Puzzling results in Dutch elections

By Steven van Hoogstraten, Former director Carnegie Foundation.

Recently, parliamentary elections were held amidst the greatest Covid precautions with voters holding their “verkiezingspotlood”(election pencil) .  

The outcome has opened a view on tendencies which do not point in the same direction. Overall, there were distinct winners and losers. It was generally expected  that the Liberal Party of Prime Minister Marc Rutte (VVD) would enjoy a strong support under the electorate, due to stable leadership in the fight against the pandemic. VVD was indeed again the biggest party with 34 seats in Parliament. The great surprise was a less expected but substantial rise of the progressive liberals of D66, headed by the former UN High Official Sigrid Kaag, to a second ranked position with 24 seats. D66 were for instance the largest party in Amsterdam, something that was never seen before. Sigrid Kaag had a good and visible campaign, mixing strong support for climate measures with high priority for education and housing.

As the Democrats are part of the current VVD government, it would be safe to assume that the reigning coalition did well. But this is not so true for the Christian Democrats, led by Finance Minister Wopke Hoekstra. His party took a blow of some seats, and ended at only 14 MP’s. Many felt that their campaign lacked a specific CDA profile.  Even if Wopke Hoekstra did well after a pretty cold start, he and his party never were a real threat for Marc Rutte. On too many issues they drummed the same beat, like on the need for economic recovery, taxation policies, etc. The number 2 of CDA, the well-known MP Pieter Omtzicht, gave the impression to be in momentary hiding. He is reported as saying that the election period is one great “spelshow” (TV spectacle), with limited time for substantial issues.  

The leftist block in Dutch politics, composed of the social-democratic party PVDA, the Green Left (Groen Links) and the more radical Socialistische Partij SP shifted backwards, notably so the Green Left led by Jesse Klaver and the SP of Lilian Marijnissen  PVDA remained stable at 9 seats, but did not win at all.

The hard hitting campaign of Geert Wilders ( PVV) – anti-Islam, anti-immigration – was rewarded with a less than expected 17 seats. Wilders emphasized that this still is a respectable result and that PVV will be the main opposition party. His views represent  feelings and concerns of many people in this country, but he looks at the country as a park with a high fence and his style is too confrontational.

And then, against the odds,  the party called FORUM led by Thierry Baudet, made a solid stride from 2 to 8 seats. This party nearly imploded in the run up to the elections due to various  internal situations, so it was a small wonder that they managed to restore the sympathy of the voters on anti- Covid restrictions and anti-Europe feelings. There were newcomers as well, like the pro-European party “Volt”, and “Ja21”, a split-away from FORUM but headed by the seasoned (conservative) parliamentarian Joost Eerdmans.

The election campaign was only partly affected  by the Covid issues, the international fight against the pandemic did not take center stage in the TV debates. There was a lot of exchange on Climate Change, e.g. how best to fulfil the targets set by the Paris Agreement. The Netherlands need to show by 2030 that its emissions of CO2 greenhouse gasses has been halved, a huge task. The option of nuclear energy popped-up repeatedly, and it was certainly not shot down immediately – as it would have been 10 years ago. Prime Minster Marc Rutte aired that a new nuclear power plant could be installed in the province of Groningen. That thought did not go down so well with the provincial authorities and was withdrawn within a day or two. The campaign also did not dwell on the failure of the Belastingdienst to service the citizens, the cause for the recent fall of the government. It was all rather forward looking, and inspired by high ideals. The debates about nationality and identity, about migration, about personal freedoms , about the Care system and the like were often the most interesting.

There was hardly a role for international or EU issues in the campaign, as if these belong to another world.  The fact that two parties (Volt and D66) who spoke openly and unreservedly in favour of Europe were crowned with success, must have diminished the engrained political sentiment that Europe is only good for making money. That view has been allowed to dominate for too long. I personally think that the British example of leaving the EU will not be followed by the Netherlands, in spite of some “ketelmuziek” (pots and pans) which can be heard  here and there (FORUM, PVV). But some European policies need a fresh and hard look, that is for sure. Migration being a prime example.

The great coalition-question, “de Formatie” always so typical of this country, is now on the table. How to form a government on the basis of these election results. Several scenarios are possible, some more to the left and others more to the right, all grouped around a center of VVD and D66.  

Discussions have just started, and it is not possible – at least not for me – to make any  prognosis. That is why the results of the elections will be puzzling material for still some time to come.

Hamed Bakayoko passed away in Germany

Sunday, 21 March 2021, Abidjan, Republic of Ivory Coast: HE President Alassane Ouattara, and the latter’s spouse Dominique Ouattara led prayers in benedictions in an Islamic ceremony behesting divine blessings for the country’s eleventh prime minister Hamed Bakayoko, who passed away on Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at University Medical Center Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, after merely a prime ministerial tenure of 245 days. 

Bakayoko (1965-2021) had been appointed prime minister on 8 July 2020 for the Rally of the Republicans party.  He had previously served as the country’s Minister of New Technologies, Information and Communication, Minister of the Interior and Minister of Defence, and was deemed as a confidant of President Ouattara. 

Hamed Bakayoko was laid to rest on Friday, 19 March in Séguéla (Worodougou Region). He was honoured with a national tribute on Wednesday, 17 March, during which he was raised to the dignity of Grand Cross in the National Order. He passed away at the age of 56 from cancer. 
He was also mayor of Abobo municipality since October 2018.

For further information 
Prime Minister’s Office: http://www.premierministre.ci/Main.html

Embassy of Ivory Coast in Germany (HE Ambassador Philippe Mangou): https://ambaci.de/hommage-au-premier-ministre-hamed-bakayoko-a-lambassade-de-cote-divoire-en-allemagne/

Ambassador Sergei Netschajew calls for the recognition of Crimea’s right to self-determination

Premier Kretschmer and Ambassador Sergej Netschajew – Picture by Sächsische Staatskanzlei.

Thursday, 18 March 2020, Berlin, Germany: In an article written for the Berliner Zeitung, Russian Ambassador in Germany, HE Ambassador Sergei Netschajew called upon the European partners ‘to recognise the legitimate choice of the multinational people of Crimea’ in re-joining Russia. 

In his column, he emphasised that Crimea is a dynamic Russian region. He recalled those events in 2014 that resulted in reunification, when the Ukrainian opposition signed comprehensive political agreements with Ukraine’s legitimate President Viktor Yanukovych under the auspices of Germany, France and Poland.

However, these were broken by the Maidan supporters, leading to widespread rioting: “This has happened with the tacit approval of the European mediators and the EU. No one has raised their voice to urge the parties to respect the agreements.”

Of all Russian regions, Crimea has been affected most severely by the destructive foreign actions. A great deal has been recently accomplished in this sphere by the Russian authorities and the Crimeans themselves.

The Agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the ‘Accession of the Republic of Crimea in the Russian Federation and on Forming New Constituent Entities within the Russian Federation’ was signed on March 18, 2014.  

The Crimean Spring and the free vote at the referendum in Crimea, which was a fine example of the right of peoples to self-determination sealed in the UN Charter and the Declaration on Principles of International Law, allowed Crimea to reunite with Russia.

For further information: 
Embassy of the Russian Federation to the Federal Republic of Germany: https://russische-botschaft.ru/ru/

President Ramkalawan intensifies ties with Qatar

0

Sunday, 21 March Doha, State of Qatar: Seychelles and Qatar are set to strengthen and diversify relations of cooperation between the two nations. The latter emerged following talks between the President of Republic of Seychelles, Wavel Ramkalawan and His Highness The Emir of the State of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani

The two leaders highlighted the deep bonds of friendship that have existed between the two countries for over three decades and expressed their shared commitment to further elevate collaborations to new heights. 

During bilateral discussions attended by both the Seychelles’ Presidential delegation, Qatari Government ministers and senior officials, key issues of common interest were outlined. The value to both Seychelles and State of Qatar. Cooperation and exchange in areas such as tourism, budget support, sharing of technical expertise in addressing Covid-19 pandemic, climate change, maritime security, trade and investment, among others were also discussed. 

The two leaders also met for a tête-à-tête before the signing of two Memoranda of Understanding (MoU). 

Later in the afternoon, as per tradition for visiting heads of state or head of governments to address young adults enrolled in the Qatar Leadership programme, President Ramkalawan addressed a group of fifteen young Qatari leaders during a high-level dialogue session themed: The role of leadership, skills in decision-making process, lessons learned and challenges facing leaders and how to overcome them. 

President Ramkalawan and his delegation is currently on a three-day official visit to the State of Qatar at the invitation of the Amir of the State of Qatar, His Highness, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani. He is accompanied by the First Lady, Mrs Linda Ramkalawan, the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Tourism, Mr Sylvestre Radegonde and the Minister for Finance, Economic Planning and Trade, Mr Naadir Hassan.

For further information:
http://www.statehouse.gov.sc/news/5130/president-ramkalawan-to-undertake-official-visit-to-the-state-of-qatar?fbclid=IwAR2DzMTu5eoGafWCBl-AvrCaZWduEukIacTZRoCEdTX8sVlu43CT3MrNr34

Picture by State House Seychelles.

Thirty Years of the Southern Common Market

By Felipe Solá, Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship of the Argentine Republic.

The Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) was founded upon the signing of the Treaty of Asuncion in 1991 by Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. The bloc is a historic achievement in the region and one of the major milestones in Latin American economic integration, which was intended to overcome the previous logic of rivalry between the countries and establish cooperation dynamics.

With a population of almost 300 million and an area of about 15 million square kilometres (50 % larger than the European continent and almost as large as Russia), MERCOSUR is known for its great natural resource and food potential. The bloc exports 63 % of the world’s soy and is the largest global exporter of beef, chicken, corn, coffee and iron, as well as the eighth largest global automobile producer. Based on its GDP, which in 2019 reached USD 4.467 trillion (measured by purchasing power parity), the bloc is the world’s fifth largest economy.

Although the explicit goals of MERCOSUR upon its foundation were of an economic and commercial nature, the bloc plays an important role in the consolidation of democracy and the avoidance of conflict. Peace is a necessary condition for development, and regional integration has historically been a key instrument for consolidating our region as an area of peace and cooperation, without armed conflicts.

First, in 1991, we created a free-trade zone so that our goods and services could move without restrictions, as well as a common external tariff so that we could manage exchanges with the rest of the world. This allowed for great expansion in our mutual trade. We were also able to promote the exchange of added-value products between the four member countries, which allowed for the stimulation of non-traditional export activities which create high added-value jobs (in the biofuel, chemical and petrochemical, plastics, pharmaceutical product, steel and automotive sectors, among others). Therefore, whereas MERCOSUR is a traditional and well-known exporter of primary products, many of the products traded between members of the bloc are industrialized products, among which automobiles, for example, stand out (representing almost 50 % of the total products traded between Argentina and Brazil).

We are also working on the harmonization of technical regulations so as to protect production and consumers without unnecessarily preventing trade. As to public health, coordination between our countries has always been important, especially during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Our citizens may also settle in other countries of the bloc and easily work freely, which is uncommon in the rest of the world.

In 2004 we created the Structural Convergence Fund of MERCOSUR, through which more than USD 1 billion has been allocated to non-refundable loans for infrastructure and productive development projects, among others, which has allowed us to enhance the competitiveness of our economies, especially in the less developed areas of the region.

Since its first years, MERCOSUR has negotiated and signed trade agreements with most of the countries in the Latin American region, which allowed for a free-trade zone that comprises most of the Latin American countries. We have also negotiated trade agreements with the European Union, EFTA, Israel, Egypt, India and the countries in the south of Africa, among others. MERCOSUR is not a bloc that is closed to foreign trade, but a platform created for our countries to be open to the rest of the world.

Cooperation within MERCOSUR covers many areas: culture, education, science and technology, the development of a common citizenship, the coordination of social and economic policies, etc. There are several and varied areas of joint work within the bloc, and they change as necessary, as the international context and the context of our countries change.

Obviously, all these achievements in its three decades of history do not mean that there are no challenges ahead. Therefore, our strategic agenda makes us work to frame common and coordinated policies on productive development, increase our capacity to produce goods and services, create economies of scale and economies of specialization, as well as enter global value chains and attract global investment flows in a more intelligent manner.

In addition, MERCOSUR has a role to play in the international arena. Within the G20, the WTO, FAO and other international organizations, the unity of our countries helps us defend our positions on the global agenda. In an increasingly complex and fragmented global scenario, the coordination of positions enabled by MERCOSUR becomes increasingly important.

We believe that the purpose of integration is to reach agreements with due regard for the diversity of our countries, driven by the political will to achieve integration. MERCOSUR promotes supportive political, economic and social regionalism, because we know that facing difficulties together makes us stronger.

MERCOSUR is the most important foreign policy instrument of the last thirty years for our countries. It is ultimately a State policy which has remained constant in spite of government changes. Throughout the last thirty years, we have achieved a great deal of common ground: a commitment to democracy as an essential condition for the lives of our peoples; respect for human rights as an essential and inalienable value for coexistence; the acknowledgement of our diversity; and the coordination of our growth policies in order to combine our productive structures.

The world is undergoing a reconfiguration of the global power structure, as well as a crisis of the international institutions that have governed us during the last seventy years. Given the challenges and uncertainties arising from this context, we are certain that the integration of our countries will continue to be the best way to boost our development, preserve our sovereignty, promote the well-being of our peoples and be integrated into the world.

ICC Presidency assigns judges to judicial divisions and Chambers

Following the solemn undertaking of six newly elected judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC) on 10 March 2021 and the Presidency’s electionon 11 March 2021, the Presidency of the Court has assigned the judges to the three judicial divisions. The Presidency also recomposed a number of Chambers where necessary, dissolved Pre-Trial Chamber III as well as Trial Chambers I, III, VI and VII and assigned the respective situations and cases currently before the Court to the remaining Chambers. The Presidency also decided that several cases do not currently require assignment to a trial chamber. The assignments as well as the re-composition of Chambers will be effective immediately.

The Appeals Division will be constituted as follows: Judges Piotr Hofmański, Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza, Marc Perrin de Brichambaut, Solomy Balungi Bossa and Gocha Lordkipanidze.

The Trial Division will be constituted as follows: Judges Bertram Schmitt, Chang‑ho Chung, Kimberly Prost, Joanna Korner, Judge Miatta Maria Samba and Judge Althea Violet Alexis-Windsor.

The Pre-Trial Division will be constituted as follows: Judges Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua, Péter Kovács, Tomoko Akane, Reine Alapini-Gansou, Rosario Salvatore Aitala, María del Socorro Flores Liera and Sergio Gerardo Ugalde Gordinez.

The situations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; Libya; the Republic of Mali; Georgia; the Gabonese Republic; Registered Vessels of Comoros, Greece and Cambodia; Palestine; the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the Republic of the Union of Myanmar; the Plurinational State of Bolivia; the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela I and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela II will be assigned to Pre-Trial Chamber I, to be composed of Judges Péter Kovács, Reine Alapini-Gansou and María del Socorro Flores Liera.

The situations in Central African Republic I; Central African Republic II; Republic of Uganda; Darfur, Republic of the Sudan; Republic of Kenya; Republic of Côte d’Ivoire; Islamic Republic of Afghanistan; and Republic of Burundi will be assigned to Pre-Trial Chamber II, to be composed of Judges Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua, Tomoko Akane and Rosario Salvatore Aitala.

In addition, the Trial Chambers will be composed as follows:

Trial Chamber II

  • The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga
  • The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo
  • The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Judge Péter Kovács
  • Judge Chang-ho Chung
  • Judge María del Socorro Flores Liera

Trial Chamber IV

  • The Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain
  • Judge Reine Alapini-Gansou
  • Judge Kimberly Prost
  • Judge María del Socorro Flores Liera

Trial Chamber V

  • The Prosecutor v. Alfred Yekatom and Patrice-Edouard Ngaïssona
  • Judge Bertram Schmitt, Presiding
  • Judge Péter Kovács
  • Judge Chang-ho Chung

Trial Chamber VIII

  • The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al-Faqi Al Mahdi
  • Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua
  • Judge Bertram Schmitt
  • Judge María del Socorro Flores Liera

Trial Chamber IX

  • The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Judge Bertram Schmitt, Presiding
  • Judge Péter Kovács
  • Judge Raul C. Pangalangan

Trial Chamber X

  • The Prosecutor v. Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud
  • Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua, Presiding
  • Judge Tomoko Akane
  • Judge Kimberly Prost

Each Division will elect a President of the respective Division from amongst its members and each newly composed Pre-Trial and Trial Chamber will elect a Presiding Judge. The Appeals Chamber decides on a Presiding Judge for each appeal.

According to article 39(1) of the Rome Statute, the assignment of judges to Divisions by the Presidency is based on the nature of the functions be performed by each Division and the qualifications and experience of the elected judges, so that each division contains an appropriate combination of expertise in criminal law and procedure and in international law. The judges are assigned for three years, and thereafter until the completion of any case. The judges assigned to the Appeals Division serve exclusively in the Appeals division for their entire term.

In view of the above assignments and re-composition of Chambers, the Presidency has noted the need for both the Appeals Chamber and Pre-Trial Chamber I to be operational. Accordingly, consistently with the requirements of article 35(3) of the Rome Statute, the assignment and re-composition makes it essential that Judges Gocha Lordkipanidze and María del Socorro Flores Liera be called to full-time service imminently, on the basis of workload. These two judges are anticipated to assume full-time service shortly after the Easter judicial recess.

Austria’s Sebastian Kurz enforces EU strategy with Germany

18-20 March 2021, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany: Austrian Federal Chancellor Sebastian Kurz encountered Armin Laschet, Premier of North Rhine-Westphalia, today for an exchange in a good atmosphere.

We are “on the last metres of the pandemic”, the Austrian head of government said before the meeting. Now it was important to dismantle the border controls between Germany and Austria “as soon as possible” and to restore freedom of travel. Both also agreed that European solutions were needed in the fight against the pandemic.

Sebastian Kurz also stressed the need for an eco-social transformation of the economy. Both also pointed out the importance of economic relations between Austria and North Rhine-Westphalia. The phase of reconstruction and recovery after the Corona pandemic had to be used skilfully “to bring about an even stronger ecosocial transformation”. One must “reconcile the relief of work and small incomes” “with the necessary protection of the environment and climate”, said Chancellor Kurz.

The Chancellor had already held talks with German Interior Minister Horst Seehofer on Thursday. “After the talks with the German Interior Minister, I am very optimistic that border controls will be abolished in the coming weeks. The situation in Tyrol has developed excellently – some time ago we had 200 cases of the South African variant, meanwhile it is well below 100.

The path that has been taken there is a success story: we have succeeded in pushing this variant down quite massively. This is the basis for the German decisions and I therefore assume that border controls will soon be abolished,” said Federal Chancellor Sebastian Kurz in a press statement after talks with the German Interior Minister in Berlin.

The German Interior Minister had given him a very clear signal that the success in Tyrol was an indication that border controls should be gradually dismantled. However, this decision would have to be taken together with the Ministry of Health and the Bavarian authorities. Since he was in contact with all relevant authorities, he assumed that the border controls would soon be a thing of the past.

Picture by Bundeskanzleramt Österreich.

Prior to the meeting with Seehofer, Chancellor Kurz had met with Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, with whom he had discussed issues such as Russia and Israel, the Chancellor said afterwards. The Chancellor then held talks with the German Health Minister Jens Spahn.

Green passport as a chance to restore freedom of travel

The Chancellor said he was pleased that the Green Passport, which Austria and also some other European countries had developed and promoted, was now also being taken up by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

“I know that Germany was very sceptical at the beginning: I am glad that the Commission President has now also made concrete proposals for this project. It is supposed to be a digital green passport and it is supposed to be a way for us all to get back more freedom, to finally be able to travel freely again in Europe,” said the Chancellor, who reiterated that it was not a vaccination passport, but a digital passport for those who had been vaccinated, recovered or tested.

“I thank the Commission President and hope that the Green Passport, which we want to introduce in Austria in mid-April, will be available throughout Europe by 1 June at the latest. With the vaccination, we will return to normality in the summer,” said Sebastian Kurz, who stated that the goal was to aim for a complete restoration of freedom of travel in Europe in the summer, “so that German tourists can spend their holidays in Austria again”.

Rapid development of vaccines is a success story

On Thursday evening, Chancellor Kurz gave the laudatory speech for BioNTech founders Özlem Türeci and Uğur Şahin  at the “Axel Springer Awards” ceremony. In his speech, he praised the rapid progress of science in the development of vaccines. “We cannot thank you enough,” said Kurz, who spoke of a “European and global success story”. It had shown that “almost anything is possible if we decide to work together”. He hoped that one day “we will see the ways in which this experience has made us stronger and more resilient – as individuals, societies and democracies”.

The Chancellor expressed confidence that “the light at the end of the tunnel is approaching” in the fight against the Corona pandemic. Only if it is possible to vaccinate large sections of the population by the summer will it be possible to return to normality in the course of the summer, Chancellor Kurz said as per statement below.

For further information


Austrian Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2021/03/bundeskanzler-sebastian-kurz-gehe-davon-aus-dass-grenzkontrollen-nach-deutschland-bald-der-vergangenheit-angehoeren.html?fbclid=IwAR3WgCl8wMWc3c5pzl3GI01VgMOVK–kWY4dJ8i5Krgh0HY3W0z6AgTeCEo

Federal President of Germany: https://www.bundespraesident.de/DE/Home/home_node.html#-gallery

Representation of NRW to the German Federation: https://mbei.nrw/de/oesterreichischer-bundeskanzler-zu-gast

Main picture by NRW-Landesvertretung, Phil Dera.

Samia Hassan serves as first female president in East Africa

In the image, Samia Suluhu Hassan – Picture by Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.

Friday, 19 March 2021, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania: Tanzania’s hitherto Vice President Samia Suluhu Hassan (61) was sworn in as the East African country’s first female president after the sudden death of President Dr. John Magufuli from a heart failure.

According to Tanzania’s constitution, the vice president serves out the remainder of the term of a president who passes away whilst in office. Magufuli (61), who was first elected in 2015, secured a second five-year term in polls won in October 2020.

The constitution also states that after consultation with their party, the new president will propose a deputy, the choice to be confirmed by the votes of no fewer than 50 per cent of the National Assembly.

Hassan is the first Union head of state to be born in -the then Sultanate of- Zanzibar; the archipelago that forms part of the union of the Republic of Tanzania. She is described as a soft-spoken consensus builder. She is now Tanzania’s sixth president since the Union between Tanganyika with Zanzibar and Pembar in 1964. 

Rais wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania is the Union’s head of state, head of government and commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces. A president is permitted to serve merely two terms, be it consecutively or separated by an hiatus. The President of Tanzania resides at Ikulu, or State House located in Dar es Salaam, the country’s largest city. 

As head of the Executive branch of government the president appoints a prime minister, and cabinet members from the National Assembly. He is also entitled to appoint ten unelected MPs who are able to take up a seat in the union’s cabinet. 

For further information 
Presidency of Tanzania: https://www.ikulu.go.tz

Irish delegation unveils artwork donation to International Criminal Court

On 18 March 2021, H.E. Kevin Kelly, Ambassador of Ireland to The Netherlands, and ICC President Judge Piotr Hofmański unveiled a new artwork donation to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, the Netherlands.  

The artwork is a sculpture by Irish artist Fergus Martin titled “Oak”. The piece was designed and commissioned for the Court. It consists of two green benches made of glass fibre reinforced concrete. The sculpture reflects the landscape around the Court and represents the strength of the mighty Oak tree, a traditional Irish symbol of truth, justice, courage and wisdom.

“In presenting this artistic work to the Court, Ireland wishes to highlight both our ancient past wherein wisdom, the prerequisite of justice, is reflected, while also representing modernity and endurance through the choice of material,” H.E. Ambassador Kevin Kelly said in his remarks at the ceremony.

“Ireland continues to stand firmly in support of the ICC. Our support for the Rome Statute and the continuing development of the ICC is based on our commitment to ending impunity for those most responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, and is in line with Ireland’s clear understanding that justice is a prerequisite for lasting peace, stability and equitable development,” the Ambassador added. 

ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, ICC President Judge Piotr Hofmański, H.E. Kevin Kelly, Ambassador of Ireland to The Netherlands and ICC Registrar Peter Lewis with the artwork donated to the ICC by the Government of Ireland

Expressing the Court’s gratitude to the government of Ireland for “this generous and thoughtful donation”, ICC President Judge Piotr Hofmański stated that “Ireland was one of the ICC’s founding States Parties and has been consistent in its support of the Court ever since. Of particular note are Ireland’s recurring voluntary contributions to the Trust Fund for Victims, totalling more than 1.3 million euros since 2004. Ireland has also stood up to add its voice to those of other States Parties at a time when the Court has been faced with unprecedented threats and challenges.”

Ireland signed the Rome Statute – the Court’s founding treaty – on 7 October 1998 and deposited its instrument of ratification on 11 April 2002. This donation highlights Ireland’s support to the Court and the joint efforts deployed in the fight against the impunity of those who perpetrate the most serious crimes that affect the international community as a whole.

Since the move to its new permanent premises in December 2015, the ICC received artwork donations from the Governments of Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Japan, Republic of Korea, Liechtenstein, Mexico, The Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Senegal, Slovenia, and Tunisia, representing their cultural heritage as well as reflecting the mandate of the Court.

ICC Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, on the transition process and related discussions with the Prosecutor Elect

On 12 February 2021, the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute elected Mr Karim Khan, Q.C. to serve as the next Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (“ICC” or the “Court”). I welcomed the announcement and once again congratulate Mr Khan on his successful candidacy. Mr Khan brings with him a wealth of experience and acumen to lead the Office of the Prosecutor (“OTP” or the “Office”) and we welcome him to the post. With the full support of my team, I am committed to ensuring that our colleague, Mr Khan, is in the best position to assume the Office’s crucial mandate when he takes office on the 16th of June.

The Office has swiftly moved to put those words into action. Since the results of the election were announced, I have engaged in a series of productive transition discussions with Mr Khan through telephone conversations, virtual meetings and in person. I am grateful to the Prosecutor Elect for his commitment to an effective transition process as well as the strong interest he has already demonstrated in the mandate of the Office and the duties and responsibilities he is about to assume and uphold.

Our discussions to date have touched upon a wide range of issues, from the transition itself to the Court’s budget process and the current budget cycle, matters related to human resources, the Independent Expert Review, and the successes secured by the Office, as well as the challenges we confront. I have found the discussions open, rich and productive. I am comforted by the fact that the Prosecutor Elect shares that view.

To facilitate our ongoing discussions and the Office’s ability to more freely share information with the Prosecutor Elect, we have also entered into a confidentiality agreement during this transition phase. This will assist us in our goal to ensure Mr Khan is as fully prepared as possible when he officially assumes office.

In addition to my own interactions with the Prosecutor Elect, we have arranged a series of meetings with the Office’s Senior Management, the OTP’s Legal Advisory Section, Services Section, and Information Knowledge & Evidence Management Section amongst other sections and services of the OTP. Additional in-depth briefings by the Office’s Divisions and Sections are envisaged, all with a view to ensuring that the Prosecutor Elect is as prepared as possible upon assuming his important functions, familiar with the dedicated team at the Office eager to assist him, and fully ready to engage his mandate come June.

As mentioned, I have welcomed the election of Mr Khan as the next Prosecutor and assured him of my full support and that of my team as he takes over the helm of the Office later this year.  I also wish, in the clearest terms, to allay any possible fears about potential conflicts of interest, real or perceived, that may be thought to affect Mr Khan upon his assuming office as the new Prosecutor of the ICC. Under his leadership, the Office will continue to discharge its vital mandate under the Rome Statute of combatting impunity, to deter international crimes, with independence, impartiality and objectivity.

ICC new prosecutor transition process.

The framers of the Rome Statute foresaw the possibility of potential conflicts of interest and provided for them in article 42(7) of the Statute, stipulating that “[n]either the Prosecutor nor a Deputy Prosecutor shall participate in any matter in which their impartiality might reasonably be doubted on any ground.” Mr Khan will apply this provision scrupulously whenever the circumstances require. In his correspondence with me, Mr Khan has informed me that he will recuse himself from any case, where a conflict of interest may be perceived to arise from his former representation of suspects or accused persons. He will have practical measures implemented to protect against any such risk, and the public can have complete confidence in the good faith and efficacy of this process, and Mr Khan’s unyielding commitment to his duties and responsibilities under the Rome Statute.

It is evident that Mr Khan and I share a joint conviction in the importance of the Court and a duty to serve its crucial mandate. When he assumes office as the Court’s new Prosecutor, I have no doubt he will continue to strengthen the OTP and to build on the accomplishments of the last nine years to advance the fundamental goals of the Rome Statute. He benefits from my confidence and the support of the Office as he sets out to do so.