President Biden has announced that the U.S. will remove Cuba from its list of state sponsors of terrorism. This decision is part of an agreement, facilitated by the Catholic Church, where Cuba agreed to release 553 political prisoners, but their nationalities have not been specified in the reports.
While the deal has been widely regarded as a diplomatic breakthrough, it has sparked criticism from Republican lawmakers, who argue that the move could be easily reversed by a future administration. The agreement marks an important moment in U.S.-Cuba relations, with potential implications for regional diplomacy and human rights though its long-term impact remains to be seen amid political tensions in both countries.
Today, January 15, 2025, Lebanon has undergone a significant political change with the election of President Joseph Oun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. This new leadership team faces an uphill battle to address Lebanon’s multifaceted crises. Key priorities include post-war reconstruction, maintaining the fragile ceasefire, and implementing overdue economic reforms to stabilize the country’s faltering economy. The appointments of Oun and Salam also mark a symbolic reduction in Hezbollah’s dominance, offering hope for renewed political balance and progress.
President Joseph Aoun is a Maronite Christian with a nonpartisan stance. The Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, is a Lebanse politician, academic, jurist and a diplomat, he served in The Hague as a judge for nine years at the International Court of Justice. In 2024 he was elected the 27th ICJ president becoming the first Lebanese judge to hold this position. PM Salam was from 2007 to 2017 ambassador of Lebanon to the UN during this time he held the position of President of the UN Security Council and Vice Presdiente of the General Assembly, before been appointed as Lebanon’s new Prime Minister. His nomination was confirmed by President Joseph Aoun after securing the support of 84 out of 128 lawmakers. This marks a significant shift in Lebanon’s political landscape, especially following recent conflicts involving Hezbollah.
Salam is considered a reformist and impartial candidate, tasked with leading the country out of its prolonged political and economic crises. His appointment comes after President Joseph Aoun’s election.
The Embassy held a wreath-laying ceremony at the Embassy’s Kalayaan Hall and the Rizal Courtyard on December 30 in honor of the 128th anniversary of Dr. Jose Rizal’s martyrdom, in collaboration with the Hague Chapter of the Knights of Rizal.
In his speech Ambassador J. Eduardo Malaya emphasized that Jose Rizal’s ultimate sacrifice for the welfare of our nation and our people continue to inspire us as we also constantly do our own share to serve our beloved country, wherever we are.”The Hague chapter commander of the Knights of Rizal Sir Anton Lutter, KCR emphasized the close cooperation between the Embassy and the Knights of Rizal in propagating Rizal’s works and the historical connections between the Filipinos and the Dutch people through Rizal’s affinity and admiration for the renowned Dutch writer Eduard Douwes Dekker (pen-name Multatuli) who wrote about the colonizers’ excesses in the then Dutch East Indies (now Indonesia).
Sir Anton Lutter, KCR, and Ambassador J. Eduardo Malaya led the wreath-laying.
Former Ambassador of The Philippines to Holy See Mrs. Grace Relucio Princesa, Embassy officers and staff as well members of the Knights of Rizal-The Hague Chapter, including Sir Steef Klarenbeek, KOR and Sir Guido Ouwerkerk, KR and Mr. Rein Quint attended the ceremony.
Dr Jose Rizal monument at Rizal Courtyard, Embassy of the Philippines, The Hague.
National hero of The Philippines Dr Jose Rizal (1861-1896) literary work played an important role in the quest for independence by the Philippines people. Knowing for his political writings that sparked the Philippine revolution and led to his execution on the 30th December by the Spanish colonial rulers.
As the nation remembers the national hero’s death and martyrdom, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. called on Filipinos to be change agents in his statement.
“As we remember his noble works and honorable life, let us take to heart his words and ideals that awakened the consciousness of our forebears and stirred a national movement for freedom,” he said.
The Hague, December 2024. The Honorable Mr. Al Fakr Taifur, Attorney General of the Republic of Sudan, visited The Hague. Ms. Omaima Alsharief, Chargé d’Affaires a.i. of Sudan in the Netherlands, introduced the Attorney General, who delivered an important lecture at a briefing. He was accompanied by H.E. Ambassador Othman Abou Fatma, Director of the Human Rights, Women’s Rights, and Children’s Rights Department in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Honorable Ms. Rauda from the Attorney General’s Office was also in attendance.
Ms. Omaima Alsharief opened the event by firmly emphasizing the importance of addressing the situation in Sudan, particularly regarding what is often called the “forgotten war.” “This issue is overlooked by the international community,” she said, “but we as Sudanese have a responsibility to ensure that the world hears the reality of what is happening on the ground. It is time to speak up and bring this critical matter to light.”
Briefing on Sudan situation,
“I am very happy to welcome the Honorable Mr. Al Fakr Taifur to give you an idea about the important committee that takes responsibility for investigating all violations of national law and international humanitarian law during this crisis,” Alsharief added.
Mr. Al Fakr Taifur opened his session by expressing gratitude to everyone in attendance. Before addressing the main topic, he outlined the legal landscape in Sudan. He highlighted a pivotal constitutional amendment in 2017, which decisively separated the public prosecution from the Ministry of Justice, establishing its complete independence from both the executive authority and the judiciary. This change elevated the role of public prosecution to a position second only to the presidency within Sudan’s state protocol, surpassing even the Council of Ministers. This development, Taifur explained, reflects the Sudanese desire to strengthen the rule of law and enhance justice in the country.
The Honorable Mr. Al Fakr Taifur, Attorney General of the Republic of Sudan.
He further elaborated that the Attorney General, as the head of the committee, ensures its independence and integrity. The committee operates according to national laws and international treaties ratified by Sudan, including international humanitarian law and human rights law.
“In the past, complaints had to be filed within specific territorial jurisdictions in the country,” Taifur noted. “This has been abolished, and an electronic platform has been established where people across Sudan or even outside the country can file their complaints digitally.”
Attorney General Taifur unequivocally asserted Sudan’s commitment to accountability and the eradication of impunity. He announced significant strides made by the National Committee dedicated to investigating crimes and violations of both national and international humanitarian law. This includes issuing arrest warrants and collaborating with the General Secretariat of Interpol to issue red notices for individuals responsible for heinous crimes and atrocities committed since April 15, 2023, particularly in Darfur.
Further, Attorney General Al Fakr Taifur met with the International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor, Mr. Karim Khan, at the court’s headquarters in The Hague. Taifur expressed gratitude to the ICC Prosecutor’s Office for inviting him to visit the court and for fostering cooperation. He also attended the final hearings in the trial of Ali Kushayb.
The ICC Prosecutor thanked the Attorney General for accepting the invitation, cooperating with the Prosecutor’s Office, and facilitating visits by court delegations. He emphasized that the ICC remains committed to exploring all avenues to advance justice and strengthen cooperation with Sudan and its judicial authorities in alignment with the principle of complementarity.
During his visit to the ICC, Attorney General Taifur officially attended the trial of Ali Abdelrahman Koshyb. He was accompanied by Ms. Omaima Alsharief, Chargé d’Affaires a.i. of Sudan in the Netherlands, a delegation of diplomats, and Abubakar Ahmed, the crucial liaison between the Sudanese government and the ICC. This visit underscores Sudan’s commitment to engaging with international legal proceedings.
The Sudanese government accuses the UAE of providing weapons to its rival paramilitary force, thereby prolonging the conflict in Sudan. The UAE has denied the allegations and accused the Sudanese government of refusing to negotiate peace with its adversaries.
The Washington Center for Human Rights provides an in-depth analysis of the UAE’s role in the ongoing conflict in Sudan, particularly regarding the actions of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Darfur. The report meticulously details severe human rights violations and war crimes, including ethnic cleansing, sexual violence, and the intentional targeting of civilians.
As your columnist, I have leeway in selecting a topic to write about. Now, as with every year, we tend to ask questions such as:
What was your word for 2024?
What are your plans in 2025?’
It’s also the time to express what you wish for.
My wish for 2025 is that collectively, we do a better job in ‘Embracing Criticism’.
“Criticism is a compliment because it shows one cares”.
This sentence is straight from a speaking engagement at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Amsterdam. The title of my presentation was “A Meta-approach to Knowledge Management”. In it, I used the word ‘meta’ in its meaning of ‘an all-encompassing, overarching umbrella under which all and any entities can unite – instead of compete’.
Knowledge Management (KM) is, simply put, the art and science of how we manage what we have learned, are learning and still can learn. Criticism is an important, even crucial part of this. So, how do we deal with criticism? Do we reject it? Are we open to it? Do we ignore it? Do we learn from it? Do we embrace it?
Criticism is often framed as ‘constructive’ and/or ‘destructive’. While it is true that positive feedback confirms – and makes us feel good about – what we do, say and are, it is actually the negative feedback from which we (can) learn much more. So, when we look at criticism in this way, negative feedback can be remarkably constructive!
Considering criticism as a compliment doesn’t merely allow us to become more open to it, but we might even welcome it as a most desirable tool to improve everything we do, say and are.
One of the basic requirements for embracing criticism is TIME.
We need time. Time to receive, time to review and time to judge criticism. Do not merely set time aside to be open to criticism but reserve more time to proactively look for and ask for it. Let’s also not forget that while we are sending, we cannot receive and when we speak, we cannot listen.
Another aspect of how to embrace criticism is that we realize that there is a difference between “I DON’T CARE” and “I DON’T MIND”. There are still people out there whose command of English is such that they think that the two expressions mean the same. Well, they don’t. When it comes to dealing with criticism, “I don’t care” signifies that one is unlikely to listen to it. When, on the other hand, we hear “I don’t mind”, they likely will.
A further element needed to embrace criticism, is the realization of the difference between ‘EVIDENCE’ and ‘PROOF’. Again, they are not the same.
Evidence is what is given to a court (of justice…) but it only becomes accepted as ‘Proof’ once the court, upon careful review, has passed judgment.
A next obstacle for embracing criticism is when we confuse FORMAT with CONTENT.
When we don’t like the format or the packaging of criticism, we often use this to justify that we don’t have to listen to it or review it. What we seem to forget though, is that this amounts to an outright refusal to learn. Well, we can all agree that that isn’t very smart…
So, what do we need to embrace criticism in 2025?
Set aside time to collect, review and learn from criticism
When faced with criticism, don’t say “I don’t care”, but “I don’t mind!”
Gather all the evidence you can, because without evidence, there’s zero proof
Ignore the packaging of criticism and instead, focus on its content.
My wish for 2025 is “Embrace Criticism”.
What’s yours?
About the author:
Eelco H. Dykstra. Photography by Tom Manning
Once dubbed a ‘Global Nomad’ in East Africa, Eelco H. Dykstra is a seasoned international crisis and emergency expert. As a true ‘Prac-Ademic’, he blends – also in his column “A Thought and a Smile” – his innate optimism with knowledge from his practical experience and rigorous fact-finding.
Aside from being founder/chair of the Daily Impact Emergency Management (DIEM) network and a visiting professor in South Africa, he initiated the ’20/20 Vision’ program for the dual purpose of strengthening value-based resilience and overcoming the obstacles that stand in the way of implementing lessons (to be) learned. Eelco has been a correspondent, written multiple books and articles and continues to work extensively with media, government, business, NGO’s and community-based initiatives. In short, Eelco is a transdisciplinary and trans-cultural multi-tasker – just like diplomats are.
Among his hobbies are cooking and playing the cello – see picture, taken by Tom Manning, during an impromptu performance with the Soweto Youth Orchestra.
Eelco H. DykstraProfessor (visiting), Adaptation and Resilience, University of South-Africa, UNISA. Chair, ’20/20 Vision’ Program: How do we go from ‘Risk’ to ‘Resilience”? Founder, Daily Impact Emergency Management (DIEM) Network www.diem.nuwww.20outof20.vision / eelco.dykstra@diem.nu
By Monika Bucha, LL.M. / B.Sc., Legal Affairs & Energy Law at Kelso Institute Europe
In December 2024, Russia conducted its 12th large-scale assault on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure this year, damaging transmission grids and power facilities, especially in the western border regions (BBC News, 2024) From October 2022 to April 2023, 43% of Ukraine’s main power grid was damaged (Poltavets and De Vos, 2024), leaving over a million people without electricity (Meduza, 2024). The inability to operate air conditioning in summer and heating in winter has gravely impacted the health of Ukraine’s citizens.
The decline in energy availability is stark: Before Russia’s full-scale invasion on 24 February 2022, Ukraine produced 44.1 gigawatts hours (GWh) of electricity, mainly with nuclear, thermal, and hydroelectric plants (UNHR, 2024). Winter electricity needs stood at 26 GWh. By the winter of 2023-2024, production had plummeted by over 50% to 17.8 GWh, while peak consumption dropped by almost 30% to 18.5 GWh (UNHR, 2024).
To mitigate the impact, Ukraine has received emergency from Poland, Romania and Slovakia (Polityuk, 2024). This assistance was facilitated by the synchronisation of Ukraine and Moldova’s grids with the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) (European Commission, 2024). Just two days after the initial attack on February 22, 2022, Ukrainian grid operators were able to disconnect from the Russian grid and synchronised with the European grid three weeks later (Casey, 2024). However, the commercial capacity is limited, and European electricity prices exceed those of Ukraine’s domestic market (Yulia, 2022), prompting a need to reconsider Ukraine’s energy strategy.
Ukraine heavily depends on imported oil, coal and natural gas
Before the war, Ukraine’s energy needs were met through a mix of domestic production and imports. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), Ukraine’s total energy supply in 2022 comprised coal (21.7%), nuclear (26.5%), natural gas (25.1%) and oil (18.6%). Renewables, excluding nuclear – despite their huge potential (#Renewables4ukraine, 2024) – accounted for a minor share, with the remaining 8.1% coming from hydro, geothermal, biofuels, and waste (IEA, 2024a).
In 2022, while Ukraine was self-sufficient in nuclear energy production, it relied heavily on imported oil (83%), coal (50%) and natural gas (33%). Data by the Ukraine’s State Fiscal Service indicated that in 2018, the largest share of oil was imported from Belarus (38.7%) and Russia (37.3%) (IEA, 2021). Prior to the Russian invasion in February 2022, the IEA had already highlighted the significant risk of an oil supply shortage if Russia were to disrupt the Ukrainian oil market, prompting initial steps towards energy diversification.
Decentralised energy production to secure reliability of supply
In 2024, the IEA outlined ten actions to bolster Ukraine’s energy security for the upcoming winter. Notably, action three emphasises that large energy assets are particularly susceptible to attacks, making decentralisation a strategic advantage. Accelerating the deployment of smaller-scale gas-fired combined heat and power plants, alongside solar PV and wind systems, supplemented with batteries and other storage technologies, is crucial for enhancing the resilience of the energy supply (IEA, 2024b).
Since the onset of the war, Ukraine has experienced a significant increase in the importation of diesel generators to provide backup power, with hundreds of units arriving daily from international allies and donors (Ministry of Economy of Ukraine, 2024). However, as demand has surged, generators have become both costly and environmentally detrimental. Consequently, many municipalities are opting for solar PV panels, battery systems, and heat pumps at hospitals and other critical infrastructure sites as more sustainable, cost-effective alternatives (Adbullah, 2023).
Ukraine could become a testing ground for decentralised energy production
The Ukrainian government (2023) recently declared that building a decentralized and diversified energy system—one that is more resilient against military attacks or natural disasters and can enhance energy security while facilitating the transition to renewable energy sources (RES)—will be a key priority. This initiative resonates with the public sentiment, as over 80% of Ukrainians believe in maximizing the use of RES and that distributed energy generation could significantly strengthen the nation’s energy independence (Ecoaction, 2022). While this new system is in its early days and far from formalized, with the right support it could become a testing ground and model for Europe’s energy transition.
To also promote a just and inclusive energy transition, the Civil Society Energy for Resilient Ukraine project is facilitating the formation of renewable energy communities (Citizen Energy for Ukraine, 2024). These communities are groups of citizens who collectively own and operate renewable energy projects, thereby enhancing local energy independence, reducing costs, and aiding the decarbonisation of the energy system. However, a recent report from Razom We Stand (2024) also flags that current laws fail to define “decentralised electricity generation” and do not regulate energy storage systems or small distribution systems. Simplifying access to the grid is essential for more of these secure projects, it says (Birol, 2023).
Outlook: A Green Energy Marshall Plan for Ukraine
Ukraine’s journey towards a sustainable energy future is marked by both significant challenges and substantial opportunities. The Current Prime Minister, Denys Shmyhal, and various international bodies have voiced strong support for a just transition in Ukraine’s coal regions, underpinned by inclusivity and sustainability. Notable international assistance has been provided, including aid from the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and commitments to support structural changes in the energy sector (Borell, 2024). Additionally, initiatives such as the Ukraine Energy Support Fund are dedicated to fostering territorial energy developments (Energy Community, 2024).
While there is theoretical support for a sustainable transition, a lack of investor confidence is stalling immediate progress. Following Russia’s 2022 invasion, foreign direct investment in Ukraine plummeted from USD 6.5 billion in 2021 to just USD 570 million in 2022, as reported by the Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. Concerns about physical risk to assets are particularly acute in the energy sector, where Russia’s targeted destruction of energy facilities further complicates the acquisition of bank financing (Januta, 2024).
To support a green and sustainable energy transition in Ukraine, it is crucial to eschew investment projects that could trap Ukraine in lock-in situations and instead promote a new, decentralised approach to energy transition. Campaigners were calling for a “Solar Marshall Plan” ahead of the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Berlin which took place in June 2024. The demand partner countries help by providing cheaper loans through financial aid; more technical know-how and skilled workers; and battery storage technologies (Limb, 2024). The time to set the direction for Ukraine’s energy future is now.
Ministry of Economy of Ukraine, 2024. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine – Government exempts from VAT and import duties spare parts and components for the manufacture of electric generators, as well as satellite Internet equipment.
Ministry of Economy of Ukraine, 2023. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine – Building a decentralized energy system will allow the country to reduce its vulnerability to enemy attacks: Prime Minister. URL https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/pobudova-detsentralizovanoi- enerhosystemy-zrobyt-ii-mensh-vrazlyvoiu-do-vorozhykh-atak-premier-ministr (accessed 12.27.24).
Polityuk, P., 2024. Ukraine plans record power imports after Russian attacks on energy system. Reuters. URL: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine- plans-record-power-imports-after-russian-attacks-energy-system-2024-05-15/ (accessed 12.27.24).
Razom We Stand, 2024. Challenges and opportunities for the development of distributed power generation and microgrids in Ukrainian communities. #Renewables4ukraine, 2024. Wind Power. #Renewables4ukraine. URL: https://www.renewables4ukraine.org/wind/ (accessed 12.27.24).
UNHR, 2024. Attacks on Ukraine’s Energy Infrastructure: Harm to the Civilian Population.
I first met Cristina Rodriguez on a rainy autumn day in Brussels, two years ago. Despite the dreary weather, she arrived with an air of warmth and poise, a woman whose energy effortlessly draws people in. Her friendliness and eagerness to engage spoke volumes about her open heart, a hallmark of someone accustomed to new friendships and fresh experiences. She was anxious to know more about brussels, to discover more about Belgium, to make it her new ‘home’.
Born into a cultivated family in Mexico City, she was raised by an architect father and a university teacher mother. An older brother and younger sister completed their close-knit household. ‘I was an imaginative child’, Cristina recalls, her smile revealing a hint of nostalgia. ‘I dreamed of faraway lands and adventures with friends and cousins. Math was never my forte, but languages, history, travel, and the arts… those were my playgrounds.’
This passion for exploration guided her to a degree in International Relations at the Universidad Iberoamericana in Mexico City, which included a transformative exchange program in Lyon, France. From there, the world opened up further. Her career at the Mexican Senate’s Commission for International Relations with Europe and later, a master’s degree in Geopolitics and Global Security at La Sapienza University in Rome, prepared her for the multifaceted life of a diplomatic spouse.
When she married her husband, a diplomat in the Mexican Foreign Service, she embraced a life of movement and reinvention. ‘A couple of weeks after our wedding, I packed my whole life and moved to Arizona, his first posting. From there, we spent five magical years in Rome, and then Washington, D.C. Each place shaped me in ways I never anticipated.’
Her time in Washington, D.C., during tumultuous years, revealed the strength of the international diplomatic community. ‘The friends I made there were my stronghold, my star in the darkness’ says Cristina. ‘We all came from different corners of the world, but the challenges we shared bonded us deeply.’
This openness to connection is emblematic of what she represents as part of the new wave of diplomatic spouses: elegant, well-educated, and culturally attuned, yet grounded in authenticity. ‘Being a diplomatic spouse is a life of contrasts’ she explains. ‘It’s a privilege to live in different cultures and grow in unexpected ways. But it also comes with sacrifices—losing your own career or feeling like your identity is tied to someone else’s job.’
In the face of such challenges, she has found her own power. ‘We have the unique ability to create a more inclusive and empathetic world. By bridging divides and fostering genuine connection, we remind others of the shared humanity that unites us all.’
Her love of food has played a significant role in fostering those connections. ‘I wasn’t able to fry an egg until I was 25’, she laughs, ‘but YouTube tutorials came to my rescue.’ Today, she’s a dedicated cook, even winning a Korean cooking competition in Washington. ‘Food is a universal language. It gives you a glimpse into a culture and sparks conversations that lead to understanding and respect.’
Her culinary journey reflects her love of her homeland, where the flavours of Mexico remain her touchstone. ‘Mexican food speaks to my heart. But I never stop exploring cuisines from around the world. It’s one of the joys of this life.’
Her pride in Mexico extends beyond its cuisine. ‘Our country is so much more than the stereotypes of sombreros and mariachi bands. It’s a place of incredible diversity—deserts, snowy mountains, jungles, and beaches. Our cultural heritage is vast, from ancient civilizations to modern innovations in science, art, and technology.’
Yet, Cristina acknowledges the responsibility of representing her homeland abroad. ‘Stereotypes diminish when people experience real, human stories. By sharing our culture and breaking down prejudices one interaction at a time, we foster a more nuanced understanding of Mexico.’
This ethos of storytelling is central to her latest endeavour: her debut novel. ‘It started as an autobiographical novel but took on a life of its own’, she shares. The book follows Catalina, a young woman navigating life in Rome. Struggling to save a quaint trattoria from misfortune, Catalina discovers her own creative voice and culinary talent, building a life as fulfilling as the dishes she creates. ‘It’s a story of self-discovery and resilience, inspired by my experiences.’
As our conversation winds down, she reflects on the philosophy that guides her: ‘I am enough as I am, yet boundless in what I can become. I honour the past, cherish the present, and embrace the limitless possibilities of tomorrow.’
A true representative of the new diplomatic spouse, Cristina is much more than a partner in service. She is a bridge between cultures, a storyteller, a nurturer of connections, and an inspiration to those around her. And just as her journey is far from over, so too is the impact she will undoubtedly continue to make.
In a concerted operation, Belgian and Dutch authorities have cracked down on an internationally operating ‘phone phishing’ gang, leading to the arrest of eight suspects. In addition to ‘phishing’, or trying to gain access to bank or financial data by phone or online, the suspects also visited mainly elderly victims at their homes, pretending to be bank employees or police officers. Eurojust and Europol coordinated and supported the actions in Belgium and the Netherlands, where 17 places were also searched.
Most of the fraudulent activities took place in Belgium, but the organised crime group (OCG) behind the scam operated mainly from Rotterdam and other cities in the Netherlands. This week’s arrests have led to the apprehension of the alleged leaders of the OCG, though the investigations into the fraud continue. The fraudsters allegedly scammed victims out of at least several million euros.
At the request of the Belgian Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (PPO), Eurojust became involved in the case in November 2022. Subsequently Belgian investigative judges also asked for the support of Eurojust, which organised eight coordination meetings to enable the cooperation with the Dutch authorities and support the operation against the OCG.
Throughout the investigation, Europol brought together all partners to facilitate effective coordination and the exchange of information between Member States. Europol experts also provided national authorities with analytical and financial support.
Prevention
Authorities in both countries are warning customers to exercise caution with online transactions and not to trust phone calls allegedly made by banking staff. Citizens are advised to be cautious on the following points:
Do not trust mails claiming to come from banks that state you urgently need to update your account.
Do not trust messages claiming that your phone account has been locked and needs updating.
Be careful when buying goods via secondhand sites if sellers ask for an initial payment of EUR 0.01.
Do not provide account details, PIN numbers or other financial information over the phone, even if the caller claims to be a bank employee.
Do not trust phone calls or messages that say you have won a phone or another item but ask you to pay a small amount up front.
Check URL links sent to you and make sure they start with ‘https://’.
Beware of links that redirect you to a fake bank site. These may look similar to your bank’s website, but cannot be trusted.
Do not give any information to individuals claiming to be bank employees who visit your home.
Criminal groups often ask young people to lend their phone cards or bank accounts for seemingly harmless transactions. The police strongly advises people against this, as it may make them an accomplice to criminal activities.
This week’s operation was carried out at the request of and by the following authorities:
· Belgium: Federal PPO (Federaal Parket); Investigating Judge Court of First Instance Antwerp, section Mechelen (Onderzoeksrechter van Rechtbank van Eerste Aanleg Antwerpen, sectie Mechelen); Federal Judicial Police East Flanders (Federale Gerechtelijke Politie Oost-Vlaanderen)
· The Netherlands: PPO Rotterdam (Openbaar Ministerie Rotterdam); National Police (Nationale Politie – Eenheid Rotterdam)
Jeremy J. R. Dommnich stands at the crossroads of diplomacy, negotiation, and cultural integration, bringing years of expertise to the forefront of his mission. As an expert in international negotiations and CEO of Nvoye, he has trained and coached high-ranking diplomats and public officials from over 120 countries at the Clingendael Institute. His experience spans working with opposition groups, mediators, and stakeholders in armed conflict settings worldwide. He has also worked at the European External Action Service in Brussels and held diplomatic roles in Berlin, New York, and La Paz. At Nvoye, Jeremy dedicates himself to supporting diplomats in their integration process and fostering connections.
DM: Mr. Dommnich, you emphasize the concept of “fluidity” in diplomacy. Could you elaborate? Working in a bureaucratic organization like a ministry seems the opposite of fluid.
Jeremy J. R. Dommnich: That is the irony of the profession. If someone studies law, they often become a lawyer. A journalism graduate may become a journalist. But studying diplomacy does not clearly define what a diplomat actually does. The strong structure of a ministry contrasts sharply with the uncertainty and fluidity of a diplomat’s professional life.
Diplomatic roles are not rigidly defined; they require constant adaptation to varying contexts and demands. Diplomats must seamlessly transition between vastly different topics—trade relations, security policies, climate issues—sometimes rendering previously acquired expertise temporarily irrelevant. The profession demands not only subject-matter adaptability but also the acquisition of new hard and soft skills. Social media literacy, data analysis, project management, and networking have become as essential as traditional diplomatic skills like negotiation, advocacy, and crisis management.
This fluidity means diplomats must constantly shift professional identities: one moment they are a spokesperson, the next a negotiator, cultural ambassador, or security coordinator. Some embrace this diversity; others find it overwhelming, as they must continually acquire new knowledge and competencies.
DM: So being a diplomat is an evolving role that encompasses multiple disciplines. What about representation? That is the essence of diplomacy, isn’t it?
Jeremy J. R. Dommnich: Absolutely. Representation is one of the most defining aspects of a diplomat’s life, both professionally and personally. It comes with immense responsibility and constant scrutiny.
Sitting behind their country’s flag for the first time, a diplomat feels the weight of speaking on behalf of millions. However, in times of political polarization, diplomats often find themselves defending policies or positions that may conflict with their personal values. This tension—between private beliefs and professional obligations—is a recurring challenge in diplomatic life.
Moreover, representation extends beyond formal settings. A diplomat’s actions in private life—even something as simple as driving with diplomatic plates or attending social events—carry implications. Over time, this continuous scrutiny, coupled with the experience of living abroad for extended periods, can impact personal identity. As German sociologist Georg Simmel observed, “For the perfection of his art, the diplomat is called upon to refrain from being his true self.” This is perhaps the most profound cost of diplomacy: becoming a stranger to oneself.
And this is not even considering the impact on families, particularly children. More than 50% of third-culture children report experiencing emotional neglect due to the demands of diplomatic life.
DM: Is that emotional toll primarily due to the pressures of representation, or does frequent relocation play a larger role?
Jeremy J. R. Dommnich: It’s a combination of both. Diplomacy is more than a profession; it’s a lifestyle that operates 24/7, often for a lifetime. Moving between countries is integral to a diplomat’s career. While many are drawn to this nomadic lifestyle, it also presents challenges, particularly in cultural adaptation, professional reorientation, and identity shifts for diplomats and their families.
Surprisingly, diplomats across the board report a lack of institutional support from their employers when navigating these transitions—whether moving to a new post or returning home. This is one of the reasons I founded Nvoye: to provide diplomats with the support they need to integrate into new environments and build meaningful connections.
DM: It’s reassuring to hear that such support exists. What advice would you offer to diplomats currently in the field?
Jeremy J. R. Dommnich: One of the most crucial reflections a diplomat can have is an honest self-assessment: Why am I a diplomat? In my research at the International Psychoanalytic University, I identified four distinct types of diplomats, each with unique challenges and opportunities for professional growth:
The Life Adventurer – drawn to the global mobility and excitement of diplomatic life.
The Content Specialist – focused on expertise in a particular field, such as trade or security.
The Family Lead – balancing professional duties with family stability and well-being.
The Homo Politicus – motivated by political engagement and national service.
Understanding one’s intrinsic motivation helps diplomats proactively address career challenges and plan for long-term success. Diplomats serve their nations with their lives. If foreign ministries are the primary institutions for advancing national interests abroad, then diplomats are their most vital instruments. Countries should ensure these professionals are well-equipped, both institutionally and personally. Recognizing that diplomacy extends beyond cocktail receptions is in the interest of the public, the government, and the envoys themselves.
DM: How do you see these challenges evolving in the future?
Jeremy J. R. Dommnich: In an increasingly interconnected world, diplomats will play an even more vital role in de-escalating conflicts, fostering cross-cultural understanding, and strengthening international cooperation.
Technological advancements and artificial intelligence will continue to reshape diplomacy, but human interaction remains irreplaceable. Diplomats must function as conduits for authentic human experiences, ensuring that personal connections remain at the heart of international relations. To fulfill this role, they must stay emotionally resilient, socially engaged, and physically well.
Jeremy J. R. Dommnich holds a BA in European Studies from The Hague University of Applied Sciences, an MA in Interdisciplinary Latin American Studies from the Free University in Berlin, and an MA in Leadership and Consulting. He is an accredited coach (IPU) and supervisor (DGSV).
Diplomat Magazine sat down with Jeremy to explore his work at Nvoye, his reflections on the diplomatic profession, and his vision for supporting envoys in navigating a career defined by both privilege and pressure.
DM: Mr. Dommnich, you have trained diplomats from over 120 countries and conducted academic research on the diplomatic profession. What are the key insights you have gained about diplomacy?
Jeremy J. R. Dommnich: Diplomacy has evolved significantly since the days when envoys were semi-sovereign representatives conveying messages back to their home countries. Today, the concept of diplomacy has expanded beyond traditional foreign ministries. Terms like “private diplomacy,” “cyber diplomacy,” “health diplomacy,” and even “video game diplomacy” illustrate this shift.
This proliferation forces traditional diplomats to rethink their role. Given cultural and historical nuances, each country, ministry, and even individual diplomat has a unique perception of what diplomacy entails.
DM: With such a broad spectrum of roles, what remains constant in defining a diplomat?
Jeremy J. R. Dommnich: While diplomatic roles vary, certain core themes persist: diplomatic immunity, international travel, high-level negotiations, and the formalities of diplomatic attire and receptions. However, my research reveals that beyond these privileges, diplomats share fundamental challenges. Uprooting families, fluctuating social networks, and the relentless pressure to adapt and represent are universal aspects of diplomatic life.
In essence, diplomatic life is shaped by three defining experiences: fluidity, representation, and mobility. Understanding and addressing these elements is crucial for diplomats to thrive in their profession.
