Appeals Chamber confirms Stanišić’s and Župljanin’s sentences

0
The Appeals Chamber today confirmed the convictions of Mićo Stanišić, former Minister of the Interior of Republika Srpska, and Stojan Župljanin, former Chief of the Regional Security Services Centre of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). The Appeals Chamber affirmed that Stanišić and Župljanin are criminally responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in BiH in 1992, in 20 and eight municipalities respectively. The Judges affirmed both of the accused’s sentences of 22 years’ imprisonment. The Appeals Chamber dismissed all of Stanišić’s and Župljanin’s grounds of appeal. It confirmed their convictions for committing, through participation in a joint criminal enterprise (JCE), persecutions as a crime against humanity and murder and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war. Župljanin’s convictions for committing extermination, through participation in a JCE, and ordering persecutions through plunder as crimes against humanity were also affirmed. Both of the accused alleged in their appeals that their right to a fair trial was violated as a result of the participation of Judge Frederik Harhoff in the trial proceedings. The Appeals Chamber rejected their arguments and found that Judge Harhoff’s disqualification in the Šešelj case does not automatically disqualify him from other cases. The Judges also concluded that the Appellants “have failed to demonstrate that a reasonable observer, properly informed of all the relevant circumstances, would reasonably apprehend bias on the part of Judge Harhoff in this case”. Stanišić further argued in his appeal that the Trial Chamber failed to provide a reasoned opinion as to how his acts and conduct furthered the JCE, and whether his contribution to the JCE was significant. The Appeals Chamber agreed that the Trial Chamber failed to provide a reasoned opinion in this respect and subsequently conducted its own assessment. It concluded that the Trial Chamber’s underlying factual findings ― with the exception of certain findings the Appeals Chamber found to be erroneous ― and relevant evidence support the conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that Stanišić significantly contributed to the JCE. The Appeals Chamber also affirmed the Trial Chamber’s conclusion that Župljanin significantly contributed to the JCE. In relation to whether Stanišić and Župljanin possessed the requisite intent to be held liable under the JCE, the Appeals Chamber established that the Trial Chamber committed certain factual errors regarding both Appellants. However, on the basis of the remaining factors, the Appeals Chamber found that these errors do not impact the Trial Chamber’s conclusion that both Stanišić and Župljanin possessed the requisite intent. Župljanin also challenged his conviction for extermination as a crime against humanity. With respect to an incident in which 20 detainees died during their transport to Manjača detention camp, the Appeals Chamber found that the Trial Chamber failed to provide a reasoned opinion by failing to make the necessary finding on the mens rea of the principal perpetrators. However, following an assessment of the Trial Chamber’s underlying findings and relevant evidence, the Appeals Chamber concluded that the Trial Chamber’s error does not invalidate the Trial Judgement. The Appeals Chamber granted the Prosecution’s second ground of appeal, which argued that the Trial Chamber erred in law by failing to enter convictions for the crimes of murder, torture, deportation, and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity in addition to the convictions for the crime of persecutions as a crime against humanity. In doing so, the Appeals Chamber referred to the well-established jurisprudence that convictions for the crime of persecutions and other crimes against humanity based on the same conduct are permissibly cumulative. The Appeals Chamber, however, declined to enter new convictions on appeal. Mićo Stanišić and Stojan Župljanin were initially indicted by the Tribunal in 2005 and 1999, respectively. In September 2008, a motion to join the two cases was granted by the Pre-Trial Chamber. The trial commenced on 14 September 2009 and concluded on 1 June 2012. The Trial Judgement was rendered on 27 March 2013 and the Prosecution and the Defence filed their notices of appeal on 13 May 2013. The Appeal Hearing took place on 16 December 2015. The Appeals Chamber was composed of Judge Carmel Agius, Presiding, Judge Liu Daqun, Judge Christoph Flügge, Judge Fausto Pocar, and Judge Koffi Kumelio A. Afanđe. Judge Liu and Judge Afanđe appended a separate opinion. Since its establishment, the Tribunal has indicted 161 persons for serious violations of humanitarian law committed on the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991. Proceedings against 153 accused individuals have been concluded. Proceedings are currently ongoing for 8 accused.  

First legal training at ICC

0
The Registrar of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Herman von Hebel, just concluded the first three-day training session for counsel to be held at the new ICC premises in The Hague, the Netherlands with the participation of 122 lawyers registered on the ICC List of Counsel. This training was held as a follow up to the “Second Sub-Regional Seminar of Counsel and the Legal Profession of the ICC”, held in Arusha in February 2016. Over the last three days, the participants focussed on the understanding of the applicable law in relation to cross-examinations, the role of the lead defence counsel and the counsel assisting a witness, the applicable deontological rules in relation to the investigation, and the submission of evidence during the process. The training session also allowed representatives of the Court and members of its List of Counsel the opportunity to share experiences, discuss issues of mutual interest and how to address challenges together.
ICC
From left to right: Participants to the training session for counsel at the seat of the ICC in The Hague; ICC Registrar Herman von Hebel closes the training session, 29 June 2016. © ICC-CPI
In his closing remarks, the ICC Registrar thanked the trainers, Avocats sans frontières, as well as the European Commission for its financial support for this training. He referred to the topics discussed during this three-day training as “very relevant for the current work of the Court, as well as the Court’s future, and it is with satisfaction that I take note of the continuous interest of counsel in the ongoing developments at the ICC and its changing environment”.  He also assured all the participants that “the Court will do its utmost to enhance its consultation practices, and will remain committed to consultations with the legal profession”.      

La Fête Nationale Luxembourgeoise aux Pays-Bas

  By Roy Lie A Tjam. On 22 June 2016, the Ambassador of Luxembourg, H.E. Mr. Pierre-Louis Lorenz organized a fabulous reception-concert on the occasion of the National Day of Luxembourg. The concert was by the Luxembourg jazz duo ‘Dock in Absolute’ Jean-Philippe Koch (piano) and David Kintziger (guitar bass) The venue chosen for the reception concert was the Glazenzaal in The Hague. A similar event was earlier held in Maastricht. After the welcome words by H.E. Pierre-Louis Lorenz in Dutch/ Luxembourgeoise, the group Dock in Absolute interpreted the national anthem and the Wilhelmus the anthem of Luxembourg’s Royal House, distinct from the Dutch National Anthem, both sharing the same origin.
?
Spouses of Ambassador of Mexico, Spain, Tunisia, Cuba, Luxembourg, Uruguay, Peru, Panama, Philippines and Pakistan during the event.
Ambassador Pierre-Louis Lorenz further  added: ‘Excellencies, friends, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen, leiw Letzebuerger I am happy to welcome you here in the Glazenzaal to celebrate with you our National Day. I shall be brief, not because there is little to say, but rather that there might be too much to say. The last year was a good one for Luxembourg, we are out of the crisis mode and back to pre-crisis growth figures, even if there is reason to keep prudent and alert. On the European stage Luxembourg faced a difficult semestrial EU presidency, difficult because so many unexpected crisis moments opened up, but we succeeded to hand over the presidency gavel to The Netherlands in an orderly fashion and in good shape. In a regional perspective, 2016 is for us the year of the Benelux presidency, a yearlong occasion where we try together with Belgium and The Netherlands to be as ambitious as possible, especially in a period where Europe doubts its own strength and future. Yesterday I celebrated with the citizens of Maastricht our National Day, a city which is inspired by the European spirit as much as my own country. Luxembourgers like to say that they have two fatherlands, a small one and a larger one, Europe, the Europe of the Union. As much as we need our motherland that is the anchor which we call home, as much we need Europe to contribute to stability and security in the competition on the global stage. We cherish both and we want for both an inspiring future. Tomorrow, the 23rd , is the actual day we celebrate in Luxembourg, and if Luxembourgers can formulate a wish for that occasion, it would be to stay together united on our continent. I promised to be brief, and I would now like to let our two musicians continue.’ Laten wij nu naar Luxemburgse traditie proosten: / Let me now pronounce the traditional toast: VIVE LETZEBUERG / VIVE DE GRAND-DUC

Certificate of Merit to Ambassador Aguilera Peralta

By Roy Lie A Tjam. On 24 June H.E. Gabriel Aguilera Peralta, Ambassador of the Republic of Guatemala was honored for his outstanding contribution, in enhancing the bilateral ties between the Guatemala and The Kingdom of the Netherlands. He was also honored his support to the Diplomatic Community and Diplomat Magazine. After the playing of the national anthem of the Netherlands and Guatemala, H. E. Sergio Ugalde Godinez, Ambassador of Costa Rica addressed Ambassador Mr. Gabriel Aguilera Peralta. In his valediction discourse, Ambassador Sergio Ugalde Godinez started by thanking Diplomat Magazine for hosting the Ceremony, and for taking up the notable initiative to bid a private farewell recognition ceremony to diplomats who have carried out exceptional work in the Netherlands. Sergio Ugalde Godinez continued, “I cannot think of someone more deserving than the distinguished Ambassador of Guatemala, H. E. Gabriel Aguilera Peralta. For additional Kim Vermaat’s pictures, please open the following link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/121611753@N07/albums/72157669674016561
IMG_3741
H.E. Aida Luz Santos de Escobar, Ambassador of El Salvador, H.E. Fermin Quinones Sanchez, Ambassador of Cuba, H.E. Sergio Ugalde Godinez Ambassador of Costa Rica and honour speaker of the ceremony; H.E. Enrique Rodriguez Veltze, Ambassador of Bolivia and H.E. Carlos Herrera, Ambassador of Peru.
I am also honored to have been asked to give some words to celebrate the remarkable work that Ambassador Aguilera has carried out on behalf of Guatemala in the Netherlands. Although Gabriel has been in the Netherlands for only about to two years, his contributions to the strengthening of the ties of both countries are quite tangible. Not only was he the subject of a very warm welcome by His Majesty, King Willem-Alexander, but he quickly managed to have Guatemala in the sights of the Foreign Ministry, at the highest levels. This led to a visit by Foreign Minister Bert Koenders to Guatemala early last year. The visit not only was very successful, something the Foreign Minister commented about, but it truly served to raise awareness at the Dutch Foreign Ministry of the importance to re-open an Embassy in Guatemala, which I believe is under consideration.  
IMG_3786
H.E. Carlos Herrera, Ambassador of Peru, the Ambassador of Argentina, H.E. Hector Horacio Salvador, H.E. Fermin Quinones Sanchez, Ambassador of Cuba, H.E. Gabriel Aguilera Peralta Ambassador of Guatemala, H.E. Willys Delvalle, Ambassador of Panama, H.E. Aida Luz Santos de Escobar, Ambassador of El Salvador, H.E. Sergio Ugalde Godinez Ambassador of Costa Rica and H.E. Enrique Rodriguez Veltze, Ambassador of Bolivia.
Ambassador Aguilera also made significant efforts to have a firm Guatemalan cultural and commercial presence in the Netherlands. One of the very first activities that I, as Costa Rican Ambassador had the honor to participate in, was a Meet and Greet organized together with the Diplomat Magazine, at this very venue. This activity took place precisely during the time that Ambassador Aguilera was the chair of the Group of Central American countries, and his was the initiative to make the activity the success it was. But the Guatemalan visible presence did not stop there, I recall a number of other activities, particularly related to culture and society, which enriched us with knowledge about the extraordinary qualities of the Guatemalan people. This insight, no doubt, bridges a better understanding by the Dutch and expats alike, of Guatemala.
IMG_3751
H.E. Sergio Ugalde Godinez Ambassador of Costa Rica to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
But Gabriel´s most significant characteristic is his remarkable personae. He is of a soft touch but of a distinguishable charisma, knowledge and wisdom. His gentle approach is exemplary, as is his joyful character. His most recognizable legacy is to have built numerous new relations with peoples of all spheres of the Dutch society. I myself am grateful for having been able to meet Ambassador Aguilera, and to have been able to share insights with him of a number of issues, from International Law to Peace and Security in Central America. Being the extraordinary academic he is, I think most of his colleagues would have to agree that we have learned much from him. It is of course with great admiration and joy that we all gather today to witness the presentation of a Certificate of Merit for his contributions to strengthening the bilateral ties between Guatemala and the Netherlands. Very well deserved!”In his response, H. E. Gabriel Aguilera Peralta thanked all for attending the ceremony. He indicated how much he appreciated his posting in the Netherlands. However, his government has decided to assign him to another post. Furthermore, he observed, an Ambassador has more than one live, each new assignment is the commandment of a new life. The ceremony concluded with a reception.          

Guðni Jóhannesson elected President of Iceland

0
By Baron Henri Estramant  Saturday, 25 June 2016, Reykjavik: Guðni Jóhannesson is Iceland’s novel president-elect. Jóhanesson won 39.1 percent of the vote, or more precisely 71,356 ballots. Dr Guðni Thorlacius Jóhannesson, shall become Iceland’s sixth president. He was born on 26 June 1968, making him the youngest Iceland president ever elected. He holds a PhD in history from Queen Mary University of London. Jóhannesson is hitherto an associate professor at the University of Iceland. His wife is Eliza Reid hails from Canada. She is a journalist and businesswoman. In addition to working as associate professor, Jóhannesson has published numerous works on history, including works on the Cold Wars and the Icelandic presidency. The president-elect will be inaugurated on 1 August at Bessastaðir, the Icelandic official residence for the head of state. Iceland has been a republic since a referendum on 17 June 1944 called for the abrogation of the Kingdom of Iceland in order to be replaced by a parliamentarian republic, and the severance of ties with Denmark. Until then, Iceland and Denmark shared a monarch as their head of state, namely King Kristján X of Iceland (Christian X of Denmark). Denmark was in charged of Iceland’s defense as well as foreign affairs albeit it had become a fully-fledged sovereign kingdom on 1 December 1918. For more information: President of Iceland: http://english.forseti.is Guðni Thorlacius Jóhannesson: http://gudnith.is/en/front_page/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guðni_Th._Jóhannesson  

Eurojust – Ukraine Agreement

0
Eurojust and Ukraine sign an Agreement on Cooperation   Ms Michèle Coninsx, President of Eurojust, and the Prosecutor General of Ukraine, Mr Yuriy Lutsenko, signed an Agreement on Cooperation  on June 27, at a ceremony at the European Commission, in the presence of Ms Věra Jourová, EU Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality. Conclusion of a cooperation agreement with a third State usually leads to a greater number of cases between the third State and Eurojust. With the inclusion of Ukraine, Eurojust has signed nine such cooperation agreements to date. Cooperation with third States is a crucial element in combating serious crime, particularly organised crime and terrorism. In practice, cooperation agreements enable the exchange of operational data, including personal data, in line with European standards on data protection. They also provide for the possible secondment of a Liaison Prosecutor from Ukraine to Eurojust. In 2004, Ukraine appointed two Eurojust contact points. The agreement also provides that Ukraine will designate a contact point as Ukrainian National Correspondent for Terrorism Matters. President Coninsx commented:Cooperation with third States is essential to deliver cross-border justice. Since 2005, Ukraine has been involved in 70 Eurojust cases, 26 coordination meetings, one coordination centre and one JIT. In this respect, the conclusion of this Agreement on Cooperation is a vital step in further strengthening cooperation with Ukraine. We are very pleased to have Ukraine joining our network of third States with which Eurojust has signed a cooperation agreement.’ Prosecutor General Lutsenko said: ‘Developing a relationship with this EU organisation will give us many opportunities for international cooperation.’ Ukraine is a priority EU partner within the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership. The European Union and Ukraine signed an Association Agreement in 2014. The signing of the Agreement on Cooperation was in the framework of a visit of President Poroshenko and a large Ukrainian delegation, including the Minister of Foreign Affairs, who signed an agreement on scientific and technical cooperation with Commissioner Carlos Moedas. Additional information at: Agreement on Cooperation Ukraine Security Service’s visit to Eurojust    

Spanish artists at Utrecht Early Music Festival

0
Spanish artists participating at Utrecht Early Music Festival 2016, 26 August – 4 September The Utrecht Early Music Festival 2016 will take place from August 26 to September 4. The festival, which has been held in the city of Utrecht since 1982, will focus in this year’s edition on the musical history of the Republic of Venice, a city where new music was created and spread to the rest of Europe. Several Spanish artists will be participating: bass-baritone singer Josep Cabré (Barcelona) and his quartet La Colombina will perform different madrigals, paying a tribute to the founder of the Venetian School, the Flemish composer Adrian Willaert; Seville harpsichordist Javier Núñez will be playing dance music composed by Giovanni Picchi, the only Venetian to write music for the harpsichord, and the renowned Catalan musician Jordi Savall and his early music group Hespèrion XXI will offer a special concert including several pieces spanning a thousand years of the Republic of Venice’s musical history. Furthermore, the group “L’Apotheose” has qualified for the semi-finals of the “Internationaal Van Wassenaar Concours”, an international contest to promote young and emerging bands and artists of early music hosted for the second time by the Utrecht Early Music Festival. The members of this group come from Madrid and Frankfurt. Both the semi-finals and the final are free to the public. For more information, dates and times you can visit the Website of the Utrecht Early Music Festival 2016.    

ICTY launches report on the witness experience

0
The Tribunal’s Victims and Witness Section (VWS) launched early June at The Hague Institute for Global Justice its report “Echoes of Testimonies: A Pilot Study into the long-term impact of bearing witness before the ICTY”. Opening remarks were delivered by ICTY President Judge Carmel Agius followed by a presentation outlining the results of the study conducted over the past four years. Conducted in cooperation with the Castleberry Peace Institute of the University of North Texas (UNT), the VWS study examines the impact that testifying has had on 300 fact witnesses before the Tribunal. Participants hail from across Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, and Serbia. Most of them experienced severe emotional or physical trauma during the war. The report highlights that the process of testifying is varied, complex, and different for each witness. The most frequently cited reasons for testifying are altruistic, namely to help the judges reach an accurate decision and to fulfil a moral duty to victims. Most participants reported that testifying before the Tribunal did not worsen their health and have also indicated more positive than negative affect both before and after testifying. The vast majority of the 300 witnesses interviewed stated that they feel relatively secure today, both those who testified publicly and those who testified with in-court protective measures. They personally felt fairly treated by the ICTY (regardless if called to testify for the Prosecution or the Defence), and they felt they contributed personally to justice and truth telling. These witnesses were optimistic about their overall life situation, but dissatisfied with the current local political situation where they reside. Based on the study’s findings, VWS and UNT recommend that international judicial institutions further develop and standardize support mechanisms to safeguard witnesses’ well-being. VWS and UNT researchers thus call on courts to implement follow-up programs for those that testify and to develop strong relationships with the communities where witnesses live. The report will be presented later in Sarajevo, Belgrade, Pristina and Zagreb.  

Honoring Bertha von Suttner at the Great Hall of Justice

Commemorative Lecture in honor of Bertha von Suttner (1843-1914). Thursday, June 16th, 2016 Great Hall of Justice, Peace Palace, The Hague. By Elizabeth Naumczyk. On the evening of Thursday, June 16th, 2015 the Peace Palace Library organised a Commemorative Lecture for the public titled Beyond Die Waffen Nieder! Bertha von Suttner as a philosopher, futurist and friend of humanity in honour of Bertha von Suttner. This occurred at the end of the third annual Bertha von Suttner Master Class summer school held at the Peace Palace on the 14-15th June, 2016. The lecture was held in the Great Hall of Justice of the International Court of Justice. For additional pictures, please open the following link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/121611753@N07/albums/72157669942436542  
MA Drs. Axel Rosendahl Huber.
Bertha von Suttner (1843-1914) was an Austrian author and peace activist and one of the most prominent members of the international peace movement in the 19th century. In 1905, she became the first female recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize and also played an important role in the coming into existence of the Peace Palace. As part of its 2013 centenary, the Dutch Carnegie Foundation, the owner of the Peace Palace, acknowledged her contribution by granting her two busts.   She became the first woman in history to be honoured with a bust inside the Peace Palace. The program was introduced by Candice Alihusain LL.M, Coordinator of the Reading Room of the Peace Palace Library. Since 2014 the Peace Palace Library, the Bertha von Suttner Project and Central Michigan University (USA) organize an annual Master Class and Commemoration Lecture to draw attention to the contributions of women to international law. The Bertha von Suttner Project was co-founded with Dr Hope Elizabeth May, an attorney and Professor of Philosophy, Central Michigan University (USA) with Candice Alihusian of the Peace Palace Library.   May,  has also created a website to promote the publications of Bertha von Suttner and English translations. http://www.berthavonsuttner.com/index.html The Commemorative Lecture continues the theme of this year’s Master Class focussing on the first every English translation of Bertha von Suttner’s 1912 essay, ‘Die Barbarisierung Der Luft’ (‘The Barbarization of the Sky’).  The English translation led by Hope Elizabeth May, will be released in the summer of 2016 and will be available at the Peace Palace Library. “This publication marks the 20th anniversary of the International Court of Justice’s historic 1996 Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. In 2016, the Court will build on this jurisprudence [in the Marshall Island vs. UK case] as it considers whether the failure of the nuclear weapon states to enter into multilateral negotiations aimed at nuclear disarmament violates the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The NPT obliges signatories to enter into multilateral negotiations aimed at nuclear disarmament.” https://www.vredespaleis.nl/masterclass-14-15-juni/?lang=en
P_20160616_171443
Elizabeth Naumczyk, Associate Editor Diplomat Magazine and Helena Karels, Ministerie van Verbeelding, Rotterdam.
Professor May then spoke to her topic Awakening the will to thoughtfulness: Bertha von Suttner’s ‘Barbarization of the Sky’. She emphasised the word “thoughtfulness” which in her view involved thinking and intelligent doing or action referring to Prudentia, one of the four virtues. “Prudence is the ability to implement this ‘World Force’, Higher Insight, Truth (Veritas) into action. We may also call it the Will to Thoughtfulness.” Bertha von Suttner also believed that “Humanity develops upward”, and “we are called to hasten the development of a higher and more fortunate type of human being”. May explained the four multi-coloured stained-glass windows in the Great Hall of Justice titled The Evolution of the Peace Ideal, by Scottish artist Douglas Strachan, the official gift of the British Commonwealth to the Peace Palace in The Hague. This theme is portrayed in four phases: the Primitive age, the Age of Conquest, the Modern Age and the Fulfilment of the Peace Ideal which represent an evolution of hearts and minds. That in 1913 was awakening a will to thoughtfulness.
P_20160616_171626
Drs. Petra C. Keppler, Secretariat International Network of Museums for Peace (INMP).
She spoke about The Peace Flag, the motto, Pro Concordia Labor, “I work for peace”, which was designed in 1897 by Countess Cora di Brazzà. The colours of yellow, purple and white were chosen so that it would not be confused with any other national flags. Di Brazzà also created the Universal Peace Badge and developed the Seven Rules of Harmony. May made reference to the 1996 Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons and the current state of international law which involves principles of proportionality and necessity. If the harm is necessary, it is legal, so long as the harm is balanced in accordance with a good enough objective. “Nuclear weapons are not inherently disproportionate’ according to the Statement of the United States, filed in this Advisory Opinion. Her view is that humankind will evolve and the importance we place on honour and sovereignty will change. She ended by quoting Suttner on the ‘Change in the ‘Calculus of Benefits’, due to Change in the Baseline Metric’ from Das Maschinenzeitalter (1889) ‘Hatred and enmity were replaced with the steadily spreading of a softer morality…’. She ended saying we all have a duty to do something and we all know what to do in our sphere, that is “thoughtfulness”.
P_20160616_170834
Dr. J. Braker husband of Speaker Dr Regina Braker, Mrs Anna Franse, International Women’s Contact The Hague (IWC), and a student from Professor Hope May’s summer class from Michigan.
The second speaker was Dr Laurie Cohen, Professor of History, Universiy of Innsbruck, Austria who spoke on ‘Demanding peace versus humanizing war: a Bertha von Suttner – Henri Dunant debate in the age of nuclear security?”   She examined the question: is the absolute pacifism of Bertha von Suttner and the humanitarian work of Dunant reconcilable “pacifist” philosophies? Henry Dunant founded the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), after witnessing the aftermath of the bloody Battle of Solferino in 1859. Dunant’s emphasis was on making armed struggles as humane as possible, through international agreements that offered principles for the national branches of the Red Cross, which in turn provided actual relief to the wounded. This idea evolved from the first meeting in August 1864 and known as the First Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field to the now famous Four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their 1977 Protocols, which together constitute a significant portion of international humanitarian law and the modern law of armed conflict. Bertha von Suttner thought humanitarian aid arguably helped to validate war by softening its horrors. In a collection of essays written in 1908 and entitled “Stimmen und Gestalten” (Voices and Forms) , she suggests that “the Red Cross serves institutionally as a slowly moving intermediary stage or temporary phenomenon (Übergangserscheinung) between war and peace”. Despite this, she considered Dunant a friend a pacifist for his outreach to influential people in society in the cause of peace. Suttner’s “Barbarization of the sky” warned how modern weaponry, such as airplanes, would increase horrifically the numbers of dead and wounded. The leap to nuclear warfare was provided by H.G. Wells with his science fiction novels The War in the Air (1908) and The World Set Free (1914) in which he anticipated and named the atomic bomb and how humans facilitated its use in extermination.   Cohen then went onto to tie the activism of Bertha von Sutter motivated by moral outrage, with that of the activism of the Greenham Common Women’s Peace Camp, established in 1981 in Berkshire, England who were motivated by fear, both legitimate incentives for getting active. The continued protests and dialogue with the US Air Force against the placement of nuclear weapons in their backyards led to their removal a decade later. “In 1987 a US-Soviet Treaty was signed, allowing for the removal of the Pershing II and SS-20 missiles from Europe (done in 1991) and the USAF left Greenham in 1992.” She concluded her lecture by referring to the third middle ground approach of deterrence held by Alfred NobelAnd yet, there are still those who think deterrence is the path to peace. One of those is Alfred Nobel, who reportedly sketched out a rocket.” The final speaker was Dr Regina Braker, Professor of German, University of Eastern Oregon, USA ‘Bertha von Suttner’s Feminist Pacifist Conviction amidst Militarist Skepticism: the 1905 Nobel Peace Prize’.  In the 1870s Bertha von Suttner became a close friend of Alfred Nobel, and they corresponded for years on the subject of peace until his death in 1896. It is believed that she was a major influence in his decision to include peace as a prize among those prizes provided in his will. Braker outlined in detail Bertha von Suttner’s peace movement activity and the support she received from many people who argued she deserved the 1905 Nobel Peace Prize on merit for her qualifications, engagement and publications and not because of her influence on Alfred Nobel and that he would have wanted her to receive the peace prize. She was nominated for this prize since 1901. In 1901 Baron Clemens von Pirquet wanted the Norwegian Nobel Committee to bestow an honorary peace award on Czar Nikolai II of Russia for his initiative that resulted in the 1899 Hague Peace Conference. He also wanted the divide the prize money between several worthy peace workers, including von Suttner. The 1901 Peace Prize was awarded to Jean Henry Dunant and Frédéric Passy. In the Official Website of the Nobel Prize it says “Suttner was the author of the novel “Die Waffen nieder” (Lay Down Your Arms), the most important anti-war novel of the period. She was the founder and president of the Austrian Peace Society (1891), and she contributed to the foundation of the Permanent International Peace Bureau (1891). Suttner was nominated for her contribution to the international peace movement.” http://www.nobelprize.org At the 1899 Hague Peace Conference she summarized the core ideas of the peace movement and in 1904 went on a United States tour attending a universal peace congress in Boston and meeting President Theordore Roosevelt. People who supported her were themselves recipients of the Nobel Prize. The Norwegian poet Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson (1832-1910), recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literature for 1903,  was a Member of the Nobel Committee when he introduced her to receive her laureate on April 18, 1906. Frédéric Passy (1822-1912), co-recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for 1901. So too, Alfred Hermann Fried (1864-1921) who shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Tobias Asser in 1911. He was an Austrian Jewish pacifist and co-founder of the German peace movement. In 1892 he and von Suttner published an international peace magazine after the title of her book Die Waffen nieder which was succeeded by Die Friedenswarte (The Peace Watch) still being published today. Paul-Henri-Benjamin Balluet d’Estournelles, Baron de Constant de Rebecque (1852-1924), was a French diplomat and politician, advocate of international arbitration and winner of the 1909 Nobel Prize for Peace. Henri La Fontaine (1854-1943), a Belgian socialist, international lawyer and president of the International Peace Bureau received the Nobel Prize for Peace in 1913. She had the support of women like the English Quaker pacifist Ellen Robinson who argued for women laureates and the importance of their work despite the limitations placed on them by society, and a supportive letter from the Norwegian women, who, at that time, were not recognized as nominators.   Despite her being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1905 she was treated dismissively by the press who believed she obtained it because of her friendship with Nobel and her need of financial support. The Netherlands also has The Wateler Peace Prize. Mr J.G.D. Wateler, a Dutch banker, died in 1927 and bequeathed his estate for this purpose to the Dutch Parliament who in turn left it to the Carnegie Foundation to choose the recipient. The prize is awarded alternatively to Dutch and non Dutch persons or organizations. The prize has been awarded annually since 1931 and from 2004 biennually. The evening concluded with a reception in the splendid surroundings outside the Great Hall of Justice.          

Czech Presidency of the Visegrad Group Piano Concert

Pictured Lenka Meurders and  Zdenka Prochazkova.  By Roy Lie A Tjam H.E. Ms. Jana Reinisová, Ambassador of the Czech Republic in The Hague, welcomed the guests and performers at the Czech Residence on June 23. It has been an evening of phenomenal piano music by the Czech pianist Lenka Meurders and violinist- singer Zdenka Prochazkova. For additional pictures, please open the following link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/121611753@N07/albums/72157667796367953
P_20160623_202757
H.E. Ms. Jana Reinisová, Ambassador of the Czech Republic in The Hague with guests.
Lenka Meurders is a Czech concert pianist and private teacher living in the Netherlands. Lenka started music lessons at the age of four and a year later she began to play the piano. She studied at the Prague conservatory under J.Tuma, M. Maixnerrova, M. Rezek and J.Novotny. Several awards have been bestowed upon her, she has also participated in competitions and won many prizes.Lenka forms a duo with clarinetist Harm Meurders. P_20160623_201808 As for Zdenka Prochazkova is also from the Czech Republic. She studied violin and viola at the Conservatory of Brno. Zdenka studied at L’Academie franco-tcheque de musiques de Telc and was in Vladimir Buka’s class of 2006-2007. She regularly performs with Collegium 1704, Czech ensemble Baroque and les Vents Atlantiques. Zdenka is currently studying at the vocal department of the Royal Conservatory The Hague. Zdenka and Lenka are recognized as gifted classical musicians of an upcoming generation. The concert was on the occasion of the Czech presidency of the Visegrad Group. The Visegrad Group (also known as the “Visegrad Four” or simply “V4”) reflects the efforts of the countries of the Central European region to work together in a number of fields of common interest within the all-European integration. The Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia have always been part of a single civilization sharing cultural and intellectual values and common roots in diverse religious traditions, which they wish to preserve. The Czech Republic is the current president of the group. Lenka and Zdenka opened the evening with Chopin’s Mazurka a minor op 17 no 4. The breakdown of the program V. Novaik: Slovak songs, F. Liszt Ballade no 2b minor and A. Dvorak, Biblical songs op 99. P_20160623_201220 Lenka and Zdenka concluded the scheduled program with a work by Dvorak: Biblical songs op 99 no 3, no4, no6, no8 no10.The audience burst into a standing ovation, Ambassador Jana Reinisová thanked the artist for their captivating  music. Furthermore, the Ambassador thanked the audience. Bouquets of flowers were presented to the talented young artist. A reception followed the musical performance.