Trust Fund for Victims’ partner in Uganda receives 2017 EU Human Rights Defender Award

0
Pamela Angwech, Founder & Executive Director of Gulu Women’s Economic Development &Globalization (GWED-G) receives the 2017 EU Human Rights Defender Award in Uganda on 25 May 2017. On 25 May 2017, on behalf of the Delegation of the European Union, the EU Member States and Norway represented in Uganda, H.E. Henk Jan Bakker, the Ambassador of the Netherlands to Uganda, announced Pamela Angwech, Founder & Executive Director of Gulu Women’s Economic Development &Globalization (GWED-G) to be the winner of the 2017 EU Human Rights Defenders Award. Ms. Angwech is Founder and Executive Director of GWED-G, the region’s largest grassroots human rights organization, focusing on women and youth. Since its founding in 2004, GWED-G aims to strengthen the capacity of grassroots communities in northern Uganda to become self-reliant agents of change for peace and development through training and education so that they can make effective decisions concerning their rights, health, and development. GWED-G has programme in health, human rights, peace building, economic empowerment and livelihoods, psychosocial support and counselling, research and advocacy. “This is great news and congratulations to Pamela and GWED-G for winning the award. A very well-deserved recognition of Pamela’s tireless advocacy and effective leadership in support of victim survivors and to ensure that women and girls have equal rights”, said Pieter de Baan, Executive Director of the Trust Fund for Victims. He adds, “The Trust Fund for Victims is honoured and proud to have a partnership with GWED-G over the years, as one of our implementing organisations in Uganda.” Since 2008, the TFV had indirectly partnered with GWED-G through another organisation, and in 2015, the TFV started a new partnership with GWED-G to implement a project under the assistance mandate in northern Uganda. Under this project, GWED-G provides medical referral (physical rehabilitation), and psychological support to reduce trauma and restore hope of victim survivors of war, and to raise awareness of  community members on preventing and responding to sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV). In winning the prestigious award, Ms Angwech is recognised for:
  • Her leadership role to promote the rights of war-affected women and girls who are suffering as a result of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) war in northern Uganda. She is at the forefront of advancing women’s and girl’s rights and gender equality in the district of Gulu, Nwoya and Amuru through empowering grassroots groups.
  • Her relentless commitment to support  over 400 women’s groups to ensure women and girls have equal rights to resources and livelihoods and are given a political voice and her  extensive experience with community-based human rights policy and post-conflict development.
  • Her strong and sharp voice on zero tolerance to sexual and gender-based violence following up on cases within the judiciary system.  She has been working on this over the past few years and has cumulatively responded to 670 gender-based violence cases- most of them with positive results for the victims.
  •  Her visibility and audacity to speak on behalf of the voiceless in various human rights platforms at local and national level, including the International Conference for Great Lakes Region, the UN1325SCR Coalition platform, the regional GBV and District Working Groups on Gender and VAWG, UWONET, CEWIGO and HURINET.
The sixth annual European Union Human Rights Defenders Award (EU HRD) granted by the EU and its member states in Uganda, to recognise the achievements of individuals who act to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms. These include civil and political rights as well as economic, social and cultural rights. An individual eligible for the EU HRD Award is nominated by another individual or organization. Human Rights organizations active in Uganda were invited to nominate candidates for the award. Candidates were assessed by a jury composed of human rights experts of different European Embassies and the EU Heads of Mission.    

President Emannuel Macron’s equality cabinet

President Emannuel Macron carried out his promise to appoint the same number of women as men, albeit merely one woman was given a senior role. Macron I cabinet Edouard Philippe, Prime Minister. Like the president, he graduated from the elitist Ena college for France’s top civil servants. In 2002 he was actively involved in setting up the centre-right, Les Républicains, party led by Bordeaux Mayor Alain Juppé. Bruno Le Maire, Economy Minister: A right-winger, aged 48, he was part of Nicolas Sarkozy’s government and is said to have coveted the economy role for several years. Gérard Darmanin, Public Accounts Minister. Right-wing politician. François Bayrou, Justice Minister: At 66, this centrist is no stranger to government, having served twice as education minister several years ago. Gérard Collomb, Interior Minister: An early adopter of the new president, aged 69, Minister Collomb was part of the Socialist party for decades. He was seen as instrumental in bringing François Bayrou into the campaign. Jean-Yves Le Drian, Foreign and Europe Minister: Aged 69, he served President François Hollande with fidelity as Defence Minister and is one of only two survivors of the outgoing government. Nicolas Hulot, Ecology Minister: An environmentalist opposed to nuclear energy, he was heavily involved in the COP21 climate change conference in Paris. Sylvie Goulard, Defence Minister: At 52, she is a europarlamentarian, and has been part of Mr Macron’s foreign affairs team for several months. Agnès Buzyn, Health Minister: A well-known health professional, she has headed the haematology department at the Necker children’s hospital in Paris as well as France’s national cancer institute. Sophie Cluzel, Disabilities minister. Her four children include a daughter with Down’s Syndrome. Laura Flessel, Sports Minister: Aged 45, she is a double Olympic fencing champion widely known in French sport. With an eye to the Paris bid to hold the 2024 Olympics. Françoise Nyssen, Culture Minister: Born in Etterbeek, Belgium. She worked for the Belgian government for several years in urban planning before moving into publishing in France. Murielle Pénicaud, Labour Minister: No stranger to the labour ministry, where she worked in the early 1990s, Ms Pénicaud, 61, has been head of the Business France agency with the aim of attracting foreign investment. Richard Ferrand, Minister for Territorial Cohesion: Aged 54, he is also secretary general of Mr Macron’s fledgling La République en Marche (Republic on the Move) party. Mounir Mahjoubi, Minister for Digital Affairs: He ran the digital side of Mr Macron’s presidential campaign but now has a high-profile post in government. President Macron has placed the digital economy as a high priority. Ambassador Philippe Étienne, Chief diplomatic adviser, 61, currently ambassador to Germany, who will have to pursue the president’s agenda of reforming the EU. Patrice Strzoda: 64, in charge of the president’s office and a highly experienced civil servant, who acted briefly as chief of staff for the outgoing prime minister. Sibeth Ndiaye: Born in Senegal, 37, and a mother of three, she ran the press relations side of his presidential campaign and now has the task of doing the same for his presidency. She only became a naturalised French citizen last year and played a starring role in a behind-the-scenes TV documentary on the Macron campaign. ——————- For further information: French Presidency: http://www.elysee.fr/toutes-les-actualites/  

Président Meron devant le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU

0

Président Meron présente au Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU le rapport sur l’avancement des travaux

Arusha, La Haye, 7 juin 2017 –  le Président du Mécanisme pour les Tribunaux pénaux internationaux (le « Mécanisme »), le Juge Theodor Meron, a pris la parole devant le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU pour présenter le dernier rapport semestriel sur l’avancement des travaux du Mécanisme. Dans son allocution, le Président Theodor Meron a souligné que le Mécanisme « continuait de faire d’excellents progrès dans la gestion de ses travaux judiciaires et a sans cesse vu sa charge de travail augmenter ». À cet égard, le Président a signalé que le Mécanisme avait rendu 146 décisions et ordonnances au cours des cinq premiers mois de l’année 2017. Un certain nombre de décisions ont été rendues au cours de la période considérée dans l’affaire Stanišić et Simatović, le premier procès devant le Mécanisme qui devrait s’ouvrir le 13 juin 2017. Le Président a également fait savoir que la phase de dépôt des mémoires dans les affaires en appel concernant Radovan Karadžić et Vojislav Šešelj s’était achevée et que la préparation des audiences d’appel avançait à grands pas. Le Président Theodor Meron a en outre souligné qu’une part importante de l’activité judiciaire du Mécanisme portait sur un vaste éventail de questions autres que les grands procès, notamment des allégations d’outrage, des demandes en révision de jugements et des demandes de mise en liberté provisoire. Par ailleurs, les juges du Mécanisme répondent régulièrement à des requêtes présentées par des autorités nationales aux fins de modification de mesures de protection et à des demandes d’autorisation de consulter des informations ou documents confidentiels. À cet égard, le Président a signalé que, sur les 366 décisions et ordonnances rendues entre la mi-mai 2016 et la mi-mai de cette année, 164 — soit environ 45 % — concernaient des demandes de modification de mesures de protection ou des demandes d’autorisation de consulter des informations confidentielles. L’examen de ces questions est le plus souvent confié à des juges uniques qui travaillent à distance. Le Président Theodor Meron a rappelé que la procédure au fond dans l’affaire Ngirabatware restait au point mort en raison du maintien en détention par les autorités turques du Juge Aydin Sefa Akay, malgré le fait que les Nations Unies aient confirmé l’immunité diplomatique du Juge Akay en octobre 2016. Il a souligné que la situation compromettait l’intégrité du modèle de travail à distance des juges envisagé par le Conseil de sécurité, et, plus grave encore, portait atteinte au principe d’indépendance judiciaire. Attirant l’attention du Conseil de sécurité sur le refus de la Turquie d’exécuter l’ordonnance rendue par le Mécanisme l’enjoignant de mettre un terme aux poursuites engagées contre le Juge Akay et de le libérer, le Président a invité le Conseil de sécurité « à prendre les mesures nécessaires pour que cette situation inédite trouve un dénouement approprié ». Le Président Theodor Meron a également informé le Conseil de sécurité que le Mécanisme avait récemment conclu un accord avec le Gouvernement du Bénin sur une version révisée de l’accord relatif à l’exécution des peines. De plus, il a fait savoir que le Mécanisme et le Gouvernement du Sénégal mettaient actuellement en œuvre le dernier volet de la décision de principe par le Sénégal d’accueillir huit prisonniers dans des cellules qu’il a mises aux normes conjointement avec les Nations Unies. Pour conclure, le Président Theodor Meron a invité les membres du Conseil de sécurité à ne pas laisser les défis dans le domaine des relations internationales menacer les progrès importants que les Nations Unies et le Conseil de sécurité ont réalisés en renforçant le principe de la primauté du droit et en combattant l’impunité conformément au droit international.

Blue Sky and Orange countries’ friendship

0

On the picture H.E. Ambassador Mr. Och Od and spouse Mrs. Tsolmon Jadamba.

By His Excellency Mr. Od Och,  Ambassador of Mongolia.

I feel myself privileged to address the audience of your esteemed magazine-the very first diplomatic magazine in the Netherland’s history, launched “By diplomats for diplomats”. It is honour for me to convey the heartfelt greetings of the Mongolian people to the great people of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. I had a chance to present my Letters of Credence to His Majesty King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands who graced me with this opportunity. The Mongolians feel special respect to the Dutch people for their great achievements.

The Kingdom of the Netherlands is one of our important partners. This year marks the 45th anniversary of diplomatic relations between our two countries.

We appreciate enormously the invaluable development assistance provided by the Government of the Netherlands. We are grateful for the reintroduction of Przewalski horses – Mongolian wild horses, which were in danger of total extinction not only in Mongolia but also in the world, to the Hustai National Park of Mongolia. It has become a flagship of our cooperation.

The Government of the Netherlands strongly supported Mongolia to become a member of the EBRD. Today, the Netherlands and Mongolia belong to the same constituency at the EBRD.

Crown Prince Willem-Alexander and Crown Princess Maxima paid an official visit to Mongolia in 2006, at the invitation of the Government of Mongolia on the occasion of the 800th anniversary of Mongolian statehood.

The Netherlands is the second largest investor in Mongolia. We see all opportunities to complement each other. Agriculture and renewable energy are the most promising sectors of our cooperation.

The Netherlands is supporting economic development in Mongolia, which is eligible for a large number of programmes, conducted by the Netherland’s Enterprise Agency (RVO), the Centre for the Promotion of Imports from Developing Countries (CBI), the Netherlands Senior Experts programme (PUM) and the Netherlands Development Bank (FMO). Mongolia’s first ever wind farm was inaugurated in 2013 thanks to the partial investment of the FMO.

Mongolia has established the Partnership Cooperation Agreement with the EU. The Netherlands was the first EU member state who ratified the Agreement.

“Takhi” Mongolian wild horses, also known as Przewalski horses at the Hustai National Park of Mongolia, supported by the Government of the Netherlands.

Mongolia and the Netherlands enjoy close cooperation in the field of education, culture and tourism. A large number of Mongolian students studied in the Netherlands thanks to a grant awarded by the Netherlands Fellowship Programme. The University of Groningen is conducting the Chair for East Asian Studies with a focus on Mongolia. Clingendael diplomatic training has been one of the highlights of our relations, since it has notable contribution to the capacity building of Mongolia and preparing Europe oriented diplomats since 1994. I was myself the first Mongolian diplomat to study in this Alma Mater.

Recent years, the number of Dutch tourists travelling to Mongolia is increasing significantly as Mongolia is a unique and relatively unexplored travel destination that offers a great combination of beautiful natural features, a wide variety of untouched landscapes, nomadic way of life and culture.

Salkhit wind farm in Mongolia.

In 2006, Crown Prince Willem-Alexander and Crown Princess Maxima paid an official visit to Mongolia at the invitation of the Government of Mongolia on the occasion of the 800th anniversary of Mongolian statehood.

In 2016, His Excellency Mr. Mark Rutte, Prime Minister of the Netherlands visited Mongolia to participate in the 11th ASEM Summit in Ulaanbaatar. His Excellency Mr.Gerrit Zalm, former Finance Minister of the Netherlands visited Mongolia in 1998 and 2002. From Mongolian side, official visits were paid to the Netherlands at the level of the President, Prime Minister and Minister of Food, Agriculture and Light Industry.

H.E. Prime Minister Mr. Mark Rutte with H.E. President of Mongolia Tsakhia Elbegdorj during the 11th ASEM summit in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia in 2016.

Mongolia and the Netherlands enjoy the successful development of our bilateral cooperation on international arena. Both countries are working closely towards promoting peace and human rights all over the world.

I wish all success to the Kingdom of the Netherlands to its noble contribution to the world progress.

Queen Elisabeth International Competition

0
The Duchess of Gloucester, Queen Mathilde of the Belgians and Princess Sarvath of Jordan – Picture by the Belgian Monarchy. For the very first time since its creation in 1937, the Queen Elisabeth Competition (DutchKoningin Elisabethwedstrijd, FrenchConcours Musical International Reine Elisabeth) included participation from cellists. To mark the milestone, the competition royal patron, HM Queen Mathilde of the Belgians, was accompanied to the performances by HRH The Duchess of Gloucester (UK/Commonwealth) and HRH Princess Sarvath El Hassan of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, whose husband was in Brussels for as a keynote speaker for Friends of Europe.  For further information http://cmireb.be/cgi?lg=en

Kazakhstan Diplomats Meet & Greet

On the picture Ambassador of Kazakhstan, H.E. Magzhan Ilyassov and spouse Mrs. Akmaral Aydarbekova.   By Roy Lie A Tjam.
The Russian Ambassador H.E. Alexander Shulgin, spouse Natalia Shulgina, Mrs. Akmaral Aydarbekova and her husband the Ambassador of Kazakhstan H.E. Magzhan Ilyassov.
An extraordinary Diplomat Meet and Greet. Ambassador Magzhan Ilyassov Joyously welcomed his guests to the Ambassadors Room of the Carlton Ambassador Hotel The Hague. Attendees came from a broad diplomatic spectrum, among them Ambassadors and Embassy representatives of Russia, Belarus, USA, Cuba, Cameroon, Bangladesh, Iraq, Georgia, Kosovo, Austria, Bangladesh, Armenia, Ecuador, Venezuela, Hungary, Bosnia & Herzegovina, European Union, European Parliament, OPCW, International Courts. For additional Kim Vermaat’ pictures, please open the following link:https://www.flickr.com/photos/121611753@N07/albums/72157682635718110
H.E. Mr Mikalai Barysevich, Ambassador of the Republic of Belarus and Ambassador Ilyassov coming behind, Mrs Tatsiana Barysevich spouse of the Ambassador of Belarus.
 Magzhan Ilyassov subsequently expressed thanks to those who made it all happen, Diplomatic Card, Hotel Carlton Ambassador and Diplomat magazine.
Ms Camelia Chirascu, Head of Political Section and Mr Gabriel Mares, Deputy Head of Mission from the Embassy of Romania and Richard Gopaul, from USA Embassy in The Hague.
Ambassador Magzhan Ilyassov continued his welcome remarks reminiscent of the fact that June 2, 2016, was the day he landed on Dutch soil in order to take up the position of Kazakhstan ‘s(new) Ambassador to the Netherlands. Magzhan Ilyassov went on, mentioning 2017 to be the year of celebrating 25 years of diplomatic relationship between his country and the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The Netherlands is Kazakhstan’s second most important EU. business partner.
Mr. Eduard Slootweg, Head of  the European Parliament Information Bureau and spouse Ms Kleice Gonzaga Carneiro are welcomed by H.E. Ambassador Magzhan Ilyassov.
The Ambassador introduced a brief video presentation of his country. By all means, the video has proven to be a very revealing one. Apparently, 2017 will be an eventful year for the Kazakhstan mission under the valiant direction of Ambassador Magzhan Ilyassov. Some of the activities to date lectures at De witte Society, a business investment seminar, and a Diplomat Meet & Greet.
The spouses of the ambassadors of Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan, Mrs Tatsiana Barysevich, Mrs. Natalia Shulgina and Mrs. Akmaral Aydarbekova during the event at Carlton Ambassador.
Furthermore, there has been ample opportunity to get acquainted with brandy and chocolate labeled “Made in Kazakhstan” it is said, Kazakhstan chocolate and brandy are secret weapons that can conquer. Ilyassov endeavored to have a friendly chat with his guests. He’s a fabulous host. Le soleil était au rendez-vous on the afternoon of Friday 2 June 2017, therefore the availability of the terras adjacent to the Ambassadors Room came in really handy.
The Ambassador of Georgia, H.E. Constantine Surguladze and Mr. Hugo Iserief, from Diplomatic Card.
 

Decret ou Loi Organique Relatif a la Qualité De Droit en Haiti

0
Introduction et Commentaires.   Par Alfred Kellermann. A la qualité de la règle de droit s’attachent des enjeux déterminants pour l’attractivité du système juridique et pour la compétitivité économique d’ Haíti. La sécurité juridique, la prévisibilité du droit et la simplification de règles inadaptées ou dépassées sont des attentes régulièrement exprimées par les citoyens et les entreprises en Haiti. Chaque projet de norme nouvelle doit ainsi être soumis à un examen de nécessité et de proportionnalité aussi circonstancié que possible, au regard de ses effets prévisibles et des exigences de stabilité des situations juridiques. Son élaboration doit en outre être l’occasion d’un réexamen du bien-fondé des règles qu’il est prévu de modifier et de la cohérence d’ensemble de la réglementation correspondante. D’importants progrès ont été accomplis en ce domaine en Haíti. En mai 2012 le Gouvernement Martelly/ Lamothe a fait de la réforme de l’Etat. Modernisation administrative et Décentralisation couvrant une période de cinq ans, s’étendant de l’exercice fiscal 2012/ 2013 à celui de 2016/ 2017vient d’être élaboré. Dans une note interne de l’Office de Management et des ressources humaines (OMRH) l’objective général par le programme est formulé d’après : « doter le pays, dans les meilleurs délais, d’une administration et d’une fonction publique modernes, efficaces, honnêtes, impartiales, au service des citoyens et de l’intérêt général, capable de gagner la confiance des premiers concernés, des fonctionnaires, et de la population, tout en effectuant une mise en œuvre efficace de l’actiongouvernementale … » Beaucoup d’instituions en Haíti fonctionnent aujourd‘hui avec un cadre légal désuet , souvent datant d’avant 1986. Il y donc un besoin pressant de rénover le cadre légal et institutionnel de beaucoup d’organismes de l’Administration centrale. Parce que l’OMRH se propose d’accompagner les Services centraux des Ministères dans la rénovation des lois organiques, cette introduction et commentaire on peut considérer commeune référence à la Procédure d’élaboration et d’adoption des textes législatifs et réglementaires par le Pourvoir Exécutif rédigé par l’OMRH.Dans cette procédure l’étude de d’impact et de faisabilité est obligatoire en Haiti : à fournir une évaluation de la réforme envisagée aussi complète , objective et factuelle que possible. La réalisation d’une étude d’impact à l’appui de chaque projet de loi et des textes réglementaires contribue à une nette amélioration des résultats obtenus dans l’application des lois. D’une part, le pilotage de la production normative doit se perfectionner, de manière à mieux assurer l’application des lois et la mise en œuvre des réformes. L’organisation de chaque département ministériel doit à cet effet être adaptée pour permettre, en relation étroite avec le gouvernement, une programmation des différentes étapes du cheminement des textes identifiés comme prioritaires et un suivi dynamique de ce cheminement. D’autre part, l’intervention de règles de droit nouvelles doit être plus systématiquement subordonnée à l’examen de critères tirés des principes de proportionnalité et de cohérence de l’ordonnancement juridique. Il est en particulier nécessaire de tirer les conséquences des nouvelles règles de partage de l’ordre du jour parlementaire, en veillant à laisser à l’écart des projets de loi toute disposition à caractère réglementaire. La démarche d’évaluation doit donner lieu dans chaque ministère comme au niveau interministériel à une mutualisation des méthodes et des ressources disponibles. La pratique, en cours d’expérimentation, qui consiste à accompagner la publication d’un décret d’une notice expliquant en des termes accessibles à la généralité des citoyens, l’objet et la portée du texte ainsi que ses conditions d’entrée en vigueur, a fait ses preuves. Elle doit être généralisée à l’ensemble des décrets réglementaires. Disciplines à Suivre dans l’élaboration de Projets de Réglementation Respect du partage entre les domaines de la loi et du règlement. L’élaboration de l’étude d’impact d’un projet de loi doit être l’occasion d’accorder une attention particulière au respect du partage entre les domaines respectifs de la loi et du règlement opéré. L’analyse de la nécessité, de la proportionnalité et des effets prévisibles des règles de droit nouvelles est une méthode à laquelle l’administration doit s’attacher dans l’élaboration de toute norme législative ou réglementaire. Chaque département ministériel a la responsabilité de développer dans son champ de compétence les ressources utiles à ces travaux. Consolidation des projets de texte législatif et réglementaire. Seule est de nature à garantir la correcte rédaction d’un projet de texte modificatif et à prévenir les risques de malfaçon la pratique consistant pour le rédacteur à élaborer conjointement ce projet et la version du ou des textes modifiés en résultant. Dans l’hypothèse où un projet de texte modifie un texte existant, son élaboration doit donner lieu à la mise au point d’un document faisant apparaître les dispositions qu’il s’agit de réformer dans leur version résultant du projet, sous la forme de modifications apparentes. Composition des dossiers pour le secrétariat général du Gouvernement. Sous peine de report de l’instruction, les dossiers des projets de décret soumis à l’examen du Gouvernement en vue de leur publication doivent comprendre : ― une fiche recensant l’ensemble des consultations obligatoires et mentionnant la date à laquelle il y a été ou sera procédé, à laquelle sont joints les avis rendus; ― une fiche exposant le raisonnement tenu quant à la nécessité de mesures transitoires et leurs modalités ; ― pour les projets de décret modifiant les textes en vigueur, la version consolidée du texte modifié en faisant apparaître les modifications en corrections apparentes. Production d’une notice explicative à l’appui des décrets réglementaires. Une notice n’est ni un support de communication ni un commentaire juridique : sa seule vocation est de donner une information fiable et accessible sur la nature et la portée des mesures susceptibles d’intéresser directement les destinataires des textes. La notice doit éclairer ses destinataires sur la portée du texte. Il est préconisé de la concevoir comme un document court (une demi-page). La rubrique « Notice » doit être rédigée dans une langue d’usage courant. Elle doit être compréhensible pour un public qui, tout en prêtant intérêt à la réforme, n’est pas nécessairement par avance averti de ses tenants et aboutissants. Tenant compte de tous les remarques et suggestionsmentionnés dans cette Introduction etCommentaire, il sera recommandable pour fixer de lignes directives en Haiti, dans un Décret ou Loi Organique, contenant des principes à garder dans la phase de rédaction d’un texte legislatif. Projet de Decret ou de Loi Organique Considérant qu’une consultation pré-législative est recommandable considérant que c’est nécessaire et obligatoire de tenir compte d’une étude et analyse de l’impact de la proposition législative relative à sa conséquence financière ou administrative pour Haiti; Considérant qu’il convient d’arrêter des lignes directives fixant les critères d’appréciation de la qualité rédactionnelle de la législation haïtienne: Considérant que les lignes directives ne sont ni obligatoires, ni exhaustives, et que leur but est de rendre la législation haïtienne aussi clair, simple, concise et compréhensible que possible; Considérant que ces lignes directrices sont destinées à servir de référence dans toutes les commissions et groupes de travail qui participent à la procédure d’élaboration des textes législatives; que le gouvernement de Haiti est invité à utiliser ces lignes directives afin de formuler des suggestions d’ordre rédactionnel, Decrete: L’objectif général de rendre la législation haïtienne plus accessible devrait être poursuivi, non seulement par un recours systématique à la codification, mais également par l’utilisation des lignes directives suivantes entant que critères d’appréciation des textes législatifs. 1) La formulation de l’acte devrait être claire, simple, concise et sans ambiguïtés; ainsi, l’emploi abusive d’abréviations, ou de phrases trop longues devrait être évité. La simplification législative repose sur une application rigoureuse des principes de nécessité et de proportionnalité. 2) Ces efforts consistent à la simplification, la codification, la refonte et la consolidation des textes législatifs, et l’abrogation des dispositions obsolètes. Afin d’améliorer la lisibilité du texte législative d’une part une réduction du volume des textes est nécessaire, d’autre part une importante simplification de la législation existante par remplaçantes dispositions trop complexes. 2) Les références imprécises à d’autres textes devraient être évitées, de même que de trop nombreuses références croisées qui rendent le texte difficile à comprendre. Les textes à rédiger doivent être conformes aux règles de la législative et textes normatifs de base (Constitution, conventions internationales, Décret du 17 mai 2005 portant l’organisation centrale de l’Etat).   3) Les différentes dispositions de l’acte devraient être cohérentes entre elles; en particulier, le même terme devrait être utilisé pour exprimer un même concept. Le vocabulaire juridique et administratif de Haiti devrait être respecté. 4) Les droits et obligations de ceux, auxquels l’acte s’appliquera devraient être définis d’une façon claire. 5) L’acte devrait être établi selon la structure type (chapitres, sections, articles, paragraphes). 6) Le préambule devrait justifier le dispositive dans des termes simples dans un exposé des motifs. 7) Les dispositions qui n’ont pas un caractère normatif (souhaits, déclarations politiques) devraient être évitées. 8) Les incohérences avec des actes existants devraient être évitées, de même que les répétitions inutiles de ces derniers. Toute modification, prorogation ou abrogation d’un acte devrait être clairement exprimée. 9) Un acte qui modifie un acte antérieur ne devrait pas comporter de dispositions de fond autonomes, mais seulement des dispositions s’intégrant directement dans l’acte à modifier. 10) La date d’entrée en vigueur de l’acte ainsi que les dispositions transitoires, dans le cas où elles s’avéreraient nécessaires, devraient être claires. Conclusion Le texte final de ce projet de Décret ou Loi organique doit être conçu et rédigé par ceux qui connaissent la structure de l’intérieur de Haiti. Un accompagnement extérieur peut être fructueux et les expériences de l’Union Européenne dans ce domaine ont une valeur ajoutée. Elaboration d’un projet de politique nationale de renforcement de la qualité des textes juridiques en Haiti est souhaitable. En plus l’élaboration d’un projet de manuel de légistique adapté au contexte haïtien dans un groupe de travail interministériel sera recommendable. —————– Rédigé en Haiti par Alfred Kellermann, 15 mai 2017.

ICMP’s Constructive Contribution to The Hague

0
By Ms Kathryne Bomberger, Director-General of the International Commission on Missing Persons. The Commissioners of the International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP) held their annual meeting in Stockholm on 1 June, a year after ICMP formally opened its new headquarters in The Hague, and two and a half years after ICMP was established as an International Organization in its own right under a treaty signed by the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Belgium and Luxembourg. In Stockholm, the Commissioners reviewed ICMP’s remarkable development over the last twelve months and examined key ways in which it can continue to coordinate the international effort to address the issue of missing persons. On a practical level, ICMP’s headquarters at Koninginnegracht 12 are now fully operational. Our core team in The Hague is being expanded, and in the coming months we will bring remaining administrative functions to The Hague from Sarajevo (where ICMP’s headquarters were located from 1996 until 2015). We will also establish a new DNA laboratory here, working in close cooperation with Dutch agencies such as the Netherlands Forensic Institute and also with leading multinationals such as the Qiagen biotechnology company. The demanding process of re-location has been made possible through the generous and support of the Dutch authorities, especially the Foreign Ministry and the City of The Hague. At the opening of ICMP’s headquarters on 7 July 2016, Foreign Minister Bert Koenders delivered a valuable and valued vote of confidence when he said that “as long as people go missing in this world, as a result of conflict, government repression, humanitarian crises, or other causes, ICMP will have a role to play. We are ready to work with you.” The Dutch authorities really have been with us all along the way, providing financial, diplomatic and practical support, and we certainly intend to honor our part of the bargain by making a constructive contribution to the diplomatic and scientific life of The Hague. From our headquarters here, we are coordinating programs throughout the world. ICMP has benefited from long-term Dutch support for its program the Western Balkans, where ICMP spearheaded the effort that made it possible to account for more than 70 percent of those who went missing in the 1990s, including 7,000 of the 8,000 men and boys who went missing at Srebrenica in July 1995. Today, ICMP is helping its partners in the region to maintain the effort to account for 12,000 people who are still missing. Between 2012 and 2014, ICMP operated a successful pilot program in Libya, before being forced to withdraw from the country because of renewed fighting. It has been active in Iraq since 2003 and is currently expanding its program there, training Iraqi experts in crime-scene management and DNA-led identification techniques throughout the country, including areas recently liberated from Da’esh. ICMP is also supporting associations of families of the missing and working with authorities throughout Iraq to develop a coordinated and law-based approach to the issue of missing persons. In Colombia, ICMP was invited by the parties to the Peace Agreement to help the authorities establish a Search Unit that will coordinate the effort to account for more than 65,000 people who disappeared during five decades of conflict. ICMP has also conducted consultations with government authorities and civil society in Sri Lanka, now grappling with the challenge of accounting for tens of thousands of missing from the war that ended in 2009. ICMP is launching a program to assist families from the Syrian conflict in finding their missing relatives. The aim is to establish a future system of locating and identifying those who have gone missing as a result of the conflict. We are also working with government authorities and other organizations to establish a program that will make it possible to begin identifying the rising numbers of irregular migrants who have been drowned trying to cross the Mediterranean. New projects will rely heavily on the knowledge base built over the last 20 years through our cross-cutting programs and will require extensive operational planning, thorough induction programs for new staff, and strategic support from donor and other countries in order to set in place office agreements and other legal and political arrangements that are needed. ICMP is playing its leading role in addressing the global challenge of missing persons in the context of an emerging international consensus that this issue – like the issues of organized crime, people trafficking and drug smuggling – cuts across judicial and national jurisdictions and can only be tackled effectively by applying dedicated techniques as part of a coordinated multinational approach. ICMP’s work is premised on the fact that missing persons can be found and that the rights of survivors – to truth, to justice, and to reparations – can likewise be met. This is validated through ICMP’s successful deployment of political, social and scientific strategies that have been honed over more than 20 years. Today, from our headquarters in The Hague, ICMP is leading a global effort to mitigate human suffering and to help governments ensure that the issue of missing persons does not undermine efforts to consolidate peace and global security. We believe that our work will benefit immensely from our proximity to other international organizations and agencies in The Hague and that in turn we can contribute to their efforts through our expertise and experience.  

A treasure of Hungarian avant-garde painting in Amsterdam, “From fauvism to surrealism” at the Jewish historical museum

H.E. Dr András Kocsis, Ambassador of Hungary, photography by John Dunkelgrün. By John Dunkelgrün. When I walked into this exposition, I was awed. Paintings in the avant-garde styles as good as any from France or Germany were all around me. Why weren’t these artists known as well as the members of the Blaue Reiter, the Brücke or say Cézanne and Gaugin? After I left, I felt intense gratitude for having been able to see this and add another page to my memories of great art.
Béla Czóbel, Boys, 1907. Photo: István Füzi. Janus Pannonius Museum.
Few people today know that in the two decades before World War I Budapest was one of the most vibrant cities in the world, the queen of cities in “Mittel Europa”. Population growth was spectacular, especially because of the many tens of thousands of Jews fleeing pogroms and violent anti-semitism in Russia, the Ukraine and Poland. Hungary is a very fertile country and the production of wheat, corn and sugar beets etc. was enormous. With advent of the new machinery powered by steam engines, the processing of the produce became very big business.
Hugó Scheiber, In de tram, 1925. Private collection, thanks to mediation by the Kieselbach Gallery – Budapest.
Also after the “Ausgleich” of 1861 (a deal with Austria about Hungary’s position within the Dual Monarchy) business conditions became far less restrictive. These three trends made for a phenomenal growth in wealth. In Budapest, where the Jewish population grew to almost a quarter, quite a lot of Jews rbecame important in business as well as in government. Parallel with this economic growth came a blossoming of the arts. Painters, writers, composers and musicians reached world levels. The arts were considered a truly national pride. When Mihály Munkácsy, Hungary’s most famous painter, died in 1900, he was given a state funeral on a par with that of Victor Hugo! A great many of these artists were Jewish. Unfortunately due to a number of circumstances only the composers are widely known today. The Jewish Historical Museum is trying to rectify this with a magnificent exposition of 85 works by nineteen Jewish painters, who were very famous at the time and deserve to be so today. The styles vary from fauvist through cubist to surrealist, predominantly on general, i.e. non-Jewish themes. The artists worked in a period of global turmoil, the first World War, the (Hungarian) revolution of 1919 and rapidly growing anti-semitism. Some of them were even active in The Netherlands. Vilmos Huszár was one of the founders of the art movement “De Stijl”, of which the centennial is celebrated this year.
Armand Schönberger, Cafe de la Paix, ca. 1929. Türr István Museum– Baja.
  The exposition, the largest ever of Hungarian art works in The Netherlands, shows that Hungarian art of the period was an important part of the international art scene. Hungarian artists traveled abroad and were influenced by the trends of the moment. At the opening, the ambassador of Hungary, H.E. Dr András Kocsis, spoke of the important contributions Hungary’s Jews had made to the economy and the arts in his country. He did so in admirable Dutch! Jaap Scholten, a Dutch writer and historian who lives in Budapest, gave a fascinating exposé of the political history and artistic development of Hungary.
Róbert Berény, Lady in an armchair, 1912. Private collection, thanks to mediation by the Virág Judit Gallery – Budapest
There is a magnificent bilingual catalogue written by the Project Director of the exposition, Dr. Joël Cahen, the previous Director of the museum and for those who read Dutch some very good articles in the current JCK magazine. The exposition runs through September 24.

Seminars: Employment Law and Real Estate

0
On the picture is Mr Jan Dop, head of the Embassy Desk, and experienced lawyer and partner at Russell Advocaten. The Embassy Desk of Russell Advocaten, a corporate full-service law firm in the Netherlands that is well-established within the diplomatic world, is hosting two seminars for Ambassadors and Embassy staff on Monday the 12th of June between 12:00 and 14:00 in Amsterdam. Two parallel sessions will focus on Employment Law (personnel handbook, illness, etc.) and Real Estate (government permits, environment, (sub)lease etc.). During these interactive sessions, practical legal questions and developments will be discussed. The aim of the event is to present relevant information in an easily accessible way. The Employment Law session will mainly focus on the effect of a personnel handbook in preventing employment related legal issues. The Embassy Desk will discuss the importance of applying rules and instructions and the positive effects thereof. The Real Estate session will provide an introduction to Dutch Real Estate Law, with a focus on government permits and building restrictions for Embassies and their neighbours. The seminar will be preceded by a lunch. To learn more about the activities and services of the Embassy Desk, please click here. If you are interested in attending the event (free of charge), please register at https://www.embassydesk.nl/seminar-12-june-2017/. See the seminar agenda here.