong-eu.org    

Connecting Past and Now, Japan and the Netherlands

0
By H.E. Hiroshi Inomata, Ambassador of Japan to the Kingdom of the Netherlands. When I assumed my post as Ambassador of Japan in the Netherlands about two years ago, I was of course familiar with the shared history of our countries which has been over 400 years relationship, but living here has truly made me realise how deeply entwined the connection between Japan and the Netherlands is. In February 2017, I had a chance to visit the place that was the key to the beginnings of this relationship: Dejima, a once fan-shaped artificial island, which as a served trading post from 17th to 19th century, in the bay of Nagasaki in the south of Japan. The island Dejima has changed the geological shape and function with city expansion. In 1922, Dejima was registered as a national historic site and full-fledged restoration projects started in 1996. On 24 November 2017, the restoration process reached a significant milestone for the Japan-Netherlands relationship. The Omotemon (Main gate) Bridge, which had formed the sole connection between mainland Nagasaki and the island of Dejima, was restored at the exact location where the original bridge had been until around 1890. It was unveiled in the presence of Her Royal Highness Princess Laurentien from the Netherlands and Their Imperial Highnesses Prince and Princess Akishino.
The Omotemon (Main gate) Bridge.
As Princess Laurentien aptly phrased it in her speech: “The completion of the Omotemon Bridge has made the bond between Nagasaki and the Netherlands even stronger.” As a matter of fact, on that very same day, the city of Nagasaki and the city of Leiden had a sister-city affiliation ceremony. In a period where Japan was all but closed off to the outside world, the Netherlands was the only ‘Western’ country that was allowed to conduct trade with Japan. For over two hundred years, from 1641 to 1859, the Dutch were granted a permanent presence on Dejima that measured no more than 120 by 75 meters (390 by 250 feet). This trading post was de facto one of the only windows Japan had on the rest of the world, and as such, it was paramount to the Japanese in terms of ‘Western’ science, knowledge, culture and lifestyle. Over several decades, the Dutch introduced a great variety of scientific knowledge to Japan: ‘Western’ medicine, chemistry, electricity, microscopes, hot air balloons and clocks, to name a few, which ushered in a new era of science. In addition, Japanese artists freely experimented with the styles of perspective that were common in the art that the Dutch imported. Indeed, for the Japanese, the interaction with the Dutch offered new views on the world, which were instrumental to the rise of Japan as a modern nation.
Her Royal Highness Princess Laurentien from the Netherlands and Their Imperial Highnesses Prince and Princess Akishino.
In turn, the Dutch greatly benefited from the trading relationship as well. They imported Imari ware, famous Japanese porcelain, which became one of the major influences on the famous Dutch Delftware ceramics. The German-born doctor Von Siebold was posted on Dejima from 1823 to 1829 as the trading post’s physician and when he returned to the Netherlands and settled in Leiden, he brought back many cultural objects from Japan, as well as samples of Japanese flora and fauna. As a result, many of the plant species he collected in Japan adorn Dutch and European gardens nowadays, among which varieties of Japanese maple trees, hostas, and various species of hydrangeas and azaleas. The Japanese prints, including Ukiyoe, and decorative art objects that found their way to Europe would later inspire painters like Van Gogh and the cultural phenomenon of Japonism that existed in the European arts. When in 1854 Japan signed the Treaty of Peace and Amity with the United States, Japan’s policy of national seclusion came to an end, and with it the unique position of the Dutch on Dejima. The historical Dutch trading post of Dejima might be a thing of the past, but the Netherlands remains a top-ranking investment partner for Japan within Europe and even on a global scale. This year we were also proud to introduce two new Honorary Consul-Generals: Mr. Ter Avest for Amsterdam and Mr. Briët for Rotterdam. With their assistance, and the enthusiasm of the various Japan-related organisations located here, I am confident that the Netherlands and Japan will further deepen their relationship in the future. The reconstruction of Dejima is scheduled to be completed in 2050. Meanwhile, in the botanical gardens in Leiden, several plants can still be found that Von Siebold planted himself and that, just like the friendship between Japan and the Netherlands, have continued to flourish to this day.

Dankuwel en Tot Ziens Nederland!

0
By Abir Ali – Chargé d’Affaires a.i., Embassy of Lebanon in the Kingdom of the Netherlands. (February 2013 – January 2018). As I prepare to leave the Netherlands, I reflect on the five years I spent in this beautiful country with joy and satisfaction. Working in The Hague has been a gratifying experience for me, at times challenging yet always enjoyable. Lebanon and the Netherlands enjoy excellent relations. During my stay in Holland, our relations witnessed a remarkable boost. For the past years, Lebanon has been facing an unprecedented challenge represented by the Syrian refugee crisis. The impact on our security, economy, infrastructure and services has been massive. In these difficult circumstances, the Netherlands proved to be a committed partner of Lebanon. The Dutch stood by the Lebanese to help them cope with the spillovers of the Syrian refugee crisis. The current Dutch government confirmed this commitment by making Lebanon a focus country in the Coalition Agreement. The cooperation between our countries is growing and becoming stronger in several fields. During my stay in The Hague, several visits took place on both sides. His Excellency the Prime Minister Mr. Mark Rutte along with former Minister Her Excellency Ms. Lillian Ploumen visited Lebanon in May 2016. A visit that consolidated the Dutch commitment to the stability of Lebanon. The number of Dutch officials and delegations visiting Lebanon is rising constantly. On the Lebanese side, the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Emigrants His Excellency Mr. Gebran Bassil visited the Netherlands in September 2014, and not only, in 2016, he also visited Curaçao where there is a sizable Lebanese community, and many prominent figures in the Curaçao public life are of Lebanese origins.
Abir Ali.
During the past years, Lebanon has been linked with the refugee crisis in the Dutch media. As a representative of my country, I never missed an opportunity to shed the light on the alarming consequences that this crisis has inflicted on Lebanon; however, my focus extended beyond the refugee crisis and its spillovers. I made every effort to highlight the values of tolerance, openness, coexistence, and pluralism which are the essence of Lebanon. I wanted to introduce the Dutch to the history, culture, art, and cuisine of Lebanon which give Lebanon its unique place in the Middle East and the world. Despite the limited means at my disposal, I tried to showcase the best of what my country has to offer. I organized regular business events to underscore the investment opportunities in Lebanon, art exhibitions to show the thriving Lebanese art scene, wine tasting to introduce the Dutch to the exquisite Lebanese wines, and various other events where Lebanese food always took centre stage. On the multilateral level, it is an unforgettable experience for me to be in The Hague when the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2013. Lebanon is an active and committed member of the OPCW, and Lebanon and the Embassy in The Hague were instrumental for the OPCW to carry out its mission smoothly. As for the Tribunals, it was instructive for me to see first-hand how international justice is being served in The Hague, the city of Peace of Justice. The Lebanese community in the Netherlands may not be as large as in other EU countries, but its contribution and loyalty to the Dutch society is praiseworthy. I was pleasantly surprised to learn the high number of marriages between Lebanese and Dutch, and I was happy to meet many of these couples who are the living example of how two cultures seemingly different can get along very well. The marking event of my stay remains the investiture of His Majesty King Willem Alexander which I had the great honour to attend. It was a privilege for me to work in the Netherlands. I enjoyed working with and getting to know the Dutch who are easy to deal with, straightforward and obliging. I find Holland a fascinating country where innovation never stops, where freedom and equality are the staples of all aspects of life, where the beautiful colours of spring blend with those of Van Gogh, and the colours of autumn with those of Rembrandt, and where no matter how gloomy the skies are, the sun graces each day with a ray of sunlight. After five years, the most precious thing I take with me from Holland is that when I talk about the people I met, or I worked with, I do not refer to them as contacts, but as good friends of mine, and for that, Dankuwel Nederland! ———— About the author:  Abir Ali is an experienced Lebanese diplomat who before coming to The Hague served her country in Washington D.C., Rome and Bahrain. She holds a BA in Economics and a degree in Law, and during her stay in the Netherlands, she earned a Master degree in International Relations Cum Laude from Leiden University. She also learned Dutch. Besides Arabic, Ms. Ali speaks French, English, Spanish, Italian, and little German. She managed to assimilate with many of the Dutch customs and habits including the Dutch ritual of New Year’s dive in the North Sea, but not riding the bike. ———— Photography by Hester Dijkstra.

The Ambassadors Lunch

0
On the picture the Ambassadors of Bosnia – H.E. Mirsada Colakovic, Canada – H.E. Sabine Nölke, Tanzania – H.E. Ms. Irene Florence M. Kasyanju, Ambassador Marriët Schuurman, Austria – H.E. Dr Heidemaria Gürer, Pakistan – H.E. Mrs. Iffat Imran Gardezi, Kosovo – H.E. Vjosa Dobruna, Estonia – H.E. Ms Kaili Terras, Portugal – H.E. Mrs. Rosa Batoréu, Albania – H.E. Adia Sakiqi, Chile – H.E. Maria Teresa de Jesus Infante Caffi, Palestine – H.E. Rawan Sulaiman, Lebanon – Ms. Abir Ali, Romania – H.E. Brandusa Predescu, Brazil – H.E. Ms. Regina Maria Cordeiro Dunlop, Cameroon – H.E. Odette Melono, New Zealand – H.E. Ms. Lyndal Elizabeth Walker, Vietnam – H.E. Ngo Thi Hoa, Croatia – H.E. Andrea Gustovic Ercegovac, Germany to the OPCW – H.E. Christine Weil, Burundi – H.E. Vestine Nahimana. By Diplomat Magazine. The Ladies Ambassador group of The Hague composed by 34 ambassadors credited to the Netherlands met for a lunch hosted by H.E. Ambassador Heidemaria Guerer of Austria. The Guest of Honour was Ambassador Marriët Schuurman, Head of UN Security Council Task Force from The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The host offered a traditional Austrian menu at the great salon of the official residence of the Austrian Ambassador. The wine served during the lunch came from Ambassador Guerer private vineyards in Austria. Table conversation commenced with Ambassador Schuurman answering questions about the actions taken by the Netherlands in the Caribbean after hurricane Irma recently affected St Marteen. Further, she talked about the focus of the Netherlands in countries including Venezuela, Myanmar, Somalia and South Sudan. Additionally, she spoke about the Dutch peace keeping experience in Mali. As Ambassador Schuurman explained, more than 90% of Dutch agenda focuses on the prevention and solving of situations involving the most suffering. This manifests as protection and peacekeeping among civilians. To further elaborate, she exposed that the new security challenges of contemporary society are extremism, migration and climate change, particularly in water conflicts. According to Ambassador Schuurman, going forward the Netherlands will continue to lead the way in preventing extremism, combatting climate change, and aiding hurricane victims. Next year the Netherlands will be able to continue this leadership, as they will chair the UN Security Council in March 2018.  Ambassador Schuurman foresees the Netherlands will …’will look for larger coalitions, inclusion and making the accent in an agenda for equal participation working with all members with  transparency’. ———- Photography by Hester Djikstra for Diplomat Magazine.  

The Pinocchio fable, revisited

0
Pino I TELL NO LIES short version. By Dario Poli. “To see what is in front of your nose needs a constant struggle.” George Orwell As young child raised in the tough industrial centre of Scotland, amidst a culture that prided itself on its home grown achievements, past traditions of clan unity, honour, truthful expression, rebelliousness, heroism both socially and on the many glorified battlefields of wars, was not an easy experience to say the least. The first hearing of the name Pinocchio by an Italian author and Freemason Carlo Lorenzini (known by his pen name Carlo Collodi, (1826-1890) being mentioned in local schools, was quite a shock to me, as I am of Italian origins, not the best national badge to carry around, after more than five years of war involving Italians fighting against British imperial power that included the brave Scots.
Carlo Collodi’s Pinocchio–Diane Goode, Illustr.
Pinocchio was a Walt Disney film first launched in 1940 during World War Two, which I saw many years later as a 5 year old impressionable boy and it was quite an experience for me. Amazed to see how a carved wooden doll could come alive, be lifelike and to learn that if he the doll, did not tell the absolute truth, his nose size would increase dramatically within seconds. I was fascinated by this idea, with its funny scenes and shocked by what I saw in the film, which also contained darker uncomfortable moments. Because of my natural curiosity, I became fascinated by nose sizes thereafter and would watch if any of my school pals told an untruth, to see if there was any increase in size of this important facial feature, or in its colour, such as a blush pink colour. It was to no avail, as lies came and went, without any visible changes much to my disappointment, especially as I recalled that I had often been cautioned by my parents, not to be nosy and not to put my nose into others people’s affairs. To see Pinocchio’s many strange adventures and to learn that even then in the 1800’s that very young children were being lured by gifts, then abducted by ruthless criminals and sold as chattels to persons unknown…I found this part of the story rather scary, I do recall. Nevertheless despite the dark side of the Pinocchio fable, its nose growing seed was planted in my young, susceptible, subconscious mind and I remained interested in this fascinating idea from Collodi’s imaginative pen. Quite recently, due to all the conundrum, media hysteria and non-stop declarations of fake news and the huge outbreak of lies and exposure of this and that scandal, involving famous individuals, along with their vehement denials of various allegations before resigning their offices, as well as the numerous past historical lies at present being exposed, by the new internet media forums that abound today, Pinocchio was reawakened from his slumbers. I began to visualize a world, where this nose job increase due to lying, would become a reality of our times, led by ambitious people determined to nose ahead …. I first looked to our past history and to our political leaders, working in our time-honoured, dignified, parliamentary institutions, making their weekly speeches to the people and to the truthful media personages, who conscientiously write, each and every word the politicians declared. The lies of this political world seemed ocean like in scale…Lies eternal. Surely there could only be persons with short stubby truthful noses, in those hallowed halls of legal authority and power? If Pinocchio were true? Then our politicians, their political controllers and their immediate servants, would have noses so long, that they would have to acquire paid attendants walking in front of them, holding up their extended noses above their heads, to allow them to move freely and keep the stench of their snotty sickness away from human sensitivities. I imagined rows and rows of serious looking, hugely long nosed men and women, attending international conferences, in prestigious capital cities like Washington, London, Rome, Paris and the Hague, espousing their important views on this and that subject, including some blatant propagandistic untruths and promises they know cannot be delivered. The best liars, needing motorised handlers, as their outstretched noses can be supported and moved around more easily, as they receive the applause of the shorter length noses of the cheering populations, who accept and generally believe in them and their governance, being led by the collective nose. Governments and the press would first create then establish, a deception of the people by the use of misinformation, alleging, with the support of all the international medical associations that the increase of nose growing, was entirely due to a new vicious virus from the East named as Nositus Extendum. Avoiding the fact, that this nose outbreak of Nositus Extendum, had simply to do with lying and was easily curable by intense doses of the truth, by those afflicted by this false virus narrative.
Enrico Mazzanti’s Pinocchio.
International truth whistle-blowers with their short stubby noses, dumping huge amounts of truthful data via the internet, would be hunted down, arrested and put on public trial, accused of lying and deceiving the people. The Police with their generally shorter noses, could now easily capture criminals, simply by asking the right questions, as if they lied, it would be visible immediately, saving so much time, effort, cost and manpower. The established churches and various religious creeds and denominations, would also have some embarrassing problems, containing and hiding their nose extensions, as their scrupulous, undeviating versions of historical facts, are being placed in dispute as to their authenticity by learned scientific scholars, who I discovered, have shorter noses. I wonder why? I was taught that God created us in his likeness and was the illumination of Truth. So I concluded he must have a small nose. But his arch rival, Lucifer the fallen angel, due to his myriad of lies and deceptions, must have a gigantic nose, wider and longer than any motorway known to man and big enough to cruise along to eternity. Some religious souls actually accusing Lucifer of creating the Nositus Extendum virus, to once again deceive the world by pushing his unwelcome nose into the affairs of mankind. Medical establishments, would have serious problems with their doctors and nurses if they fail tell their patient’s, unpalatable truth about their conditions, as their noses would increase rapidly and due to Nositus Extendum, hospitals would be overwhelmed by people demanding operations to try and reduce nose sizes permanently. Hospitals and clinics with facial health practitioners, would boom financially from desperate people demanding nose jobs, to reduce their size to something manageable and permanent, whilst the pharmaceutical companies, are busily engaged inventing new types of medical applications and pills, to combat Nositus Extendum the nose phenomena. International financial institutions such as banks and stock exchanges, would ….performing their commercial transactions and money operations, on the computer screens as the false numbers being sent and received, would cause almighty anger and confusion, as the extended noses would be inadvertently hitting the wrong digits, causing mayhem in the markets. The military’s of the world would be unable to operate efficiently, as with such long noses how could the tank crews, manage their killing machines with long noses and the infantry would need their noses strapped to their rifles so they can be fired. The snipers would be clearly ineffective. Perhaps only by the use of drones could they perform their national duties and earn their pay. One could watch, enjoy and laugh at slick TV interviews, where both interviewer and interviewed, rest their differing nose sizes, on specially designed desks, that can be adjusted to the individual’s size and shape… I recently watched the fascinating interview, with the charming Baron de Nosebury, who clearly considered himself a nose above everyone else.
Charle Folkard’s illustr. of Carlo Collodi’s Pinocchio.
I had quite a chuckle, watching him having difficulty sipping from his glass of water as his extensive nose, got in the way and could not stop sneezing, as he tried to deliver his exaggerations and falsehoods, to his TV audience. Lovers, proclaiming their love to their amours, would have to be completely sincere with their partners, as any variation and expanding movements of the nose, could lead to an emotionally negative response and possibly a breakup of the relationship, especially after being asked “how was it for you darling?’ and told “Ooooh yes it was wonderful.” OUCH! However, some more intrepid lovers could go to any lengths, to turn this increased nose size, into a functional attraction and sexual addition to their loving repertoire. It would become a world devoid of any racial, cultural conflict, but only resentments and jealousies as regards nose sizes, as in this case, bigger would not be better. I suddenly shook my head vigorously and came out of my fanciful reverie. I touched my nose to check its size …Thank god it was only a dream, as my nose was normal, but strangely a bit warmer than normal and a little itchy I felt…I need a mirror… better check? Will our present world, nose dive into oblivion? Can the truth in its purity, save us from this fate? Is a world of falsehoods, deceptions, downright lies and a plethora of fake news, permanently survivable? Do we as a species, need to reflect once again on the Pinocchio Fable? ——— Copywrite: Dario Poli December 2017

The new Dutch Cabinet: profiles of Ministers and State Secretaries. Part I.

0
By Anton Lutter. After the longest period of negotiating in Dutch political history – 208 days – a cabinet has been formed by the VVD, CDA, D’66 and CU political parties under the slogan “Trust in the future”, with Mark Rutte as third time Prime Minister, thus starts cabinet Rutte III. In part I and II, we will introduce the 24 Ministers and State Secretaries who were initiated by H.M. King Willem-Alexander at palace Noordeinde the 26th of October. Mr. Mark Rutte Prime Minister and Minister of General Affairs, is the party leader of the largest coalition party in government the VVD. Rutte born in The Hague 1967 is Prime Minister of the Netherlands since 2010 and the first liberal Prime Minister for 92 years. Since 2006 he’s also the leader of the Peoples Party for Freedom and Democracy. He earned his master’s degree in history from Leiden University, after which he worked for Unilever and Calvé. He entered public office as state secretary for Social Affairs and Employment in 2002 until 2004 and Higher Education and Science from 2004 until 2006 after which he entered parliament until being initiated as Prime Minister in 2010. As a politician, he still manages teaching class for two hours a week at Johan de Witt high school in The Hague. Deputy-Prime Ministers The leaders of the other coalition parties – unusually in Dutch political tradition – did not enter the cabinet but prefer to stay in the Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal (parliament). CDA, D’66 and CU put forward as their Deputy-Prime Ministers Mr. Hugo de Jonge, Mrs. Kajsa Ollongren and Mrs. Carola Schouten. Mr. Hugo de Jonge, born in 1977 is Deputy-Prime Minister for the Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA) and Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport. Before entering the cabinet, he was Deputy-Mayor of Rotterdam since 2010, for Education, Youth and Family and later of Welfare. Mr. de Jonge is a teacher by education later serving in various positions within the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. He’s married with two children. The second Deputy-Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations is Mrs. Kajsa Ollongren, representing Democrats 66 (D’66) party. Mrs. Ollongren, who’s also of Swedish nationality, studied history at University of Amsterdam earning a master’s degree and subsequently studied public administration at École nationale d’administration in Paris. Her career has been in the civil service starting at the Ministry of Economic Affairs, lastly becoming the Secretary-General of the Ministry of General Affairs under Prime Minister Rutte in 2011. In 2014 she entered politics by becoming the Deputy-Mayor of Amsterdam, her portfolio including such topics as economics, sea-and airports, local media and monuments. For a shortwhile she was acting Mayor of Amsterdam, after the sudden death of Mayor Eberhard van der Laan on the 5th october 2017. Ollongren is married with two children and is the first minister since 1981 who belongs to the Dutch nobility. The third and last Deputy-Prime Minister also Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food quality Ms. Carola Schouten, who enters the cabinet as one of the 10 female Ministers and State Secretaries, is also the youngest minister in Rutte III. She represents the Christian Union (CU) who for the second time enter a government coalition. Before entering the cabinet she was a member of parliament 2011-2017 and earlier a civil servant at the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. Mrs. Schouten studied business at Erasmus University Rotterdam. Cabinet Ministers and Ministers without Portfolio A surprise appoint is Halbe Zijlstra who will lead Dutch foreign policy as Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Mr. Halbe Zijlstra (VVD), born in 1969 studied sociology at the University of Groningen earning a master’s degree in 1996. Working for Royal Dutch Shell he visited countries like Greece, Italy, Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela and Nigeria. From 1998 to 2001 he was a member of city council of Utrecht and again from 2003 to 2006 when he was elected to parliament. In october 2010 until 2012 he was chosen to be the State Secretary for Education, Culture and Science in the Rutte Cabinet I. In that he was known for initiating budget cuts in the cultural sector, which bolstered his image as person who’s not afraid to take unpopular measures. As Mr. Mark Rutte became Prime Minister for the second time, Zijlstra became the chair of the VVD parliamentary group until his appointment as Minister of Foreign Affairs. He’s married, having one son. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also houses the office of the Minister without Portfolio for Development Cooperation. For this position D’66 member Mrs. Sigrid Kaag has been chosen. A career diplomat Mrs. Kaag, born 1961, held the post of United Nations Special Coordinator for Lebanon (UNSCOL) since january 2015. She has been working in a variety of positions both for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Royal Dutch Shell and the United Nations. She has earned a master’s of philosophy degree in international relations from the University of Exeter and a master’s degree in international relations from the University of Oxford. Mrs. Kaag is married with Mr. Anis al Aq former Palestinian representative to Switzerland, having 4 children. Known to be rising star in the CDA, 42 year old Wopke Hoekstra is the Minister of Finance. He studied law at Leiden University and was praeses (president) of the Minerva student society. In 2005 he earned an MBA from ENSEAD at Fontainbleau. His start in public politics is as member of the Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal (senate) since 2011 until his recent appointment. He worked for Royal Dutch Shell and lastly as partner at McKinsey. His State Secretary of Fiscal Affairs, Lower Governmental Finances is Menno Snel (CU). Amongst others Mr. Snel was acting-director-general of Fiscal Affairs at said ministry, executive director of IMF and lastly chairman of the executive board of the Nederlandse Waterschapsbank. He studied economy at Groningen University. At the Ministry of Justice and Security Mr. Ferdinand Grapperhaus (CDA) is at the helm. The son of a former state secretary of Finance, he was a law professor at Maastricht University and chairman of Allen & Overy Law firm. Born 1959 in Amsterdam Mr. Grapperhaus earned a master of law and doctor of philosophy at University of Amsterdam. Minister of Legal Protection (minister without portfolio) is 42 years old Mr. Sander Dekker (VVD). In Rutte II cabinet he was State Secretary at the Ministry of Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, dealing with higher education, science and knowledge, teachers and culture. From 2006 until 2012 he served as Deputy-Mayor in The Hague where he started his political career as city councillor and was known as a strong debater. He studied public administration at Leiden University. State Secretary of Immigration, Integration and Asylum Affairs at the Justice and Security Ministry is Mr. Mark Harbers (VVD). Born in 1969 he was a member of parliament since 2009 until this appointment. 2007-2009 he served as deputy-mayor in Rotterdam, at which city he also studied economy.        

Global Justice and the Rule of Law: the future of the International Liberal Order

0
Intervention by Steven van Hoogstraten, CEO Hague Institute,  before the Human Rights Committee of the Liberal International, at the “Europa Huis”. Mr Chairman, ladies and gentlemen Many thanks for the invitation to come and speak before your parliamentary committee this morning on behalf of the Hague Institute for Global Justice. In the words of the former Mayor of the Hague, the liberal politician Jozias van Aartsen, “the Hague Institute for Global justice was established 5 years ago in response to a growing demand for policy relevant research and innovative thinking on critical issues of peace and justice. Today the Institute plays a key role in informing the work of cities, governments and international organizations by conducting research, building capacity and convening scholars and practitioners to discuss solutions to contemporary global challenges”. Mr. chairman Global Justice is what we call in this country a “container notion” , a notion that does cover many things for many people. In other words, it is not a one dimensional concept but it brings together many issues under the umbrella of an attractive, overriding theme. Issues of global justice are indeed ranging from the individual responsibility of military commanders to the conduct of states, from migration to mediation, from crimes to humanity to the greatest needs of humanity. At the Hague Institute for Global Justice, we tend to use a framework which is composed of 4 different objectives or 4 dimensions
  • The first is enhancing accountability for perpetrators of international crimes.
  • The second is the promotion of the Rule of Law notably in fragile states.
  • The third is the effort to improve Global Governance.
  • The fourth is the prevention and resolution of Conflict.
Justifiably, there might be more of these axes, such as the fight against illicit trade, human trafficking or the widespread pandemic of corruption. But at this more strategic level we should not complicate matters too much, and so stick to this first set of 4 already wide ranging perspectives. You will note that the protection of human rights is not defined as one of the 4 axes. That is because in our view, the problem of Global Justice is primarily one of the ethical and legal behavior of states, of the judiciary or official institutions. Human Rights are in this perspective an intertwining concept, one that does not come directly to the forefront. Global Justice basically seeks to improve the conditions for the population at large, and that of course means the enhancement of the position of individuals too. The Rule of Law presupposes the establishment of democratic institutions, which do their work properly and can be held to account. These institutions may or may not step on the line of human rights, which then is easily a lesser consideration in the light of the greater objective of societies which are stable and which know an internal system of checks and balances. One may criticize China for its record on Human Rights, but it knows what governance is and there is more than a hint that the Chinese governance is acceptable at the world stage. It is no overstatement to say that the city of the Hague is well placed to work for Global Justice, as this city is working for Peace and Justice according to its coat of arms. The Hague is the home to so many judicial institutions. The International Court of Justice, principal judicial organ of the United Nations, the International Criminal Court and the International Criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ICTY are the most visible examples. But there is more. What to think of the oldest institution for the settlement of disputes by arbitration, the Permanent Court of Arbitration – which has a pretty large agenda these days. Or the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, and another special tribunal for Kosovo ? For many people, the enhanced accountability for crimes is clearly at the top of list, if we talk about Global Justice. No person should go unpunished, if he or she commits the worst conceivable attacks. Still, this is primarily a matter for national concern, as is shown by the constitution of the International Criminal Court. The ICC comes into play only if national jurisdictions are incapable or unwilling to prosecute the crimes themselves. We are all aware of the weaknesses of the ICC, namely (1) the procedures are slow, (2) there seems to be an emphasis on Africa – for whatever reason – and (3) many nations have not yet signed up to the ICC, including the most powerful ones. But if Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Japan, Argentina, South Africa and all the European nations can be part of ICC, we are justified in asking why Russia, China, India and the US are not. And if we place a historical lens before our eyes it is still early days, as the ICC has merely had its first 10 years. Still there is a lot to improve and notably the efficiency and speed of bringing justice. The case of the prosecution launched at the request of Kenya is a horror example like no other, but it would be hard to blame only the Court for that. The killing of important witnesses is not attributable to a court of law, if you understand what I say. I think that the Prosecutor made an important announcement when she said that she had opened proceedings in Afghanistan. That will go some distance to take away the so called anti African sentiments Incidentally, the improvement of accountability is not just a matter for International Courts to be established. If we look to Syria, it is obvious for me that a legal mechanism of international criminal law will not quickly be created to deal with the crimes of this long-lasting and bloody internal war. All the more reason to applaud the decision by the General Assembly to create a monitoring mechanism called the IIIM, or commonly the triple I M, the International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism whose primary aim it is to collect evidence and document the war crimes since 2011 in Syria. Not a prosecutorial system, but an important helping hand to support a future prosecution if it ever came to that. (Resolution nr A/71/248 dd 19 December 2016) . According to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, “this new mechanism is a very significant step to further accountability”. Global governance At The Hague Institute for Global Justice, a lot of our work is related to the architecture of global governance. This concerns of course mainly the United Nations, whose Charter and institutional setup still reflect the political situation of the Post World War II period; but also other important building blocks of global governance, including the development and promotion of new norms, the role of regional organizations as supporting pillars of the global order, and specific sectorial regimes. Concerning this overarching architecture, I would like to point to the Commission on Global Security, Justice and Governance, which was co-chaired by former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and former Nigerian Foreign Minister Ibrahim Gambari, and for which The Hague Institute and the Stimson Center in Washington DC served as the joint secretariat. It culminated in the Commission’s final report entitled Confronting the Crisis of Global Governance, which was launched at the Peace Palace here in The Hague in June 2015. Some commentators may have found that the title was “too gloomy”, but the system is often seen as blocked by national interests. It should be borne in mind that the recommendations are intended for the 75th birthday of the United nations in 2020. To attract some attention, one needs a spicy title and pickled proposals. This World Commission introduced the notion of “Just Security”, the intersection of justice and security which is critical to understanding – and tackling – today’s global governance threats and challenges. Justice is essential to safeguarding human security. A just society is an illusions without security. The goal of Just Security is to forge a global system of accountable, fair, and effective governance and sustainable peace. This vision is rooted in long standing international commitments to human rights, international law, and the critical role of flexible and evolving multilateral institutions, states and NGO’s in global governance. Among several other recommendations , this World Commission aimed to create the next generation for the UN conflict mediation and peace operations capacity, to innovate climate governance, to establish a new G 20 + for global cooperation in order to avert financial, cross border shocks and to work on the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals, and to develop a global network of cybercrime centers next to increasing internet access in the Global South. The Commission also saw great merit in expanding the Security Council’s membership while restraining the use of the veto. Finally and importantly for the Hague, the World Commission wishes to strengthen and more fully use the International Court of Justice, by expanding the number of acceptances of this Curt’s jurisdiction and use its advisory opinions in innovative ways. You may know that only 73out of 195 countries in the world accept the jurisdiction of the ICJ as a matter of national policy. The Dutch are among those who do, like most European nations. But not the French, who backed out after the Nuclear Test Case. And not the USA, nor Russia, or China and so many others. Last but certainly not least, we understand that global justice cannot be only promoted by norms and strategies alone, but also through well-functioning institutions and implementation on the ground. A good example of this is the Global Governance Reform Initiative (GGRI). The GGRI is a collaboration between The Hague Institute, The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Observer Research Foundation, India’s leading think tank. It seeks to analyze the deficiencies in salient regimes and proposes evidence-based policies for improving governance in select domains. Moreover, it looks at emerging patterns and how innovations in one sector can foster solutions in others as well. As a multi-year, multi-phase project, it focused first on cyber governance, with its findings feeding directly into the India Conference on Cyber Security and Cyber Governance in 2014 and the Global Conference on Cyber Space held in The Hague in April 2015. Subsequently, the project’s attention turned to oceans governance, in particular concerning blue growth and sustainable development. The findings from this phase were presented at the Oceans Dialogue 2017 in Kerala, India, a conference organized by the ORF in partnership with the Dutch government. The project’s current and final phase homes in on its politically most contentious topic: Migration governance, with a particular emphasis on using regional cooperation as a way to manage the pressures created by migration and refugee flows, not just in Europe but also in other world regions. Through its expert meeting and online consultations, the project is designed in such a way that it absorbs input from all relevant stakeholder groups, including business and civil society, as well as perspectives from the Global North and South, in particular the BRICS countries. In a similar vein, the deliverables that GGRI produces are designed to speak not just to academic but a range of different audiences. For instance, while each phase produces a special issue of articles in the leading, interdisciplinary academic journal Global Policy, a compact policy brief provides practitioners with the main take-away and reform proposals for each phase, while op-eds and blog posts address the wider, interested public. Mr. Chairman You have asked me to look into the future of the international justice system. May I say that such broad question is easier asked than answered. What I can say from my experience that the international justice system is now rather well developed, but still ailing from one serious illness. That illness is that so many countries have not accepted as yet the jurisdiction of either the International Court of justice or the Rome statute of the ICC, or the arbitration rules of the PCA. I refer to the arbitration case under the UN Convention for the law of the Sea about the South Chines Sea, between the Philippines and China. China did not accept this arbitration and simply refused to come to the proceedings. In the same vein I note that still so many countries are outside the mandate of the International Criminal Court. One can see the importance of the work of the ICTY, an institution which has passed judgement on the main “names “ of the war in Yugoslavia in roughly 20 years. The recent decision of the ICTY on general Mladic after 500 court days is a strong example. But the process of international justice is painstakingly slow, and especially the International Criminal Court has not yet a record to show with pride. My view of the future of the international justice system is that the call for justice will not diminish, and that the core principle of ‘no safe havens for crimes committed” will stand strong. This by itself will allow for new forms of justice systems to come into place, like the investigation mechanism for Syria. But we all know what is needed for that, and notably that is a form of consensus in the Security Council. Sometimes the window of the Security Council will open briefly, but most of the times this window stays shut. Locked by some veto of one of the powers. That is a flaw in the UN system, where a global reform is urgently called for . Like the report on global governance mentioned, why not abolish the veto rule for situations where mass violations of human rights are at the heart of the debate. That would be a small but highly significant step forward. ***          

Diplomat Magazine’s new edition – The magic of The Hague

0
Diplomat Magazine, the first diplomatic magazine in the Netherlands, is more active than ever. One need only look back at our recent successes, including the innumerable events organised by the magazine in the last five months, the special 10th Anniversary issue for the embassy of Rwanda, the development of the magazine into a leading online publication with hundreds of thousands of readers, and now this special printed edition.   Inside the microcosm of The Hague, the picture of the world is composed of unique elements. In terms of international politics The Hague is different; here diplomats live in an exceptional territory, meeting regularly in order to find agreements, support, alliances and information. The diplomatic scene is so alive here that it becomes possible to see the world as a place of hope for the future. That is the magic of The Hague, and that’s why we are always busy looking for the best angle to show our readers the diversity and the intensity of diplomatic life.  Diplomat Magazine became global after passing all of its articles to the Dow Jones / Factiva platform where more than 1.3 million subscribers have access to the unique compendium of texts produced by ambassadors, ministers, diplomats, heads of international organisations and academics from the Benelux and around the world. We are also traveling to capture events and places globally; recently invited to Kazakhstan, Thailand and Uzbekistan, we share here with you our impressions of the Astana Expo, the Health and Wellness Showcase in Thailand and the Festival Taurami in Marken.  In this issue we have the privilege to publish the reflections of Sidiki Kaba, President of the Assembly of the State Parties for the International Criminal Court, on international justice and accountability, Dr Mary Aiken talks about cyberspace, Martin Wyss exposes the European migration dilemma, the Ambassador of Russia communicates his pride at his country’s completion of their chemical disarmament program in association with the OPCW, while women Ambassadors in The Hague are discussing global security with the Dutch Ambassador to the UN. A dear friend is leaving The Hague soon; more than 50 ambassadors came to say ‘au revoir’ to Abir Ali from Lebanon, Duke Michael of Mecklenburg, our Junior Editor and leader of our Junior Team, finished his Master of International Relations programme at Leiden University, Barend ter Haar is asking which countries are powerful? and Mirko Zambeti talk about new Swiss technologies. The role of the spouse is analysed by Linda Zin of Malaysia, and the new President of Eurojust, Ladislav Hamran takes office at the same time as Prime Minister Mark Rutte and his new cabinet which includes an appointment of special importance to all of us, the appointment of H.E. Halbe Zijlstra as the new Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs. We take this occasion to specially congratulate His Excellency Fernando Arias, Ambassador of Spain who has been elected as the new OPCW Director-General.  Thanks to the Diplomatic team for all of their unconditional support and hard work as always. Dr Mayelinne De Lara, Publisher.