GAFG Essay Competition

0

The 2025 Technology, Mind & Health Essay Competition is open to students and young thinkers to write about balancing technology and mental well-being. Submissions are due November 16, 2025, and should be sent to info@balkanyouthcooperation.com. The competition is organized by the Global Academy of Future Governance (GAFG) and the Balkan Youth Co-operation (BYC). 

President Gatti Santana Addresses the United Nations General Assembly

Arusha / The Hague, 22 October 2025 — The President of the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT), Judge Graciela Gatti Santana, presented the Mechanism’s thirteenth Annual Report to the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

At the outset, President Gatti Santana congratulated H.E. Ms. Annalena Baerbock of the Federal Republic of Germany on her election as President of the 80th session of the General Assembly. She noted that she shares the President’s vision that the United Nations must preserve its past achievements while adapting boldly to confront present and future challenges — a principle also guiding the Mechanism’s work.

The President emphasized that, with the consistent support of the General Assembly, the Mechanism and its predecessors — the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda — have delivered justice, documented historical facts, and developed international legal standards and best practices. These, she said, form the foundation of today’s global accountability efforts. President Gatti Santana underlined that this legacy must be protected and that responsibly concluding the “justice cycle” remains vital. The Mechanism, she affirmed, is committed to being a partner in change — reducing costs, transferring or terminating functions no longer required, and upholding the principled application of international law.

She noted that the Mechanism continues to carry out a range of mandated tasks, including adjudicating residual judicial matters, supervising the enforcement of sentences, supporting national jurisdictions in prosecuting perpetrators of international crimes, monitoring referred cases, and managing the preservation and access to its archives and those of its predecessors. These residual functions, she stressed, are essential:

“Verdicts must not only be entered; sentences must be enforced. Reconciliation is advanced by comprehensive accountability. Protecting and ensuring access to judicially established facts is critical today due to growing and systemic revisionism and genocidal denial.”

President Gatti Santana also highlighted the Mechanism’s collaboration with other UN entities in assisting the Secretary-General with two reports requested by the Security Council under Resolution 2740 (2024), concerning the future of certain functions. She reiterated that it is for the Secretary-General to recommend, and the Council to decide, whether such functions should be transferred. Meanwhile, the Mechanism continues to align with the Council’s vision of a small, temporary institution — reducing staff and resources since 2020, adjusting its legal framework to avoid resource-intensive proceedings, and streamlining operations in the supervision of sentence enforcement.

The President underscored that the Mechanism’s efficient completion of its mandate depends on the cooperation of Member States. She pointed to the three persons still held in the United Nations Detention Unit in The Hague, as well as the five persons relocated to Niger in 2021 after acquittal or completion of their sentences — all of whom remain under the Mechanism’s care, generating significant financial costs.

In closing, President Gatti Santana reaffirmed the enduring message of the Mechanism and its predecessor tribunals:

“Possessing the power and resources to commit mass atrocities today does not insulate any individual from accountability tomorrow.”

She cautioned that the international community must not “falter in this last mile of the justice cycle and risk undoing all that has come before.” President Gatti Santana concluded by assuring the Assembly that the Mechanism stands ready to work with both the General Assembly and the Security Council to find innovative solutions to complete its mandate fairly, efficiently, and at an appropriate cost, and she expressed gratitude to Member States for their continued support.

Peace in Ukraine Through Washington and Moscow, via Budapest. Where Does Bucharest Stand?

“Peace is not decided where blood is shed, but where maps are redrawn.”


By Lieutenant General (ret) Corneliu Pivariu

For more than two and a half years, the war in Ukraine has become not only a human tragedy and a test of national resilience but also a battleground of great powers — a field where diplomacy intertwines with global economic and geopolitical interests. Throughout this period, there have been discreet attempts at dialogue between Washington and Moscow, as well as several European or regional initiatives seeking to outline the premises of a potential peace.

Increasingly, Budapest seems to emerge as a link between the two power centers. Hungary, maintaining an active channel of communication with Moscow while remaining a NATO and EU member state, is skillfully positioning itself as an informal yet pragmatic intermediary in a context where other European actors prefer firm rhetoric over direct dialogue.

General Context

Both the United States and Russia share, in the medium term, an interest in stabilizing the situation. Washington envisions a global strategic reconfiguration in which the Asia-Pacific pivot becomes a priority, requiring that efforts and resources allocated to Ukraine be rationalized. Moscow, on the other hand, seeks to consolidate its territorial gains and avoid internal exhaustion that could threaten the regime’s stability. Within this fragile balance, any credible intermediary—be it a state, organization, or leader—can play a role of varying importance.

Budapest – A Discreet Channel Between Washington and Moscow

Hungary has cultivated a unique position within the European Union: it maintains close economic and energy relations with Russia, yet participates fully in NATO structures and EU mechanisms. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has been among the few European leaders to continue direct dialogue with the Kremlin while simultaneously keeping a pragmatic openness toward Washington, regardless of the administration in power.

Regarding the outcome of the negotiations that were supposed to begin shortly in Budapest[1], the most likely scenario is that they would mark a principled agreement and a formulation along the lines of: “the parties acknowledge the necessity of a negotiated solution and commit themselves to avoiding further escalation.” The front will remain relatively stable, and diplomacy could regain the initiative in place of military actions. More, however, will become clear after the Budapest round.

It is not by chance that some working diplomatic channels between East and West seem to discreetly pass through Budapest. Against the backdrop of an evident deadlock in multilateral negotiations, this seemingly peripheral capital is transforming into a balancing point for indirect Russo-American discussions about the architecture of Europe’s future order.

A Symbol of Security Guarantees: The Budapest Memorandum

Budapest also carries special historical significance. It was here, in 1994, that the Budapest Memorandum was signed — the document by which Ukraine renounced its nuclear arsenal in exchange for security guarantees from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Russia. The memorandum stipulated respect for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity—commitments gravely violated with the annexation of Crimea and later, with the 2022 invasion.

Budapest’s return to the forefront of peace discussions is thus not merely a geographical coincidence but also a symbolic reactivation of an international commitment that once seemed to guarantee regional stability—or perhaps, an irony of history itself.

The European Union – Between Declarative Solidarity and Strategic Fragmentation

The European Union as a whole is going through a period of strategic ambiguity. Although support for Ukraine remains a point of declarative consensus, there are significant differences among member states regarding the level of military involvement, the economic sustainability of aid, and perspectives on possible negotiations with Russia.

Hungary plays here a double, yet calculated, game: through its critical discourse toward Brussels, it consolidates its internal and regional position, but never leaves the European institutional framework. In reality, Budapest capitalizes on the EU’s internal contradictions to legitimize itself as a “realist voice” in a chorus of often idealistic messages.

Thus, the European Union—caught between its economic dependencies and its desire for strategic autonomy—fails to articulate a concrete peace proposal of its own (or perhaps chooses not to), leaving the initiative to others.

Washington and Moscow – Signs of a Cautious Recalibration

In both the American capital and the Kremlin, a more measured tone has become noticeable in recent months. In the United States, public opinion and Congress appear increasingly reluctant to support an open-ended military effort, while Russia seeks to achieve a “positional peace” that would legitimize its territorial gains.

Hence the renewed interest in indirect negotiation formats involving intermediary capitals. Budapest, but also Ankara and even Beijing, play subtle roles in this network of diplomatic messages and signals—where nothing is officially declared, yet everything is carefully calculated.

Bucharest – Spectator or Actor?

Romania, situated on the border of the conflict and holding major strategic interest in the stability of the Black Sea region, appears to remain more a cautious spectator than an engaged actor. Although a member of both NATO and the EU, Bucharest has not managed to build a distinct initiative or role in the European dialogue on Ukraine.

While Hungary, Turkey, and even Poland actively promote their own agendas, Romania’s absence from this diplomatic game risks becoming a constant. The lack of a coherent foreign policy strategy, compounded by internal decision-making fragmentation, limits the country’s ability to be perceived as a partner with initiative and regional vision.

In fact, the question in the subtitle is eminently rhetorical, as long as Romania’s political class remains captive to other interests and narrow perspectives.

Peace through Washington and Moscow, via Budapest, is not a metaphor but a diplomatic reality in the making.

Budapest has understood that in a world where great powers negotiate over the heads of regional actors, the one who succeeds in becoming an intermediary or catalyst gains influence—even without major military or economic power. Romania, by contrast, continues to remain within the comfortable zone of strategic conformity, without proposing its own solutions or dialogue platforms.

If peace in Ukraine is ultimately decided—one way or another—through Washington and Moscow, via Budapest, at least two legitimate questions remain for Romania: Where does Bucharest stand?; And how long will Bucharest remain merely an informed but uninvolved capital in the process that will shape the future of Eastern Europe?

Brașov, October 22, 2025

Selective Bibliography
Official Sources and Primary Documents

1. Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, signed in Budapest, 5 December 1994.
 – United Nations Treaty Collection, Depositary Notification C.N.911.1994.TREATIES-5.

2.U.S. Department of State. Press Statements and Briefings on Ukraine and Russia (2022–2025).

3. The Kremlin. Official Transcripts and Statements on the “Special Military Operation” and Peace Proposals (2022–2025).

4. European External Action Service (EEAS). EU Foreign Affairs Council 5. Conclusions on Ukraine and Security Architecture (2023–2025).

NATO. Vilnius and Washington Summit Communiqués (2023, 2024).

 Geopolitical Analyses and Think Tanks
6. Chatham House (London). “Security and Diplomacy in Post-Conflict Ukraine.” Research Paper, 2024.
7. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “Negotiating with Moscow: Lessons from the Minsk and Astana Formats.” Policy Brief, 2023.
8. RAND Corporation. “Frozen Conflicts and Negotiated Settlements in Eastern Europe.” Santa Monica, 2023.
9. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). “The Future of U.S.–Russia Relations: Limited Engagement under Pressure.” Washington D.C., 2024.
10. Royal United Services Institute (RUSI). “Hungary’s Strategic Hedging in the NATO–Russia Equation.” London, 2024.
11. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). “Europe’s Divided Response to the Ukrainian War: Between Values and Realpolitik.” Brussels, 2023.
Theoretical Analyses and Reflections
12. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1997.
13. Kissinger, Henry. World Order. New York: Penguin Press, 2014.
14. Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton, 2021 (Updated Edition).
15. Walt, Stephen M. “Realism and Restraint in the Age of Multipolarity.” Foreign Affairs, 2023.
16. Severin, Adrian. Policentric Harmony: A New Model of Global Cooperation and Security. Bucharest, 2024.
17. Pivariu, Corneliu. Global Geopolitical Evolutions in the First Quarter of the 21st Century. Romania in This Context. Forecasts for 2050, Financial Intelligence, 2025
 Selected Analytical Articles and Media Sources
18. Financial Times. “Trump, Putin, and the New Architecture of Power: Why Budapest Matters.” October 2025.
19. Reuters. “Hungary to Ensure Putin Can Enter Country for Trump Meeting in Budapest.” October 2025.
20. France 24. “Zelensky Ready to Join Putin–Trump Summit if Invited.” October 2025.
21. Bloomberg. “EU Uneasy as Hungary Hosts Potential Trump–Putin Talks.” October 2025.
22. Diplomat Magazine (The Hague). “Regional Balances and the New European Security Format.” Issue 3/2025.

[1] According to a statement released by the White House on October 21, 2025, President Donald J. Trump announced the postponement of the planned meeting in Budapest with Russian President Vladimir Putin to an unspecified later date. The statement noted that the decision was made “following ongoing diplomatic consultations and recent international developments.” (Source: White House Press Office, Statement by the President, October 21, 2025; Reuters, Associated Press, October 22, 2025.)

Four Centuries Forward: The Thai–Dutch Strategic Partnership

0

By H.E. Mr. Asi Mamanee, Ambassador of Thailand to the Kingdom of the Netherlands

In 2024, Thailand and the Netherlands celebrated 420 years of diplomatic relations — one of the longest continuous partnerships between Europe and Asia. What began with 17th-century maritime trade has evolved into a multifaceted partnership spanning technology, agriculture, sustainable development, and innovation.

Today, the Netherlands remains Thailand’s largest investor from the European Union, while Thai companies increasingly use the Netherlands as their gateway to European markets. Bilateral trade between the two countries reached USD 7.4 billion (7,404.27 million) in 2024. These figures underscore the strong and growing economic interdependence between the two nations, built on practical cooperation and shared strategic interests that have deepened over time.

Connecting Two Nations

Strengthening the practical foundations of our partnership remains a top priority. Thailand and the Netherlands share a common vision to enhance connectivity and foster closer ties among our peoples, businesses, and institutions. In this spirit, we look forward to promoting greater mobility between our two nations, which will play a pivotal role in driving future exchanges — bringing government officials, entrepreneurs, researchers, and students ever closer together. Enhanced connectivity will serve as a powerful catalyst for innovation, collaboration, and enduring friendship between our two kingdoms.

During the recent Thailand–Netherlands Political Consultation held in The Hague in September 2025, both countries reaffirmed their commitment to advancing cooperation. As Thailand pursues its Ignite Thailand 2030 vision to become a regional innovation hub, the Netherlands offers complementary, world-class expertise in areas ranging from advanced manufacturing to sustainable agriculture.

Building on Proven Success

The strongest foundation of Thai–Dutch cooperation lies in areas where both countries have achieved concrete results. Dutch expertise in water management has contributed to Thai flood control systems and agricultural water efficiency. Similarly, Dutch innovations in precision agriculture, greenhouse technology, and sustainable food production address Thailand’s specific needs in agricultural productivity and climate adaptation. These collaborations demonstrate what works: clear objectives, technical expertise, and measurable outcomes.

Exploring New Frontiers

Thailand is actively working to deepen partnerships in frontier technology sectors, particularly advanced manufacturing and semiconductors. Building on its strong electronics manufacturing base, skilled workforce, and strategic location at the heart of ASEAN, Thailand stands ready to collaborate with Europe’s leading technology innovators to co-create resilient, sustainable, and future-oriented value chains.

The Netherlands hosts some of Europe’s most advanced capabilities in semiconductor equipment manufacturing, precision engineering, and photonics. Driven by the global supply chain crisis and the geopolitical push for regional resilience, Thailand aims to position itself as a reliable, strategic partner in secure regional production networks.

Collaboration is being explored in areas such as advanced semiconductor assembly, packaging and testing, photonics, and green energy technologies. The Knowledge-to-Knowledge (K2K) model — which prioritises research partnerships and talent exchange before large-scale industrial commitments — offers a pragmatic pathway for initial cooperation in these complex, high-tech fields.

Translating Policy into Action

The Royal Thai Embassy in The Hague has initiated several targeted programmes to translate high-level policy into practical cooperation:

  • Investment Showcase: In June 2025, the Embassy co-hosted a seminar on the Bio-Circular-Green (BCG) Economy in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC), showcasing investment opportunities and inviting Dutch companies to partner in clean energy and circular innovation. In September 2025, the Embassy participated in the 5th Thai–Netherlands Business Forum, organised by Thailand’s Board of Investment, to highlight investment opportunities in Thailand.
  • Human Capital Development: In August 2025, the Embassy supported Thai engineering students to attend the Eindhoven Semicon Summer School, focusing on the critical development of human capital through hands-on training.
  • Technical Fact-Finding Mission: In September 2025, Dutch representatives visited Thailand’s semiconductor ecosystem. These reciprocal exchanges are vital for Dutch stakeholders to gain a deeper understanding of Thailand’s technical capabilities and to identify areas for future collaboration.

A Partnership of Mutual Interest

As Thailand and the Netherlands enter their fifth century of diplomatic relations, the partnership continues to thrive in line with shared strategic interests. Collaboration now spans a wide range of sectors, reflecting a joint understanding that sustainable partnerships rely on diversification. Success in long-established areas such as water management has built a foundation of trust and confidence — enabling both nations to explore bold new frontiers in future-defining, high-technology sectors.

The coming years will determine whether policy commitments translate into functioning partnerships. The 420-year history of Thai–Dutch relations offers a solid foundation, yet the partnership’s future relevance will depend on what both nations choose to build together today. As Thailand and the Netherlands embark on this next chapter, they do so with a blend of ambition and realism — guided by the same mutual respect, trust, and practical cooperation that have sustained their friendship for over four centuries.

Panama and the Netherlands: From Maritime Heritage to Global Shipping Giants

0

By H.E. Ms. Sally Loo Hui, Ambassador of Panama to the Kingdom of the Netherlands

The Netherlands and Panama, though continents apart, share a profound connection to the sea, through the North Sea, the Caribbean, the Atlantic, and the Pacific. These waters have shaped their maritime cultures, defining a way of life and a vision for commerce.

The Netherlands was born from the sea, learning to coexist with it through dikes and canals, fostering a philosophy of balance between humans and nature. Panama stands as a global hub for business, finance, and logistics. Its position at the Isthmus has made it a vital crossroads for international trade, linking imports and exports across continents.

In maritime transport and industry, Panama offers world-class infrastructure. The Panama Canal, together with the world’s largest fleet of Panamanian-flagged vessels, ensures secure and efficient operations. Investors in logistics and transport find in Panama a platform that connects global markets and supports growth.

Panama also offers an enviable quality of life, with a safe, multicultural environment ideal for professionals and their families. Investing in Panama means leveraging a strategic location, a favourable business climate, and a lifestyle that balances work and well-being.

The Multinational Headquarters Law provides fiscal, labour, and immigration incentives for companies establishing regional operations, including tax exemptions and streamlined hiring of foreign staff. Panama also hosts free trade zones and special economic areas, such as the Colón Free Zone, which grant significant tariff and logistical advantages.

Documentacion del transito del Buque Chemtals Cancale por las esclusas de Miraflores, Canal de Panama. © Autoridad del Canal de Panamá. USO DE FOTOS / Material de Vídeo / Términos y Condiciones: Cualquier uso de material visual del Canal de Panamá debe estar debidamente acreditado / mencionó como “Cortesía de la Autoridad del Canal de Panamá.” El material de archivo o fotografías sólo podrán ser utilizados para el fin solicitado y / o programas / content / relacionada con el Canal de Panamá. Este material no puede ser vendido / transferido a terceros. © Autoridad del Canal de Panamá. USE OF PHOTO / VIDEO MATERIAL / TERMS & CONDITIONS: Any use of Panama Canal’s visual material must be properly credited / mentioned as “Courtesy of the Panama Canal Authority”. The footage or photographs may only be used for the purpose requested and / or programs / content / related to the Panama Canal.  This material may not be sold / transferred to third parties.

Panama’s flag represents over 15% of the global merchant fleet, reflecting a maritime tradition rooted in compliance with international standards such as Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS), and the International Labour Organization Maritime Labour Convention. The national ship registry applies strict due diligence, ensuring vessels or owners linked to sanctioned entities are excluded. Panama remains committed to maritime safety, security, and the rule of law.

The Panama Canal connects more than 140 maritime routes and 170 countries, demonstrating the nation’s dedication to neutrality and free transit. The Panama Maritime Authority promotes high standards to protect both vessels and seafarers, the silent workforce sustaining global trade.

Panama and the Netherlands have turned maritime geography into identity and opportunity. A shared “blue bridge” links them, carrying commercial visions and stories across oceans.

H.E. Ms. Sally Loo Hui, Ambassador of Panama.

Bilateral agreements reflect this maritime vocation. They include the 1997 treaty in The Hague to avoid double taxation for international shipping and aviation companies; the 2000 treaty on Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, effective since 2001; the 2004 social security coordination law allowing nationals to transfer benefits; and the 2010 agreement on double taxation and tax evasion.

Trade between the two countries is dynamic. Panama exports bananas, frozen shrimp, pharmaceuticals, teak, scrap metal, and palm oil to the Netherlands, while the Netherlands supplies electrical equipment, industrial machinery, specialized vehicles, and logistics technology.

Panama maintains a stable financial environment, with transparent banking laws, competitive taxation, and an ecosystem connecting Latin America to global markets. Through its embassies in Europe, Panama has worked with national authorities to share progress in strengthening financial transparency and compliance, efforts that culminated this year in Panama’s removal from the EU list of high-risk third countries for money laundering and terrorist financing, which underscores its commitment to international cooperation and good governance.

Academic collaboration continues to grow. The Technological University of Panama (UTP) partners with Dutch institutions, including the “Holland House – UTP Master Class,” where Dutch executives teach specialized courses. Panamanian students and professors also benefit from scholarships and exchange programs in the Netherlands, fostering a two-way flow of knowledge and innovation. The partnership extends to science: last year, INDICASAT and the University of Groningen signed a MoU for joint research on tuberculosis, an initiative already showing results, contributing to a projected decline in cases in Panama this year.

Panama invites Dutch investors to view the country not merely as a commercial partner but as a home for sustainable investment, offering a strategic location, a favourable business climate, and strong government support for foreign capital. Together, Panama and the Netherlands can continue building a future of shared prosperity, where every investment is a seed on fertile ground and every success a joint achievement.

Saudi Arabia’s 95th National Day Celebrated in The Hague

On 23 September, His Highness Prince Jalawi bin Turki Al Saud hosted an elegant reception to celebrate the 95th National Day of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, attended by members of the Dutch government, ambassadors from around the world, members of the diplomatic corps, heads of international organizations, distinguished members of society, Saudi nationals, and friends of Saudi Arabia, as well as leaders from the cultural, artistic, business, and scientific sectors.

Traditional Saudi hospitality was evident at every stage of the evening, creating a warm and gracious atmosphere that reflected the Kingdom’s rich heritage.

In his address, His Highness Prince Jalawi bin Turki Al Saud welcomed the guests and emphasized the ongoing journey of unity and development that began with the unification of the Kingdom by the late King Abdulaziz Al Saud. He highlighted the nation’s continued progress under the leadership of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, and His Royal Highness Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

His Highness noted that the National Day serves as a time to renew loyalty, pride, and belonging, reaffirming commitment to national development and global engagement under wise leadership. He emphasized the Kingdom’s far-reaching transformation driven by Vision 2030, which aims to diversify the economy, empower citizens, and promote sustainable development.

Some ambassadors and heads of International Organizations at Saudi Arabia National Day 2025.

The Prince also highlighted the historic and growing bilateral relations between Saudi Arabia and the Netherlands, dating back to 1872 with the opening of the Dutch consulate in Jeddah and the establishment of formal diplomatic relations in 1930. Today, cooperation spans key sectors including economy, culture, energy, education, technology, innovation, and food security.

At the international level, His Highness reaffirmed the Kingdom’s commitment to global peace and stability. He referred to the High-Level International Conference hosted by Saudi Arabia in July 2025 in partnership with France, which led to the New York Declaration—calling for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital. The declaration was endorsed by 142 UN member states.

His Highness reiterated Saudi Arabia’s firm stance against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, citing its active role in the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), and its steadfast support for international law and the peaceful resolution of disputes through institutions such as the International Court of Justice.

Saudis attending the 95 Anniversary of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s reception in The Hague.

He also underscored the Kingdom’s transformation under Vision 2030, highlighting efforts to empower youth and women and to invest in technology and innovation. Initiatives such as the creation of the Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA) and the hosting of the Global AI Summit demonstrate Saudi Arabia’s leadership in the digital economy.

In the fields of energy and environment, His Highness noted Saudi Arabia’s pioneering role through OPEC and major sustainability programs such as the Saudi Green Initiative and the Middle East Green Initiative. These efforts aim to reduce carbon emissions by 278 million tons annually by 2030, achieve net zero by 2060, and generate 50% of the Kingdom’s electricity from clean energy sources by 2030.

Following His Highness’s remarks, guests engaged in warm conversation while enjoying a lavish dinner showcasing the variety and richness of Saudi gastronomy—a vibrant blend of Bedouin roots, Middle Eastern influence, and regional flavors that delighted every palate.

Cheo Hurtado, the Soul of Venezuela, Performs at the Permanent Mission in The Hague


United by Music

As part of a series of cultural activities highlighting Latin American talent in Europe, the Permanent Mission of Venezuela in The Hague distinguished itself by presenting the renowned maestro Cheo Hurtado, in what became an unforgettable evening for diplomats, artists, and lovers of traditional Venezuelan music.

Held on Thursday, October 9, at the Venezuelan diplomatic headquarters, the event transformed the Mission into a space of cultural dialogue through music. With his inseparable cuatro, the traditional Venezuelan string instrument, Hurtado captivated the audience, demonstrating that culture is a source of pride and a powerful tool of diplomacy.

Cheo Hurtado, Venezuela.

Recognized as one of the most emblematic performers of the cuatro, Cheo Hurtado offered a recital lasting over an hour before Ambassador Héctor Constant-Rosales, Venezuela’s Permanent Representative to international organizations, and an audience of distinguished guests, including fellow ambassadors and friends of Venezuela.

Many guests attended Cheo Hurtado’s concert at Venezuela Representation.

Among the attendees were the ambassadors of Kazakhstan, Costa Rica, Tanzania, Colombia, Belarus, Uruguay, Bolivia, Cuba, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Guatemala, who joined in celebrating Venezuela’s rich cultural heritage. Hurtado’s repertoire covered the most representative genres of Venezuelan folklore — from joropo to calypso, as well as waltzes and aguinaldos — each piece performed with mastery and deep emotion. The concert reached its peak with Pajarito, one of the most iconic pieces in the llanero repertoire, performed with the expressive intensity that characterizes Hurtado’s art.

Cheo Hurtado, concert at the Venezuela Representation.

A living legend of Venezuelan music, Cheo Hurtado’s artistic career spans more than five decades. He has devoted his life to performance, research, teaching, and the dissemination of Venezuela’s traditional rhythms. His work has been instrumental in promoting the cuatro internationally and preserving indigenous genres such as joropo, guasa, waltz, calypso, and aguinaldo — earning him recognition as one of the great cultural ambassadors of Venezuela.

Following the concert, Ambassador Constant-Rosales hosted a warm reception where guests enjoyed typical Venezuelan delicacies, including arepas.

Saudi Cultural Fund Injects SAR 3 Billion to Boost Cultural Investments

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia, Oct. 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Cultural Development Fund (CDF), Saudi Arabia’s key financial enabler of the cultural sector, has announced a suite of new funds and financial products exceeding SAR 3 billion (USD 933 million), further advancing its mission to unlock private investment and build a sustainable cultural economy.

Through these efforts, CDF continues to enrich Saudi cultural production and create developmental economic opportunities—advancing the Kingdom’s cultural scene and deepening appreciation of national culture both locally and globally.

Commenting on the new funds, Majed Abdulmohsen Alhugail, CEO of the Cultural Development Fund said:

“As a Center of Excellence and Financial Enabler for the cultural sector, the Cultural Development Fund works to strengthen integration across the cultural ecosystem and deepen strategic partnerships with the private sector, driving the sector’s sustainability and long-term growth. The agreements we recently signed during the Cultural Investment Conference reflect our commitment to advancing public–private partnerships through risk-sharing mechanisms and co-financing models that channel new capital flows into the cultural economy. These commitments mark a pivotal step toward building a thriving cultural sector that is globally competitive, generates investment and employment opportunities, and contributes to sustainable development. These efforts align with the National Culture Strategy and Vision 2030, which aim to raise the cultural sector’s contribution to GDP to 3%, while increasing the private sector’s share to 65% and diversifying the Kingdom’s economy.”

CDF’s announcements span both investment and financing solutions, including agreements to establish three new investment funds, with CDF acting as an anchor investor for two of them. The first fund is the SAR 375 million (USD 100 million) film investment fund, where CDF is an anchor investor in partnership with BSF Capital. The second is the SAR 300 million (USD 80 million) Fashion Investment Fund, also with CDF as anchor investor in partnership with Merak Capital. The third fund, valued at SAR 850 million (USD 227 million), is launched by the Cultural Assets Group and financed with SAR 200 million (USD 53 million) CDF as part of its role in enabling the cultural sector.

The Cultural Assets Group’s Fund will make investments across visual arts, fashion, digital content, experience design, and emerging technologies. This fund integrates public and private capital to localize IP, attract international companies, and sustain long-term growth of the cultural economy.

The new film investment fund, managed by BSF Capital, targets investment in high-quality film projects and studio facilities in and beyond Saudi Arabia. This includes film production and distribution. Its goal is to develop the Saudi film sector’s infrastructure and expand its global reach, in collaboration with one of the world’s leading film production companies.

The Fashion Investment Fund, managed by Merak Capital, is the Kingdom’s first dedicated fashion investment fund. It will support local and regional fashion companies and supply chains, aiming to grow Saudi brands with international expansion potential while enhancing sector sustainability.

On the financing side, CDF has launched the Co-Lending Product – the first of its kind in the cultural sector – in partnership with five leading financial institutions. At the same time, CDF introduced five new financing products under “Cultural Finance”. These are receivable financing, revolving loans, bridge loans, medium- and long-term loans, and micro-lending. The Fund also signed cooperation agreements with three local banks to broaden the reach of CDF’s “Cultural Finance.” Through these announcements, CDF aims to provide cultural MSMEs with flexible financing options tailored to their needs, enabling their growth and expansion across the cultural value chain.

Beyond investment funds and financing products, CDF announced the release of its inaugural investment report, “Saudi Arabia Cultural Market Outlook 2025: Vision, Impact, and Opportunities”, which maps the Saudi cultural economy landscape, featuring 36 promising, ready-to-invest opportunities introduced by the Ministry of Investment, Invest in Saudi, and CDF. The Fund also launched a digital investment platform to empower local and foreign entrepreneurs to explore opportunities in the Saudi cultural economy.

These announcements were underpinned by strategic partnerships with both the public and private sectors. CDF signed Memoranda of Understanding with the Ministry of Culture, Ministry of Investment, Sparklabs, and Asyad Holdings to develop and enable the growth of the cultural sector. In addition, it signed cooperation agreements with the Royal Commission for AlUla, MBC Group, Rotana Studios, and the Saudi Coffee Company to drive the sector’s sustainable growth and amplify its economic and social impact.

Europe – In Search of its Moral Triumph

Lessons from Iceland, Bhutan, and New Zealand

Caught by two Guernicas, which we frivolously call conflicts – one Semitic and the other inter-Slavic – of uncertain ends and its beginnings, and trapped in a cycle of confrontational multispatial despair, the European continent finds itself demoralized and disoriented, deindustrialised and disenfranchised. Hot rhetoric does not warm up a steep, cold recession. As it witnesses loss of its geopolitical centrality, the unravelling of global cooperation – to say; slowbalisation, internal depopulation, collapsing social cohesion and fracturing cross-generational contract, Europe desperately searches not just for stability, but for its moral triumph.

What could mark such a turning point? Is the strategic decoupling and geo-economic binarization a way out? Is there, on the horizon of an attainable future, a model of renewal—one grounded not in abstract geopolitical ambition, but in the tangible, lived well-being of its people? In seeking an answer, Europe might look not to its (selectively interpreted) past or (deceiving) power, but to its priorities.

Iceland, Bhutan, New Zealand: Three Roads to Rethinking Prosperity

In a world often driven by economic growth metrics such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), some nations have dared to redefine what it means to thrive. Rather than chasing purely financial gains, countries like Iceland, Bhutan, and New Zealand have taken bold steps to prioritize the holistic well-being of their citizens. Iceland’s recent shift to a nationwide four-day workweek, Bhutan’s long-standing focus on Gross National Happiness (GNH), and New Zealand’s reimagined budgeting framework centered on well-being illustrate three distinct, yet deeply aligned, approaches to redefining progress in the 21st century.

Iceland: A Work-Life Revolution

Since 2019, Iceland has been at the forefront of an innovative experiment in workplace reform. Through a series of trials led by Reykjavík City Council and the national government, the country tested reduced working hours for thousands of workers without a drop in pay (Haraldsson & Kellam, 2021). The results were overwhelmingly positive: improved work-life balance, lower stress levels, and in many cases, even higher productivity.

The Icelandic model challenges the assumption that more hours equal more output. It also generated ripple effects in gender equality. Men and women reported greater sharing of domestic duties and child-rearing responsibilities, making the shorter workweek not only a labor reform but also a cultural shift.

Unlike most current narratives that link the introduction of new technologies (such as AI) with massive joblessness, Icelandic case is a strikingly bright. This transformation reflects a broader national commitment to well-being, mental health, and equity. Iceland’s success reveals that redefining the workweek can improve both quality of life and economic performance. Simply, the new technologies can bring the self-realisation for many, not just a profit for the few.

Bhutan: Happiness Over GDP, Development over Growth

Bhutan stands as a global benchmark in its official rejection of GDP as the sole measure of progress. Since the 1970s, the country has embraced Gross National Happiness (GNH), a development philosophy structured around nine domains, including psychological well-being, health, education, good governance, and ecological diversity (Ura et al., 2012). This multidimensional model is designed to ensure that material growth does not come at the expense of spiritual and environmental integrity.

Bhutan’s policies reflect this philosophy. The country is not only carbon-negative—absorbing more carbon than it emits—but also constitutionally mandated to preserve at least 60% forest cover (Royal Government of Bhutan, 2008). Tourism is limited to minimize cultural and ecological disruption, and all national planning must pass through a GNH policy screening tool. Personal happiness in Bhutan is a constitutionally guaranteed category.

The Club of Rome warned in its landmark 1972 report Limits to Growth that unchecked economic and population growth would inevitably collide with the planet’s finite resources (Meadows et al., 1972). Bhutan’s development philosophy can be seen as a rare real-world embodiment of this insight: a country designing its policies around planetary boundaries before surpassing them. Bhutan is not against economic growth but it prioritises social development, following the 3M matrix: maximum good for the maximum species over the maximum time.

New Zealand: The Wellbeing Budget

In 2019, New Zealand launched the world’s first “Wellbeing Budget,” a fiscal framework prioritizing citizen well-being over short-term economic growth. Spearheaded by then Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and its Finance Minister Grant Robertson, the initiative aimed to address systemic issues like mental health, child poverty, and indigenous inequality (New Zealand Treasury, 2019).

Instead of merely focusing on GDP or deficit targets, policies were evaluated based on how they improved life satisfaction, social cohesion, and long-term health outcomes. For example, major investments were funnelled into mental health services and the support of marginalized communities, such as the Māori and Pasifika populations.

As economist Thomas Piketty notes in Capital and Ideology, “Every human society must justify its inequalities: unless reasons for them are found, the whole political and social edifice stands to collapse” (Piketty, 2020, p. 6). Iceland, Bhutan, and New Zealand (as well as sporadically the Latin American examples, such as those of Uruguay, Argentina, Peru, Brazil, Venezuela, Mexico) implicitly answer this challenge by reducing structural inequities and embedding well-being into their policy frameworks.

A Global Movement Toward Well-Being

While the specifics differ, Iceland, Bhutan, and New Zealand all embody a significant shift in national priorities. They challenge the dominant global narrative that defines success in purely economic terms. Their experiences show that it is possible to elevate health, equality, sustainability, and happiness without sacrificing prosperity.

This trend is timely. The world today faces an epidemic of burnout, climate emergencies, collapsing social cohesions, rising inequality and over-militarisation instead of good neighbourly collective security. The traditional growth-at-all-costs model is no longer adequate. Neither more products lead to prosperity, nor do increased security expenditures translate into greater stability and safety. The Limits to Growth report predicted systemic collapse unless societies transitioned away from the pursuit of endless material expansion (Meadows et al., 1972). That warning, echoed decades later by doctors, sociologists, and economists alike, is more urgent than ever.

As Piketty (2014) writes, “The history of inequality is shaped by the way economic, social, and political systems interact” (p. 20). These three countries, along with the numerous earlier examples, offer a model of interaction that fosters dignity, justice, inclusion and cohesion over mere expansion.

 

The Right to an Analog Life and Mental Balance in the Age of Overdigitalised, Contactless Society

In parallel with structural economic reforms, any meaningful shift toward well-being in Europe must also acknowledge the psychological and social toll of constant digital exposure. The latest acceleration of digital platforms into nearly all aspects of life—work, education, governance, and even leisure—has created what many now call an always-on culture. This has not only blurred the boundaries between public and private life, real or simulated, but also contributed to rising levels of anxiety, burnout, and digital fatigue, especially among younger – increasingly contactless – generations.

A recovery plan rooted in well-being must defend what could be termed basic liberty -the right to an analogue life—the right to meaningful offline time, unmediated by screens, algorithms, or notifications. Public institutions, workplaces, and schools should actively promote “analogue weekends,” nature immersion programs, and screen-free zones to restore attention, mental balance, and human connection.

As Erich Fromm foresightedly observed, modern individuals risk becoming “having” rather than “being”, caught in a mode of existence dominated by possession and consumption rather than authentic experience and presence (Fromm, 1976, p. 41). Protecting analogue space and slowness is not a nostalgic act but a strategic investment in mental resilience and civic cohesion in an overstimulated age, especially for the younger cohorts of our societies. (Analogue retreat modalities, as e.g. these offered by the Global Academy for Future Governance, are valuable models for reflection, reloading, and adjustment.)

A Recovery Plan for the Union and its Candidate Countries

In contrast, much of the European Union—and particularly its candidate countries—grapples with structural stagnation. Regional inequalities, youth unemployment, demographic decline, and democratic erosion (voters’ apathy) reflect a broader crisis of legitimacy and purpose. While the EU’s brief recovery (through quantitative easing) offered a short-term lift, deeper structural problems remain unresolved.

Former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis argues that Europe’s economic framework is often driven by technocratic logic that isolates fiscal policy from democratic control (Varoufakis, 2017). In his works, he advocates for radical democratization of economic life, public investment in green technology, and replacing extractive capitalism with participatory models (Varoufakis, 2020) – similar to the Yugoslav socially (not, a state owned) self-management models, the so-called self-managing interest communities of labour (so-called SIZ and OUR). These ideas, previously implemented in Yugoslavia, Spain (Mondragon), Parecon (Albert-Hahnel initiative), Worker-Owned Cooperatives (e.g., USA, Argentina, Italy), and Israeli Kibbutzim, align strongly with the well-being-centred governance models recently implemented in Iceland, Bhutan, and New Zealand.[1]

A European recovery plan inspired by these examples would involve six strategic actions:

  1. Institutionalizing Well-Being, Inequality reductions, Equitable socity: The EU should formally integrate well-being metrics—such as the OECD Better Life Index—into funding and evaluation frameworks, particularly within cohesion and pre-accession policy. It should be coupled with the quality education and healthcare, progressive taxation and social safety nets, supporting vulnerable populations, affordable housing, combating generational discrimination, and fostering similar socio-economic and demographic opportunities for the population at large; self-realisation and self-enhancement;
  2. Reforming Labour Structures: As Iceland has done, Europe should pilot shorter workweeks, flexible work hours, and universal care programs. These changes would directly target burnout and improve work-life balance across generations. In short, technology should work for people, not against them – coupling human development and the overall advancement of working age populations with growth, driven by innovative technologies;
  3. Generational Transition and Youth Employment: Europe must address the growing crisis of long-term youth unemployment and underemployment. Lasting cross-generational contract as well as the generational renewal requires major investment in training, green and digital skills, apprenticeships, and pathways into meaningful work. A “New Deal for Youth” could prevent the economic disillusionment and migration that threaten demographic balance in many parts of Europe;
  4. Demographic Renewal, Orderly migrations: Low birth rates and an aging population, especially in Southern, Central and Eastern Europe, pose structural risks to social compact and sustainability. Policies that combine work-life balance (such as childcare access and parental leave), housing affordability, maternity assistance, and youth retention strategies are crucial. Without generational renewal, Europe’s welfare systems and democratic institutions risk stagnation. Europe must address root causes of forced migrations, and support repatriation of economic migrants’ and welfare nomads by linking it to economic development of the migrants’ regions of origin;
  5. Oversecuritisation and Environmental Limits, Green Investment: Echoing the Limits to Growth (Meadows et al., 1972), Europe must refrain from warmongering and declarative overmilitarisation, while urgently redefining its neighbourhood policies (Arctic policy, Eastern policy, EURO-Med Barcelona Process reinvigoration, trans-Atlantic policy balanced for inclusion of Central and Latina America). Green (demilitarised) investments primarily should secure clean and reliable sources of energy but also modes of transportation across continental Europe – such as high-speed rail networks. Over-excessive computing power build up goes in the same, unnecessary consumption of resources, direction.[2] Simply, the digital world pollutes the analogue — and it must be restrained. Such a transition – towards sustainable infrastructure, local resilience, and ecological regeneration – should not be viewed as a cost but as a generational obligation. Not a burden but an opportunity;
  6. Democratizing Policy-Making: Inspired by Varoufakis’ calls for economic democratization and the previous Yugoslav self-management model including SDK (the fee-less monetary/finance infrastructure system),[3] the EU should expand participatory governance through citizen assemblies, regional councils, social and cross-generational dialogue. These mechanisms would help reverse trust and democracy deficits and ensure that younger generations feel heard in decision-making processes.

Towards Europe’s renewal

Iceland, Bhutan, and New Zealand each represent a distinct but converging trend in governance: the prioritization of well-being over traditional economic performance. Whether through a shortened workweek, happiness-based development, or a well-being-oriented budget, these countries are forging paths toward a more humane and sustainable future.

Thomas Piketty’s work reinforces the need for such rethinking. As he argues, the persistence of inequality cannot be understood apart from the systems that produce and justify it. The Club of Rome warned decades ago that the planet itself cannot sustain the dominant economic models we inherited. Yanis Varoufakis adds that democracy must return to the heart of economic design, of already successfully tested Yugoslav model of social ownership, self-management.[4]

For the EFTA, the EU and its candidate countries, this is not just a moment for economic repair—but one for generational renewal. With a bold shift toward well-being, inclusion, youth empowerment, and the urgent need to tackle overfinancialization, overdigitalisation, oversecuritasation and overconsumption along with the ecological limits, Europe can build a new foundation for prosperity—one that serves both its people, planetary raw-model for many generations to come.

Moral triumph attainable?

Finally, will Europe be able to triumph morally ever again? The main obstacles to such a mastery, especially considering the Continent’s loss of initiative on the international arena, can be outlined as follows:

  • Internal fragmentation (disagreements and inconsistences);
  • External dependences diluting Europe’s autonomy (on the US for security, Chine for trade, Russia for energy, and southern and eastern peripheries for demographic compensation);
  • Moral inconsistences (dubious arms sales, selective observance of human rights, rule of law, democracy and humanitarian law within and beyond the Continent);
  • Post-colonial lapses and Historical amnesia (imperial past burden, patronisation of Global south, subtle jingoism in education media and culture);
  • Economic prioritisation over principles (profits driven deals over moral imperatives, historical obligations and legal commitments);
  • Loss of soft powers and cultural leadership as the main power of Europe on the global stage (for a long while, Europe held monopoly of historical vertical, beacon of humanism and moral reservoir).  

In brief, the Continent’s main obstacle to moral triumph is not a lack of values, but a lack of coherent, principled, and decisive action to defend and promote them in a fragmented, interest-driven global system. Without genuine leadership, unity, collective (not selective) security as stipulated by the Helsinki accords and the Charter, strategic independence and coherence, as well as the courage to accept economic and political costs for moral leadership, Europe risks further irrelevance on the world stage.

Bhutan or Nepal, simply choice.[5]

Anis H. Bajrektarevic            

Vienna, 16 SEP 2025

anis@corpsdiplomatique.cd    Author is chairperson and professor in international law and global political studies, Vienna, Austria. He authored ten books. His latest title: Justice and Ho


[1] It is worth noting the real attempts to respect labour autonomy and the self-realisation of society as a whole (that leaned on the Antonio Gramsci and, Herbert Marcuse’ as well as on the works of Erik Olin Wright, Murray Bookchin, Michael Polanyi and the Pareconese; Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel). Still, considering its global recognition and the contemporary context, the thinker closest to it is Hayek: And well, it is the Yugoslav Self-management system that is the most thorough and elaborate realisation of the basic Hayek’s (socio-)economic theory. Both –his theory as well as the Yugoslav practice– regar-ded the following as central to the very success of a society: (i) Decentralisation; (ii) Optimisation of the market mechanisms; (iii) Limits to the central planning; (iv) Freedom and Autonomy enhancement. Surely, while Hayek was primarily attuned to the pure economic needs, the Yugoslav system demonstrated great attention to overall societal well-being (eliminating many of the hidden costs).

[2] Human brain has an effective computing power of about ten to 100 petaflops (quadrillions of operations per second). The most powerful computes that we have today in general use in the world are also rated at about ten to 100 petaflops. The only problem is that each such a device is the size of living room, cost some €200 million, untold heat and related primary and secondary pollutions, annually producing an electricity bill of some €3 million.    

[3] It is absolutelyfascinating and insightful to compare theblockchainand Yugoslavia’s SDK (Social Bookkeeping Service/ Služba društvenog knjigovodstva). Hence, the author of this text is inviting researchers and practicioners to study SDK system for the futher betterments of the banking/finance systems. Though very different in terms of technology and historical context, the two do share conceptual similarities in how they manageaccountability, fees, decentralization, and transparency. Yugoslavia’s SDK was, in many ways, a proto-blockchain idea in a centralized socially owned form: (i) It functioned like a clearing house or state ledger, charging NO fees for its services. Hence, it was apublic service, not a profit-seeking institution; (ii) It embedded trust and compliance into the decentralised financial infrastructure; (iii) It offered transparency and control, by centralized social oversight and public recordkeeping; (iv) It pursued systemic accountability, much like blockchain aims to do today; (v) It enjoyed full support and trust from the entire community, as it was genuine and rooted in its own society.

[4] One of the most influential figures in literature, politics and culture of the modern age, Jean-Paul Sartre famously claimed: “Yugoslavia is the realization of my philosophy.” In the same tone, Britain’s King Charles III (then Prince), speaking to the media in early 1970s — as Director Zbanic beautifully reminds us in her latest work, nominated for an 2026 Oscar — says, “The Yugoslav self-management model deserves a closer look, as it might be indispensable for the stability and prosperity of Europe.”

[5] It refers to the recent massive popular revolt against all three major political parties – both ruling and opposition – driven by unbearable social and economic disparities in Nepalese society. The discontent, that turned violent and resulted in the deaths, injuries and hasty flight abroad of government officials and their family members, was fuelled by chronic, unsolved issues such as youth unemployment, corruption, lack of access to quality education and healthcare, and the ever widening gap between the rich and the poor.

References (APA Style)

Haraldsson, G. D., & Kellam, J. (2021). Going public: Lessons from Iceland’s journey to a shorter working week. Alda – Association for Sustainability and Democracy. https://autonomy.work/portfolio/icelandsww/

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. Club of Rome. Universe Books.

New Zealand Treasury. (2019). The Wellbeing Budget 2019. Government of New Zealand. https://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/wellbeing-budget/wellbeing-budget-2019

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Belknap Press.

Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Royal Government of Bhutan. (2008). The Constitution of the Kingdom of Bhutan. http://www.nationalcouncil.bt/assets/uploads/docs/acts/2014/The_Constitution_of_Bhutan_2008.pdf

Ura, K., Alkire, S., Zangmo, T., & Wangdi, K. (2012). A short guide to Gross National Happiness Index. Centre for Bhutan Studies. https://ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Bhutan-GNH-Index-short-guide.pdf

Fromm, E. (1976). To Have or To Be? Continuum.

Bajrektarevic, A. (2005). OSCE EF 13th Ministerial, Closing Session ( EF.NGO/9/05 ) www.osce.org/files/f/documents/1/7/14857.pdf 

Hayek, F. A. (1982). Law, legislation and liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy (Vols. 1–3). University of Chicago Press.

Baković, J. (1979). Služba društvenog knjigovodstva u sistemu socijalističkog samoupravljanja, Narodne Novine, Zagreb-Sarajevo

Sartre, J-P. (1985). Critique de la raison dialectique, Éditions Gallimard

Varoufakis, Y. (2017). Adults in the room: My battle with Europe’s deep establishment.

Bajrektarević, A. H. (2013). Geopolitics of Peter Pan, Europe of the West: Imperialism of Imagination. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 5(2), 136–150.

Žbanić, J. (2024). Blum: Masters of Their Own Destiny, (Oscar Nominated documentary (2026)) – movie script.

First Latin American Food Festival with Chef Luis Rojas

The tastes of Latin America are coming together for the very first edition of the Latin American Food Festival, led by renowned Peruvian Chef de Cuisine, Luis Rojas.

The real secret behind Hilton The Hague’s celebrated restaurant, Blue Blood, is its chef. Hilton The Hague succeeded in luring Chef Rojas away from Abu Dhabi, where he wore the toque at the Hilton restaurant on Yas Island. Trained in Lima and at the prestigious Cordon Bleu School—an epicenter of great cuisine in Latin America—Chef Rojas has honed his craft across the globe. Yet it is his roots and passion for Latin flavors that truly define his cooking.

Chef Rojas, a big, amiable, teddy bear of a man, exudes enthusiasm for the upcoming festival, which he has designed to be served in waves of dishes rather than courses. Each wave is both a feast for the eye and a sensation for the palate. Meeting him is a pleasure in itself—he speaks of his creations with vivid clarity, charming guests with his pride and passion.

H.E. Ms. Franca Deza Ferreccio, Ambassador of Peru to the Netherlands, expressed her congratulations to Blue Blood restaurant and, in particular, to Peruvian Chef Luis Rojas for organizing the Latin Food Festival, which will take place on Friday, October 17, 2025.

We are confident that, as in previous editions of the Peruvian Food Festival, Chef Rojas will once again shine at this celebration dedicated to Latin American cuisine, demonstrating his talent, creativity, and commitment to promoting the rich flavors of our region.

The Embassy of Peru extends its best wishes to Blue Blood restaurant and its talented Peruvian chef, Luis Rojas, for the greatest success in this new culinary initiative.

This festival will celebrate the rich culinary traditions of Latin America, offering an extensive buffet filled with authentic dishes that showcase the diversity, color, and flavor of the region. “For me, food is more than taste; it is memory, tradition, and celebration. Through this festival, I want to share the warmth and spirit of Latin America with every guest,” says Chef Rojas.

Dining at Blue Blood during the Latin American Food Festival is something you truly must not miss. Expect a festive atmosphere, exceptional food, and an unforgettable culinary journey guided by one of Latin America’s most passionate chefs. Reservations are highly recommended.