ICC Prosecutor and a delegation from the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan hold meetings

Left to right: H.E. Mr Fazal Ahmad Manawi Minister of Justice of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Mrs Fatou Bensouda, Prosecutor of the ICC, and H.E. Mr Mohammad Haneef Atmar, Minister of Foreign Affairs at the Seat of the Court in The Hague, The Netherlands.

The Office of the Prosecutor and high-level delegation from the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan hold productive meetings at the Seat of the Court.

On Friday, 7 May 2021, the Prosecutor of the International criminal Court, Mrs Fatou Bensouda and her team met a high-level delegation from the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan at the Seat of the Court led by H.E. Mohammad Haneef Atmar, Minister of Foreign Affairs.

The full day of productive discussions with the representatives of Afghanistan included the participation of officials from, inter alia, the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Justice, the Attorney General’s Office, the Supreme Court and the National Security Department. The meeting was organised in the context of the Government of Afghanistan’s March 2020 request for the Office to defer its investigation pursuant to article 18(2) of the Rome Statute. At the meeting, detailed presentations provided further insights into investigative steps taken or planned by the national authorities in Afghanistan and an opportunity for the Office to seek clarifications on a number of discussion points.

In stressing the importance of a victims-centred approach, Prosecutor Bensouda and H.E. Minister Atmar on behalf of the Government of Afghanistan pledged to work together to achieve justice for the Afghan people by holding perpetrators of atrocity crimes accountable.

“I have great admiration for the courage and resilience of the people of Afghanistan who have withstood tremendous adversity through decades of conflict and violence. They deserve tangible justice without delay”, stated Prosecutor Bensouda. “I look forward to continuing our constructive exchanges with the Government of Afghanistan, which was exemplified by today’s discussions, as we work towards determining how justice may best be served through joint collaborative efforts with full commitment to our respective independent duties and responsibilities under the Rome Statute”, added the Prosecutor. 

H.E. Minister Atmar thanked Prosecutor Bensouda for her commitment stating that ”this was a historic and very constructive meeting. The Government of Afghanistan is grateful to the ICC Prosecutor for hosting our high-level delegation to address the investigation and prosecution of all international crimes in Afghanistan” adding that “at this decisive moment for our country’s future, we have made encouraging progress in charting the way forward to ensure that no crimes will go unpunished. With our government’s unwavering commitment to human rights and justice, we are confident that with full cooperation with the Prosecutor, we can jointly advance the cause of justice for all of the victims of the long and devastating conflict.”

Mrs Fatou Bensouda, Prosecutor of the ICC and H.E. Mr Zabihullah Karimullah, Attorney General of Afghanistan

H.E. Mr Zabihullah Karimullah, the Attorney General of Afghanistan who also participated at the meeting added: “Our meeting with the ICC Prosecutor was very useful for discussing the constructive ways in which we can cooperate with the Office of the Prosecutor and for sharing information about the cases that Afghanistan is investigating and prosecuting at all levels. We look forward to continuing our positive exchanges and collaboration to guarantee that there will be no impunity for international crimes.”

The Office is appreciative of Afghanistan’s expressed commitment and the steps taken towards addressing accountability for atrocity crimes and securing justice for victims in Afghanistan in close collaboration with the ICC. The information and clarifications generated at the meeting will be helpful to the Office’s independent assessment of the Government of Afghanistan’s article 18(2) deferral request. The Prosecutor’s decision on that request is pending.

XXVI Summit of Tourism Ministers of the Americas

In the picture UNWTO SG Zurab Pololikashvili, President Luis Abinader, and DR Tourism Minister David Collado Morales – Picture by UNWTO.

Friday, 7 May 2021, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic: President of Dominican Republic, Luis Abinader invited the tourism ministers participating in the XXVI Summit of Tourism Ministers of the Americas, convened by the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), to “show the world that we are redesigning the future of tourism, that this is Latin America’s moment”.

President Abinader affirmed that, “today I feel prouder to be part of Latin American leadership. Seeing this commitment inspires me to move forward, to get up every day and bet on the future of our region”.

Tourism leaders in the Americas committed to jointly addressing the reactivation of tourism, making the sector a priority and adopting international protocols. Additionally, they agreed to emphasize innovation and digital transformation, develop sustainable tourism and strengthen support mechanisms for workers and impacted companies.

At the beginning of the meeting, the Secretary General of the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Zurab Pololikashvili commended the way Dominican Republic has handled the response to the COVID-19 pandemic and highlighted that “re-establishing trust in travel is a key first step towards tourism recovery, bringing hope to millions of people in the Americas and igniting the economic recuperation in general.”

Among the main topics of discussion included re-establishing confidence in travel, protecting businesses and jobs, and ensuring that the benefits of the tourism revival are felt beyond the industry itself. The working sessions were attended in person by ministers and vice ministers of Brazil, Colombia (Vice Minister of Tourism, Julián Guerrero) Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico (Secretary of Tourism, Miguel Torruco Marqués), Panama, Puerto Rico, Uruguay and Venezuela, and virtually by government officials from Argentina, Barbados, Bolivia, Chile, Nicaragua, and Peru.

The meetings were developed with the coordination of the host country through the Ministry of Tourism of Dominican Republic, with the participation of representatives of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the Association of Hotels and Tourism of Dominican Republic, among other sector organizations.

The summit ended with attendees signing the Declaration of Punta Cana which sealed the commitment  of the regional leaders to make tourism a pillar of sustainable development and ensure an effective recovery plan post-COVID.

For further information 

Presidency of Dominican Republic: http://www.presidencia.gob.do/noticias/abinader-pide-en-reunion-de-la-omt-en-puna-cana-mostrar-que-america-esta-unida

UNWTO: https://www.unwto.org/news/the-world-tourism-organization-unites-with-tourism-ministers-in-the-americas-to-relaunch-tourism-in-the-region

Learning from the ghosts of foreign policies past

Joe Biden is reading too much into the election. America never left the global scene during the Trump presidency, but it did begin to expunge the bad policies of previous years.

By Pete Hoekstra.

Perhaps the scariest words in Joe Biden’s speech to the joint session of Congress were, “America is back.” Combine this with former President George W. Bush’s recent charge that the Republican Party of today is isolationist, protectionist, and nativist, and one could be forgiven for imagining Biden and Bush were harkening back to some golden age of foreign policy.

But let us take a closer look at how the ghosts from the pre-Trump era still haunt us.

As my colleague Fred Fleitz pointed out in a recent opinion piece, China should be viewed as a hostile state power and adversary, not a competitor. China has evolved into a strategic threat economically and militarily because, prior to President Donald Trump, the United States coddled China.

In 2001, the United States signed the final documents granting China permanent normal trade relationship status. For the next 16 years, successive presidents took their eyes off of China as Beijing aggressively exploited our trade relationship and put American workers out of work and job providers out of business. They also watched as China launched a massive military build-up to challenge us.

Just as striking are the other colossal foreign policy failures during those 16 years. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, the Arab Spring, and the ISIS caliphate spanning much of Syria and Iraq are major policy blunders from this time. They cost America precious lives and treasure. Since 2001, these costs have included the lives of more than 7,000 American service members, an estimated 8,000 U.S. contractors, and approximately $5 trillion. This was far from a golden age in American foreign policy.

So, as we evaluate this “golden pre-Trump era” what do we find? America continues to fight and be attacked in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and across Africa. The ISIS caliphate, which was allowed to rise during this golden era, was dismantled, but Syria remains an unstable humanitarian and environmental nightmare.

These foreign policy results are why the American people responded so positively to President Trump’s America First foreign policy to keep the United States out of endless and unnecessary wars and not start new ones.

Now is not the time for George W. Bush, Barack Obama, or Joe Biden to be taking victory laps. Americans do not want to go back to the policies of that era—adventurism masquerading as global engagement, conceding our economic position to China on the altar of free trade, and open borders.

Is it fair to attack people for nativism just because they are opposed to open borders? Slandering Americans who believe that immigration to the United States should be managed is disappointing. I am a naturalized citizen of the United States. I have witnessed and participated in numerous naturalization ceremonies and seen the joy in people’s eyes when they receive their new status—citizen of the United States of America. Those naturalization papers are among the most valued documents in the world that a person can receive. They should be treated as such.

Returning to the failed policies of 2001-2016 as Bush and Biden say we should will lead to the same failed results. Does anyone really believe that doing the same thing, will somehow yield different results? As someone who once advocated some of these policies, I do not. We should all be willing to learn from what did not work in the past.

President Trump tried something new and got different results. Rather than more wars, he tried diplomacy and economic sanctions. He exhibited strength, without resorting to military force, by using tough rhetoric and rebuilding the U.S. military.

The results include the Abraham Accords, which was a major foreign policy breakthrough towards normalization in the Middle East. On the border, Trump restored the rule of law and used diplomacy with Mexico and Central American countries, resulting in significant decreases in illegal border crossings. On trade, Trump challenged China on trade policy, intellectual property theft, human rights, and the role of the Chinese Communist Party. This finally put China on notice, and there are few signs Americans want to go back to the way things were.

Joe Biden is reading too much into the November election. America never left the global scene during the Trump presidency. Under the leadership of President Trump, America started to expunge the ghosts of the previous years. Biden should not bring them back.

Published by Center for Security Policy. https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/our-mission/

About the author:

Pete Hoekstra.

Pete Hoekstra is the Chairman of the Center for Security Policy Board of Advisors and former US ambassador to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Turkey’s Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu intensifies cooperation with Germany

In the image Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu & Premier Armin Laschet – Picture by Land NRW, Stefanie Loos.

5-6 May 2021, Berlin, Germany: Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu encountered Germany’s Interior Minister Horst Seehofer, and held a meeting to assess the steps to be taken regarding irregular migration on the first day of his visit to NATO partner country Germany. 

Later on Wednesday, Minister Çavuşoğlu met with former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and former German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel and held a friendly discussion on Turkish-German relations.

On the second and last day of his programme in Berlin, Minister Çavuşoğlu spoke with his German counterpart Heiko Maas about the deep-rooted Turko-German relations, the state of the Turkish community on the 60th anniversary of the immigration agreement and reliable tourism. The meeting was followed by a joint press conference.

Foreign Minister Çavuşoğlu stated during the conference that bilateral trade volume has increased despite the pandemic, and will exceed 40 billion US dollars, that Germany is making a constructive contribution to Turkish relations vis-à-vis the European Union, and that we expect concrete steps from the EU.

Minister Çavuşoğlu then met with the Federal Government Commissioner for Tourism, Thomas Bareiß, and provided him with information about Turkey’s tourism programme, and discussed with him the development regarding the vaccination passport in the EU and the measures undertaken in Turkey.

Later the same day, Minister Çavuşoğlu was received by German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier and stated that they assessed the further development of their cooperation and discussed the situation and achievements of the Turkish community on the 60th anniversary of the Immigration Agreement.

On Thursday, 6 May NRW Premier Armin Laschet received Turkey’s Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu for talks that took place at the State Representation of North Rhine-Westphalia in Berlin. The talks with Premier Laschet focused on the pandemic, the situation of Syrian refugees in Turkey and the situation in the Mediterranean region.

Relations between Turkey and Germany are very close. Last year, Turkish students formed the largest group of foreign students at German universities. In 2019, Turkey ranked first among the main investor countries for the first time with 73 investment projects.

For further information:

 
Embassy of the Republic of Turkey (HE Ambassador Ali Kemal Aydın): http://berlin.be.mfa.gov.tr/Mission/ShowNews/20006

Government of NRW: https://www.land.nrw/de/pressemitteilung/ministerpraesident-armin-laschet-trifft-den-tuerkischen-aussenminister-mevluet

The ambassadors’ visit to the Peace Palace, a symbol of Peace and Justice in the world

In the picture, the Ambassador of Panama, H.E. Ms. Elizabeth Ward Neiman, who came to the city’s emblematic Peace Palace, with Mr. Erik De Beaedts, Peace Palace & Carnegie Foundation Director-General.

Mr. Erik de Baedts, General Director of the Carnegie Foundation-Peace Palace and Treasurer of the Hague Academy of International Law since 2015, individually welcomed to the Peace Palace the ambassadors that have presented their credentials in the Netherlands throughout 2020 and 2021.

As part of a program started in 2019, the Peace Palace would normally organize, in collaboration with Diplomat Magazine, a private group reception at the Palace for the new ambassadors. However, in light of the anti-COVID regulations, the traditional group reception has now morphed into a set of individual visits to the Palace, under the personal guidance of its General Director Mr. De Baedts.

“Until now I’ve had the pleasure to welcome the ambassadors of Egypt, Panama, and Rwanda. They all showed a sincere interest in the Peace Palace and in all the activities that the institutions hosted here undertake to promote peace through law” – Mr. de Baedts said.  

“The ambassador of Panama, H.E. Ms Elizabeth Ward Neiman, was very much interested in the architecture and the cultural heritage of the Peace Palace, whereas with the ambassador of Egypt, H.E. Mr. Hatem Elsayed Mohamed Kamaleldin, there was an interesting exchange on how to deal with extremist narratives and how to promote peace and tolerance between people with various backgrounds and faiths” – the General Director continued, describing his meetings with individual ambassadors.

H.E. Mr. Olivier Jean Patrick Nduhungirehe, Ambassador of Rwanda and Erik De Beaedts, Director General of the Peace Palace.

“I met H.E. Mr. Olivier Jean Patrick Nduhungirehe, ambassador of Rwanda the day after I laid a wreath at the monument opposite the Peace Palace to commemorate the victims of the Second World War. I learnt a lot from the dynamics that have taken place in Rwanda over the past decades. We share an interest to prevent dynamics of exclusion and persecution of minorities from taking place” – Mr. de Baedts said.

The Peace Palace hosts two of the most important Courts in the world: the United Nations’ International Court of Justice, which is the only main UN organ located outside of New York; and the Permanent Court of Arbitration. In addition, the Palace also hosts The Hague Academy of International Law.

The Peace Palace was built after the First Hague Peace Conference of 1899. It finally opened its doors in 1913, thanks to a donation from the philanthropist Andrew Carnegie, who established the Carnegie Foundation to build and maintain the Palace in perpetuity. The Carnegie Foundation also manages the Peace Palace Library and hosts the Academy.

The Palace has been designated as a National Monument and carries the European Heritage Label – recognitions that testifies to its high cultural, historical and architectural value.

In addition to the aforementioned functions, the Peace Palace also facilitates conferences during which important international law concepts are elaborated. At the same time, The Hague Academy of International Law, since its establishment, has educated more than 50,000 students and lawyers from all over the world, including future ambassadors and judges of many countries.

The meeting between the Peace Palace’s General Director and the new ambassadors, jointly organized by the Peace Palace and Diplomat Magazine, wants to symbolize the need for cooperation and solidarity in the complex efforts aimed at reaching peace among all countries in the world. “I wish the ambassadors a successful tenure in The Hague and I hope to see them more often once the Palace can open up again after the pandemic” – concluded General Director de Baedts.  

Dominic Ongwen sentenced to 25 years of imprisonment

Dominic Ongwen during the delivery of the sentence before the International Criminal Court on 6 May 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Today, 6 May 2021, Trial Chamber IX of the International Criminal Court sentenced Dominic Ongwen to 25 years of imprisonment following the Trial Judgment in which the Chamber found him guilty for a total of 61 crimes comprising crimes against humanity and war crimes, committed in Northern Uganda between 1 July 2002 and 31 December 2005.

The period of his detention between 4 January 2015 and 6 May 2021, will be deducted from the total time of imprisonment imposed on him. The sentence may be appealed before the ICC Appeals Chamber by either party to the proceedings.

Judge Bertram Schmitt, Presiding Judge, read a summary of the Chamber’s decision. He highlighted that the Chamber was confronted in the present case with a unique situation. It is confronted with a perpetrator who wilfully and lucidly brought tremendous suffering upon his victims. However, it is also confronted with a perpetrator who himself had previously endured extreme suffering himself at the hands of the group of which he later became a prominent member and leader.

The Chamber decided to give certain weight in mitigation to the circumstances of Dominic Ongwen’s childhood, his abduction by the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) at a very young age and his early stay with the LRA.

The Chamber rejected the Defence’s arguments, recalling its analysis of evidence in the Judgment issued on 4 February 2021, and considered that the mitigating circumstances of substantially diminished mental capacity and duress are not applicable.

The Chamber also rejected the arguments of the Defence concerning traditional justice mechanisms, noting that there exists no possibility under the Statute to replace a term of imprisonment with traditional justice mechanisms, or to incorporate traditional justice mechanisms into the sentence in any other way.  It also noted that Acholi traditional justice mechanisms are not in widespread use, to the extent that they would replace formal justice, and that they are reserved to members of the Acholi community, meaning that their use would mean that some victims belonging to other ethnic groups would be excluded.

The Chamber emphasised that reconciliation, whatever its form, is a process in which victim participation is essential, and noted that it is clear that many victims of the crimes committed by Dominic Ongwen do not support the idea of traditional justice in the present case, and that they have also criticised the fact that submissions in this regard were made to the Chamber without consulting them. 

Judges of ICC Trial Chamber IX pronouncing the sentence against Dominic Ongwen on 6 May 2021 ©ICC-CPI

The Chamber analysed one-by-one the gravity of each of the 61 crimes for which Dominic Ongwen was convicted, finding several aggravating circumstances applicable to some or even most crimes. Aggravating circumstances included particular cruelty, multiplicity of victims, the victims being particularly defenceless, and discrimination on political grounds and discrimination against women. The Chamber imposed individual sentences for each crime, taking the mitigating circumstance of Dominic Ongwen’s childhood and abduction by the LRA into due account. The highest individual sentences were of 20 years. Other sentences pronounced for individual crimes were of 14 or 8 years of imprisonment.

In its determination of the joint sentence for all the crimes for which Dominic Ongwen was convicted, the Chamber declined to sentence Dominic Ongwen to life imprisonment, considering his individual circumstances and in order to envisage a concrete prospect for Dominic Ongwen to eventually re-build his life.

The Chamber then, by majority, decided to impose a joint sentence of 25 years of imprisonment. The Majority, composed of Judge Bertram Schmitt and Judge Péter Kovács, is of the view that this joint sentence adequately reflects the strongest condemnation by the international community of the crimes committed by Dominic Ongwen and acknowledges the great harm and suffering caused to the victims. At the same time, the Majority held that such a joint sentence acknowledges Dominic Ongwen’s unique personal history and safeguards the prospect of his successful social rehabilitation and, consequently, the concrete possibility of future re-integration into society. Judge Raul Cano Pangalangan appended a partly dissenting opinion on this matter as he would have sentenced Dominic Ongwen to a total period of imprisonment of 30 years.

The Chamber also issued today an order for submissions on reparations. It emphasised that the right of victims to reparations is also an essential part of the system of justice at the Court, and stated that it will push forward the reparation stage of the proceedings with vigour and the utmost care.

New Zealand contributes to OPCW

New Zealand contributes €100,000 to future OPCW Centre for Chemistry and Technology

ChemTech Centre will provide leading-edge facilities and strengthen implementation of Chemical Weapons Convention

In the picture the Permanent Representative of New Zealand to the OPCW, H.E. Ambassador Lyndal Walker, and OPCW Director-General, H.E. Mr Fernando Arias.

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — 6 May 2021 — The Government of New Zealand has contributed a further €100,000 to a special Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Trust Fund to support the construction of a new facility, the OPCW Centre for Chemistry and Technology (“ChemTech Centre”).

The contribution was formalised during a ceremony between the Permanent Representative of New Zealand to the OPCW, H.E. Ambassador Lyndal Walker, and OPCW Director-General, H.E. Mr Fernando Arias, which was held yesterday at OPCW Headquarters in The Hague.

Ambassador Walker stated: ““New Zealand is proud to contribute a further €100,000 to the construction of the new OPCW Centre for Chemistry and Technology. Our total contribution of €200,000 demonstrates New Zealand’s commitment to disarmament and our strong support for the OPCW’s vital role as the world’s chemical weapons watchdog. The new Centre will enable the OPCW to future-proof its work, respond to the concerning re-emergence of chemical weapons, and enhance international cooperation. We look forward to construction starting soon on this important project.”

The Director-General expressed: “I am grateful to the Government of New Zealand for its further support to the ChemTech Centre project – a new leading-edge facility that will ensure the OPCW remains adequately prepared and robustly equipped to address future challenges for the Chemical Weapons Convention. The project is progressing swiftly as construction is scheduled to begin this summer.”

Both delegations during the ceremony.

Director-General Arias also thanked all the OPCW States Parties and other donors that have supported the project to date. He emphasised the important role the new ChemTech Centre will play in strengthening the OPCW’s ability to address threats from chemical weapons use and enhance capacity building activities to the benefit of all 193 Member States.

So far, 47 countries, the European Union, and four other donors have contributed or pledged to contribute financially to the ChemTech Centre project, and €33.6M has been raised.

States Parties are encouraged to continue participating in this important project. Further voluntary contributions will be used to finance equipment and activities related to International Cooperation and Assistance involving the ChemTech Centre.

Europe-Canada: dialogue on future management of raw materials

By Domenico Letizia.

A new important meeting took place between representatives of the European Union and officials and business people of Canada. The third meeting of the bilateral dialogue focused on raw materials established under the strengthening of CETA opportunities took place.

The deepening on new opportunities and synergies was born following the analysis of the economic sector on the mechanisms of raw materials after the spread of the health pandemic. Particular importance was given to recovery and recycling models related to raw materials and how to jointly affect climate and environmental protection.

Both sides expressed a strong interest in establishing stable relationships on common interests through the mutual integration of their respective commodity chains, cooperation in Research and Innovation, levelling of environmental, social and governance criteria. Further impetus to the opportunities of the CETA agreement was achieved as a result of the common vision to look forward to the EU-US-Japan Trilateral Conference on Critical Materials as an important forum to address global challenges related to raw materials and criticality analysis with countries sharing environmental and social concerns.

The recent opening of the EU-U.S.-Japan Conference on Critical Materials to Canada and Australia is an important step in ensuring greater coordination activity between Canada and Europe in the immediate future. Canada is among the largest per capita producers and consumers of energy in the world. Its prosperity and competitiveness in the energy sector are linked to achieving sustainable economic growth and a transition to a low-carbon future.

Canada’s energy industries operate in free markets, where investment by Canadian and foreign companies ensures an efficient, competitive and innovative energy system. International energy trade is a vital part of the Canadian economy. In 2018, Canada traded energy with 165 countries, totaling C$132.2 billion in exports and C$50.5 billion in imports. The country has a wide variety of energy resources, producing primary energy, from crude oil (45%), natural gas (33%), hydroelectricity (7%), coal (6%), other renewables (4%), natural gas liquids (4%) and nuclear power (2%). In 2018, Canada ranked third in global crude oil reserves, behind Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. 96% of Canadian reserves are concentrated in the oil sands, whose production in 2018 (2.91 million barrels per day) has exceeded conventional oil production (1.64 million barrels per day) since 2010. In 2018, Canadian coal production reached 63.3 million tons, of which 34 million tons were for export.

Currently, nearly 20% of Canada’s total energy supply comes from renewable sources. Canada has 7% of the world’s renewable freshwater with a hydroelectric capacity of 80,764 megawatts, available to a population that represents only 0.5% of the world’s population. The mining industry has a considerable weight in the Canadian economy, and is supported by a great diversity of resources: there are over 60 metals and minerals present in the territory that make up the great geological endowment of the country. Thanks to its rich resources Canada is a world producer of uranium and cobalt, aluminum and tungsten, with important resources of platinum, sulfur and titanium, nickel and diamonds. Fifty-seven percent of the world’s mining companies are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

These dynamics have generated an important debate between Europe and Canada regarding the development of the R&I sector along the commodity value chain. In Canada, the main elements of the research strategy for the commodity value chain want to explore how best to strengthen research and innovation cooperation with European research. The important meeting that took place between the representatives of the European Union and the institutional and business realities of Canada focused on the dynamics of sustainability and innovation characterizing the interaction with stakeholders, in particular on four topics: increased investment; environment and social license to operate with responsible extraction of raw materials; common procedures and jurisprudence and innovation processes.

Stakeholders believe it is essential to work on an economic system that follows the principles of green economy, digital and climate neutrality. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the health pandemic, the date of the next dialogue meeting has not been set precisely, and will take place in mid-2021.

___________________

Published by the Canadian Chamber in Italy.

Virtual Counselling for Migrants Opting for Voluntary Return

IOM the Netherlands is launching virtual counselling support for migrants considering return to 10 selected countries. Direct contact with our staff in countries of origin makes it possible for them to exchange information in their native tongue. Also, reliable and up-to-date information can be shared on diverse topics such as housing, medical support and economic possibilities.  

The virtual component of the return support is an addition to the existing counselling offered by our staff in the Netherlands. Next to information about the current situation in the country of return, migrants can be informed in advance about the post-arrival assisted voluntary return and reintegration procedures. This way, both the migrant and IOM can manage expectations and prevent misconceptions. Moreover, it gives migrants the opportunity to make a well-informed decision about their return. 

The concept of virtual counselling was introduced last year by IOM Germany. Learning from their positive experiences, we will make virtual counselling available to all migrants from the selected countries who are considering return from the Netherlands starting in April. IOM staff in the selected countries of origin are currently being trained in this new way of counselling.

For now, virtual counselling will be offered to migrants from Algeria, Ethiopia, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Guinee Conakry, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan and Vietnam. They will receive information on how to contact the virtual counsellor via our counselling team in the Netherlands, once they have indicated their interest in voluntary return. Contact with the country of origin can be established together with the Dutch IOM counsellor or independently.   

For more information please contact Ilse Waindrich and/or Lisa van de Pol: iomnlavrreintegration@iom.int

Published by IOM News Netherlands.

MATCH: Remote Recruitment from Nigeria and Senegal

“Good ICT staff is hard to find; and once you do find someone, the turnover rate is high. People have another job offer in no time,” says Guido Geerts, CEO of Delft Imaging Systems. Guido supports our MATCH project, aimed at supporting Dutch companies from all sectors that have struggled for years to find the right staff.

The pandemic has been a source of challenge, but also innovation for the MATCH project team. While the physical relocation of highly skilled employees from Senegal and Nigeria is near-impossible under current travel restrictions, Dutch companies have responded positively to the project’s offering to support remote work and upskilling. 

As the world adjusts to working-from-home arrangements and online meetings, remote work is becoming more and more appealing to Dutch companies who want to tap into highly skilled talent pools within Africa, and who want to establish a stronger foothold for themselves. 

The MATCH project recently supported a Dutch company active in seed and agriculture technologies. They struggled to find the right staff member through their own recruitment efforts, and so MATCH stepped in to find their ideal candidate from a pool of thousands of highly skilled Nigerians.

“This is a win:win:win arrangement” confirms Mia McKenzie, MATCH focal point for the Netherlands: “The company was looking for an extremely specific profile, and we made it happen. Now this successful candidate is receiving a 6-month training in Senegal and will return to Nigeria to build the Dutch company’s base there. Through MATCH, the company benefits from highly skilled staff and the recruit now has a promising career path ahead of him. Also, Nigeria is going to reap the rewards of competence that the recruit will return from Senegal with – not to mention the possibilities for further recruitments once this Dutch company scales up its business in Nigeria.” 

The project’s aim to bring together African and European expertise, which is interesting for Dutch companies looking to grow their business outside of Europe. Many Dutch companies are making the most of this time of international travel restrictions to recruit, upskill, network and enjoy the benefits of remote recruitment. We can hardly wait to see what the rest of 2021 has in store.

__________________

To learn more about the MATCH project, click here. Interested in discussing your company’s recruitment needs, or to organize a matchmaking session with candidates, please contact Mia McKenzie: mmckenzie@iom.int

Published by IOM News in the Netherlands