Canada contributes €2.5 million to support OPCW work in Syria.   February 17, 2015 | The Hague, Netherlands – Canada’s Permanent Representative to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), Ambassador Sabine Nölke, and OPCW Director-General, Ambassador Ahmet Üzümcü, announced today that Canada will contribute an additional €2.5 million (C$3.9 million) to support the Organisation’s verification and fact-finding work in Syria. This contribution builds on previous Canadian voluntary contributions to the OPCW totalling €8.5 million (C$12 million) for the initial 2013 investigation into chemical weapons use in Syria and to eliminate Syria’s chemical weapons program. It will be channeled through the OPCW’s new Trust Fund for Syria Missions, which will consolidate extra-budgetary contributions from member states to cover the high cost of contingency operations in Syria. “Canada is pleased to support OPCW activities to verify the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons program and to investigate allegations of chemical weapons use through its Fact-Finding Mission,” said Ambassador Nölke. “Since 2013, the OPCW has played a crucial role in addressing the threat posed by chemical weapons in Syria. We commend the Organisation’s staff for their tireless efforts under difficult circumstances.” “I welcome this significant contribution by Canada to the Trust Fund for Syria Missions,” said Director-General Üzümcü. “These funds will help the OPCW’s important work toward the complete elimination of Syria’s chemical weapons program.” This contribution complements a US$2 million (C$2.8 million) allocation by Canada, announced in tandem this week in New York, to the OPCW-United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism to support the pursuit of accountability for chemical weapons use in Syria. Both contributions will be funded by Canada’s Global Partnership Program, established in 2002 to reduce the threat posed by the proliferation of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons, materials, and expertise.

Statement by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Mrs Fatou Bensouda* regarding recent ICC-visit to Georgia. *Delivered in situ by Mr Phakiso Mochochoko, Director of Jurisdiction, Complementarity and Cooperation Division on the Prosecutor’s behalf  Tbilisi, 18 February 2016 “I would first like to acknowledge the warm welcome which you have extended to my colleagues in the course of our three-day programme of meetings in Tbilisi which comes to an end today.” “Why is a team from the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) here in Georgia this week? The present ICC mission comes on the heels of the decision by ICC Judges at the end of January, granting my Office authorisation to investigate the alleged crimes in and around South Ossetia during the 2008 armed conflict. It follows the previous visit I personally made to Tbilisi, in October last year, when I explained the legal reasons behind my request to open an investigation. Over the past few days, my team has held a number of meetings with key persons based in Tbilisi, including from Government, international organisations, civil society and others. These meetings allowed us, firstly, to clarify the roles of the different parts – which we call ‘organs’ – of the Court; secondly, to explain the next steps in the judicial process, particularly the investigation by the ICC Office of the Prosecutor; and, finally, to discuss the ICC’s cooperation needs and procedures.  These exchanges are a key element of preparations as we gear up for more regular deployments into Georgia of investigators from the ICC Office of the Prosecutor, as well as staff from other organs of the ICC who are responsible for distinct aspects of the Court’s work, such as facilitating defence legal representation, witness protection, and outreach. I wish to reiterate today what I have already stressed: no part of our investigative activities will be public. They are and must remain completely confidential. This is required in order to preserve the integrity of the investigations and the evidence collected, as well as to ensure we fulfil our legal and fiduciary duties towards witnesses and persons with whom we interact during the course of our investigations. I want to stress that my Office’s own investigators will collect evidence, from a variety of sources. Our investigators will do their work independently and impartially. They will examine relevant places and sites, collect evidence and question persons as witnesses, gather materials and screen documents. Therefore, if you read accounts purporting to detail in any way our ICC investigative activities, you can be assured they are fiction. You may wonder why the ICC investigation in the 2008 events commences only now. Under its laws, the ICC cannot proceed if the national authorities are already undertaking (or have undertaken) genuine domestic proceedings themselves. Until early last year, this seemed to be the case in Georgia. The timing of this investigation by the ICC has thus largely been determined by the pace, and eventually, lack of, national proceedings here. Regarding the alleged crimes the investigation will look into, it is important to note that depending on the evidence that emerges, as Prosecutor, I may bring forward charges in relation to any crimes linked to the armed conflict in and around South Ossetia, irrespective of the nationality or affiliation of the alleged perpetrators. The investigation will take as long as needed to gather the required evidence, and depending on resources, security, and cooperation. When that time comes, I will request the ICC judges to issue arrest warrants or summonses to appear for those persons assessed to be responsible for the alleged crimes on the strength of the evidence our independent investigations have produced. In other words, we do not start the investigation with specific suspects in mind. There is no list of suspects or targets. It should be absolutely clear that it is only at the conclusion of our investigation, when we have collected and reviewed all necessary evidence, that we will identify suspects. Finally, my Office, and the ICC more generally, count on full cooperation from all parties to the conflict. Timely and consistent cooperation from the parties, regardless of their status, is in the interest of an effective and efficient investigation. It will lead to establishing the truth and bringing justice to the victims, from whatever nationality or background, who suffered so terribly during the conflict. Source: Office of the Prosecutor | OTPNewsDesk@icc-cpi.int