Press Conference by Rex Tillerson (US Secretary of State) Left: Ambassador Kay Bailey Hutchison (US Permanent Representative to NATO). Photography US Embassy in Brussels.The US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson visited NATO Headquarters during his travels last week to Belgium, Austria, and France. On December 6, 2017, he spoke at a press conference in Brussels.
Here below an extract of this speech:
The United States, obviously, I think has affirmed now on multiple occasions our support for NATO’s mission. We know that the security NATO provides protects Western democratic principles, protects our right to live in freedom. To that end, the United States is eager for our NATO allies to exert their sovereignty and take on greater responsibility for our shared deterrence and our defense burden. I think, as each of us contributes, the better we will be able to deter and defend against the threats on Europe’s frontiers, which also can become threats for America.
We do commend the many countries that have made additional commitments and greater contributions. This year Romania joined the United States, Greece, Estonia, the United Kingdom, and Poland as six allies that spend at least two percent of their GDP on defense. And two more allies, Latvia and Lithuania, will join that club in 2018. We expect 26 allies will increase their defense spending budgets this year and five more NATO allies have put plans in place to achieve the 2 percent objective by 2024.
Increased spending, however, is not enough. It is really about increasing capabilities. And we’ve spent a lot of time in the sessions here at NATO over the last day-and-a-half talking about that. It is interesting, since NATO was formed the single largest cause of loss of lives within NATO from threats has been terrorism. And I think President Trump, as all of you well know, has made it clear that stopping terrorism must be a growing focus of attention for NATO. And we had just completed a session on the subject.
Yesterday we discussed how to further leverage the action plan to strengthen the allies’ resilience against terrorist attacks and, in particular, to build upon NATO’s already long-standing commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan, increase their cooperation as the President has announced his new South Asia strategy. We appreciate NATO members’ commitments to the United States effort to defeat ISIS globally, as well as our other counterterrorism efforts.
The original mission of NATO, obviously, is still relevant. We have been clear with Russia that we cannot return to business as usual in the NATO-Russia relations, as long as Russia continues its illegal occupation of Ukraine. And Russia’s continued use of hybrid warfare seeks to undermine Western institutions, and this stands as a significant obstacle to normalizing our relations, as well.
Russia’s aggression in Ukraine remains the biggest threat to European security, and demands continued transatlantic unity in confronting that threat. Our NATO allies stand firm in our support of Ukraine’s sovereignty and their territorial integrity. We do not accept Russia’s efforts to change the internationally-recognized borders of Ukraine or recognize Russia’s illegal occupation of Crimea.
Earlier this morning we also had a productive discussion with Georgian Foreign Minister Janelidze. Georgia is a large contributor to our joint efforts in Afghanistan. In fact, they are the largest per capita of any contributing nation, and we strongly support Georgia’s aspirations to become a NATO member.
Looking ahead to our final session, which will be over lunch today, the United States does support NATO’s open-door policy, and our commitment that any Europe-Atlantic country that wishes to join the alliance and meets the requirements to do so should be allowed to do so. And no third party should have anything to say about that pursuit of NATO membership.
As we have done for decades, the United States will continue to maintain our straightforward, ironclad commitment to Article V. We will continue to work for the common defense and the preservation of peace called for in the NATO charter, and do so with confidence that our allies will continue to do the same
By Mr Martin Wyss, Chief of Mission, IOM International Organization for Migration in the Netherlands.
The Secretary General of the United Nations mentioned in a recent speech that he was a migrant too, but not one who had to resort to a leaky boat. He also said that safe migration must not be limited to the global elite (for the full text see his twitter below).
With these truisms, he captured two coexisting, yet starkly diverging realities clashing on the same planet.
First, while the Secretary General certainly is part of the global elite, he is also part of an increasingly, mobile, global citizenry for which it is most natural to move safely and freely around the world.
He enjoys his freedom of movement just as millions of tourists, students, businesspersons, visiting family members and migrant workers (e.g. over 2 million Filipinos and 1 million Sri Lankans etc.).
All these millions travel with passports and where required with a visa. It is as normal as getting rid of one’s water bottle when passing security on the way to the gate.
Why state the obvious?
Because we overlook that the uninterrupted, global mass movements of people are all orderly and we accept them as completely normal as well as highly beneficial for all.
But in fact it means that if you are rich enough you can travel or migrate wherever you want. The world is your oyster.
This is maybe best illustrated by the residence permits offered in exchange for substantial investments or property purchases. There is also a rapidly growing, truly global labor, particularly talent market– for Professors, Senior Managers, Senior Accounts and IT Specialists etc. with offers on the back pages of The Economist magazine (see also https: //www.crownworldmobility.com/en-us/blank_page/perspectives—talent-mobility–the-new-normal-download).
Secondly, the Secretary General at least implicitly refers to the perverse, global income disparities which prevent millions from enjoying the same rights, because even as a tourist you must have means to sustain yourself, and for the vast majority living in poor countries the need for a job alone or the ambition to have a better income remains unmatched by a right to a visa or a work permit.
Therefore, the strongest willed among those barred from access will have no choice but to board leaky boats at great costs and risks or to attempt to climb over fences in Ceuta and Melilla.
This is the type of migration that remains unresolved, bitterly argued over and which in some cases divides electorates into new, more conservative and even xenophobic constellations.
In this context, it is hoped that the Global Compact for Migration, the first, inter-governmentally negotiated agreement to be prepared under the auspices of the United Nations will cover all dimensions of international migration in a holistic and comprehensive manner.
Whenever the UN is committed to go forward as ONE, it can be difficult when many follow different or opposing views and rules. Although the UN holds up many principles as universal, we may notice when listening to the news that not all interpret or follow these universal principles in the same manner.
Therefore it is not easy to find common ground when discussing a potentially divisive issue such as migration affecting many in different ways.
But maybe we have just forgotten that a majority already accepts a few basic and important tenets:
• Everybody knows that migration must be regulated (the question is how).
• Many understand and agree that there should be more open channels and lower thresholds for regular migration.
• Most agree that refugees and those forced to migrate need international protection, and almost all understand that effective protection of refugees can only be upheld with international solidarity, with a fair sharing of the “burden” with the countries in the vicinity of conflict zones which host most of the world’s refugees.
• There is furthermore agreement that all countries have the right to have their own migration rules and visa requirements.
But then there is no agreement on how to deal with those in breach of migration procedures. For some they are all victims – for others and I hesitate to say this – they are criminals.
One of the problems is that so far there have been no sufficient efforts to find an overarching common “language”, common ideas and values on whether migration is a right that a priori should benefit all.
In practice, there is no agreement on whether the rights of states prevail over the rights of individuals or the other way around.
However, there may be reason for hope as there is no escaping from a smaller, more mobile, more interconnected world – in short: from more mobility and migration in all its forms.
It must thus become possible to balance the rights AND obligations of all migrants with the rights AND obligations of all states.
It appears difficult, but if we take note how all nations fully agree and comply with the very strict and mandatory rules which must prevail so that thousands of flights carrying billions of air travelers around the globe every year can take off in safety, it should be possible to find some common rules in order to allow many more to travel and migrate freely and safely, some day.
The sooner we face up to these difficult, unresolved, but burning challenge, the sooner we will reach a truly global language and understanding on migration which hopefully will be the basis of a new Global Migration Governance.
——-
https: //twitter.com/antonioguterres/status/91//twitter.com/antonioguterres/status/9105721549739089920572154973908992
——-
Mr Martin Wyss, IOM Photography Barbara Salewski-Ratering
From June to September 2017, Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan hosted the Astana Expo showcase, where over 120 countries and 22 international organizations demonstrated the latest innovations in the clean energy sector. Titled the Future of Energy, this expo focused on four themes, including the ‘Reduction of Carbon Emissions’, ‘Energy for Life’, ‘Energy for All’, and the ‘World of Energy,’ which focused on the role of each individual’s contribution to the efficient use of energy.
The Dutch pavilion was launched by the Minister of Economic Affairs of the Netherlands, at that time Mr. Henk Kamp and the Kazakhstan Vice Minister of Energy Mr, Asset Magauov.
Mr. Kamp accompany by H.E. Magzhan Ilyassov, Ambassador of Kazakhstan to the Netherlands, led a delegation of more than 100 Dutch companies, 75 of which were already established in Kazakhstan. As a leading investor in Kazakhstan, the Dutch pavilion emphasized the economic partnership between the two nations, organizing various activities during the duration of the Expo.
When looking back at the origins of this economic partnership, a notable moment was in 2007, when a delegation from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign and Economic Affairs visited Kazakhstan. 2 years later, Kazakhstan’s foreign minister visited the Netherlands, were he met with his counterpart and the Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte. Since then, Prime Minister Rutte has visited the country several times, including for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) summit in 2010.
Due to this positive relationship, Dutch multinationals as well as small and medium-sized businesses, primarily in the energy, agriculture, logistics, and port development sectors – are increasingly showing interest in Kazakhstan. In contrast, Kazakhstan is showing increasing interest in working with the Netherlands in the agricultural, horticultural and poultry sectors. Additionally, currently, the Netherlands and Kazakhstan are profiting trade partners. The Netherlands exports chemicals and machinery, while Kazakhstan exports primarily oil.
While the countries are successful trade partners, there are significant differences between the two countries. Kazakhstan’s population of 17.7 million people enjoys an area of 2,724,900 km2, approximately 65.6 times bigger than the Netherlands.
Additionally, Kazakhstan’s economy is primarily focused on natural resources. As geographically the largest of the former Soviet republics, excluding Russia, Kazakhstan’s vast hydrocarbon and mineral reserves form the backbone of the economy. Kazakhstan is landlocked and depends largely on Russia to export its oil to Europe. Further, oil is exported directly to China, showcasing Kazakhstan’s unique position as a bridge between Eurasia and Asia.
Astana, Kazakhstan.
Vice Minister Magauov said: “We are sure that Astana will become an effective platform for demonstrating the best world developments and trends in the use of energy from the sun, wind, biogas, sea and thermal waters.Development of mutually beneficial bilateral ties with the Kingdom of the Netherlands has always been based on cooperation, trust, and friendship, and continues to be one of the priorities of our foreign policy. Kazakhstan considers the Netherlands as our key political, trade and investment partner in the European Union.”
When considering Kazakhstan’s economy, it is important to understand the ramifications of natural resource dependence. The economic downturn of its Eurasian Economic Union partner, Russia, and the decline of global commodity prices from 2014 to 2015 contributed to an economic slowdown in Kazakhstan. In order to combat this issue, in 2014 Kazakhstan devalued its currency, the tenge, and announced a stimulus package to cope with its economic challenges. Since 2015, Kazakhstan has replaced its currency band with a floating exchange rate, leading to an even sharper fall in the value of the tenge. Since January of 2016, the tenge has modestly appreciated, primarily due to a slight increase in oil prices.
In addition to lack of diversification in the economy, Kazakhstan also struggles with various issues surrounding corruption, bureaucracy, and arbitrary law enforcement. This has been a large concern for investors, who seek security in their ventures. Further, the country’s banking sector is subpar, suffering from low liquidity, poor asset quality, and a lack of transparency.
Despite these drawbacks, the Astana Expo revealed promising changes for the country of Kazakhstan. Green technologies based on new fundamental discoveries, physics, and building on the developments of Nikola Tesla are helping facilitate diversification within the Kazakhstani economy. Moreover, this demonstration showcased the best of the best in the solar, wind, biogas, and marine sectors, raising Kazakhstan as an emerging player in the global push for clean energy development. The facilities built for the Expo will continue to serve as vital constructions as Kazakhstan continues to develop. For example, spaces used for pavilions can be converted into standard office spaces, to ensure investment is not wasted.
Overall, while Kazakhstan’s economy and political situation remain shaky, major strides are being made in the country’s development as exemplified via the Astana Expo. Not only was this Expo a major achievement for Kazakhstan as a nation, it will serve as an example for other countries in Eurasia and Asia who are seeking to diversify their economy, broaden international contacts, and push for modern development.
By Barend ter Haar.
The coming third Planetary Security Conference (on 11 and 12 December in The Hague) is a good reason to look at the current state of planetary security. It can be summarized in one sentence: Mankind has reached a pinnacle of prosperity and power, but it shies away from confronting the unintended environmental, moral and social consequences of this success.
Let me qualify that somewhat, beginning with the enormous achievements of mankind. A century ago, most people still lived close to nature, illiterate and with little means to protect themselves and their families against famine and infectious diseases. Now the great majority of children goes to school, agricultural productivity rises fast and most infectious diseases have been brought under control. As a result global life expectancy has more than doubled from less than 35 years to more than 71 years.
But this unprecedented global development has a grave impact on the environment. Take for example the concentration of carbon dioxide. Last year it reached a level (400 parts per million) that had not occurred for 3 million years. At that time temperatures were 2-3oC higher and sea level 10 -20 metres higher. Hopefully temperatures and sea level will not reach these levels again, but the sea level does not have to rise ten meters to make life in The Hague less comfortable.
Or take the astonishing decrease of the number of flying insects. This summer I did not terribly miss the mosquitoes in our bedroom, but I missed the bumblebees and butterflies in our garden. Species are currently becoming extinct at between 1,000 and 10,000 times the natural extinction rate. But even if the extinction rate were only 100 times as high as normal, shouldn’t that give us pause to reflect (and act)?
Another unintended consequence of the fast growth of science and technology, is the proliferation of immense powers such as nuclear weapon technology and genome engineering. Who should be allowed to use these technologies and for what purposes?
These problems can only be effectively addressed through close international cooperation. However, the social consequences of the vast economic and technological growth tend to drive many people in an opposite direction. Almost everybody enjoys the supply of ever cheaper and better products, but the financial benefits are not evenly distributed. The main winners are the inhabitants of poor countries like China and India and the highly educated elites of the rich countries. The losers, at least in relative terms, are middle class people in rich countries whose jobs are taken over by computers or by cheaper labour in other countries.
Another unintended consequence of globalisation is that people are more directly confronted, both through internet and as the result of migration, by the, sometimes radically, different traditions and values of people with another cultural and religious background. The combination of relative economic decline with such a clash of cultures brings many people to vote for parties that pretend that by withdrawing behind their borders countries can bring back former times without losing the current levels of peace and prosperity.
As result, the United States and the United Kingdom, countries that once were in the vanguard of international cooperation, have expressed their wish to withdraw from respectively the Paris Climate Agreement and the European Union. To prevent other countries from following their bad example, governments will have to combine strengthening international cooperation with addressing domestic problems of inequality, discrimination and integration.
By Corneliu Pivariu.
Following the military confrontations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which intensity increased in 2016 and which did not stop during 2017 in spite of the international efforts for finding a solution, both sides suffered important losses, as certain data mention a total of around 350 military death on both sides, in an approximate equal proportion. Even after the meeting in Geneva on 16th of October, 2017, between presidents Serzh Sarksyan and Ilham Aliev, fire exchanges continued with losses on both sides.
During the 6th edition of the Armenian diaspora forum in Erevan, between 18-20th of September, 2017, the Armenian foreign minister Eduard Nalbandian refered to the possibility that some of the occupied territories be retroceded to Azerbaidjan in accordance with the already accepted principles by the sides concerning the negotiations for Karabakh, adding that the respective territories “do not represent a threat to Artsakh’s security (the self entitled Republic Nagorno-Karabakh)”, and that stirred vivid emotions and positionings in the Armenian society.
The head of General Staff, General-lt. Movses Hakobian declared that even a non significant territorial alteration of the “security belt (i.e. the Azeri occupied regions)” around Karabakh, may cause dramatic consequences for Artsakh’s security and concluded that “we need new territories for… ensuring (Nagorno-Karabakh’s)security”. The declaration came too on the background of Azerbaijan’s acquiring new weapons systems such as the152 mm DANA-M1 (Czech made) self-propelled gun and the multiple launching rockets system (MLRS) RM-70 Vampir and carrying out important maneuvers with offensive character.
In this framework, on October 24th, president Serzh Sargsyan delivered an important speech at the Defense Security Research University, and underlined the importance of modernizing Republic of Armenia’s armed forces for facing the challenges it may be confronted with in the future. In this regard, he suggested preparing a modernization program of the army for the next eight years (2018-2025) which, after being discussed and improved, will be adopted on January 28th, 2018 that coincides with the army’s day. The draft of the Defense Law, that is debated in the parliament, will secure the new legal framework imposing drawing up a set of laws for its implementation.
Although an important increase of the 2018 defense budged is contemplated (17% as compared to 2017, around 5.5% of the GDP) president Sargsyan emphasized the importance of quantitatively and qualitatively modernizing the army, by a balanced manner of spending the funds. Mention should be made to the fact that Armenia spent for defense during 1992-2016 on average 246.33 million $/year (the biggest sum was 447.4 million $ in 2015, 4.3% of the GDP, with a small decrease in 2016 – to 422.9 million $).
In comparison, Azerbaijan spent during the same period, 1992-2016, an yearly average 1,071.09 million $ (3,020.80 million $, or 5.6% of the GDP in 2015 with a significant decrease to 1,931.90 million $ in 2016 – 3.7% of the GDP).
As it was expected, the Armenian president’s speech of 24th of October included an important part concerning the strategic situation around Armenia, and appreciated that ”the general situation is stable, yet this stability is fragile and full of numerous impredictible developments” . Certainly the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh occupied an important place of this chapter. The president Sargsyan’s remark “it is impossible to shoot with one hand and to negotiate with the other for finding a solution. We either negotiate or shoot. We are ready for both situations” is worth noticing.
Presumably, Armenia’s new defense strategy will give up the soviet style static defense and will adopt a deterrence system, “active deterrence”, to be applied in the conditions when Azerbaijan will continue the operations of “controlled escalation”.
We noticed in president Sargsyan speech the special attention paid to the quality of military training, to the relations within the military system, the importance of the compulsory military service for having a well trained reserve and the care for an appropriate status for the active and reserve military. Lastly, the attention for developing the national military-industrial complex.
—————–
About the author: Corneliu Pivariu, former first deputy for military intelligence (two stars general) in the Romanian MoD, retired 2003. Member of IISS – London, alumni of Harvard – Kennedy School Executive Education and others international organizations. Founder of INGEPO Consulting, and bimonthly Bulletin, Geostrategic Pulse”. Main areas of expertise – geopolitics, intelligence and security.——————-Photographer: Ionus Paraschiv.
By Tanja Fröhlich-Israng.
I had the pleasure to spend three years in the Netherlands together with my family. Our child attended a Dutch kindergarten as well as a Dutch school. It was a great way of meeting a lot of people outside the expat community. Also, our neighbourhood was mainly Dutch.
I would like to share my observations with you – the observations of a German woman who fell in love with the Dutch culture – apart from the fact of many tall attractive Dutch men wearing posh (brown) shoes.
I treasure the Dutch culture especially the….
…characteristics of
being straight forward,
natural self-esteem,
being practical, being helpful,
being open – e.g. having a friendly chat just here and there,
being ungrudging – a great virtue adding its part to a peaceful society,
being patient – e.g. honking in traffic is rare,
living and let live – judgemental thinking is rare,
the existence of hierarchies which are simply not so important.
…culture of discussion
The unagitated and un-capricious mentality in all aspects of life.
The possibility to talk about more sensitive topics without returning sweeping judgements.
…politics
All of the above also reflects in politics which is built on cross-party consensus. It is refreshing to watch pragmatism in politics rather than all-time election campaign folklore. Politicians are accessible. The Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte, for example since 2008 teaches two hours once a week at a school in a problem area of Den Haag.
…family culture
Children are an essential part of life. In the Netherlands this is not just paying lip service but inherent in most all-day-living aspects. The atmosphere breathes child friendliness and consideration. Children are generally well received almost wherever you go. There are some very advanced leisure or thematic parks for children and their parents (e.g. “Avifauna” or “Archeon”), inviting, well thought and organised, clean. Especially during holiday times there are a lot of offers for children such as theatre plays (great ones!!), outdoor activities, festivals, workshops, mostly already starting at the age of two. Visit wonderful museums or parts of it that specifically address children (e.g. the “Wonderkamers” in the Gemeentemuseum in Den Haag).
Also, one of the most fantastic Christmas markets in Europe is the Country & Christmas fair at the extraordinary water castle Kasteel de Haar.
…culture of taking care and engaging
Being a volunteer – first and foremost “digging in your own garden” of your relatives, friends, people you know or other in a specific environment. It is about e.g. getting organized in a neighbourhood and/or helping elderly people, disabled people, disadvantaged children. There is a long grown implicitness in it, simply part of life.
Egalitarian way / respect – and here I am deliberately choosing examples of simplicity, e.g. the natural way in having a talk with the public gardener or the street cleaner. Thus an appreciation of all jobs and professions simply as necessary parts of the puzzle called society. By the way – I love the clean toilets even at most (Dutch) frequented beach restaurants. To me this is also a sign of respect towards the owners and the cleaners.
The love and individual care for children. The caretaking system belongs to the most advanced – e.g. a high density of choices of kindergarten and basic schools within reach of your neighbourhood. This includes the side-effect of no need for cars and parking as you either come by foot or by bike to bring or fetch your child.
Only a few annual days of closure in kindergarten which are open at least till 6 pm. School starts at the age of four years and parents are an integral part of the school system – rather a community than a necessity. Voluntary work is mostly not perceived as a necessary burden but a fun part by parents (there are often more volunteers than tasks). I remember well I almost did not get in the louse seeking parental group… It is rather a social happening to see each other in the morning or the afternoon dropping or fetching the kids.
…efficient health care
Although as a foreigner you might never get used to it… The health care system is based, in general, on three pillars: (1) general practitioners, (2) wait and see plus (3) paracetamol. If there is medical necessity than a very well advanced hospital system kicks in. Fully digitalized but assisted inscription systems, appointments are on schedule, mostly friendly and hygienic looking waiting and caretaking areas, no overcrowded spots, specific children activities and provisions, advanced doctors, the absence of hectic but simultaneously efficiency. A concierge takes also care of the company in case of an emergency.
…organizational culture
If you ever thought Germans are organized – meet the Dutch.
Pragmatism meets efficiency e.g. if there is a road construction site the road users will be informed well in advance also about the duration. In most cases the construction is completed before the final date.
…way of keeping the country tidy and in order
Believe it or not – there are specific dustbins for cyclists. You don’t have to stop – just throw. Roads, houses, bridges are constantly being taken care of if necessary 24/7. This is reflected also by clean and thus inviting environments at most places in the country.
…arts & culture
For a low fixed amount everybody can get an annual museum card providing free access to most of the museums in all of the Netherlands (so no excuses!).
The museums are well thought, well maintained, modern and well curated.
They are sometimes stunningly embedded in nature (such as the Kröller-Müller museum or the Museum Voorlinden).
You will find your Dutch neighbours overproportionally directly or indirectly engaged in art: voluntary help at a museum, being a painter, writer, dancer, musician, sculptor, provider of art spaces. General high regard of art and culture.
…sports culture
The main population of the Netherlands are bicycles. Already the implicitness of being sportive by cycling makes a sportive nation. Plus keeping balance although transporting three kids and a Christmas tree at once. If there is sun you are outside. If not you are outside anyway.
There is a general healthy way of living as the Dutch are “outsiders” obviously born with the resistance to wet or cold air. So they are cool without wanting to be by start wearing flip-flops and shorts as soon as the temperature exceeds around 10 ° C. There is always a lot of water throughout the Netherlands plus nice beaches so swimming is almost natural to everybody. Kite surfing, sailing and all possible other water sports are also regular. Hockey – what a nice sport – is quite popular and classes already run from the age of three. The million-euro dressage horse Totilas originates from the Netherlands as some of the best breeds nowadays. There are many other sports of course. Pick one it will be there.
…architecture and interior design
Quite experimental architecture. One gets a good insight by visiting Rotterdam. The Dutch are not shy mixing different styles.
Dutch architecture is certainly one thing not – boring. There might also wait a surprise entering a rather ugly perceived building which turns out extraordinary from the inside. Being invited into a house or flat of a Dutch citizens always is a great pleasure. There seems to be a natural way of decorating well also if the budget is limited.
…way of being smart, experimental and highly innovative, just examples
Magic control over water: protection against floods, land reclamation, navigability, nature protection, architecture & water, everyday life surrounded by water etc. – being world renowned experts.
The Netherlands is leading in Connectivity in Europe, in particular when it comes to fixed broadband. The practical aspects of the digital world are well advanced (e.g. one chip card for the whole public transport system, free Wifi in all trains).
In Dutch supermarkets you mostly get home grown products such as vegetables and fruits. Additionally the Dutch are market leader in Europe in exporting agricultural products and food. The worldwide list is headed by the USA but the Netherlands are already second. This is also due to the very well advanced high-technology which is an export hit as well.
Having open space offices, flexible working hours and a preference for teleworking in every ministry is not fancied by everybody but a consequent experiment that followed the necessity for economizing structures.
…obsessional foods
Ok. Not every specific Dutch food is everybody’s cup of tea but you will always find alternatives.
Truly there exists an obsession with peanuts (in their true sense). I will not forget a sport session where our instructor asked us to imagine being a peanut.
Hagelslag for breakfast.
Haring, hold it over your head and just put in your mouth.
Having lunch usually means bread or soup or salade.
Young, middle-aged, old aged cheese.
Bitterballen and anything else deep-fried.
Poffertjes – the only non-efficient food: a lot of effort for the smallest but so yummy pancakes.
…particular traditions
The Sinterklaas, the St Nicholas, is actually the real Father Christmas in the Netherlands 🙂 Already in November he arrives by ship from Spain, accompanied by the Zwarte Pieten. It is a happening and celebrated all over the country. The 5th of December is the gift receiving day for all children.
On Vlaggetjesdag the Dutch celebrate the new haring brought into the harbour. It is a big feast, do not miss.
On 1st January the Nieuwjaarsduik takes place. If you are eager to have a real endorphin kick than try it out. Run with thousands of other enthusiasts into the sea and party.
Creative small treats at specific occasions (e.g. birthdays, entering/leaving) already at kindergarten from one child for all children in class/caretakers. Be as creative as you wish.
The song “Hoof, schouders, knie en teen” every Dutch knows and sings in all ages.
Buurman & Buurman (although originally Czech) has been translated into Dutch and is a big success. Anyhow there is not much spoken. It is one of those down-to-earth, non-hectic or flashy but funny short movies (available on youtube) for children and adults of all ages. Buurman means neighbour and the two of them are puppets trying to figure out a lot of things together.
———-If you want to learn more:
– meet the Dutch.
The author: As part of a diplomats family Tanja Fröhlich-Israng lived for three years from 2014 to 2017 in Den Haag. She works for the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
Thailand, the premier destination for health and wellness tourism.By Roy Lie A Tjam.The Tourism Authority of Thailand organized the Amazing Thailand Health and Wellness Showcase conference, which took place on 11 August 2017. The event unveiled Thailand’s latest innovation on Functional and Regenerative Medicines – a globally emerging health trend that focuses on the restoration of the structure and function of damaged tissues and organs.
De facto, Thailand is the first and only country in Asia that has institutions, such as Better Being Hospital and MALI Hospital, which specialize in functional and regenerative medicine. Moreover, it has 58 JCI accredited hospitals, thus ranking highest in Southeast Asia, and has become an anti-aging center with the largest number of American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine-certified medical professionals, tallying a total of 500 doctors, in Asia.
The objective of the Amazing Thailand Health and Wellness Showcase 2017 conference was to promulgate Thailand as a destination indisputably befitting for Health and Wellness Tourism. This one day conference, at Centara Grand Bangkok Convention Centre, demonstrated the potentiality and readiness of Thailand’s health-service products. Top level Thai health service providers made good use of the opportunity to present their services to international buyers. The conference and annex fair presented health innovative services for healthy longevity such as:
Regenerative medicine
Anti-aging medicine
Cosmetic dentistry for beauty and anti-dental aging
Cosmetic surgery
Cell therapy
Health check-up innovation
Tourism Authority of Thailand’s Mr. Noppadon Pakprot, Deputy Governor for Tourism Products and Business, delivered the opening speech in which he cordially and warmly welcomed all to the 4th Amazing Thailand Health and Wellness Showcase. Mr. Pakprot went on to announce general hospitals, dental clinics, laboratory checks, regenerative functional clinics and regenerative functional medicine hospitals – just to name a few – as the top 44 Health and Wellness providers in Thailand, as selected by the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT).
All are ready, he said, to discuss prospective business deals. Moreover, Mr. Pakprot is convinced that the event will get prospective buyers up to speed on Thailand’s generous offering on health-and-wellness tourism knowledge and products. He then concluded his address by remarking the following, “We hope that this event will further strengthen the awareness of Thailand as the premier destination for health and wellness tourism.”
The event proved to be very successful, providing ample opportunity to rub shoulders with high-level medical doctors and specialists as well as one-on-one conversations between stakeholders. There was also time for presentations, examinations, digital information and so much more. Some of the hospitals and clinics had even arranged to shuttle prospective buyers for visits to their respective institutions.
As a renowned tourist destination, Thailand and its people are well known for their hospitality. It has been recognized among the top level Wellness and Health providers in the world. According to a report by, the independent consultancy, VISA and Oxford Economics, Thailand has once again been confirmed as one of Asia’s top medical tourism destinations.
The Thailand Authority for Tourism is aspiring to widen out on the fusion of tourism wellness and health. It has been proven beyond all doubt, the capacity and motivation Thailand possesses towards taking up that challenge. As a major highlight, the event confirmed people’s conviction of Thailand being a “Paradise for Longevity”.
The organisers during the conference.
The government of the Kingdom of Thailand has implemented new medical tourism policies – extending the visitor-stay period to 90 days for citizens of the integrated CLMV countries and the Republic of China – in order to accommodate medical tourists traveling to its shores. Additionally, the long-stay visa preferentially offers an extension of 10 years to Australia, Canada, Japan, Denmark and other European countries.
The conference got international media coverage with media delegations from Belgium, France, and the Netherlands being present. Under the auspices of TAT France and the Royal Thai Embassy in The Hague, an educational tour, to selected health-and-wellness facilities, was organized after the conference, in order to provide first-hand experience.
Royal Thai collaboratively with Tourism Authority of Thailand offices, around the globe, will eagerly assist interested parties in obtaining further information on Thai health and wellness tourism.
By Jhr mr Alexander W. Beelaerts van Blokland.
In the 90’s of the 20th century the first war in Europe since World War II (1939-1945) took place. Europe was in shock. After the death of President Tito of the nation named Yugoslavia, people of that country started from 1991 onwards civil wars and formed several new, smaller countries. Some of them were at war with others as well. In several cases it happened with genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and / or violations of the Geneva Conventions. In those cases those people should be charged and should be brought to trial. But for what court ?
The Security Council of the United Nations in New York decided in February 1993 to establish a special tribunal: the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and The Hague was -again- chosen as the city where this ICTY would have its offices and courtrooms, with 24 permanent judges and twelve judges ‘ad litem’, which means: just for one or more specific cases. Altogether about 300 people worked there in an earlier situation than now (see below).
In the last 24 years no less than 161 accused persons were brought before their judges of ICTY, since 2007 by the Belgian head public prosecutor Serge Brammertz. The three most well known were Slobodan Milosevic (1941-2006), former President of Serbia and also of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Radovan Karadzic (born 1945), President of the so called Republika Srpska and Ratko Mladic (born 1943), former commander-in-chief of the Bosniak-Serbian army. Milosevic passed away in prison on March 11, 2006 during his ICTY-trial, Karadzic was condemned on March 3, 2016 to 40 years imprisonment and finally Mladic recently (November 22, 2017) was sentenced to imprisonment for life.
My old friend, the very experienced Dutch international criminal lawyer Judge Alphons Orie (born 1947) presided that case and pronounced the verdict the day before his 70th birthday, the age at which judges in The Netherlands have to retire (as I will myself also, in September 2018).
ICTY –with now only 90 people working there- will stop on December 31st, 2017. The appeal cases of Karadzic, Mladic and others will be handled over to MICT: the United Nations Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals, that also handles appeal cases of the former Rwanda Tribunal. MICT is based in Arusha (Tanzania) and in The Hague, according to the former Secretary General of the United Nations Boutros Boutros Gali no less than ‘The Legal Capital of the World’.
a.beelaerts@planet.nl
————-
About the author: Jhr mr Alexander W. Beelaerts van Blokland is Justice (Judge) in the (Dutch) Court of Appeal and since 2004 also honorary Special Advisor International Affairs , appointed by the Mayor and Aldermen of The Hague
H.E. Sheikh Nahayan bin Mabarak Al Nahayan, Minister of Tolerance of the UAE. Picture by Government of the UAE
Tolerance, an intricate Emirati value By HE Sheikh Nahayan bin Mabarak Al Nahayan, Minister of Tolerance (United Arab Emirates)
The Ministry of Tolerance was initiated merely in the year 2016 yet its roots go back generations, in an effort to continue the support and celebration of our diverse country.
In a time of on-going political tensions, regionally and globally, it is imperative that we encourage individuals in the UAE and from across the world to respect one another. To be able to look beyond our differences, in order to emphasise the common traits of humanity that we all share.
We aim at guiding our nation forward through education, knowledge, new technologies, and openness for the world. Already in the times before the federation, the then sheikhdoms were at the crossroads between Europe, Africa and Asia. Nowadays we remain thus and much more, as our population is a melting pot that by far supersedes multiculturalism in any Western capital. We manage to succeed, not simply get along, by our innate make-up for tolerance towards others.
Over the last two decades the UAE has been one of the most socially progressive nations in the Gulf region; we have strived to attract talent from across the globe to collectively work with our citizens to improve the lives of Emiratis and foreigners alike. For our focus is not only on ourselves, as our country has significantly increased its share of humanitarian and development aid to other nations. At home, we endeavour to ensure high-quality lives for expatriates in the UAE, that they feel at home as our guests.
We live in a world made up of many different cultures and opinions, if we are to proactively collaborate and solve problems regionally and globally, we must always aspire to better understand each other’s perspectives. For, if we better understand each other, we can work more effectively as a whole.
Through technology and connectivity, the youth of our nation and the world are now more connected than ever before. Having access to information and knowledge instantly through social networks is a first in the history of humankind. Naturally we understand the advantages; however, we must likewise face the challenges linked to these possibilities. For misinformation is also more easily spread than ever before, our liberalised societies must be able to tackle this challenge in order to maintain social order as well as an atmosphere of tolerance and unity.
As our dear founding father, the late President, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, once uttered “To treat every person, no matter what his creed or race, as a special soul, is a mark of Islam”.
The UAE shall remain a dynamic and forward-thinking country. Not least, for we are the first country in setting up a ministry dedicated exclusively to artificial intelligence. It is the customary kind-nature of Emiratis, the fact that we accept and respect people from all over the world, which is indeed one of the fundamental pillars to our success.
Conversation avec S.E. M. Sidiki Kaba, Président de l’Assemblée des Etats Parties
By Diplomat Magazine.Quelles sont les réalisations les plus marquantes de votre mandat ?
Au cours de mon mandat, je me suis attaché à promouvoir le raffermissement de la relation entre la Cour pénale internationale et l’Afrique ainsi que la complémentarité.
Je me suis efforcé d’encourager un dialogue franc et constructif entre les Etats africains ayant des griefs envers la Cour et l’Assemblée des Etats Parties de la CPI. Il était nécessaire de répondre aux sources du malaise qui existe entre la Cour et certains Etats africains qui l’accusent de néocolonialisme. À ce propos, je me réjouis que l’Afrique du Sud et la Gambie aient renoncé à se retirer du Statut de Rome, le traité de la Cour, et aient réaffirmé leur attachement à la CPI. Toutefois, nous devons poursuivre le dialogue pour raffermir davantage les rapports entre la Cour et ses Etats Parties en général.
S’agissant de la complémentarité, je me suis engagé à promouvoir ce principe essentiel auprès de tous les Etats, qu’ils soient Parties ou non au Statut de Rome. En effet, la complémentarité doit être l’épine dorsale de la lutte contre l’impunité car la justice pénale internationale ne prime pas sur le droit national mais complète ses faiblesses lorsque les systèmes judiciaires nationaux ne disposent pas des capacités nécessaires ou n’ont pas la volonté pour juger ces crimes de masse.
La CPI apparaît donc comme un recours contre l’Etat qui faillirait à ses obligations internationales et il est donc souhaitable et avantageux que les Etats remplissent leurs obligations parce que la répression nationale est la règle, la répression internationale l’exception
Quelles sont, selon vous, les principaux défis auxquels est confrontée la Cour ?
Alors que la Cour atteint l’âge de la maturité, 2018 marquera le 20e anniversaire de l’adoption du Statut de Rome. Elle doit maintenant asseoir son statut de juridiction indépendante et notamment répondre à deux grands défis : la coopération et l’accusation de politisation.
La coopération des Etats Parties est primordiale alors que la Cour ne dispose pas de force de police. Sans coopération, la Cour ne peut s’acquitter pleinement de son mandat de rendre justice aux victimes et de mettre fin à l’impunité pour les crimes graves qui choquent la conscience humaine.
Quant à la perception d’une institution politisée, il faut y répondre. Certes, comme toute œuvre humaine, la CPI n’est pas parfaite mais une imperfection juridique reste toutefois préférable à un vide juridique, d’où la nécessité et la pertinence incontestable de cette institution pour répondre à l’exigence de justice et de réparation des torts subis par les millions de victimes d’atrocités.
C’est pour cela que la Cour, lorsqu’elle est saisie, doit aller au bout de sa mission qui est de rendre la justice, à l’abri des influences politiques, avec l’assurance de la coopération de tous les États Membres.
Que peut-on faire pour continuer d’avancer sur la voie de l’universalité alors que le nombre d’accession au Statut de Rome stagne ?
Ma conviction reste que la ratification universelle du Statut de Rome et son incorporation effective dans les systèmes internes, ainsi que la coopération des Etats parties et non parties, sont d’une importance capitale pour la lutte contre l’impunité.
La promotion de l’universalité du Statut de Rome doit s’appuyer aussi bien sur les Etats Parties que sur les Etats non Parties mais aussi sur les organisations intergouvernementales, la société civile.
Il est aussi aujourd’hui nécessaire d’atteindre la ratification universelle du Statut de Rome, de rendre la Cour compétente partout dans le monde afin de lutter efficacement et effectivement contre l’impunité des crimes graves relevant de sa compétence.
Pour cela, la tenue régulière des réunions de coordination avec tous les acteurs et l’élaboration d’un plan et d’une stratégie d’action pour les prochaines années, impliquant tous les Etats, tous les acteurs y compris les ONG et la société civile aux séquences d’exécution de ce plan est une nécessité.
Le dialogue avec les Etats asiatiques, continent le moins représenté au sein de l’Assemblée, doit aussi se poursuivre avec l’appui de la société civile afin de promouvoir les valeurs et principes du Statut de Rome qui sont au service des victimes.
Lors de la négociation du Statut de Rome, en tant que membre de la FIDH, vous avez beaucoup œuvré pour la reconnaissance des droits des victimes. Comment voyez-vous la place des victimes aujourd’hui au sein de la justice pénale internationale ?
La participation des victimes est primordiale dans la justice pénale internationale car il ne peut y avoir de paix sans justice. La question de l’aide et de la protection des victimes nécessite à cet égard une attention toute particulière et appelle un engagement politique, l’implication de tous les acteurs concernés au niveau national, régional et international mais aussi des organisations de la société civile et les organisations de victimes, une formation des acteurs de la justice mais une cohérence dans l’action.
Les communautés fracturées par les conflits ne peuvent pas se reconstruire si les victimes ne sont pas entendues lors des audiences. La Cour pénale internationale est la première juridiction pénale internationale à donner une voix aux victimes en permettant leur représentation lors des audiences et est également la première juridiction pénale internationale à accorder des réparations aux victimes. Ainsi, la Cour constitue une réponse à l’exigence de justice et de réparation pour les victimes des atrocités.
———–
Sidiki Kaba
S.E. M. Sidiki Kaba est élu Président de l’Assemblée des Etats Parties de la Cour pénale internationale en décembre 2014. Garde des Sceaux et ministre de la Justice du Sénégal depuis 2013, il est nommé Ministre des Affaires Etrangères et des Sénégalais de l’extérieur en 2017.