Today the European Commission is presenting proposals to reform the Common European Asylum System by creating a more efficient system for allocating asylum applications among Member States.
The basic principle will remain the same – asylum seekers should, unless they have family elsewhere, apply for asylum in the first country they enter – but a new fairness mechanism will ensure no Member State is left with a disproportionate pressure on its asylum system.
Today’s proposals also include transforming the existing European Asylum Support Office (EASO) into a fully-fledged European Union Agency for Asylum to reflect its enhanced role in the new system and reinforcing of the EU’s fingerprinting database, Eurodac, in order to better manage the asylum system and to help tackle irregular migration.
First Vice-President Frans Timmermans said: “Managing migration better requires action on several fronts, to manage our external borders more effectively, cooperate better with third countries, put an end to smuggling and resettle refugees directly to the EU. We also know that people will keep arriving at our borders and ask for asylum, and we will need to make sure those who need protection receive it. Yet we have seen during this crisis how just a few Member States were placed under incredible strain because of the shortcomings of the present system, which was not designed to deal with situations of this kind. There’s simply no way around it: whenever a Member State is overwhelmed, there must be solidarity and a fair sharing of responsibility within the EU. This is what our proposal of today is meant to ensure.”
Commissioner for Migration and Home Affairs, Dimitris Avramopoulos, said: “If the current refugee crisis has shown one thing, it is that the status quo of our Common European Asylum System is not an option. The time has come for a reformed and more equitable system, based on common rules and a fairer sharing of responsibility. With the proposed reform of the Dublin system, the reinforcement of Eurodac and the transformation of EASO into a true European Agency for Asylum, today we are taking a major step in the right direction and putting in place the European-level structures and tools necessary for a future-proof comprehensive system. We will now put all our efforts into working side-by-side with the European Parliament and Member States. We must turn these proposals into reality as swiftly as possible.”
Today’s proposals are part of a first set of legislative proposals the Commission is presenting in the context of a major reform of the Common European Asylum System, as outlined in the Commission’s Communication of 6 April 2016. This reform is intended to form the medium term response to future migratory challenges. In the meantime, existing Dublin rules and the two emergency relocation decisions continue to apply and will be enforced by the Commission to the full.
Reforming the ‘Dublin’ System
The EU’s rules for determining which Member State is responsible for dealing with each asylum application (known as the Dublin System) were not designed to ensure a sustainable sharing of responsibility across the EU and guarantee timely processing of applications.
The new elements include:
A fairer system based on solidarity: The new system will automatically establish when a country is handling a disproportionate number of asylum applications. It will do this by reference to a country’s size and wealth.
f one country is receiving disproportionate numbers above and beyond that reference (over 150% of the reference number), all further new applicants in that country will (regardless of nationality) be relocated, after an admissibility verification of their application, across the EU until the number of applications is back below that level.
A Member State will also have the option to temporarily not take part in the reallocation. In that case, it would have to make a solidarity contribution of €250,000 for each applicant for whom it would otherwise have been responsible under the fairness mechanism, to the Member State that is reallocated the person instead;
A mechanism that also takes account of resettlement efforts: the fairness mechanism will also factor in the effort being made by a Member State to resettle those in need of international protection direct from a third country. This will acknowledge the importance of efforts to implement legal and safe pathways to Europe.
A system: with shorter time limits for sending transfer requests, receiving replies and carrying out transfers of asylum seekers between Member States, and removing shifts of responsibility;
Discouraging abuses and secondary movements: with clearer legal obligations for asylum applicants, including a duty to remain in the Member State responsible for their claim, geographic limits to the provision of material reception benefits and proportionate consequences in case of non-compliance;
Protecting asylum seekers’ best interests: with stronger guarantees for unaccompanied minors and a balanced extension of the definition of family members;
The UK and Ireland are not required but instead determine themselves the extent to which they want to participate in these measures, in accordance with the relevant Protocols attached to the Treaties. If they do not opt in, the current rules as they operate today will continue to apply to them, in line with the Treaties.
Reinforcing the Eurodac system
To support the implementation of the reformed Dublin System, the Commission is also proposing to adapt and reinforce the Eurodac system and to expand its purpose, facilitating returns and helping tackle irregular migration. The proposal will extend the scope of the Eurodac Regulation to include the possibility for Member States to store and search data belonging to third-country nationals or stateless persons who are not applicants for international protection and found irregularly staying in the EU, so that they can be identified for return and readmission purposes.
In full compliance with data protection rules, it will also allow Member States to store more personal data in Eurodac, such as names, dates of birth, nationalities, identity details or travel documents, and facial images of individuals. Increasing the information in the system will allow immigration and asylum authorities to easily identify an irregular third-country national or asylum applicant without having to request the information from another Member State separately, as is currently the case.
Establishing a European Union Agency for Asylum
The proposal will transform the existing European Asylum Support Office into a fully-fledged European Union Agency for Asylum with an enhanced mandate and considerably expanded tasks to address any structural weaknesses that arise in the application of the EU’s asylum system.
One of the main new tasks of the Agency will be to operate the reference key in order to apply the fairness mechanism under the new Dublin system. The Agency will also be tasked with ensuring a greater convergence in the assessment of applications for international protection across the Union, strengthening the practical cooperation and information exchange between Member States and promoting Union law and operational standards regarding asylum procedures, reception conditions and protection needs.
Similarly to what was proposed by the Commission for the European Border and Coast Guard Agency on 15 December 2015, the role and functions of the Asylum Agency regarding operational and technical assistance will be expanded. This will include the possibility to deploy asylum support teams from a reserve of experts composed of a minimum of 500 experts from Member States and experts seconded by the Agency, as well as a capacity to provide operational and technical assistance in cases where a Member State is subject to disproportionate pressure which places exceptionally heavy and urgent demands on its asylum or reception systems.
Photography by Euractiv
Wat een bal weekend! Het Tulpen Bal! / What a ball weekend! The Tulips Ball!
By Duke Michael of Mecklenburg.
The Tulips Ball Committee hosted its second edition of the Tulips Ball from 18 to 20 March 2016. In total, more than 140 guests visited the Grand Tulips Ball on March 19. The Netherlands, Germany, Armenia, Italy, the UK, Ireland, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, France, Lichtenstein, Romania, Spain, the US, and Hong Kong SAR, China were all were present at this years’ Tulips Ball!
With such an international crowd and more than 300 tulips, the Ball Committee was proud to have hosted the Tulips Ball at Hotel van Oranje. The weekend featured a lot of fun, laughing, dancing, interesting conversations and cultural appreciation in the wonderful city of Noordwijk. Diplomat Magazine congratulates the Tulips Ball Committee and especially Clemens van Steijn, the initiator of this great success.
On Friday 18 of March the ball weekend started with an exceptional programme highlight: a morning horse riding trip along the beach in Noordwijk! After a refreshing start, the noon and afternoon were free and the guests came back for the Eintanzen to get to know the other guests or speak with familiar faces.
There was a short dancing lesson in Friesenrock and Waltz for those who wanted to learn the basics or improve their style. After the lesson, one side of the room’s walls slid aside, revealing tables and a delicious dinner buffet. Having eaten and feeling refreshed, the dance floor filled rapidly, accompanied by a variety of music enabling everyone to find their moment to dance to their preferences.
As it grew late, the after-party got into full swing. The whole crowd found enough energy to sing along to songs from all over the world played by a pianist until well after midnight.
On Saturday noon, the ball crowd visited the nearby city of Leiden to do some sightseeing by boat through the old channel system of the University City. The Tulips Ball guests were warmly welcomed by the captain of ‘Rederij Rembrandt’, who provided them with a typically Dutch drink called Jenever.
This made sure that even though it was still very early and some of the guests had only caught a short night of sleep, the perfect atmosphere was created to enjoy some of the great sights Leiden has to offer. After a relaxing trip, the group had lunch next to the castle of Leiden in the Koetshuis de Burcht in the historical city centre. Guests then had a free afternoon which allowed everyone to prepare and dress up for the Grand Tulips Ball.
As guests arrived for the evening, the weekend came to its peak. The Grand Tulips Ball was opened by Clemens van Steijn with a fine opening speech, welcoming the guests, thanking all supporters and encouraging everyone to enjoy the special evening to the fullest extent. This was followed by a speech of the mayor of Noordwijk, Jan Rijpstra, who welcomed all guests to the beautiful city of Noordwijk, and wished everyone a great evening. Finally, a third speech was given regarding the charity aspect of the ball.
A wonderful dinner was then served to everyone’s satisfaction. During the main course, charity raffle tickets were sold. The main price was provided by Hermance Gransberg – Baroness van Heeckeren van Kell (attelier2adorn) who received a gilded roe head on a pedestal. Furthermore, Hotel van Oranje, Countess Yasmin von Schweinitz and Krain (Lunari.de), Museum van Loon and L’Oreal generously donated to the charity tombola.
More than 1,000 euros was collected and donated to the foundation Het Vergeten Kind. After the main course and a fantastic dessert, the music started to play and the opening Waltz commenced and was joined by many guests, after the first dance by the Ball Committee. After some classical music, the song Staying Alive by the Bee Gees brought most of the guests onto the dance floor to dance Friesenrock, which is a mix of rock and roll and swing. In German it is called a Knotentanz. Towards midnight, the prizes from the raffle tickets were read out and given to the winners.
The dancing then continued until the early hours. On the final day of the weekend, the guests had an opportunity to observe holy mass or a chapel service. At noon, the guests also had a chance to use the facilities of Hotel van Oranje, which included a spa and other relaxing activities.
Overall, the atmosphere was great and the Ball Committee received much positive feedback. The Ball Committee is certain that there will be another Tulips Ball in the coming year. After the Tulips Ball weekend, some of the far-traveling guests stayed a bit longer to enjoy some of the great sights the Netherlands has to offer.
The Keukenhof, Amsterdam and of course The Hague were on the agenda and ensured the Tulips Ball mood was sustained long after the ball weekend. The Ball Committee is very enthusiastic about next year’s ball and has already started working on some ideas to make the next ball an ever greater success than that of this year. In order to do so, the Committee is open to suggestions and is looking forward to expanding cooperation with diplomatic and other organisations that wish to support the ball or its charity cause in any way they see fit.
Moreover, the ball committee would be delighted to invite to the ball guests from the diplomatic community in the Netherlands and beyond.
For more information, please visit the website: www.tulipsball.com
European Commission opens way for decision by June on visa-free travel for citizens of Turkey
The European Commission is today proposing to the European Parliament and Council of the European Union to lift the visa requirements for the citizens of Turkey, under the understanding that the Turkish authorities will fulfil, as a matter of urgency and as they committed to do so on 18 March 2016, the outstanding benchmarks of its Visa Liberalisation Roadmap. The proposal is presented together with a Report on progress by Turkey in fulfilling the requirements of the Roadmap.
First Vice-President Frans Timmermans said: “Turkey has made impressive progress, particularly in recent weeks, on meeting the benchmarks of its visa liberalisation roadmap. There is still work to be done as a matter of urgency but if Turkey sustains the progress made, they can meet the remaining benchmarks. This is why we are putting a proposal on the table which opens the way for the European Parliament and the Member States to decide to lift visa requirements, once the benchmarks have been met.”
Commissioner for Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship, Dimitris Avramopoulos said: “The Turkish authorities have made remarkable progress since the 18 March EU-Turkey Summit and we trust Turkey is committed to delivering on all fronts as soon as possible. On the understanding that all benchmarks will be met as a matter of urgency, the Commission has decided to put forward a proposal to transfer Turkey to the list of visa-free countries. Of course, the Commission will continue to monitor the continuous fulfilling of these criteria.”
Visa liberalisation for Turkey is a key component of the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016 which stated that the fulfilment of the visa liberalisation roadmap will be accelerated with a view to lifting the visa requirements for Turkish citizens at the latest by the end of June 2016, provided that all benchmarks have been met. In order to meet a June deadline for adoption by the co-legislators, a Commission proposal to put Turkey on the visa-free list has to be tabled at the beginning of May to allow an eight-week period to elapse between a draft being made available to national Parliaments and its adoption.
The Progress Report adopted today assesses progress made to date by Turkey in implementing the benchmarks, identifies outstanding benchmarks and sets out the concrete measures that Turkey needs to meet in order to complete the remaining requirements, in areas such as the fight against corruption, data protection, judicial cooperation with all Member States, enhanced cooperation with EUROPOL and revision of the legislation and practices on terrorism.
In a number of exceptional cases, the acceleration of the Roadmap’s implementation has made completion of some benchmarks, such as a full roll-out of biometric passports and a review of the implementation of the EU-Turkey readmission agreement (fully applicable only as of 1 June), impossible to date. In others, the Commission acknowledges the good progress made by the Turkish authorities so far, and encourages them to urgently step up these efforts to meet all requirements in order to obtain visa liberalisation by the end of June.
Visa-free travel will apply to all EU Member States except for Ireland and the UK, and to the four Schengen associated countries (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland). The exemption concerns only short stays of up to 90 days (in any 180-day period) for business, tourist or family purposes, among others. The visa exemption does not provide for the right to work in the EU. Other entry conditions for accessing the Schengen area will continue to apply, including the need to be able to prove their purpose of travel and sufficient subsidence means.
As for all countries listed in Annex II of the Visa Regulation and whose citizens can travel visa-free to Europe, the safeguard clause introduced in the beginning of 2014 will apply to visa-free travel for citizens of Turkey. Taking into account recent discussions with Member States on the EU’s visa policy as a whole, the Commission has today proposed to strengthen this suspension mechanism to make it easier for Member States to notify circumstances leading to a possible suspension and enabling the Commission to trigger the mechanism on its own initiative.
Background
The European Union launched the Visa Liberalisation Dialogue with Turkey on 16 December 2013, in parallel with the signature of the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement. The Visa Liberalisation Dialogue is based on the Roadmap towards a visa free regime with Turkey, a document setting out the requirements that Turkey needs to meet in order to enable the Commission to propose to the European Parliament and the Council an amendment to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 which would allow Turkish citizens to travel without a visa for short stays of 90 days within any 180-day period for business, touristic or family purposes, in the Schengen area.
The 72 requirements listed in the Roadmap are organised in five thematic groups: document security; migration management; public order and security; fundamental rights and readmission of irregular migrants.
On 20 October 2014, the Commission adopted its First Report on progress by Turkey in fulfilling the requirements of its visa liberalisation roadmap. The First Report assessed the fulfilment of each requirement and issued recommendations for making further progress in all of them.
At the EU-Turkey Summit of 29 November 2015, activating the EU-Turkey Joint Action Plan, the EU welcomed the commitment by Turkey to accelerate the fulfilment of the Visa Roadmap benchmarks vis-à-vis all participating Member States. Turkey committed to accelerating the fulfilment of the Roadmap, including by bringing forward the application of all the provisions of the EU-Turkey Readmission agreement.
On 4 March 2016, the Commission adopted its Second Report on progress by Turkey in fulfilling the requirements of its visa liberalisation roadmap. The Report welcomed the new level of engagement and determination demonstrated by the Turkish authorities.
At the EU-Turkey Summit of 18 March, Turkey committed to accelerating the fulfilment of the Roadmap even further. In the Joint Statement after this meeting, the 28 EU Heads of State or Government committed to lifting the visa requirements for Turkish citizens at the latest by the end of June 2016, provided that all 72 benchmarks of the Roadmap are fulfilled.
Photography by Curaçao Chronicle.
From Traditional aid to Responsible Trade: the role of the private sectorBy Prof. Dr. André Nijhof & Nika Salvetti
At present many governments are in a transition from traditional aid to responsible trade and the Netherlands is at the forefront of this development. What is the background of this transition and why is the private sector involved in addressing development cooperation objectives?
Traditional aid starts with the definition introduced by the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) which in 1972 described the Official Development Assistance (ODA) as those flows of capital, goods and services to countries and territories on the DAC list of ODA recipients and to multilateral institutions with the aim to promote economic development and welfare of developing countries. At that time the formulation of a common international definition was necessary to enable the measurement and comparison of spending by donor countries. However only funding provided by public authorities could qualify as ODA. So no place for responsible trade at that time.
The approach to aid for developing countries has been since changing. A main reason is that the provision of development cooperation through aid is now part of a more vast and complex global agenda which expanded its horizon to new goals, such as climate change, migration and security, taking into account the new UN Sustainable Development goals (post 2015). Also the financial instruments used for aid provision are becoming more complex and innovative; special forms of insurances and guarantees to minimize risks for private funding as well as public private financial and technical partnerships.
Donors are also increasing in the form of private funding flows through charity, remittances and direct investments. But the most relevant reason for change, as also emphasized in Rome (2003), Paris (2005), Accra (2008) and Busan (2011), is motivated by the need to ensure aid effectiveness by mutual efforts and co-responsibility of donors and recipient countries.
The challenge at this point is to couple aid with the benefits of trade and investment to promote a sustainable and inclusive growth. How to do this is still work in progress but a promising example is the public-private partnership that resulted in an eco-system supporting business at the base of the pyramid. Since its launch in November 2014 the Inclusive Business Accelerator has grown to a global platform, assisting more than 180 ventures across 37 different geographies with the required ammunition to scale up their business and increase their benefits for low income communities (see iba.ventures). And many more examples will follow with the implementation of the “A world to Gain: A New agenda for Aid, Development and Trade” policy of the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
About the authors:Prof Dr André Nijhof is full professor in Sustainable Business and Stewardship and is visiting professor at Chang Gung University in Taiwan and the University for Peace in Costa Rica.Nika Salvetti is a PhD candidate and practitioner in the field of CSR, Sustainability, Social Responsibility where she worked on in different developing countries such as Bangladesh, Uganda, Guatemala, as well as in Costa Rica, the overall Balkans and Middle East.About Nyenrode Business UniversiteitNyenrode Business Universiteit is the only private university in the Netherlands, founded for and by business. Nyenrode pillars of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Stewardship are reflected in all of their programs which include undergraduate and graduate degrees in management, business, finance and accounting.Nyenrode is a proud partner of Diplomat Magazine. Together, they have developed the Nyenrode – Diplomat Magazine Award which recognizes the talents from the diplomat network in the Netherlands and worldwide by providing them with exclusive scholarships for the programs Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Master (MSc) in Management, full-time International MBA and part-time Executive MBA. For more information visit www.nyenrodemasters.nl/diplomat and register for the launching event on June 1st at the Carlton Ambassador Den Haag.
H. E. Brett Mason, Ambassador of Australia.When the politicians fail and the diplomats can’t find an answer and the light of peace is blown out – it is young men like those buried all around us this morning who too often make the ultimate sacrifice.Young men, such as Pilot Officer Sampson of the RNZAF, who died in May 1943, aged 22 and beside him, Flight Sergeant Speechley of the RAAF, who died in July 1943, aged just 20. Both sought to liberate this beautiful country during the Second World War. Their deaths are tragic. But the greater tragedy would be to forget. The scriptures tell us (Ecclesiasticus 44:9) that;“there are some who have no memorial, who have perished as though they had not lived.”Well, no soldier is forgotten in Australia or New Zealand. All their names are etched in our memorials and their sacrifice in our hearts. Just like those two young men – who died in our cause and whom we will never forget.-Excerpt from the ANZAC Day 2016 speech by H.E. Dr Brett Mason
ANZAC Day is an important day in the Australian calendar. It commemorates all Australian and New Zealand troops killed in war and also honours returned servicemen and women.
The date of April 25 is the anniversary of the landing of Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZACs), on the Gallipoli peninsula in 1915. They landed there with the aim to capture the Dardanelles, an important strategic location, from the Turks. As the campaign started at dawn, ANZAC Day commemorations are often held at dawn.
Gallipoli was only one part of the significant contribution and sacrifice ANZACs made in the Great War.
Ambassador Brett Mason and Father Sjaak de Boer.
ANZAC Day 2016 was commemorated in The Hague ceremony at Westduin Cemetery. This ceremony was led by Father Sjaak de Boer from the Church of Our Saviour.
With readings given by: H.E. Dr Brett Mason, Ambassador of Australia; H.E. Ms Janet Lowe, Ambassador of New Zealand; H.E. Mr Sadık Arslan, Ambassador of the Republic of Turkey; Lieutenant Colonel Arthur Tsamis, Australian Defence Force and Thomas Binns, Australian student.
After the ceremony the attendees moved to the Ambassador’s residence for a gunfire breakfast. So called because of the Gunfire Coffee (coffee with a splash of rum), drank by the soldiers of Gallipoli as a form of Dutch courage.
Lest we forget.
Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives… You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours…You, the mothers, who sent their sons from far away countries wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.-Quotation from Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1934As read by H.E. Mr Sadık Arslan, Ambassador of the Republic of Turkey.Fotography by Carlijn Hermans.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is launching a new website at www.icc-cpi.int on Monday, 9 May 2016. The new site is designed with a user-centred, mobile-friendly approach. The refreshed visual identity and design is combined with revamped content to make information about the Court more easily accessible.
The new structure aims to help users find what they need effortlessly, whether they are seeking an introduction to the Court or to conduct in-depth research on Court records and judicial developments. This is paired with a strong search engine and short URLs. The website will still be available in the Court’s working languages, English and French. Most features are available within one click of the homepage.
The ICC invites its website users to mark their calendars to explore the new website and refresh all favourites and bookmarks. Follow us this week on Twitter as we unveil key features of the new site.
The trial in the case The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda before the International Criminal Court (ICC) continued from 18 to 21 April 2016 with the testimony of the 17th Prosecution witness, expert John Charles Yuille.
Bosco Ntaganda, former Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Force Patriotiques pour la Libération du Congo [Patriotic Force for the Liberation of Congo] (FPLC), is accused of 13 counts of war crimes (murder and attempted murder; attacking civilians; rape; sexual slavery of civilians; pillaging; displacement of civilians; attacking protected objects; destroying the enemy’s property; and rape, sexual slavery, enlistment and conscription of child soldiers under the age of fifteen years and using them to participate actively in hostilities) and five crimes against humanity (murder and attempted murder; rape; sexual slavery; persecution; forcible transfer of population) allegedly committed in Ituri, DRC, in 2002-2003.
Mr Ntaganda is in the Court’s custody. His trial at the ICC opened on 2 September 2015 before Trial Chamber VI, which is composed of Judge Robert Fremr, Presiding Judge, Judge Kuniko Ozaki, and Judge Chang-ho Chung.
Dr. Atsushi Sano.By Roy Lie A Tjam.
The 150th Ph.D. defence graduate at Institute of Social Studies (ISS) is a milestone worth celebrating. Ph.D. researchers are the backbone of ISS, so on the 21st of April 2016, the historical moment was commemorated.
One hundred and fifty Ph.D. research projects mean one hundred and fifty personal stories and experiences, a feat that cannot go unnoticed.
The Institute of Social Studies is an international research institute located in The Hague but is a part of the Erasmus University Rotterdam that specialises in the field of development studies. It was established in 1952, where it was the first of its kind in Europe, at present there are over 100 Ph.D. researchers, with these researchers mostly coming from developing countries with emerging economies.
The 150th Ph.D. defence graduate was Dr. Atsushi Sano who specialised on the topic of Victimhood and Agency in the Sex Trade. His thesis on experiences and perceptions of teenage girls in rural West Java investigated the entry of adolescent girls from rural West Java (Indonesia) into commercial sex work, with a focus on their experiences and perceptions of the forms of injustice they are exposed to. Sano’s desire to research this topic further stemmed from when he observed young girls selling beverages in a Jakarta’s sex district in 2001.For various reasons, it took him 10 years to complete.
Dr. Atsushi Sano’s research revealed that procurement of young women for sex establishments in Jakarta is run and sustained by informal but well-established sex-trade recruiting networks with connections in both rural Indramayu.
Fellow Ph.D. colleagues and invitees also attended the historical 150th Ph.D. public defense and this particular segment of the sex sector in Jakarta.
The study also finds disturbing evidence of the results of well-intended counter-trafficking interventions implemented by both international- and Indonesian organizations. Institutions in general should primarily listen to what the victim has to say rather than executing what politicians deem fit or following presumptions of international donor agencies.
Examiner Dr. Karin Arts highlighted how she would have liked to see more about human rights in the thesis. Interestingly, after analysing the remarks by the young women involved in commercial sex works suggest that their involvement is to an extent, related to the betterment of their parents and family’s economical situation.
Dr. Atsushi Sano’s daughter Ms. Haruka Sano and his father Mr. Masayoshi Sano and mother
Mrs. Yoshiko Sano, came all the way from his native Japan to witness his ceremony. Fellow Ph.D. colleagues and invitees also attended the historical 150th Ph.D. public defense. A reception concluded the solemn ceremony.
By Baron Henri Estramant.
The Czech Republic’s leaders have chosen “Czechia” as the one-word alternative appellation of their country to facilitate for companies, politicians and sportsmen to use on products, name tags, and sporting jerseys.
The choice, agreed on Thursday evening, 14 April 2016, by the president, prime minister, heads of parliament and foreign and defence ministers, has won the cabinet’s approval before the foreign ministry can lodge the name with the United Nations so that it becomes the country’s official short version.
The Czech Republic emerged, along with Slovakia, from the peaceful breakup of the old Czechoslovakia in 1993. However hitherto there has been no standardised one-word English name for the Czech Republic, unlike, for instance, France, the shortened version of the French Republic.
That has led to a lot of head-scratching. The largest part of the country is known as Bohemia (“Čechy” in Czech), but there are also other regions, Moravia, and Silesia, so one name is needed that does not exclude those historical lands.
In other languages, including Dutch (Tsjechië), French (Tchéquie), German (Tschechien), the Czech Republic is already designated by a single name, but in Czech itself the name “Česko” has made slow progress since 1993 and “Čechy” (or Bohemia) is still commonly used to signify the entire country.
For more information:
Mission of Czechia to the EU, H. E. Ambassador Martin Povejšil: www.mzv.cz/representation_brussels/en/
Embassy of Czechia to Belgium, H. E. Ambassador Jaroslav Kurfürst: www.mzv.cz/brussels
Embassy of Czechia to The Netherlands, H. E. Ambassador Jana Reinišová: www.mzv.cz/hague
Embassy of Czechia to Luxembourg, H. E. Ambassador Petr Kubernát: www.mzv.cz/luxembourg
Final results of a referendum on the Dominion of New Zealand’s flag show 56.6% voted for no change while 43.1% opted for the new design. Just over 2,1m ballots were cast.
Prime Minister John Key had advocated the new flag after launching the process in 2014, nevertheless, called upon New Zealanders to embrace the people’s decision.
The existing design features the British Union Jack, a legacy of New Zealand’s days as a British Crown colony and the reason many longed to change it.
The proposed new design combined four red stars representing the Southern Cross constellation (also seen in the current flag) with a silver fern on a blue background with black infill in the corner; both motifs commonly associated with New Zealand and its famous rugby team. The Silver Fern was chosen in the first referendum last December from a shortlist of five candidates.
Total cost of referendum process came up to NZ$26m ($17m, £12m)
For more information:
Mission of New Zealand to the EU and NATO, Embassy to Sweden, H. E. Ambassador David Taylor: https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/europe/belgium/new-zealand-embassy/david-taylor/
Embassy of New Zealand to The Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Finland, Mission to the OPCW, H. E. Ambassador Janet Lowe: https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/europe/netherlands/new-zealand-embassy/
Embassy of New Zealand to Belgium, Luxembourg, Bulgaria and Romania, H. E. Ambassador Paula Wilson: https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/europe/belgium/#Embassies