Diplomacy, call me etiquette

H.E. Mr. Jose De Bouza Serrano, Ambassador of Portugal, H.E. Ms. Marta Betanzos, Ambassador of Spain in Portugal and H.E. Mr. Luís Albuquerque Veloso, Deputy of Portuguese Protocol, before pandemic times.

By Alexandra Paucescu

It is said that it takes only seven seconds to form an opinion about your counterpart, when you first meet a new person.

We live in the 21st century but appearances still matter, etiquette and social norms are important, especially when it comes to the diplomatic world.

We have two eyes, two ears and just one mouth. So we should learn to listen, observe and talk only when it is appropriate and relevant. Behaving properly and creating a correct and pleasant look are also critical aspects of diplomacy. Clothes have always been considered and recognized as real tools of soft power, many times even being capable of making a strong diplomatic point.

Originally started as an exclusive role for nobility, diplomacy has undergone transformations over time, in all aspects. The fashion style and etiquette were no exception. Diplomacy is a highly hierarchical area, and perhaps that is why a few hundred years ago diplomats and senior foreign state representatives sent to various royal houses, had the allure and gala uniforms somehow inspired from those of career soldiers, but far more impressive and elaborate.

The first official diplomatic uniforms were initially introduced in France by 1781 and it is generally accepted that they became a custom in the 18th century, widely adopted by all European countries. The fashion style was then rapidly followed by other nations’ foreign representatives from Asia (especially Japan) and Latin America, each country trying to bring its own styling and national related symbols to the diplomatic festive costume.

Whether it was made of dark blue tailcoats with standing collars and embroidered velvet (in Prussia), dark turquoise or white coats (in Italy), black wool frock coats with gold-embroidered paulownia flowers (in Japan) or black coats with gold stars on each side (in the USA), they all had in common the elegant bicorn (or tricorne) hat, decorated with white rich plumes, perfectly completing those elegant gala outfits. The costumes were also differentiated by rank, so that the more senior diplomats had much more sophisticated outfits, richer embroideries and more feathers, long swords with ivory handle, plated with gold and precious stones. Also, I should add that the consular officials had less festive and less elaborated outfits, comparing to diplomats.

The gala uniforms were paraded to special occasions and at the royal court audiences, balls and opera nights, but they gradually disappeared, ending this tradition almost entirely after World War II. A few countries, such as Denmark, Spain, Sweden or Great Britain, still maintain it though. Their high-ranking diplomats still use the official diplomatic uniforms for high-class events, state dinners or the traditional presentation of credentials, at the beginning of each diplomatic posting as ambassadors. And especially these days, it is a real pleasure to see them, like a splash of color, bringing the flavor of old times back to us.

However, by presenting the credentials to the head of state, the ambassador and its diplomatic crew will always adopt a protocol style with elegant tailcoat or national costume.

Diplomatic life is generally full of high-level events, lunches and dinners, receptions and conferences. Invitations to such protocol events are almost always accompanied by the related dress code, which should be followed accordingly.  Personal appearances are of great importance to diplomatic world, without making it shallow. Always inform yourself before you participate, about the meaning of the dress code, as inappropriate clothing might be interpreted as an affront to the host and as a lack of respect to the rest of the participants.

Time of day also plays a great role when it comes to adequate clothing. Afternoon functions, addressed as ‘Tea’, ‘Champagne glass’, ‘Garden party’, ‘Lunch’ or ‘Cocktail’, are usually considered less formal. Meanwhile, evening receptions and diplomatic gatherings, as National Day celebrations, state or gala dinners, royal and diplomatic balls or opera nights, are considered high etiquette events, usually requiring more formal clothing for men and women both.

As a general and easy rule to remember, I would say that the more ceremonial the occasion and the later it is during the day, the more elegant and sophisticated you should look.

‘White Tie’ is established as the most formal. It usually requires elegant tailcoats and white ties for men and long evening gowns with above-elbow gloves for women. Small and delicate bags are also part of the perfect feminine outfit for such occasions. ‘White Tie’ is usually recommended when attending balls, opera nights and most formal dinners. Diplomatic corps annual receptions traditionally held at the beginning of each year, where ambassadors, high-commissioners and government officials are invited, are the best examples.

Part of this is also sometimes required in some countries when being formally accredited to the president or monarch.

‘Black Tie’ means usually wearing tuxedo with a bow tie for men and also floor-length dresses for women.

‘Dinner jacket’ means a dark-colored jacket or dark suit for men. Always wear these with dark polished shoes and dark socks, long enough so that one cannot see your bare legs while you are seated!

H.E. Mr. Jose De Bouza Serrano, Ambassador of Portugal, saluting the King and Queen of the Belgians.
Ambassador of Portugal H.E. Jose de Bousa Serrano presenting his respects to Queen Maxima of the Netherlands.

‘Cocktail’ means a bit more relaxed but it is still a very elegant style.  It is normally associated with dark suits and silk ties for men and knee-length elegant dresses with (preferable) high heels for women. Remember: boots are usually not considered adequate, no matter the season or weather conditions and peep-toes or sandals are not recommended! And, I should also add that one would have to avoid wearing black ties, except for mourning occasions.

‘Casual’ does not mean ‘jeans and sneakers’, as one might think… nor very short dresses, deep cleavage for women or shorts and short-sleeve shirts for men. No odd or ‘too modern’ combinations, as for instance suits and sneakers worn together, are encouraged, when it comes to diplomatic events.

When being invited to a breakfast, lunch, daytime function, garden party or tea-time meeting, you should wear a light grey or beige suit (especially on summer days) if you are a man and a daytime, but still elegant dress, if you are a woman. Depending on the type of event, sometimes hats and gloves may be required for women (usually specified on the invitation). However, always keep the hat or fascinator on for the whole duration of the gathering; don’t take it off during the reception.

A special talk should be about each country’s traditional costume. These colorful costumes, hand-embroidered by incredibly talented and many times anonymous artists, in long hours of handicraft work, have deep emotional meaning for each one of us, because they relate directly to our own cultural and national identity. They can generally be worn on the occasion of the National Day or at other diplomatic events, where this dress code is specified or required. And it is such nice scenery to see the diversity and beauty in these costumes, when gathered!

I confess I had never had a national costume before going on our first diplomatic mission, but I have more than one now and wore them proudly on the appropriate occasions.

However, when not sure about what to wear or not very clearly specified on the invitation, my advice is to better ask while confirming the attendance!

No matter what time of day or occasion, it is preferable that you should avoid wearing excessive perfume or jewelry.

Posture is of great importance, too. A confident attitude will always send this message about you to the others. Respect and admiration are earned by your actions and behavior, and can be so easily damaged by moments of negligence and misconduct.

Always button up your jacket while standing, only when seated you may let it loose. Don’t play with your hands, don’t gesticulate too much when you talk, look straight and relaxed, have a fresh haircut (men) or a light and modern hairstyle (women). Small details, such as how you carry your bag and gloves; how you get off a car, when are done the wrong way can totally ruin a first impression.

Diplomatic etiquette refers to the whole attitude and behavior, not just clothes. However, many of these rules are common sense and are considered general rules of good manners. You cannot participate at an event if you haven’t been invited, you can’t bring more guests with you than is specified on the invitation that you’re allowed. You must be punctual, although the notion and relevance of time are differently perceived around the world, due to the wide cultural differences. Generally an event is considered opened once the ‘honor guest’ arrived.

Although traditional and formal diplomatic uniforms are mostly gone from the modern 21st century picture, clothes have long been used as strategic tools, establishing supremacy and sending powerful coded messages. Fashion and etiquette will always play an important role and will sometimes help or support the diplomatic efforts, as easily as they can also undermine it, when used inappropriately.

Clothes and notorious brands have been used as cultural diplomacy tools for quite a while now. More or less, everybody thinks of France when we talk about Chanel or Dior, Armani means Italy, Burberry will always be associated with Great Britain as well as the USA and Ralph Lauren or Calvin Klein are bound together.

In today’s world, where the visual is more important than ever and a good image says more than a thousand words, we see the increasing power of suggestion. The choices of adequate colors, brands, styles and their symbolism, nothing is random anymore, at the high level. All these details are extensively studied and advised by image experts and PR consultants, and used deftly in the diplomatic life. The image sells, promotes, conquers or creates alliances.

It is true that maybe the pandemic temporarily changed a bit part of all this. While online virtual meetings are today’s reality, it seems of less importance what color is your suit behind the screen, not to mention that most of the times, elegant shoes and socks are missing entirely, conveniently replaced by house shoes and comfy loafers. After all, we see people only from above their waist on screen, don’t we? … A lot of funny situations come to my mind now, about innocent ‘accidents’ related to clothing, which happened in the online environment of the last year. I am sure you know a few, too.

World is changing and is trying to adapt to realities unexpected until not too long time ago. But make no mistake, some things will always stay the same: real class and etiquette are timeless!

About the author:

Alexandra Paucescu

Alexandra Paucescu- Author of “Just a Diplomatic Spouse” Romanian, management graduate with a Master in business, cultural diplomacy and international relations studies.

She speaks Romanian, English, French, German and Italian,  gives lectures on intercultural communication and is an active NGO volunteer.

Bavaria boosts “Lion’s March” projects

Minister Melanie Huml and HRH Prince Ludwig of Bavaria – Picture by Bayerische Staatskanzlei

Saturday, 4 September 2021, Free State of Bavaria: Bavaria is supporting housing units for students at the IT Campus in Turkana, Kenya, with over 600,000 Euros. 

Bavaria’s Minister of State for European and International Affairs, Melanie Huml, took part in her capacity as patron of the “Lion’s March” – a fundraising and solidarity march from Kaltenberg to Hohenschwangau – and handed over a donation chèque from the Bavarian State Government in the sum of 600,000 Euros to the “Learning Lions” initiative of HRH Prince Ludwig Bavaria.

The monies will be used up primarily to build housing units at the ICT campus in Turkana in northern Kenya. Huml: “With this, we are not only giving young people in Kenya a perspective for the future, but also strengthening their personal responsibility and financial independence.”

The state government had already funded the construction of the classroom building at the ICT campus of the “Learning Lions” with almost 580,000 Euros in a previous project since 2019. The construction of the building was completed in spring 2021 and the campus could go into operation with work and training places for more than 200 people.

To ensure that the campus also has accommodation facilities in the future, the construction of residential units is planned in the new project. So-called “Tiny Houses” will be able to accommodate 225 students and guests. In addition, a day-care centre for up to 30 children is to be built to give young mothers the opportunity to continue their education and work.

The aim of the “Learning Lions” project is to give young people in the very poor and remote Turkana region prospects in their home country through free training in the IT sector. The students are introduced step by step to digital services that they can offer worldwide via the internet. In this way, they are trained to become digital entrepreneurs.

Huml: “The project shows that the jobs of the future can be created anywhere. Africa is a continent of opportunities. With our funding, we are making a lasting commitment to providing sound training here. I am particularly pleased that the creation of childcare facilities also makes it possible for young mothers to continue their jobs and education.

For further information Government of Bavaria: https://www.bayern.de/kenia-bayern-foerdert-wohneinheiten-fuer-studenten-des-it-campus-in-turkana-mit-ueber-600-000-euro-bayerns-ministerin-fuer-internationales-melanie-huml-neue-zukunftsperspektiven-fuer-jun/

Lion’s March: https://löwenmarsch.de

Georgia’s Role in Afghanistan Evacuation Efforts

By Giorgi Nakashidze

Throughout years, Georgia actively participated in the NATO-led operations in Afghanistan – the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the Resolute Support Mission (RSM). At the peak of the operation ISAF in 2012-2014, Georgia had up to 1500 military personnel on the ground. As part of the RSM mission, Georgia had deployed 857 personnel under different Allied commands being the largest per-capita contributor to the mission and the single largest non-NATO provider of manpower. During these missions Georgia’s airspace and its territory was used as a transit route to Afghanistan. At the final stage of the RSM mission, Georgia supported withdrawal of the NATO and partner forces from Afghanistan providing the host nation support and full transit opportunities through its territory.

Today, when the tragic events in Afghanistan put us in danger of a large-scale humanitarian crisis, Georgia is once again actively involved in the management of humanitarian and evacuation processes. Since August 14, three C-17 Globemaster III military transport aircrafts of the Heavy Airlift Wing (HAW), operating as part of the Strategic Airlift Capability (SAC) program, have been deployed to the Tbilisi Airport. The aircrafts have been conducting regular flights on the route Tbilisi-Kabul-Tbilisi to evacuate military and civilian personnel from Afghanistan. As for now, up to 20 flights have been conducted from Kabul to Tbilisi and approximately 2500 people have been evacuated.

Inside the Tbilisi International Airport, special facility was designated by Georgian side to allocate evacuated personnel before the departure to the NATO member states via charter flights. During the transit operation, the embassies of the member states and Georgian authorities provided evacuees with the first medical aid, food and other necessities. To ensure processing of the evacuated refugees, several member states have deployed their military and civilian personnel to the Tbilisi Airport.

At the military base, adjacent to the Tbilisi International Airport, Georgian Defence Forces installed the large multipurpose tents to host evacuees during the long delays before the departures. Georgian side established an interagency task force, which was responsible for supporting the transit operation with all necessary measures. Since various international organizations and partner states are carrying out urgent humanitarian evacuation of employees and their family members from Afghanistan, Georgia, as a trustworthy member of the international community, has decided to engage in this process.

Accordingly, the Georgian side agreed to assist several international organizations, namely the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), Open Government Partnership (OGP), the International Republican Institute (IRI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) in evacuation of their staff. Evacuees will be provided with the temporary accommodations on the territory of Georgia.

Georgia’s international partners, including International Monetary Fund, EU, USA, Norway, Sweden, Poland and Netherlands expressed their gratitude towards Georgian Government for its role in Afghanistan evacuation efforts. For example, Embassy of the Netherlands in Georgia thanked Georgia “for the excellent cooperation with the Georgian government and airport authorities regarding the transit flights from Kabul via Tbilisi to Amsterdam.

Together we managed to offer transit to hundreds of passengers, amongst which were Dutch nationals, Afghans who worked for our country and their families. The Tbilisi evacuation team is thankful for the smooth and flexible collaboration with many committed people at the airport Tbilisi, under uncertain circumstances, due to the harsh and complex situation at Kabul airport.”

Current developments in Afghanistan threaten the regional and global security environment. Contributing to the international humanitarian efforts in the times of great difficulties once again demonstrates the importance of Georgia as a regional actor, as well as a reliable stakeholder that can ensure the security and stability of the region. In addition, it strengthens Georgia’s role with the regional security context and positions the country as a strategic partner to the Transatlantic Alliance, promising enhanced cooperation and increased interoperability. Being part of this mission is a giant step on the path towards NATO membership as it proves that Georgia is able to handle matters of collective defense and security in a successful and responsible manner.

FM Heiko Maas in Afghanistan-related talks in Qatar

Tuesday, 31 August 2021, Doha, State of Qatar: Germany’s chief of diplomacy Heiko Maas was received by his Qatari counterpart Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani to discuss the Qatari role in moderating the response by Western countries to the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan on 15 August, which is yet to be recognize by any country. 

Qatar has been mediating between the EU, the U.S.A. and the now-toppled elected Afghan government and Taliban representatives for many years, and Doha has been the centre of Taliban diplomacy since 2013.  As a matter of fact, the U.S.A. as well as the United Kingdom have already announced that their diplomatic ties to Afghanistan shall henceforth be dealt from Doha until further notice. 

Qatar’s Vice Premier and Foreign Minister warned that isolating the Taliban could lead to further instability and urged the international community to engage with the movement to address security and socioeconomic concerns in Afghanistan during a press conference.

On the agenda was the issue of legitimacy for the novel Afghan government that according to Taliban sources will be announced within days. Meanwhile the international community is eager to secure a working airport in Kabul, albeit the issue remains contentious as no foreign power is thus far willing or capable to provide the necessary expertise, and military security for it. 

Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain and Uzbekistan have been instrumental staging posts for evacuation flights for Western countries’ citizens, as well as Afghan interpreters, journalists and members of civil society. 

During his visit to Qatar, Foreign Minister Heiko Maas was also received by the country’s head of state, HH The Amir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani at the Amirial Diwan. 

For further information: 
Embassy of the State of Qatar in the Federal Republic of Germany: https://berlin.embassy.qa/en

New Diplomatic Police Vehicles

By Audrey Nguyen

The signature blue Dynamic Diplomatic Surveillance vehicles that patrol around diplomatic institutions of The Hague will soon have a new appearance.

The Hague is home to many international and diplomatic institutions in the Netherlands, including embassies and consulates. Under the Vienna Convention, these institutions must be protected by the host country to ensure undisturbed operations. This obligation has long been undertaken by The Hague police unit’s Protection and Security Department, also known as ABB.

The ABB is tasked with observing certain objects such as embassies by making use of surveillance containers and the Safety and Security Monitor Centre (MBB), which monitors movements in the area 24/7.

In addition to these methods of maintaining security, Dynamic Diplomatic Surveillance (DDS) is another task of the ABB. DDS involves actively and dynamically monitoring diplomatic objects and international institutions to bring more unpredictability in their operations. This includes patrolling areas around diplomatic residences, embassies, and more in their distinct dark blue vehicles with gold stripes.

From September 1st however, these vehicles will gradually be replaced by regular white police cars with blue and red stripes. They can be distinguished from other police vehicles by the text “Protection and Security”. These cars will be used to continue patrols and support diplomats when they require assistance with safety.

As usual, embassies can request assistance from the police through the Diplomatic Front Office (DFO). Depending on the request, the DFO will deploy the Safety and Security Department and/or other parts of the police unit of The Hague, including the DDS. The service of the DDS remains unaltered, apart from a change in the appearance of their vehicles.

About the author:

Audrey Nguyen

Thuc Anh “Audrey” Nguyen – Vietnamese student studying BSc International Relations and Organizations at Leiden University. 

Her mother’s career in foreign affairs allowed her to experience diplomatic life growing up. The unique international setting of her childhood sparked her interest in global affairs. After moving to The Hague a few years ago for her mother’s assignment, she has stayed behind to begin her own path in International Relations. 

Celebrating 20 years of renewed Belgian diplomatic presence in Berlin

0

By Geert Muylle, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Belgium in Germany 

This year the Belgian Embassy in Berlin celebrates its 20th anniversary. Exactly 20 years ago, on 17 May 2001, the renovated Embassy was officially inaugurated by King Albert II alongside the German and Belgian Ministers of Foreign Affairs Joschka Fischer and Louis Michel.

This anniversary presented us with the opportunity to look back at the history of our diplomatic presence in the city and showed us how fundamentally interlinked our representation here is with the history of the city and its people.

It all started in 1913 with the acquisition of the mansion at Jägerstrasse 53, built in 1884 by Ernst von Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, one of the most influential German private bankers of his time. In 1938, Belgium bought the house next door that belonged to the Bank Mendelssohn & Co and had been built by Martin Gropius (great-uncle of Bauhaus founder Walter Gropius) and Heino Schmieden, who together formed one of the largest architecture firms of the city, and also built the famous Martin Gropius Bau.

We know what happened next: the war broke out, Germany invaded Belgium and the Embassy was closed. Both buildings  were destroyed during the bombings of the city. After the war, the plot was situated in the Soviet zone. It lay fallow until it was expropriated by the GDR in 1966. The situation was very central and apparently quite useful for the regime: the new building erected on the ruins of the former Embassy was used by the Ministry for State Security (StaSi). From this plot, situated close to an important telecommunications hub in the city, the StaSi tapped phone lines in Berlin-Mitte.

It took some time, but eventually the wall fell and the two Berlins and two Germany’s could finally be reunited. The double-plot  became the property of the City of Berlin and we started negotiations to try to reacquire the historical plot, which eventually succeeded at the end of 1993. It goes without saying that for structural, esthetic but also reasons linked to the history of the building, a thorough renovation and transformation was required. The Belgian authorities launched an architectural competition.

The representation of the Kingdom of Belgium in the German capital was to signal light, transparency and openness whilst preserving something of the architectural esthetic of the “Plattenbau” that is so typical of East Berlin. In 1998, the project by the Berlin studio Rüthnick Architekten was selected. This choice made Belgium one of the few countries whose Embassy was planned by a German architect…and a woman! As the sales agreement stipulated that the building was not allowed to be left unoccupied pending renovation, the Head of the Berlin Bureau of the Belgian Embassy at the time offered studio spaces to Belgian and German artists.

During the end of the 1990s, the building was used for exhibitions, receptions and lectures, and gradually developed into a cultural centre as the Berlin art scene was booming.

Today, the Embassy is the first point of contact for the more than 24,000 Belgians living in Germany and for all Germans interested in Belgium, whether for economic, educational, cultural or touristic reasons. This building is one of the places where the bilateral relations between Belgium and Germany are given shape to the benefit of both our countries and their citizens.

As demonstrated above, the history of the German capital and that of the Embassy building are inseparable. I am proud of 20 years of diplomatic and consular work in this historic location at the heart of Berlin and am thrilled to celebrate what unites us with the city and its inhabitants as well as the contacts, partnerships and friendships that have blossomed over the years.

For further information 

Embassy of the Kingdom of Belgium in the Federal Republic of Germany: https://germany.diplomatie.belgium.be/de/botschaft-und-konsulate/botschaft-berlin

————

Images courtesy of the Belgian Embassy in Germany (Berlin)

Kyrgyzstan 30th Anniversary celebrated with a new book

The 30th Anniversary of the Independence of Kyrgyzstan is an ongoing celebration during all month of August organized by H.E. Mr. Muktar Djumaliev, Kyrgyz ambassador to Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg and his team of diplomats. One of the important moment on the independence agenda for 2021, was the launching of the book “Kyrgyz” by K. Imanaliev Kanybek Imanaliev that has been translated into French and will soon be presented in Europe.

Kyrgyz – the book

The book was translated by Audrey Bealieu, a doctoral student in international relations and world politics at the University of Ottawa. Audrey came from Canada to participate in the commemoration activities and visited Kyrgyz Embassy in Belgium to meet Kyrgyz people and diplomats.

Eugene Matos, Audrey Beaulieu, H.E. Mr. Muktar Djumaliev, Ambassador of Kyrgyzstan and First secretary Mr. Chyngyz Maniiasov.

“I learned a lot about the Kyrgyz, the culture and traditions of the Kyrgyz people in the process of translating the book”, Audrey said. The Embassy has organized a video VTC with the author of the book, where K. Imanaliev invited Audrey to visit Kyrgyzstan, and also thanked her for her contribution to promoting Kyrgyz culture among the French-speaking population.

Audrey Beaulieu congratulated all Kyrgyzstanis on the 30th Anniversary of Independence with the wishes of peace and prosperity to their country.

FM Abdulaziz Kamilov received Heiko Maas in Tashkent

German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas and Uzbek Foreign Minister Abdulaziz Kamilov – Picture by Uzbekistan’s Foreign Ministry.

Monday, 30 August 2021, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan: Uzbek chief of diplomacy, Abdulaziz Kamilov held a tête-à-tête with the Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Germany Heiko Maas, after the latter’s arrival to Tashkent.

During their bilateral meeting, an emphasis was paid to issues pertaining to the current situation in neighbouring Afghanistan. On behalf of the German Federal Government, Heiko Maas, expressed its gratitude to Uzbekistan, and its people, for their assistance in organizing the evacuation of German and other foreign nationals from Afghanistan.

The two sides expressed willingness to continue close cooperation in Afghanistan. Maas likewise stressed the relevance of Uzbekistan’s geographical position for the Bundeswehr, and thanked Foreign Minister Kamilov on their behalf. 

Views were likewise exchanged on the interaction of the two countries within the framework of international and regional organizations.
Not least Heiko Maas was pleased to arrive in Uzbekistan conveying regards to President Shavkat Mirziyoyev and the Uzbek people, for thirty years of independence, since the country became broke away from the Soviet Union on 1 September 1991.

Those regards were reiterated later during the day when Germany’s Federal President Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier telephoned his Uzbek counterpart on the occasion of the Central Asian country’s round birthday. Concretely the two heads of state discussed the expansion of bilateral trade and investments, support for business initiatives, industrial cooperation projects in high tech industries and infrastructure modernisation programmes with the participation of leading German companies such as Siemens, Bosch, Man, Claas, Knauf and many others.

Furthermore, the two presidents discussed separately the issue of advanced German language studies at schools and higher educational institutions in Uzbekistan. 

For further information

 
Uzbek Foreign Ministry: https://mfa.uz/ru/press/news/2021/o-vstreche-s-glavoy-mid-frg—30213

Embassy of Uzbekistan in Germany (HE Ambassador Nabijon Kasimov): http://www.uzbekistan.de/frontend/web/news/75?fbclid=IwAR1bhPajgsLWxPI_LnARwiRtoRSYPESKqSl_ppqdilNM4CMmWFxmP3NcHis

Uzbek Presidency: https://president.uz/ru/lists/view/4591?fbclid=IwAR0I3o9ePvHdA9UFYwYmyVvI3pnh96ETL_YlY1sf3xuFUminxKCWn2HChh

China’s Reaction to the US Military Withdrawal from Afghanistan

By US President Joe Biden has made a strategic decision to withdraw US forces from Afghanistan, after twenty years of military presence under the pretext of eliminating terrorism and spreading democracy. Twenty years later, the Taliban has become more powerful and influential and has seized all the joints of the state and major cities easily and in a record period, which leaves many questions about the role that the United States was playing in Afghanistan and its relationship with the Taliban. Paradoxically, the superpower, accompanied by an alliance of powerful armies, could not eliminate an armed group not too numerous.

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who was one of the political promoters of the US (Western) intervention in Afghanistan, has expressed his shock at the Biden administration’s decision to withdraw military, and considered this decision “tragic, dangerous, unnecessary and idiotic.” Tony Blair led Britain to participate in the US campaign against Afghanistan in 2001 under the administration of President George W. Bush. In a scathing statement to the US leadership, Blair said, “the absence of consensus and cooperation and the deep politicization of foreign policy and security issues clearly weaken the power of the United States.”

Consequently, US allies feel mistrust in the absence of coordination and political and security cooperation on international issues of common concern. In the end, Blair recommended the US administration to develop a strategic diplomatic plan to put “maximum pressure” on the Taliban, and said: “We need to make a list of incentives, sanctions, and actions that we can take, including protecting the civilian population, so that the Taliban understands that their actions will have consequences.”

Some political analysts have argued that “US blood and money is wasted in the quagmire of Afghanistan.” Others view the decision to withdraw the military from Afghanistan as a terrible blow to the credibility of the United States: its credibility as a partner, and its moral standing in global affairs. However, President Biden indicates that the United States has returned with force again to the international arena. Will President Biden find a door for the United States to exit peacefully from the thorny issues that successive administrations have been involved in twenty years ago?

The current international scene is much different from the era of the beginning of the twenty-first century, China has become more powerful and possesses the second economy in the world, Russia has regained its strength and is working to form a Eurasian alliance, and Iran is expanding rapidly in the Middle East despite US sanctions. President Biden is aware that the United States will lose time and money in futile wars in the Middle East, because the imminent danger to the United States comes from East Asia and more specifically from China. Therefore, the United States seeks to increase its military presence in the Asia-Pacific and South China Sea, and establishing more political, economic, and military alliances in Asia with the aim of undermining Chinese progress.

International newspapers published pictures of evacuating Americans by helicopter from Saigon, Vietnam, fifty years ago, and recently from Kabul, Afghanistan, indicating that the US strategy has not changed since then. The context of international events today is fundamentally different from what it was in the 1970s. The United States – indeed, the West in general – is involved in many conflicts, but it is not the clear winner. The Afghan collapse could be a disaster, in the war known as the War on Terror. But Washington’s failure in the broader struggle between democracy and authoritarianism can be seen only as a serious setback. The main question is whether the allies of the United States, such as Israel, Japan and the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, will feel reassured about the recent US decision, or will they be afraid and insecure about the future of their country, which is closely related to US foreign policy.

The Western model that promotes the spread of democracy in the world has proven its failure, which increases the chances of the Chinese model based on cooperation, partnerships and a common destiny without interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. Therefore, it seems that the Chinese model, one of its tools, the Belt and Road Initiative, is more attractive, has many economic benefits, and brings security stability. The US withdrawal may turn into an opportunity for China to fill the void and build strategic partnerships with this country rich in natural resources and with a distinguished geographical location between South Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East.

US President Joe Biden defended his decision to withdraw US forces from Afghanistan in his address to the American people last week. For him, this decision reflects the rearrangement of US interests, and gives it a better position to deal with the new challenges of the twenty-first century, as he makes clear to allies and adversaries – on both – its priorities that determine if it will spend its resources here or there. Following the American decision, the foreign ministers of the European Union held an emergency session and criticism was directed at Washington, which is one of the rare times that Europe blames the United States publicly and explicitly, because what it did in Afghanistan may cause an influx of refugees to European countries, as it would return Afghanistan a platform for terrorism in Central Asia. “This era is over,” said the Latvian defense minister, “and unfortunately the West – and Europe in particular – is showing its weakness to the world.” German politician Armin Laschet, a candidate to succeed Chancellor Angela Merkel, described the withdrawal of Western forces from Afghanistan as “the biggest disaster that NATO has seen since its founding.”

The Taliban’s control of Afghanistan may bring to light the project of laying gas pipelines from Russia through the Black Sea to India through the territory of Turkmenistan and then Afghanistan. This gigantic project may change the world’s energy map, which may severely affect fuel prices. The danger here lies in the ability of the Taliban, if the pipelines pass through its territory, to control international energy prices to some degree, and to exploit this by manipulating the oil exchanges to their advantage. After talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Moscow last Friday, Putin said the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan shows that efforts by the West to impose democracy are futile. “It is necessary to end the irresponsible US policy, which aims to establish democracies in other countries according to principles that are incompatible with their societies, without taking into account historical, national and religious characteristics, and in complete disregard for the traditions in which other people’s live” Putin added.

The Chinese government has not yet taken a decisive position regarding what is happening in Afghanistan. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said that the Chinese government will take its position after the formation of a government in Afghanistan, but the Chinese government is open to communication and dialogue with the Taliban. The two sides showed their goodwill when a Taliban delegation met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Tianjin. In this context, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said that her country “maintains contact and communication with the Afghan Taliban.”

This US decision will have long-term repercussions and impacts on security and stability in Central Asia, Pakistan and the Middle East, and may affect the narrow Chinese borders with Afghanistan, which has a Muslim majority of Uyghurs. The effects may extend to the Belt and Road Initiative proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013. China is focusing on enhancing economic connectivity with Afghanistan by building the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, from which Kabul will eventually benefit. China-Taliban cooperation will deal with security, border protection with China, and non-use of Afghan territory for actions that endanger China’s security.

Geng Shuang, China’s deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, said several terrorist organizations, including the “East Turkistan Movement”, have gathered and developed in Afghanistan, hoping that Afghanistan will not become a “terrorist paradise again.” Through its contacts with the Taliban, China will seek to draw red lines, and confirm that the development of any relationship in the future depends on maintaining China’s security. The Taliban described China as a “friendly country” and welcomed it for the reconstruction and development of Afghanistan. The movement’s spokesman, Suhail Shaheen, said in a press statement that his movement will ensure the safety of Chinese investments in Afghanistan. For his part, the editor-in-chief of the Chinese newspaper, Global Times, Hu Xijin, believes that China establishes its relations on the basis of mutual benefit, noting that if China goes to Afghanistan, it will not seek to fill any void, based on its foreign policy, which raises the slogan “respect for the choices of the peoples of all countries.”

Ambassador Xu Chen

During an emergency session of the UN Human Rights Council, China’s envoy, Chen Xu, said, “the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and other countries should take responsibility for the human rights violations committed by their armies in Afghanistan,” adding, “under the banner of democracy and human rights, the United States and other countries are carrying out military interventions in other sovereign countries and imposing their own model on countries with a vastly different history and culture,” noting that this brought “great suffering” to the peoples of those countries.

The West considers the countries neighboring Afghanistan to fall into the trap sooner or later. British analyst Richard Kemp, a former commander in the British army, likened Pakistan, Iran, China and Russia to a flock of vultures, which will fall on the Afghan carcass after the withdrawal of the United States. For its part, China considered that it would not allow itself to fall into the trap of military entry into Afghanistan, which was the graveyard of three empires: Britain, the Soviet Union and the United States of America. China considered that the arrival of the Taliban to the north-eastern province of Badakhshan, which is located on the mountainous border with Xinjiang province; estimated at 80 square kilometres, may provide a safe haven for Uighur Muslim separatist rebels. This prompted China to recognize the Taliban and hold talks with them with the aim of security coordination in the future.

The relationship of the Taliban with the “East Turkistan Islamic Movement” and its successor, the Turkistan Islamic Party, is solid since the 1990s. They have established training camps in Afghanistan since the “jihad” against the Soviet occupation, and it remained strong after the “Taliban” took control in 1996 of 90% of the territory of Afghanistan. What increases China’s concern is that in 2020, the United States removed the “East Turkistan Islamic Movement” from its list of foreign terrorist organizations, after the Security Council had designated it a terrorist organization under Resolutions 1267 and 1390 on September 11, 2002, for its association with Al-Qaeda. China considers that this organization may have increased its logistical and financial resources, manpower and weapons since Washington removed it from the list of terrorist groups in 2020. A report issued by the United Nations Security Council indicated that the “East Turkistan Islamic Movement” is not only present and operating in Afghanistan, but also has a “transnational agenda”.

China will not neglect Afghanistan, as it is a strategic region on the Silk Road and a major economic partner, since the meeting of the Chinese ambassador in Kandahar with the leader of the “Taliban” movement Mullah Omar in December 2000, Chinese investments in Afghanistan began to increase and multiply dramatically, there are more than 100 Chinese companies, all affiliated with the Communist Party in various fields in Afghanistan, including oil and gas exploration, mineral sectors, communications, transportation and military supplies.

In 2008, two Chinese companies obtained mining concessions in the “Mis-e-Ainak” mine, which was said to contain the second largest copper deposits in the world. China plans to build road and rail infrastructure projects between Peshawar, the capital of Pakistan’s North West Frontier Province, and the Afghan capital, Kabul. So, the consolidation of China’s presence in Afghanistan will depend on Beijing’s success in reaching an understanding with the “Taliban”.

China will not fall into the trap of military entry into Afghanistan, which was the tomb of the three greatest empires, but will seek to intensify political communication and economic projects. China needs the Afghan land, which is rich in mineral deposits of copper, iron, sulphur, bauxite, lithium and rare earth elements necessary for the technology industry. On the other hand, the presence of the Taliban in power may threaten the security of the Silk Road, despite the Chinese communication with this group.

The former commander of Indian forces in Kashmir, Deependra Singh Hooda, notes to the Washington Post that the resurgence of the Taliban is boosting the morale of Pakistan-based armed groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammedand the Pakistani Taliban. This makes Islamic militant groups more powerful and violent from Kashmir to Xinjiang. To reassure China, Taliban spokesman Muhammad Naim pledged that “the territory of Afghanistan will not be used to harm the security of any country.

About author:

Dr Mohamad Zreik


Dr. Mohamad Zreik is a PhD of International Relations, a researcher specializing in China’s foreign policy towards the Arab region, with a special focus on the Belt and Road Initiative, and has many writings and publications.

———————–

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own.

NRW opens academy for international politics

In the picture, President Nana Addo Akufo-Addo greeting Premier Armin Laschet, Luxembourgish Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn and erstwhile Afghan chief of diplomacy Rangin Dadfar – Land NRW, Ralph Sondermann

Wednesday, 25 August 2021, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Premier Armin Laschet opened the North Rhine-Westphalia Academy for International Politics. The Academy is dedicated to the global challenges and structural changes in international politics

in the 21st century. The focus is on promoting scholars from all over the world and their international and interdisciplinary networking. Among others, Nana Akufo-Addo, President of the Republic of Ghana, Jean Asselborn, Foreign Minister of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the former Afghan Foreign Minister Rangin Dadfar Spanta attended the opening. 

Premier Armin Laschet uttered as per statement below: “On the 75th anniversary of the founding of our state, the North Rhine-Westphalian Academy for International Politics is taking up its work. It brings together scientists from all over the world to jointly design solutions for forward-looking international cooperation. It promotes the exchange between science, politics and society.

The current global challenges show that we need a more strategic foreign policy. That is why the Academy’s goal of thinking internationally and interdisciplinarily about the future of international politics – is more important today than ever before. With the Academy, we are further expanding scientific excellence at the international UN location Bonn and creating a platform that combines international dialogue and interdisciplinary research at the highest level.”

The work of the new institution begins this week with a summer academy on “Artificial Intelligence and International Politics”. Scholars and diplomats from 23 nations will meet at the Petersberg near Bonn from 23 to 26 August 2021 for it. The Academy is also establishing a fellowship programme that will enable outstanding international scholars from a wide range of disciplines to conduct research in Bonn on issues related to the Academy’s thematic area. These range from current developments in international and European relations, international and European law, peace and conflict research, security policy to developments in economic policy, education policy, changes in global climate policy or questions of energy security.

The Academy will work closely with the diverse institutional and research landscape in Bonn and North Rhine-Westphalia and will also discuss its topics in conferences and events. 

The North Rhine-Westphalian Academy for International Politics is an independent academic institution in the legal form of a non-profit limited liability company (GmbH) funded by the state of North Rhine-Westphalia. 

For further information

 
Government of North-Rhine Westphalia: https://www.land.nrw/de/pressemitteilung/ministerpraesident-armin-laschet-eroeffnet-nordrhein-westfaelische-akademie-fuer

North Rhine-Westphalian Academy for International Politics: https://mbei.nrw/akademie