Unprecedented cyber-attack on the ICC

Five weeks ago, the International Criminal Court detected a serious cyber security incident, thanks to the alert mechanism provided by its monitoring system. The ICC has made various and serious efforts to address this attack. The Court deems it is its responsibility to continue to inform about these efforts and to provide the relevant additional information on the attack itself.

As soon as the incident was confirmed, steps were taken to mitigate its effects by initiating an immediate incident response with the support of the Netherlands, the Host State, and external cyber security experts. This included forensic analysis of the incident, its causes and its impact, and initial mitigating measures.

The evidence available thus far indicates a targeted and sophisticated attack with the objective of espionage. The attack can therefore be interpreted as a serious attempt to undermine the Court’s mandate.

Based on the forensic analysis carried out, the Court has already taken and will continue to take all necessary steps to address any compromise to data belonging to individuals, organizations and States.  Should evidence be found that specific data entrusted to the Court has been compromised, those affected would be contacted immediately and directly by the Court. For the Court, the safety of its data and maintaining trust with all of its stakeholders are paramount.

With the information currently available it is not presently possible for the Court to confirm who is responsible for the attack. The Dutch law enforcement authorities are currently conducting a criminal investigation.

As a result of the attack, the Court is reinforcing its risk management framework and identifying actions and procedures to be ready to respond to any potential repercussions from the cyber-attack including any potential security risk to victims and witnesses, Court officials and the Court’s operations .

As part of broader assessment into potential actions by threat actors, the Court has also identified that disinformation campaigns targeting the ICC and its officials may be anticipated to be launched in an effort to tarnish the ICC image and delegitimize its activities.

The Court is also accelerating a number of existing initiatives aimed at enhancing digital security.

This latest attack comes at the time of broader and heightened security concerns for the Court: several elected officials, including Judges of the Court and the Prosecutor, have had criminal proceedings initiated against them; the Court has recently undergone daily and persistent attempts to attack and disrupt its systems; and the Court averted an almost successful attempt to infiltrate a hostile intelligence officer into the Court under the guise of an intern.

The Court wishes to emphasize its utmost gratitude for the numerous expressions of support received from its States Parties and other international organizations, a number of whom have experienced similar cyber incidents in the past. The Court looks forward to cooperating with them and working together in addressing the increasing risk of cyber-attacks and the need to protect our institution to ensure its capacity to implement the ICC’s critical mandate of justice and accountability, which is a shared responsibility of all States Parts.

Regional Hegemonies in the Future Global Geopolitical Landscape

By Kung Chan and Zhou Chao

While the fears of a global war largely subsided since the Cold War’s end, recurring regional conflicts cast doubt on the attainment of worldwide peace. The U.S. aspires to sustain and bolster its global dominance, striving to retain sole superpower status. As China’s influence grows amid the anti-globalization tide, the international geopolitical landscape is in a state of profound transformation. Looking ahead, the enduring prevalence of regional hegemonic divisions appears to be a defining trend in the long-term geopolitical landscape.

Over the coming decades, a pivotal shift will unfold: the rise of diverse regional hegemonies. This transformation is propelled by the persistent fragmentation of the global scenes amid the era of anti-globalization.

In the context of the Americas, the United States, exercising its role as the preeminent superpower, commands significant influence over proximate nations such as Mexico and Canada. The augmentation of economic interconnections through U.S. nearshoring serves to fortify its dominion within North American affairs. This cohesion is underpinned by similar political systems and shared ideologies, rendering Canada’s alignment with the United States unsurprising, with Mexico potentially following a similar trajectory.

Within the European domain, the European Union (EU) demonstrates limited capacity to emerge as an independent global actor. Perturbations stemming from events such as the Russo-Ukraine war, the redirection of U.S. capital, and the tide of anti-globalization are expected to reduce the EU’s inherent advantages. The assertive anti-Russia stance adopted by several Eastern European nations, coupled with their notable contributions during the war, served to diminish the sway traditionally held by France and Germany. Hungary’s discernible policy deviations further compound challenges to EU cohesiveness. As a consequence, the EU is poised to rely extensively on NATO for security and the Anglo-American axis for economic and energy-related affairs, thereby relinquishing a degree of its strategic autonomy.

In Asia, China is poised to maintain its dominant position in East Asia, albeit amidst challenges such as Western-driven decoupling, global economic interdependence, and China’s aging demographic. India, positioned in opposition to China, will emerge as a consequential actor. The U.S. will persist in its engagement in the Asia-Pacific region, influenced by the strategic significance of the Taiwan Strait in international trade routes. Due to the complexity of territorial conflicts in the South Sea, it is unlikely that Vietnam and the Philippines will be fully won over by China. The Southeast Asia-China relationship may remain contentious.  Within the region, there are foreseeable frictions among major powers, with India intensifying its sphere of influence.

The region spanning across Central and West Asia, to North Africa, will be marked by multiple competing fractions, contributing to the gradual decline of U.S. supremacy there, while Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and other nations are set to ascend as regional powerhouses.

As for the African continent as a whole, it confronts internal conflicts and the impacts of anti-globalization waves, creating impediments to regional stability. Due to the reverberations of the Arab Spring, coupled with pre-existing religious and ethnic tensions, along with the challenges posed by high inflation and financial instability, a state of continuous upheaval prevails in many regions of the continent. Notably, Sudan remains a focal point of unrest. South Africa, being the most developed and politically stable country on the continent, holds the potential to rise as a regional hegemon in Africa. Nevertheless, the intricate web of conflicts within the African landscape, along with heightened competition among Western powers seeking to counter China’s influence on the continent, indicates that South Africa’s attainment of dominant control over regional affairs in the short term is unlikely. The prevailing trend toward fragmentation in Africa will persist and the ascendancy of South Africa as a regional hegemon will be a protracted endeavor.

Given its territorial expanse, population, and overall economic strength, in conjunction with strategic diplomatic efforts initiated during Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s tenure, Brazil is on the verge of emerging as the dominant regional power in South America. Nevertheless, it is imperative to recognize that Argentina, in parallel, has undertaken significant measures to diversify its diplomatic and economic relationships. These endeavors include bolstering economic, trade, and financial ties with China. Recent years have witnessed intensified efforts by both the U.S. and the EU to expand their influence in South America, in response to China’s growing impact in the region since the early 2000s. While Brazil is steadily enhancing its influence in South America, it is bound to encounter resistance, possibly even confrontation, from Argentina. The full consolidation of Brazil’s regional hegemonic status remains an evolving process that will require time and strategic finesse.

The global system has witnessed a profound shift, characterized by substantial realignments in supply chains that have eroded the long-standing dominance of the U.S. on the world stage. This transition towards anti-globalization appears poised to endure, potentially spanning a significant temporal expanse, measured in years or even decades. Within this evolving paradigm, one discerns an impending fragmentation of global space, heralding the emergence of regional hegemonies as an enduring motif within the realm of geopolitics.

About the authors:

Founder of ANBOUND Think Tank, Kung Chan is one of China’s renowned information analysis experts specializing in geopolitical and economic policies. 

Zhou Chao is a research assistant at ANBOUND’s Center of International Relations and a Ph.D. candidate at Freie Universität Berlin.

President Gatti Santana addresses United Nations General Assembly

Arusha, The Hague, 18 October 2023 – The President of the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (Mechanism), Judge Graciela Gatti Santana, today presented the Mechanism’s eleventh annual report to the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

At the outset, President Gatti Santana was pleased to announce that the Mechanism has reached a critical juncture in its lifespan, with no more active trials or appeals in relation to the core crimes incorporated in its Statute. This follows decisive developments in the cases of Prosecutor v. Stanišić & Simatović and Prosecutor v. Félicien Kabuga, including a decision of the Appeals Chamber in the latter case that has “triggered the Mechanism’s truly residual mode.”

President Gatti Santana reported that the resulting shift in the Mechanism’s attention, from in-court proceedings to longer-term mandated functions, is coupled with a need “to think and do things differently”. She underscored that, while the Mechanism is not closing down and still has much to do, it must start to redefine the way it works. Against this backdrop, President Gatti Santana indicated that she had recalibrated her own key objectives, to better reflect the Mechanism’s new reality.

President Gatti Santana then proceeded to announce the three new priorities of her Presidency, as follows:

First, to present the Security Council with a framework of operations to complete functions during the Mechanism’s new residual phase. President Gatti Santana explained that this responds to Security Council resolution 2637 (2022) and is intrinsically connected with the Mechanism’s future-planning activities. As part of this priority, she will also be focusing on areas of activity where potential restructuring might help to avoid duplication of efforts and deliver greater efficiencies.

Second, to promote effective leadership and good governance in the performance of mandated functions and residual activities. Here, President Gatti Santana emphasised that those in senior and leadership positions within the Mechanism must be vigilant in managing with transparency, efficiency, and accountability. She spoke of the challenges of leading a downsizing institution and keeping productivity high when morale is low, and mentioned the key role of management in helping ensure that the Mechanism remains a functional and thriving organisation.

And third, to continue consolidating the legacy of the ad hoc tribunals and the Mechanism and working closely with all main stakeholders. In relation to this priority, President Gatti Santana highlighted the Mechanism’s support to national jurisdictions and the importance of ensuring that the public judicial records of the ICTY, the ICTR, and the Mechanism are as accessible as possible, including through the establishment of information centres in accordance with Security Council resolution 1966 (2010).

Having affirmed the Mechanism’s commitment to cooperating with its key stakeholders, President Gatti Santana observed that the Mechanism, in turn, relies heavily on the support provided by Member States and others. In this context, she identified a number of areas where there is a pressing need for further cooperation, namely: the situation of the relocated persons in the Republic of Niger, who remain under de facto house arrest; the failure of the Republic of Serbia to arrest and transfer the accused in the Jojić & Radeta contempt matter; and the enforcement of sentences, where the Mechanism urgently requires enhanced assistance from States.

In closing, President Gatti Santana recalled the importance of working together to deliver on the promise of justice, stating: “It now falls upon all of us to ensure that the Mechanism can carry on towards the final chapter of this historic mission and secure the precious legacies of all three institutions, for the benefit of generations to come”.  

President Gatti Santana is in New York to report on the Mechanism’s activities in accordance with Article 32(1) of the Statute of the Mechanism.

Indonesia International Flavors – Why is Indonesian food so delicious?

By Roy Lie Atjam

Yet another authentic Indonesian flavour Festival at Leo’s Restaurant in The Hague. Indonesian Fine Dining Festival, taking Rawon and Rujak petis and other dishes to the next level. The food festival on 13 – 14 October 2023 was organized by the H.E. Ambassador Mayerfas and his team, in collaboration with Diplomat Magazine and Leonardo Royal Hotel The Hague. The atmosphere was sublime.

Paintings and photo exhibitions from Gallery Lukisan (Bergen Op-Zoom) at Leonardo Royal Hotel.

H.E. Ambassador Mr Mayerfas delivered the following cordial welcome remarks.

“People often ask me these two questions? Why is Indonesian food so delicious? Well, it is because it is made of fresh spices and herbs. And then what is the most delicious Indonesian dish? I will say Nasi Padang. But maybe another 200 million people in Indonesia doesn’t agree with me. People may say Rawon, Babi Panggang, Konro, or Papeda.

In fact, Indonesian cuisine is as diverse as the people, the ethnicities, and the culture, stretching along the archipelago from Aceh to Papua. Imagine if you want to taste each and every one of them, it will need more than a lifetime journey to do that. This evening, Chef Agus and Chef Sido will take you to a culinary journey through their unique creation, presentation, and interpretation of Indonesian cuisine.

Indonesian culture.

But before that, allow me to thank Mr. Thomas Kortleve, the General Manager of Leonardo Royal Hotel the Hague, for your warm welcome, also for the good cooperation from you and the hotel staff, to make the event this evening happened. I also wish to thank Indonesia Diaspora Network the Netherlands and Diplomat Magazine for their support in organizing this event.

My appreciation also goes to Gallery Lukisan, Javara, Kutus Kutus, Stichting Aniadi Arts, and Stichting Peduli Seni Indonesia for participating in the exhibition and giving wonderful entertainment.

Chef Agus Hermawan and Chef Sido de Brabander; Mr. Thomas Kortleve, the General Manager of Leonardo Royal Hotel The Hague at the micro.

Last but not least, special thanks and appreciation for Chef Agus Hermawan and Chef Sido de Brabander, who have been working hard and professionally in preparing a unique and exceptional dinner for us this evening. So, on this special occasion, I would like to present a token of appreciation for the Chefs.“

Ambassador presented the certificates  to the Chefs and Madam Virna, spouse of the Ambassador presented the flower bouquets to the Chefs.

Indonesian Flavors

The Embassy of Indonesia issued the following “Indonesian Fine Dining Event – Taking Rawon and Rujak Petis to the Next Level
It was a full house. For two days in a row, the dining hall of Leonardo Royal Hotel The Hague Promenade was fully booked. Guests sat in anticipation while wondering how homemade food like Pecel, Pindang, and Rujak would be presented on fine dining plates.

Chef Agus Hermawan (Indonesian guest chef) and Chef Sido de Brabander (host chef at Leonardo Hotel) did their magic and showcased an 8-course dinner, which gave a new and exquisite look but kept the original taste of the food and left the diners in awe.

Sinom, or a traditional drink made from turmeric, tamarind, and palm sugar, is served on ice as a welcome drink. On the dining table, a sequence of the menu was served beautifully: Horn of Tomato; Vegetable Salad Ball; Tempeh Salad; Sea Bass in Balinese broth; Assorted Satay (chicken, goat, and venison); Rawon (slow-braised beef in dark soup); and Rujak Petis (fruit salad).

Madam Virna, spouse of the Ambassador presented the flower bouquets to the Chefs.

More than 200 guests attended the Indonesian Fine Dining Event on Friday and Saturday, 13-14 October 2023 at Leonardo Royal Hotel the Hague. The event was inaugurated by Ambassador Mayerfas together with the General Manager of the hotel, Mr. Thomas Kortleve, and the Chairwoman of Indonesian Diaspora Network the Netherlands (IDN-NL), Mrs. Lany Pradjarahardja.


The guests also enjoyed the side events, organized at the atrium of the hotel. There were paintings and photo exhibitions from Gallery Lukisan (Bergen Op-Zoom), and Indonesian spices products fairs from Javara and Kutus Kutus. A special entertainment of Indonesian culture was also showcased through various traditional dances, such as Sekar Jagat (Bali); Jaipong (West Java); Sekar Pudyastuti (Yogyakarta) and Piring dance (West Sumatera)”

Indonesia, a wonderland for food lovers and foodies!

Ambassador Mayerfas with guests.

President Trendafilova Contemplates Revision of Nasim Haradinaj’s Sentence

0

On October 12, 2023, the President of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers (KSC), Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, announced her intention to review the sentence of Mr. Nasim Haradinaj, with the possibility of his release under specific conditions. This decision followed the receipt of a report from Registrar Fidelma Donlon regarding Mr. Haradinaj’s conduct during his detention at the KSC Detention Facilities.

In reaching this decision, the President consulted with the Judges of the sentencing Panels, as outlined in Article 51(2) of the Law on Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office. She also took into account the considerations detailed in Rule 196(3) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. Additionally, an oral hearing was conducted with Mr. Haradinaj.

The President recognized the severity of the offenses for which Mr. Haradinaj was convicted, particularly the grave impact of the disclosure of confidential information on (potential) witnesses. Nevertheless, she acknowledged several factors that might support the modification of his sentence. Notably, the President considered Mr. Haradinaj’s expressions of remorse expressed during the oral hearing and his commitment to avoid engaging in any actions that could be construed as offenses against the administration of justice in the future.

However, the President also took into account Mr. Haradinaj’s disciplinary record at the Detention Management Unit (DMU). While acknowledging some progress towards rehabilitation, she believed there was room for improvement. As a result, the President directed the Registrar to submit a report on Mr. Haradinaj’s future behavior at the DMU within a specific timeframe as part of the assessment regarding the potential modification of his sentence.

Ambassador Azerbaijan Meets Members of the Press

Representatives of some press outlets in the Netherlands had a briefing with the Ambassador of the Republic of Azerbaijan in the Netherlands, H.E. Mr. Rahman Mustafayev, at the chancellery on 9 October 2023 concerning projects for the reintegration of Karabakh Armenians.

Further on the program: the current situation in and around the Karabakh region of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the anti-terror measures undertaken by Azerbaijan in this region on September 19-20 and consequences, subsequent humanitarian support and reintegration efforts concerning the Armenian residents of the Karabakh region, the position of Azerbaijan on “ethnic cleansing” claims, the role of the international community in support of the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process, the relations between Azerbaijan and the Netherlands in the context of current issues in the South Caucasus.

The key takeaway points of the press meeting with Ambassador H.E. Mr. Rahman Mustafayev are as follows:  Azerbaijan had to intervene in NagornoKarabakh due to the illegal presence of the Armenian military on Azerbaijan territory. The enormous quantity of military equipment and ammunition found proves this. It is a violation of the UN. Security Council resolution and the agreement between Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Russia signed after the second war. Azerbaijan’s attack is, therefore, a counter-terrorism action. 

Regarding ethnic cleansing, Azerbaijan facilitated free passage for the Karabakh Armenians exodos, providing food, fuel, and shelter access to the Red Cross. For those who would like to return, Azerbaijan has put in place a digital portal to enable people to apply to obtain Azerbaijan citizenship without relinquishing their Armenian passport.

Additionally, on 11 October 2023, the Dutch Minister for Foreign Affairs Hanke Bruin Slot responded to questions from members of the Foreign Affairs Committee (No.2733) that there is no ground for any allegation of ethnic cleansing.

According to the Ambassador, the Caucus region is ready for economic development. Azerbaijan proposes building a railway corridor to realize economic prosperity for Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia.

Concerning the allegations that Azerbaijan is an authoritarian state with a bad human rights record, the Ambassador referred to the fact that there is opposition, free press, and (media) tolerance in the country.

There will be talks in Brussels and Russia, however, none in The Hague. Ambassador Mustafayev still sees a role for The Hague, the city of peace and justice in this conflict. The soft power of The Hague makes her an excellent mediator.

Furthermore, Ambassador Mustafayev considers it lamentable that the Netherlands is reluctant to assist with demining the territory. Ambassador qualifies the attitude of the Dutch media as biased.

A meeting has been scheduled with the Prime Minister of Armenia, Mr Nikol Pashinyan, and the President of Azerbaijan, Mr Ilham Heydar Oghlu Aliyev, in Brussels at the end of October 2023. This meeting is to be facilitated by the President of the European Council, Mr Charles Michel, who is known to be an impartial mediator. Hopefully, the talks will result in a satisfactory solution for all parties involved, leading to durable peace.

Common Bonds exhibition: Intimate portraits and the pursuit of justice before the ICC

This year marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of the adoption of the Rome Statute, the international treaty that established the International Criminal Court (ICC). To mark the occasion, the ICC unveiled an exhibition entitled “Common Bonds”, first at the Atrium and then at the Grote Kerk event space in The Hague. An outdoor version of the exhibition will be on display along the Lange Voorhout from 24 October to 6 November 2023. The exhibition is free and open to the public

On 17 July 1998, 120 states adopted the Rome Statute, a treaty creating the first permanent international criminal court to investigate and try individuals accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, and now also the crime of aggression.

Today, a total of 123 states have ratified the treaty, which represents two-thirds of the states in the international community. In an effort to create a more just world and fight impunity, the Court has worked tirelessly to investigate and prosecute some of the world’s gravest crimes.

Since the signing of the Rome Statute in 1998, the Court has been and remains committed to act against atrocious crimes on a global scale. To commemorate and reflect on the impact of the Rome Statute’s first twenty-five years, the ICC launched this exhibition, which offers a glimpse into the stories of survivors, the conflicts under ICC investigations, and the work of the Court.

“Hunger and despair” Photo: UN Photo / UN / Alexis Duclos

The exhibition reflects on how we are “united by common bonds”, a quote from the very first sentence of the Rome Statute’s Preamble. As explained by H.E. Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi, President of the Assembly of States Parties (ASP): “In our fragmented world, it is indeed appropriate to emphasize the bonds that unite us. These are the ties that prompted us to work together for the creation of the first permanent criminal court and allowed us to succeed, against all odds, in that historic evening of 17 July 1998. Unfortunately, as the Preamble of the Statute also recognizes, our shared heritage is a delicate mosaic that may be shattered at any time. And indeed it has been shattered again and again since the creation of the Court. The atrocities of the XXth Century that led to the creation of the Court have not ceased.”

The ASP President continued: “The exhibit pays tribute to victims and survivors of these atrocities, focusing on those within the 17 situations under investigation or prosecution by the Court. For them, who have seen horror, there is hope of justice and reparations.”

This exhibition is hosted by the Assembly of States Parties and was produced by the ICC in collaboration with the Trust Fund for Victims (TFV). The photos and accompanying captions are for the purpose of the exhibition only. They do not represent, and are without prejudice to, the legal findings in specific cases and situations before the Court. The ICC is grateful for the generous support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Municipality of The Hague, and the European Union in producing this exhibition.

As a complementary court of last resort, the ICC has opened investigations into 17 situations over the past two decades, across four continents – Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Europe – bringing 31 cases to the Court, issuing 40 arrest warrants, 10 convictions and 4 acquittals. From the situation in Ukraine, to the so-called “war on drugs” in the Philippines, and to acts of violence that have displaced and harmed millions of people in Afghanistan, Darfur (Sudan), Venezuela and other countries, the “Common Bonds” exhibition highlights all 17 situations in which the Court has opened investigations.

“They burnt my home” Photo: Pete Muller

Working closely with photographers from around the world, the Court carefully curated the exhibition to reflect the voices of victims and survivors of atrocities and crimes that the Court is working to address. Many of the stories included in the exhibition were collected directly by the ICC while working in countries and interviewing people affected by the respective crimes. Some other stories were generously shared with the Court by partners or other international organizations. The photographs from the Democratic Republic of Congo were created in collaboration with the TFV and include some of the first ICC reparation stories to be made public in the Court’s history. The ICC’s system gives victims and survivors of crimes the opportunity to participate in the proceedings, thereby helping to bring those accused to justice.

“This exhibition seeks to tell stories that cannot be told by numbers or by data. Instead, these stories will be told through the medium of art and will, hopefully, leave us with a fresh perspective of the Court’s work and renewed commitment to its mandate,” said Judge Piotr Hofmański, ICC President, at the launch of the exhibition.

Each story focuses on a single person or family, a single experience of a conflict. A man forced to flee his country of Libya, an elderly Georgian woman whose house was burned to the ground, a man who was shot in the face in the Central African Republic – these are individual accounts, but there are thousands more stories of survival behind each of them.

“The bullet hit” Photo: Rena Effendi

The stories involve violence, suffering and loss, but also many other common threads: love, friendship, family, home, community, and hope. They are stories of humanity’s most serious crimes, but they also represent courageous individuals and a relentless pursuit of justice.

In the words of the ASP President: “Twenty-five years after the creation of the Court, our turbulent world needs more justice than ever. It is the time to demonstrate that the bonds that united us in 1998 continue to hold us together twenty five years down the road.”

New Specialist Prosecutor signs solemn declaration

Specialist Prosecutor Kimberly West signed a solemn declaration today, affirming her commitment to exercising her duties with independence, impartiality, and diligence. This pledge aligns with the stipulations outlined in Article 36 of the Law on Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office.

Ms. West assumed the role of Specialist Prosecutor in June 2023, following a selection process organized by the European Union. She brings a wealth of experience to the position, having served as a US prosecutor with a background in both domestic and international criminal investigations.

Ms. West is the third individual to hold the position of Specialist Prosecutor, succeeding Jack Smith, who served from 2018 to 2022, and David Schwendiman, who held the position from 2016 to 2018.

The Commercialized War Between Israel and Hamas

By Kung Chan

The sudden assault of Hamas of Israel has resulted in numerous debates on the actual culprit behind it – some argued that it was the United States, as usual, while others point their fingers at Iran.

However, the core issue likely stems from the Hamas regime itself. Despite not being recognized as a sovereign nation, this entity operates autonomously, mirroring the functions of a nation-state, complete with financial resources, diplomatic efforts, business interests, alliances, relationships, and a standing army. It stands as an autonomous quasi-state organization, essentially functioning as a private military company (PMC) group with both military capabilities and territorial control, bearing resemblance to entities like the Wagner Group. Notably, Hamas has displayed a remarkable degree of operational efficiency, surpassing even the Wagner Group in certain aspects.

There is a possibility that Hamas, acting as a PMC, started this conflict primarily due to financial difficulties. They were compelled by the pressing need for funds, feeling a significant constraint on their economic resources and growing uncertainties, which ultimately led to the current crisis.

The persistent financial challenges inherited from the Palestinian Authority (PA) have long been a prominent issue in the Middle East. Prior to Hamas assuming full control of Gaza, it boasted a workforce of around 58,000 civil servants engaged in various public institutions. Following the schism between Hamas and Fatah, the PA, primarily led by Fatah disengaged from Gaza. They requested Gaza’s civil servants to halt their work but continued disbursing their salaries. To ensure the regular functioning of Gaza’s government, Hamas appointed its own civil servants, totaling approximately 50,000 employees, and established an administrative system that ran in parallel with the West Bank.

In April 2017, the PA slashed its employees’ salaries in the Gaza Strip by 30-50%. In July of the same year, it decided to allow 6,145 civil servants in the Gaza Strip to retire early, which was seen as pressure on Hamas. However, it stated that the PA would consider withdrawing this decision if Hamas relinquished control of the Gaza Strip and accepted the conditions of Mahmoud Abbas’s government.

Hamas, of course, would not readily accept any suggestions or pressure to change its status. Hamas is a PMC and it chooses to fight. In fact, in the past, Hamas had many businesses and various sources of income and funding.

Since its emergence during the First Intifada in 1987, Hamas has been the beneficiary of significant economic assistance, notably from Gulf nations like Saudi Arabia, among others. During that period, the worsening political, economic, and social crises in Palestine provided Hamas with an opening to invest in the establishment of an extensive social services network, encompassing the construction of mosques and prayer halls. Hamas maintains a shroud of secrecy over its economic operations, but some income sources have come to light.

Firstly, there are individual contributions from Palestinians, Arab nations, and the international community. Hamas has received hundreds of millions through donation campaigns initiated by religious figures, such as the fundraising efforts of organizations like “Itilaf al-Khayr” (Union of Good) led by the prominent Qatar-based figure Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Islamic charitable institutions within Israel and charitable organizations affiliated with Hamas in Gaza maintain close connections, with a significant portion of their donations aimed at assisting the Palestinian people ultimately finding their way into Hamas’s coffers.

Another method is through money laundering. Hamas utilizes intermediaries or Palestinian importers to launder certain funds. These importers employ Hamas’s ‘black money’ to cover payments when procuring goods from abroad.

In addition, Hamas has established several financial and commercial entities. Israel recently took action against numerous currency exchange firms and food establishments in Gaza, alleging connections to Hamas. It is reported that due to investments from Hamas, many of these commercial entities have become profitable, consequently yielding a proportion of profits to Hamas.

The global landscape of power has adopted a hierarchical structure with varying capabilities. At one level, we find PMCs capable of engaging in commercial warfare, while another level comprises Western alliances and coalitions. Superpowers occupy their tier, and the rest fall into the category of ordinary nations. The capabilities and influence of these entities differ significantly, and unless one belongs to the ranks of superpowers, they may find it challenging to contend with PMCs. Hamas, operating as a PMC, maintains a similar presence in the Middle East, and even a formidable nation like Israel has faced difficulties in dealing with it.

This is a commercialized war, and the world has indeed changed.

About the author:

Chan Kung

Founder of ANBOUND Think Tank, Kung Chan is one of China’s renowned experts in information analysis. Most of his academic research activities are in economic information analysis, particularly in the area of public policy.

Maxime Mokom in the situation in the Central African Republic

On 16 October 2023, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Karim AA Khan KC notified the Pre-Trial Chamber II of the withdrawal of all the charges against Mr Maxime Jeoffroy Eli Mokom Gawaka pursuant to article 61(4) of the Rome Statute.

ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II during the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 22-24 August 2023 ©ICC-CPI

The Office will continue its work in the CAR situation within the existing cases before the Court seeking justice for the victims of the crimes committed in that situation.