Croatia: When the Victor tries hard to become Loser

Energetically Marching in to the Wrong Side of History

By Tomislav Jakić

The first half of May in Croatia is marked by the anniversaries of two events from the end of the Second World War. With one democratic Croatia, which, if we believe its Constitution, is built on the foundations of anti-fascism (and opposite the so called Independent State of Croatia, established by the Ustasha movement, under the wings of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy) should be proud of, the other would be politically opportune not to mention at all, or keep  within the limits of individual commemorations. We are speaking, of course, of Victory Day and the date of the surrender of the remnants of the Ustasha and Home Guard forces, united in the Croatian Defense Forces, on the Bleiburg field, ie the liquidation of still uncertain number od those made prisoners there.

The opposite is happening, however. Instead of being proud of the V Day, the official Croatian tries to push it into oblivion, and because it does (still) cannot, makes only certain protocol gestures. And the fact that during WW2 a Croatia existed which was on the side of Nazi-fascism existed and kept fighting to the last day, and even after that, that there was a Croatia which systematically committed war crimes against Serbs, Jews, Roma and Croats – political opponents, thus tarnishing the Croatian name, is persistently being pushed in the foreground. With a barely concealed positive context.

This is obvious not only from this year, but exactly in this, 2021. it becomes, perhaps, most clear than ever. And this presents the Republic of Croatia as a state that is dangerously turning into the waters of neo-fascism, that is, Ustashaism. Of high representatives of state, Victory Day was personally marked only by the head of State, who laid flowers at the tomb of national heroes, ie. Partisan fighters (representatives of high positioned politicians are not worth mentioning, they were really there just to satisfy form). And yes, one, the only (!) Academy was organized to mark that day by the Alliance of Anti-Fascist fighters and Anti-Fascists (and not the State!). It commemorated the Victory Day, the (almost forgotten) Day of the Liberation of Zagreb, and Europe Day, which is marked on May 9th in order to convey in this way the message that post-war Europe, and that should mean today’s Europe too, is built on the foundations of the anti-fascist struggle and on the values ​​of anti-fascism. The current President was not present at that academy. There were two former presidents of the Republic and again – several representatives. The information about this celebration somehow found its way into the media, but that was all.

              Public television marked this significant day by broadcasting one American and one Russian-Ukrainian film with a theme from the time of the Second World War. And with an unspoken message: that war in Croatia did not rage, and if by some chance it did – there are no films about it (what about some of world-famous movies showing the antifascist struggle in Yugoslavia, such as Neretva or Walter defends Sarajevo?)

The other event, the surrender at Bleiburg and everything that happened after that, has been talked about for days. The state (Parliament) and the Church are maximally engaged in the organization of the commemoration of something that is as cynically as hypocritically called the Memorial Day for “Croatian victims in the fight for freedom and independence”. Mass celebrations and gatherings will be held in three (!) places in Croatia, and buses (even from Germany) are being organized to bring “pilgrims” to them. And what about pandemic? Everything will be, they say, in line with epidemiological measures and restrictions. They say so and they knowingly and recklessly lie, believing that the public is so stupid, or resigned, that something like this can be served to them with impunity, even on the eve of important local elections.

Since 1990, when the surrender at Bleiburg was publicly marked for the first time in Croatia (and when on that occasion the re-named Croatian Radio “shone” with a report, featuring Dinko Šakić, former commander of Jasenovac, one of about 60 concentration camps in the Ustasha state, who categorically stated that – if he lived again – he would do everything the way he did, this commemoration turned not into commemoration of those executed without trials after the surrender, but into regret over the defeat of the Ustasha para-state which, in accordance with Tudjman’s statement at the First HDZ congress, held in Yugoslav times, was “the realization of the centuries-old aspirations of the Croatian people too ”.

Austria has for years tolerated gathering on Bleiburg field, speeches that were often politically colored, highlighting of the Ustasha symbols and flags (the first white field in the Croatian coat of arms), but then – largely under pressure from Europe – denied its hospitality to the, as it was called by a reputable European medium, the largest gathering of radical right-wingers and neo-fascists on the Old Continent. Official Croatia, but also the “Church of the Croats” could not come to terms with that, so last year the “Bleiburg Mass” was held in Sarajevo (probably to remind how Sarajevo was part of the Ustasha state), while this year gatherings organized are being organized, it is worth repeating, on three locations in Croatia, the largest one in Udbina.

What message does such treatment of Victory Day and the date of capitulation of Ustasha and Home guard forces (along with other collaborators from Yugoslavia) sends to Europe and to the whole world?

Just one thing: as far as Victory Day is concerned, we’re not sure whether it should be and how celebrated, because in the meantime we succeeded in transforming the winners into criminals and murderers, and their Supreme Commander as “one of the 10 mega murderer of the 20th century” , and are open to considering the Day of Liberation of the Croatian Metropolis as the day of the beginning of its occupation (this, under the mask of the freedom of public speech can be calmly stated today – as an explanation why the street of May 8th 1945. was abolished . On the other hand, we are very engaged in commemorating those forces and their members who, ignoring the unconditional capitulation of the Third Reich signed on May 8th in Reims and on May 9th in Berlin, continued fighting until mid-May, trying to escape Tito’s partisans, knowing that among the partisans there is hardly anyone who has not directly or indirectly felt the Ustasha terror. Official Croatia and the Catholic church are commemorating and mourning their defeat, because they were – as it is written in a stone memorial at Bleiburg field “the Croatian army.” Were they really? And what were the Croatian partisans?

There is not a single country in the world that would organize commemorations for war criminals executed without trial or sentenced to death (and that there were such people in the Bleiburg field is an indisputable fact). Croatia is an exception – for now. And we have listed these two categories of post-war victims (if that is an appropriate term) because retaliation was not a specific feature of Yugoslavia. It took place, on a larger or smaller scale, for several weeks or several months in all the European countries occupied until then. In France, unofficial estimates list about 100,000 liquidated collaborators, while the leader of the Free France, who would later become the president of the Fifth Republic, General Charles de Gaulle, officially admitted 10,000, with the laconic remark : “Given what they were doing at the time of the occupation, France can live with this”.

Croatia may soon find itself in the company of several other countries, former Soviet satellites, which are well immersed in historical-revisionist waters, which allow marches of former members of SS units and which – like Ukraine – proclaims notorious collaborators (Stepan Bandera) as national heroes. But, will it mean that Croatia is on the right way by (almost) ignoring V-day and by glorifying and mourning the members of the collaborationist forces? Not at all! This will be just be another worrying indicator of the divisions within the European Union and of the abandoning, by some of its “young” members the ideas and ideals that guided those who conceived the project of a united Europe. That accepting the idea of ​​the possibility of a new war (and the EU should have prevented it for all time) is not just a theoretical possibility, is best seen from the wholehearted adherence of part of the EU to the American policy of confrontation with the Russian Federation (even armed, military drills lasting for several months in Europe just now, demonstrate this). 

And, finally, let’s go back to the name of the Memorial Day in mid-May, mentioned earlier. It is the Memorial Day for the Croatian victims in the fight for freedom and independence. What does that mean? That only Ustashas (Croatian fascists) and Home guards were fighters for Croatian freedom and independence? Given the date, such a conclusion seems only possible. But, if that is the case, then all those Croats (not to mention Serbs from Croatia) who fought in the ranks of the People’s Liberation Army were the enemies of Croatian freedom and independence. But, if somehow, we “remembered” what is written in the Constitution, if today’s Croatia, democratic and independent Croatia, “generously” added Partisans to Ustashe and Home Guard, this would mean the completion and realization of morbid ideas of the first Croatian president Franjo Tudjman who wanted to bury the remains of the victims of fascism and anti-fascist fighters together with those who killed them in the area of the former Ustasha concentration camp Jasenovac.  Tudjman then, under pressure from abroad (even from the USA), had to give up copying something that was realized in Spain during his long-term dictatorship by the openly pro-fascist generalissimos Francisco Franco (who in the meantime was “removed” from that memorial complex by democratic Spanish authorities).

 His successors went a step further. While Tudjman never attacked the People’s Liberation Struggle (he participated in it), nor did he utter an ugly word about Marshal Tito, they “bravely” abolished Marshal Tito Square in Zagreb (and none of the candidates for Zagreb mayor dares to say that he would return the square with that name), they tolerate and even encourage the harshest revision of history (as if learning from Serbian right-wingers, but also the current authorities who marked Victory Day with an academy with pictures of Chetnik leader Draža Mihailović and partisan leader Josip Broz Tito, claiming the resistance to fascism only for the Serbian people), they are (almost) ignoring Victory Day and glorifying the sacrifice of those who had been on the side of Nazi-Fascism throughout World War II.

Does today’s Croatia (not only the official) really has a dilemma: either to celebrate the V-day, or to mourn the surrender of quisling forces near Bleiberg, their defeat? Judging by what we are witnessing – no! And his is devastating not only for Croatia, but also for the European Union of which Croatia is a member.

About the author:

Tomislav Jakić is one of the most influential Yugoslav and Croatian journalists, who is covering the international relations for over 50 years and who served as Foreign policy Advisor to Croatian President Stjepan Mesic (2000. – 2010.)

Georgia’s 30th Anniversary of the Independence from the Soviet Union and 30 years to Euro-Atlantic Integration

By Mr. Giorgi Nakashidze, Chargé d’Affaires a. i., Embassy of Georgia to the Kingdom of the Netherlands

26 May 2021 marks 103rd year of the Democratic Republic of Georgia as well as 30th anniversary of the restoration of independence from the Soviet Union. On 26 May 1918, Georgia declared independence. Despite the short period of its existence (1918-1921), the Democratic Republic of Georgia had a significant impact on the development of the Georgian statehood in a long run.

At the referendum in 1991, Georgian voters (99.08%) answered ‘yes’ to one single question: ‘Do you support the restoration of the independence of Georgia in accordance with the Act of Declaration of Independence of Georgia of 26 May 1918?’ Consequently, the country gained back its sovereignty in 1991. Since then, Georgia has made a substantial success in multiple directions, including on the path to the European and Euro-Atlantic integration.

Due to Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic course, maintaining of independence, unfortunately, turned out to be harder than gaining it. Since regaining independence, Georgia has been target of full-scale military aggression and hybrid warfare from the Russian Federation aiming to destabilise the country, keep it in the sphere of influence and hinder its pro-western foreign policy. Even today, Georgia continues its fight for territorial integrity. The Russian Federation continues the illegal occupation of the indivisible regions of the country – Abkhazia and Tskhinvali/South Ossetia. In a historic judgment in January 2021, the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights found that Russia is exercising effective control over Abkhazia and Tskhinvali/South Ossetia and it is responsible for the mass violations committed against the Georgian population.

Relations between the European Union and Georgia started soon after Georgia regained its sovereignty. The European Union and Georgia’s close relationship is based on the EU-Georgia Association Agreement including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), which entered into force in July 2016 and strives for political association and economic integration. Besides, since 28 March 2017 nationals of Georgia are exempt from visa requirement to travel to the Schengen zone for a short-stay. As a next benchmark, Georgia is preparing to apply for full EU membership in 2024.

Georgia is a thriving Eastern European democracy and as a successful case of European integration, it carries an important benefit for the EU as a value-based transformational power. Georgia is the EU’s gateway to the Caucasus, to the Caspian Sea and Central Asia. As a Black Sea littoral state, it can play a significant role as Europe’s alternative transport hub and an alternative energy route. Georgia is also a contributor to tackling global and regional security challenges. A Framework Agreement on Georgia’s participation in the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy operations entered into force in March 2014, and Georgia has since made remarkable contributions to several operations.

Accession to the NATO is another top foreign and security policy priorities of Georgia. Shortly after Georgia restored independence in 1991, the country joined the North Atlantic Cooperation Council in 1992. At the 2008 Bucharest Summit, the Allies agreed that Georgia will become a NATO member. This decision has been reaffirmed at successive NATO Summits. By actively involving in NATO-led operations, Georgia aims at becoming not only the consumer of security, but also an important player for strengthening common Euro-Atlantic security.

During past three decades, Georgia demonstrated significant progress in the economic and cultural diplomacy. As of now, country has free trade with 2.3 billion-consumer market. Georgia is a leader in the region in terms of stability and investment attractiveness. The elements of Georgian intangible cultural heritage, among others, include the ancient Georgian traditional Kvevri winemaking method. In 2017, 8,000-year-old pottery fragments revealed the earliest evidence of grape winemaking in Georgia, which entered Guinness World Records as the ‘oldest wine’.

30 years after regaining independence from the Soviet Union, Georgia has become a reliable partner in the international community to which world also presents differently. Country’s geopolitical, economic and cultural interests have spread across the globe while its security, political and economic stability are in the interests of the majority of the countries in the world. In pursuit to bridge Georgia and the world, Georgia continues to maintain a persistent foreign policy and conduct proactive diplomacy guided by predictability, sustainability and continuity.

Ireland contribution to Trust Fund for Victims

Ireland sends important message of support for reparative justice with €300,000 contribution to Trust Fund for Victims

Reaffirming its support for reparative justice and the related mandates of the Trust Fund for Victims (TFV) at the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Government of Ireland has pledged a  voluntary contribution of €300,000 to the  TFV this year. This marks a significant increase in its annual contribution, which amounted to €200,000 in 2020, and demonstrates Ireland’s strong support for the TFV and its critical work in support of the reparative justice function of the Rome Statute.

The voluntary contribution will be equally divided, with €150,000 assigned to the reparations mandate and €150,000 to the assistance mandate.

H.E. Mr. Kevin Kelly, Ambassador of Ireland .

Speaking on Ireland’s support for the TFV and the Rome Statute, H.E. Mr Kevin Kelly, Ambassador of Ireland to the Kingdom of the Netherlands said “With this contribution Ireland wishes to signal its commitment to international criminal justice and to ensuring victims of the worst crimes are seen, heard and delivered the justice they deserve. This increased contribution from Ireland is also an expression of our confidence in the TFV to fulfil its critically important mandate of making reparative justice a reality and giving dignity and hope to victims of crimes under the ICC’s jurisdiction”.

Baroness Arminka Helić, the TFV Board member representing the Western European and other States Parties, welcomed the contribution saying “On behalf of the Board of Directors of the TFV I extend my warmest thanks to Ambassador Kelly and the Government of Ireland for this increased contribution and the message it sends. Ireland has been a tireless supporter of the TFV and its mission and has truly engaged with our work at every level to ensure we can deliver on our mandate. Ireland has shown itself to be a staunch supporter of the fight against impunity and for this the TFV Board of Directors is very grateful”.

TFV Executive Director Pieter de Baan thanked the Irish Government saying “The steadily increasing value of Ireland’s contributions to the TFV signals strong political support, as well as an apt recognition of the increasing portfolio of the TFV, across reparations cases and situation countries. Ireland’s designation recognises the importance of both judicial reparations and assistance activities in responding to the gravity of harm suffered by victims of Rome Statute crimes”.

ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, ICC President Judge Piotr Hofmański, H.E. Kevin Kelly, Ambassador of Ireland to The Netherlands and ICC Registrar Peter Lewis with the artwork donated to the ICC by the Government of Ireland

On 18 March 2021, H.E. Ambassador Kevin Kelly and ICC President Judge Piotr Hofmański unveiled a new artwork donated by Ireland to the International Criminal Court (ICC), symbolising Ireland’s support for the Rome Statute, its commitment to ending impunity and its clear understanding that justice is a prerequisite for lasting peace, stability and equitable development.

Kretschmann remains at the helm of Baden-Württemberg

Wednesday, 12 May 2021, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany: Baden-Württemberg’s State Diet has re-elected Winfried Kretschmann in the capacity of premier (Ministerpräsident) and confirmed the state government he formed. The coalition agreement between Alliance 90/The Greens and the CDU forms the basis of the government’s work from 2021 to 2026.

This is Kretschmann’s third term at the reins of the Southwestern German state with capital in Stuttgart. He was first elected in 2011, and remains hugely popular. 

Cabinet members are: 

Deputy Premier and Minister of the Interior, for Digitisation and Local Authorities: Thomas Strobl. Minister of Finance: Dr. Danyal Bayaz. Minister for Culture, Youth and Sport: Theresa Schopper. Minister for Science, Research and the Arts: Theresia Bauer. Minister for the Environment, Climate and Energy: Thekla Walker. Minister for Economic Affairs, Labour and Tourism: Dr. Nicole Hoffmeister-Kraut. Minister for Social Affairs, Health and Integration: Manne Lucha. Minister of Justice and Migration: Marion Gentges. Minister for Transport: Winfried Hermann. Minister for Food, Rural Areas and Consumer Protection: Peter Hauk. Minister for Regional Development and Housing: Nicole Razavi.

In Berlin, State Secretary and Plenipotentiary of the Land to the German Federation, Federal Policy Coordination is Rudolf Hoogvliet.

In Brussels, State Secretary at the Ministry of State and Representative of the State of Baden-Württemberg to the European Union: Florian Hassler.

For further information:


Government of Baden-Württemberg:https://stm.baden-wuerttemberg.de/de/service/presse/meldung/pid/jetzt-fuer-morgen-das-regierungsprogramm-fuer-die-kommenden-fuenf-jahre/

Ambassadors’ Briefing on International Knowledge Sharing for Development

By August Zeidman and Virginie Peccoud.

On Thursday 29 April from 15:00 to 16:30 IHE Delft Institute for Water Education and Diplomat Magazine organized an Ambassadors’ Briefing on International Knowledge Sharing for Development. The theme of this meeting was to tackle water related challenges affecting a large number of countries in the world by developing capacity and sharing knowledge on the topic.

Firstly, Dr. Mayelinne de Lara, publisher at Diplomat Magazine, welcomed the ambassadors. Then, Professor Eddy Moors, Rector of IHE Delft, introduced the institution and its capacity development programs to address water challenges. IHE Delft has been providing practical education and training to water professionals for more than 60 years and is the most international Dutch University in terms of both the staff and students.

Professor Moors and Mr. Johan Aad van Dijk, Business Director of IHE Delft, highlighted the need for water expertise in a world increasingly threatened by  risks of resource depletion exacerbated by climate change. By 2050, many regions will evolve from a situation of no water scarcity or water scarcity to severe water scarcity, which will have severe negative consequences, namely water quality, and on food systems.

They highlighted the fact that water is crucial and is at the heart of almost every Sustainable Development Goals (SDG); for instance SDG 2 (zero hunger), SDG 3 (good health and well being), SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation) but also SDGs 14 and 15 (life below water and life on land). Improving capacity development in people and in institutions is an accelerator of sustainable development and it was the aim of this meeting.

To reach this goal there are two possibilities; the first one is to help countries to identify water and sanitation capacity gaps and to enhance it and the second one is to implement development plans for example by providing training and institutional strengthening. IHE Delft has a crucial role in developing water capacity by providing an alternative and efficient approach to the matter.

Professor Moors and Mr. Aad van Dijk, said that countries can get involved easily by providing a capacity gap assessment of individuals and organisations, selecting training programs for individuals and analysing how to improve institutional capacity. In the Netherlands many governmental institutions have expertise in the water sector and are open for collaboration, for instance the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 

Furthermore, Professor Moors, also expressed the urgency of water related crises as not only some of the most likely natural disasters which will take place in the future, but as some of the most impactful as well. With alumni all over the world and partnerships with numerous United Nations institutions, the IHE Delft has an important and active role to play in the crisis management which is all too important going forward in not only in disaster relief and management, but also in preemptive action in order to mitigate the future of water shortages.

After the presentation, the floor was opened to discussion with many ambassadors and national representatives making remarks or asking questions. There was great interest from many ambassadors including H.E. Mr. Giorgio Novello, Ambassador of Italy and H.E. Mr. Fernando Grillo, Ambassador of Colombia, as well as others, in organizing greater coordination amongst their respective national graduates of the IHE Delft for the purposes of building a stronger working relationship with the institution, expressing great pride in these individuals so widely spread across the globe.

Other ambassadors mentioned their nations’ own unique national challenges and brought up other circumstances that may complicate any of the many water related challenges being faced today and in the near future. The Ambassador of Egypt, H.E. Mr. Hatem Elsayed Mohamed Kamaleldin discussed some of the challenges relating to water diplomacy and the challenges of fairly sharing global resources, mentioning the example of the Ethiopian Grand Renaissance dam and the contentious diplomacy surrounding the project.

In addition, comments were made by the Ambassador of Uruguay, H.E. Ms. Laura Dupuy Lasserre, Ambassador of Panama, H.E. Ms. Elizabeth Ward Neiman, Ambassador of Morocco, H.E. Mr. Abdelouahab Bellouki, Ambassador of Trinidad and Tobago H.E. Mr. Colin Connelly, Ambassador of Costa Rica H.E. Mr. Arnolodo Brenes Castro, Ambassador of Burundi H.E. Mr. Gamaliel Nkurunziza, Ambassador of Azerbaijan H.E. Mr. Fikrat Akhundov, Ambassador of Malta H.E. Mr. Mark Anthony Pace, Ambassador of South Africa H.E. Mr. Vusi Madonsela, Mr. Aizaz Khan Counsellor of the Embassy of Pakistan,  Ms. Byonabye Mwesigwa of the Embassy of Uganda, Ms. Ghallia Benziouche Counsellor of the Embassy of Algeria, and Mr. Jose Vieira Counsellor of the Embassy of Brazil.

Almost every country in the world is already or will soon be facing challenges of water scarcity and quality making the work of IHE Delft all the more important. The University already collaborates with many national institutions across the globe, with projects in South Africa and Cuba being among those mentioned during the event, but many more as well and is always interested in expanding their portfolio of partnerships for a changing world.

At the conclusion of the event, many ambassadors requested direct meetings with Rector Moors in order to facilitate opening greater dialogues between their national institutions and the IHE Delft in hopes of spawning further collaboration between the University and its many partners. These were met with enthusiasm, and the embassies in attendance were encouraged to make contact and organize bilateral meetings for mutual benefit.

France contributes €1M to OPCW’s Trust Fund for Syria Missions

H.E. Ambassador Luis Vassy, Permanent Representative of the French Republic to the OPCW, and H.E. Mr Fernando Arias, OPCW Director-General.

France provides further support to the work of the OPCW’s special missions and contingency operations in the Syrian Arab Republic 

THE HAGUE, Netherlands – 10 May 2021 – The Government of France is contributing €1M toward supporting the activities of the Trust Fund for Syria Missions at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). 

The Fund supports the Organisation’s special missions and contingency operations related specifically to the Syrian Arab Republic. France’s new contribution aims to assist in full elimination of the Syrian Chemical Weapons Programme and clarification of facts related to the alleged use of chemical weapons, in accordance with the Chemical Weapons Convention and relevant decisions of the policy-making organs of the OPCW. The contribution will support the work of the Declaration Assessment Team (DAT) and the Fact-Finding Mission (FFM). 

The voluntary contribution was formalised on 7 May by the Permanent Representative of the French Republic to the OPCW, H.E. Ambassador Luis Vassy, and OPCW Director-General, H.E. Mr Fernando Arias, at the Organisation’s headquarters in The Hague.

Ambassador Vassy remarked: “I am really pleased to make this year a further significant contribution to the activities of the OPCW in Syria in order to enable its mechanisms to pursue independently their investigations. It is in line with France’s steadfast determination to put an end to the threat of chemical weapons in Syria, which is fundamentally unacceptable – as the Conference of State Parties recently reaffirmed in adopting the decision tabled by my delegation on behalf of 46 countries.” 

The Director-General expressed his gratitude to the Government of France and noted: “This contribution will help the OPCW to continue its vital work in Syria where both the DAT and FFM face a host of issues that require a coordinated international response to ensure that the norms and principles of the Chemical Weapons Convention are upheld.”

The Netherlands is cooperating in the return of archaeological objects to Iraq

In the picture H.E. Dr. Hisham Al Alawi, Ambassador of Iraq.

By Tereza Neuwirthová

On May 6th, the Embassy of Iraq in The Hague organised a special ceremony for the return of seven archaeological objects from a Dutch private collector to the Iraqi government.

During this ceremony, the artefacts were handed over by H.E. Mr Arjen Uijterlinde, Ambassador for International Cultural Cooperation of the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Barbara Siregar, Director of the Information and Heritage Inspectorate to the Iraqi ambassador, H.E. Dr. Hisham Al Alawi.

H.E. Mr Arjen Uijterlinde, Ambassador for International Cultural Cooperation of the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

All of the objects are expressions of Mesopotamian culture, and are of great value given that the region Mesopotamia was recognised as the cradle of modern civilisation.

The cultural remnants include foundation cones, or large clay tablets that used to be placed in the walls of buildings or buried in the foundations of temples, as well as two very rare figurines. One is a representation of a ram and was used as an amulet, a stamp or a seal, and the second is a figure of Halaf –the mother goddess– that was used in sacrifice rituals.

Restored Iraqi art.

The items appeared in an auction house, where they were offered by a Dutch private collector. Following an inquiry, The Information and Heritage Inspectorate, jointly with an expert from the Dutch National Museum of Antiquities led an investigation that confirmed that the objects came from Iraq.

The private collector gave up the items as he was not aware of their exact origin, and is now glad to see their return to Iraq.

Returned objet to Iraq

A safe restoration to the country is essential, since all of the returned objects are protected under Iraqi cultural heritage legislation, as well as listed on the International Council of Museums’ red lists.

These lists include objects that are vulnerable to theft, plundering and illegal export from their countries of origin. In the Iraqi case, the ban on trade in its heritage prohibits selling the objects of archaeological, historical, cultural, rare scientific and religious importance that were designated as protected. 

Ceremony for the return of seven archaeological objects from a Dutch private collector to the Iraqi government.

Similarly, in line with the UN Security Council resolution establishing a system of sanctions to protect Iraq’s cultural heritage, these objects are protected under the Iraq Sanctions Order 2004 II. This system has been implemented in European law, and therefore the Iraqi government requested the Dutch government to return the artefacts of high historical and cultural significance.

Barbara Siregar, Director of the Information and Heritage Inspectorate.

This return, which took place during the ceremony held at the Iraqi embassy in The Hague, was authorised with a transfer document that was signed by the Ambassador HE Al-Alawi and Mr. Uijterlinde.

Signing the documents to transfer the object to the Iraqi authorities.

27 Years After the Genocide Against the Tutsi: How Can We End Genocide Denial?

On April 17th, the Embassy of the Republic of Rwanda in the Kingdom of the Netherlands hosted a virtual conference with the theme ’27 Years After the Genocide Against the Tutsi: How Can We End Genocide Denial?’ The event was part of the 27th commemoration of the genocide perpetrated against the Tutsi in Rwanda, known as ‘Kwibuka27’.

The online conference attempted to answer critical questions relating to the topic of genocide  denial namely, it’s definition and its various  forms,  how it is understood in the context of international rights and freedoms, ways of effectively preventing genocide denial for present and future generations and the role can accountability for the crime of genocide itself play the fight against genocide denial and  finally given the steady rise of genocide denial in the world and the fact that Rwanda and few other countries have adopted laws to criminalize the denial of the genocide against the Tutsi, should other countries adopt similar legislations?

The moderator of the conference was Ms. Diana Mpyisi, Founder and Managing Director of Blue Oceans, a media and communications consultancy firm and host of The Square, a weekly current affairs English show on Rwanda Television. 

Ms. Diana Mpyisi.

In his welcoming remarks the host of the conference, H.E. Mr. Olivier J.P. Nduhungirehe, Ambassador of the Republic of Rwanda to the Kingdom of the Netherlands, re-iterated  that  after 27 years after the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi, there is still a need to better understand the concept of genocide denial.

We have indeed been witnessing a resurgence of genocide denial under many forms. Denial is no longer limited to genocide fugitives’ circles, it also received support in a number of countries from scholars, regional experts, criminal lawyers and journalists. Let me hope that today’s discussion will be enriching for all of us, especially for the young generation and the diplomatic community gathered here with us,” Ambassador Nduhungirehe said.

The welcoming remarks were followed by remarks by Mr. Serge Brammertz, Chief Prosecutor at the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT) who highlighted the importance of combined effort to fight against genocide denial. “For example, in my last report to the United Nations Security Council, I denounced the lack of cooperation being provided by a number of countries. Public pressure on these countries is important to improve the situation and ensure fugitives are brought to justice,” Mr Brammertz said.

This theme raises a number of critical questions on how to face the challenge of Genocide denial and ideology that has been increasing over the past years in many countries globally.  To try to tackle  this  issue   the  conference  bought  together 3 experts to give the audience a comprehensive view of the concept of genocide denial and how to effectively handle it. 

The first expert was Dr Roland Moerland, an Assistant Professor of Criminology at the Maastricht University and a member of the International Association of Genocide Scholars and is an editor on the editorial board of Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal. Furthermore  He is the author of “The Killing of Death, Denying the genocide against the Tutsi”. Professor Moerland addressed and  provided  insight  on the “Concept of Genocide Denial”, its intentions and the  various  forms it takes.

Freddy Mutanguha.

The second expert who shared his views was Mr. Freddy Mutanguha, who is the Executive Director of AegisTrust and Director of the Kigali Genocide Memorial who  talked about “Commemoration, education and public engagement: tools for the prevention of genocide denial and pillars for unity and reconciliation”.

Providence Umurungi.

The third expert was Ms. Providence Umurungi, who is a Principal State Attorney at the Ministry of Justice of Rwanda, where she is the Head of International Justice and Judicial Cooperation Department since 2016. Prior to her current position, Ms. Umurungi was the Associate Legal Officer at the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in Arusha, Tanzania; and an Assistant Lecturer at the Law Faculty at the University of Rwanda where she taught Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law courses. She took the audience through the topic “The importance of accountability for genocide and its denial”.

Following   the presentations  of the  panelists,  the  conference  was opened  for an interactive session  where  members of the audience who included members of  the Rwandan community in the Netherlands  and  members of the diplomatic were  given the opportunity to ask questions and share  their thoughts with Ambassador Nduhungirehe, Mr. Serge Brammertz and the 3 experts.

More information, including the statements by the speakers and the link to watch the entire conference at a later stage, please go to the following page on the Embassy’s website:

www.rwandainthenetherlands.gov.rw/info/info-details/17-april-virtual-kwibuka27-conference

NRW’s Holthoff-Pförtner welcomed Robin Quinville at ‘NRW Western Embassy’

US Chargée d’affaires Robin S. Quinville. Picture by Land NRW.

Friday, 7 May 2021, Berlin Germany: North Rhine Westphalia’s Minister for European and International Affairs, Dr. Stephan Holthoff-Pförtner welcomed the US Chargée d’affaires Robin S. Quinville to sign the guestbook of NRW state government, and exchange views on the intensive partnership and transatlantic cooperation between Germany, NRW and the United States of America.

This was the very first visit to the NRW representation by a US top diplomatic envoy since the change of administration in the USA, albeit Minister Dr. Holthoff-Pförtner did hold a virtual meeting with US Consul General Fiona Evans back in January 2021. 

USA-NRW ties 

The USA are represented in NRW by Consul General in Düsseldorf, Fiona Evans.

The USA is one of North Rhine-Westphalia’s most important foreign trade partners. At the same time, US companies are amongst the largest investors and foreign employers in North Rhine-Westphalia. North Rhine-Westphalia is home to more than 1,600 US companies. In 2017, they invested a total of around 13 billion euros. German cities and municipalities are partnered with a total of 32 US cities and municipalities.

According to statistics by NRW about 13,500 US Americans live in the federal state. Between NRW and the USA there are 35 state partnership between cities. Beyond the latter there are 104 school partnerships, 327 signed cooperation agreements between NRW and US American universities and colleges that intensify the transatlantic exchanges. 

The number of school and university cooperations between North Rhine-Westphalia and the USA has increased since 2016. In total, there are 122 school partnerships (2016: 99) and 288 cooperations between universities and colleges (2016: 220).

For further information 


US Embassy in Germany (Chargée d’affairs Robin S. Quinville): https://de.usembassy.gov/our-relationship/dcm/

US Consulate General in Düsseldorf (Consul General Fiona Evans): https://de.usembassy.gov/embassy-consulates/dusseldorf/consul-general/

Representation of NRW to the German Federation: https://mbei.nrw/de/lv-bund

Previous visits by erstwhile Ambassador Richard Grenell: 

https://diplomatmagazine.eu/2019/12/22/ambassador-grenell-strengthens-nexus-to-nrw/https://diplomatmagazine.eu/2018/06/04/us-ambassador-grenell-in-nrw/

French Culture; Culture of Peace and Humanity

By  Dr. Jahair Miller

The United Nations defined the culture of peace as a ways and behavior of life that are needed for a peaceful world. French Culture has played a good relations between societies and creates mutual interest, cooperation, and friendship in shaping world arts and cultures.

According to SDG 4.7 which has targeted the education to promote a culture of peace and non-violence by 2030; Shahin Gavanji and Jahangir  Gavanji have launched the international program in 2017 which is called “French Culture, Culture of Peace and Humanity (FCCPH)” to share the French culture between societies. More than 10000 people participated  in this educational program from 3 countries of Iran (Isfahan, Tehran) , Pakistan (Islamabad, Lahore), and Afghanistan (Kabul).

In this program they teach the French culture which includes (French etiquette, peace symbol in France, and  French values), to  build bonds and interests between different cultures to make the world of friendship, since they believe that culture represents the beliefs of each societies and make a significant contribution to promote peace and friendship.

In this campaign they use the different ways to share the French culture like, brochure and street meeting since they believe that the great way to foster the values of friendship is the cultural education in all societies across the world.

In these campaign the French Traditions and Culture were put in a brochure and presented to all people who participated in this program, in the main parks and streets of each. In this campaign more than 10000 brochure were delivered.  The content of brochures include the: Language, Religion in France, French Values, French Fashion, French Art and media, Greetings, Public Behavior, also they talked about the symbol of peace and friendship in France like the Eiffel Tower, I love you wall and other places which make a significant contribution for the promotion of a culture of peace between societies

The goals of this campaign:

The main goal of this  is  to introduce the French etiquette and social norms to help people in different countries to know about the life and culture of France

Raising awareness about the outstanding  cultural and natural heritage of France to establish good relationships with French culture with the others in different countries. Building a bridge between the French culture with other societies and send a message of peace and friendship.