Implementing the EU-Turkey Statement

0
Implementing the EU-Turkey Statement – Questions and Answers On 18 March 2016, EU Heads of State or Government and Turkey agreed to end the irregular migration from Turkey to the EU and replace it instead with legal channels of resettlement of refugees to the European Union. The aim is to replace disorganised, chaotic, irregular and dangerous migratory flows by organised, safe and legal pathways to Europe for those entitled to international protection in line with EU and international law. The Statement took effect as of 20 March 2016, and 4 April 2016 was set as the target date for the start of returns of people arriving in Greece after 20 March and of the first resettlements. 4 April 2016 thus saw the start of two processes: returns from the Greek islands to Turkey to make clear that this is a dangerous route and the wrong route; and the first resettlements of Syrian refugees from Turkey to Europe, to underline that this is how Europe lives up to its responsibilities as a continent committed to providing protection to those in need, as well as the Geneva Convention and to the fundamental right to asylum. The implementation of the Statement requires huge operational efforts from all involved, and most of all from Greece. As European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said, this is a Herculean task. Greece and Turkey are the two governments in charge of implementing the Statement. It is their authorities who have to do the legal and operational work. The Commission is assisting Greece with advice, expertise and support from the EU budget and by coordinating the support which is being provided by other Member States and EU agencies – via the EU Coordinator Maarten Verwey who is leading three teams in Brussels, Athens and Ankara. Significant steps in the implementation of the Statement have been taken and good progress in operationalising the Statement has been made. Continued success will however depend mainly on the political determination of all parties involved. So far, 511 Syrian refugees have been resettled from Turkey to Europe. The return of 462 migrants who had not made asylum applications in Greece has been carried out from the Greek islands to Turkey, in full respect of EU and international law. There has been a substantial decrease in the numbers leaving Turkey for Greece: In the weeks before the implementation of the Statement, around 1,740 migrants were crossing the Aegean Sea to the Greek islands every day. By contrast, the average daily arrivals since 1 May are down to 47, a decrease of over 95%. Continued efforts are needed from Greece, Turkey and all EU Member States in the days and weeks to come. What was agreed in the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March? The EU and Turkey agreed that: 1) All new irregular migrants or asylum seekers whose applications have been declared inadmissible crossing from Turkey to the Greek islands as of 20 March 2016 will be returned to Turkey; 2) For every Syrian being returned to Turkey from the Greek islands, another Syrian will be resettled to the EU from Turkey directly; 3) Turkey will take any necessary measures to prevent new sea or land routes for irregular migration opening from Turkey to the EU; 4) Once irregular crossings between Turkey and the EU are ending or have been substantially reduced, a Voluntary Humanitarian Admission Scheme will be activated; 5) The fulfilment of the visa liberalisation roadmap will be accelerated with a view to lifting the visa requirements for Turkish citizens at the latest by the end of June 2016. Turkey will take all the necessary steps to fulfil the remaining requirements; 6) The EU will, in close cooperation with Turkey, further speed up the disbursement of the initially allocated €3 billion under the Facility for Refugees in Turkey. Once these resources are about to be used in full, the EU will mobilise additional funding for the Facility up to an additional €3 billion to the end of 2018; 7) The EU and Turkey welcomed the ongoing work on the upgrading of the Customs Union. 8) The accession process will be re-energised, with Chapter 33 to be opened during the Dutch Presidency of the Council of the European Union and preparatory work on the opening of other chapters to continue at an accelerated pace; 9) The EU and Turkey will work to improve humanitarian conditions inside Syria. What has Greece done to implement the Statement? Since 18 March 2016, Greece has: Moved all migrants who arrived on the islands before 20 March to the mainland; Returned from Greece to Turkey 462 persons who entered irregularly after 20 March and did not apply for asylum; Adapted its hotspots to facilitate swift returns and provided for closed reception facilities where necessary to avoid irregular migrants absconding when they are subject to return decisions; Adapted its legislation to provide a legal framework for the implementation of the ‘first safe country of asylum’ and ‘safe third country’ principles and ensuring fast-track procedures for the examination of asylum applications, including appeal procedures with currently 20 appeal committees operational to examine all pending asylum claims at second instance by the end of 2016; Agreed to further amend their legislation to set up the new Appeal Authority and the new Appeal Committees responsible for the judicial review of decisions on applications for international protection taken by the Greek Asylum Service; Begun processing claims and delivering judgments and appeals, based on individual assessments. What has Turkey done to implement the Statement? Since 18 March 2016, Turkey has: Effectively received all those returned from Greece; Provided formal guarantees that all Syrian refugees returned to Turkey from the Greek islands may request and be granted protection under the temporary protection regulation in Turkey; Provided formal guarantees that non-Syrians in need of international protection who are returned from Greece to Turkey will be able to apply for and receive protection and have their applications processed in a timely manner and will be protected from refoulement; Agreed to allow the EU to monitor regularly the situation of Syrians and non-Syrians returned to Turkey, including access to refugee camps and centres, and concluded an agreement with the UNHCR to provide access to removal centres to monitor implementation of international protection procedures. The first visits to these camps and removal centres have already taken place; Ensured access to the labour market for non-Syrians in need of international protection; Put in place a roadmap to reduce the backlog of applications for international protection by non-Syrians; Completed and shared with the Commission a roadmap on the implementation of voluntary returns. The Turkish Parliament approved the entry into force of the provisions of the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement concerning third country nationals as of 1 June. The relevant law was signed by the President’s office on 18 May and published in Turkey’s Official Journal on 20 May. The entry into force of the provisions on third-country nationals of the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement should be completed with a decision by the Turkish Council of Ministers as a matter of urgency to allow for actual readmission. Continuous patrols by the Turkish and Greek authorities are an important factor in preventing migrants crossing the Aegean. The Greek and Turkish authorities now exchange information on a regular basis. During the first five months in 2016, the Greek Coast Guard alerted its Turkish counterpart to 120 search and rescue cases. Frontex has deployed a liaison officer in Ankara since April which has allowed for regular operational contacts and daily reporting with the Turkish National Frontex Point of Contact. Since 2 May 2016, a Turkish Liaison Officer has also been stationed with Europol. The Turkish authorities have set up units on migrant smuggling and human trafficking and are taking legislative steps to put in place higher penalties for smugglers. How many staff from the EU Agencies have been deployed to the Greek islands? EU Agencies are providing the necessary support to the implementation of the Statement. In total, 141 Frontex and European Asylum Support Office (EASO) officers are currently working in Greece under the EU-Turkey Statement (43 interpreters, 47 asylum experts and 51 escort officers) – corresponding to the current needs identified by the Greek authorities. A total of 584 Frontex officers are currently deployed in Greece within the framework of the Rapid Intervention Poseidon. All Member States have provided detailed indications including figures for their contributions to Frontex and EASO calls for experts and a significant number of additional experts have been identified for deployment should the Greek authorities so request. How many migrants arrived in Greece since 20 March? In the weeks before the implementation of the Statement, there were around 1,740 daily crossings of migrants to the Greek islands. Since 1 May the average daily number of arrivals is down to 47, a decrease of over 95%. The total numbers of irregular arrivals from Turkey to Greece in September, October, November, December 2015, January and February 2016 were respectively 147,639, 214,792, 154,381, 104,399, 61,602 and 56,335 persons. For the same months the corresponding daily averages were 4,921, 6,929, 5,146, 3,368, 1,987 and 1,943 persons. How many returns and resettlements have taken place so far? Since the Statement entered into force, there have been 462 returns from the Greek islands to Turkey of persons who did not apply for asylum or voluntarily revoked their asylum application, including 31 Syrians. Other nationalities returned have included Pakistanis, Afghans, Bangladeshis, and Iranians as well as people from Iraq, India, Congo, Algeria, Sri Lanka, Morocco, Nepal, Somalia, Ivory Coast, Egypt and the Palestinian Authority. In total, 1,546 returns of irregular migrants have been carried out from Greece to Turkey in the course of 2016. 511 Syrian refugees were resettled from Turkey to Europe to underline that Europe will live up to its responsibilities as a continent committed to the Geneva Convention and to the fundamental right to asylum. How are resettlements and returns physically being carried out? Resettlements from Turkey to the European Union are taking place via plane. Returns from the Greek islands to Turkey are taking place via ferry and bus. The operational arrangements are decided between Turkey and Greece. Frontex is assisting in their practical implementation. Frontex has mobilised the following resources for the time being: 2 ferries 3 buses for transportation from the hotspots to the ports 1 charter plane 51 Frontex escort officers On what basis are Syrians being resettled from Turkey? Resettlement from Turkey to the EU will be carried out in the first instance by honouring the commitments of Member States under the Council conclusions of 22 July 2015 of which 18,000 places for resettlement remain. Furthermore, the Commission has proposed an amendment to the relocation decision of 22 September 2015 to allow for the resettlement of an additional 54,000 persons under a voluntary arrangement. Beyond this, the Voluntary Humanitarian Admission Scheme based on the Commission’s Recommendation to that effect last December, will be activated. How does the resettlement process, including the selection of candidates, work? To organise fast-track resettlement under the 1:1 scheme, a mechanism is being established and Standard Operating Procedures have been developed, in close cooperation between the Commission, Member States, EASO, UNHCR and Turkey. The system foresees that an initial list of resettlement candidates is prepared by the Turkish authorities on the basis of vulnerability criteria. This list is then assessed by UNHCR in order to identify the eligible cases to be submitted to EU Member States for resettlement, especially taking into account their situation and vulnerability. Member States make the final decision on candidates submitted to them by the UNHCR, and carry out their own security checks. On what legal basis are irregular migrants being returned from the Greek islands to Turkey? People who do not apply for asylum in Greece or whose applications for asylum have been declared inadmissible will be returned to Turkey. The legal framework for these returns is the bilateral readmission agreement between Greece and Turkey and the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement. On what legal basis are asylum seekers being returned from the Greek islands to Turkey? People who apply for asylum in Greece will have their applications treated on a case-by-case basis, in line with EU and international law requirements and the principle of non-refoulement – the EU-Turkey Statement has made this very clear. There will be individual interviews, individual assessments and rights of appeal. There will be no blanket and no automatic returns of asylum seekers. The EU asylum rules allow Member States in certain clearly defined circumstances to declare an application “inadmissible”, that is to say, to reject the application without examining the substance after a fast-track procedure and thereby to accelerate the process of handling applications. There are two legal possibilities that can be used for declaring asylum applications inadmissible, in relation to Turkey: 1) first country of asylum (Article 35 of the Asylum Procedures Directive): where the person has already been recognised as a refugee in that country or otherwise enjoys sufficient protection there; 2) safe third country (Article 38 of the Asylum Procedures Directive): where the person has not already received protection in the third country but the third country can guarantee effective access to protection to the readmitted person. To ensure full respect of EU and international law, Greece and Turkey have both taken a number of legislative and administrative steps. As well as providing assurances that all returned Syrians will be granted temporary protection upon return, the Turkish authorities have provided further written assurances to the Commission that each non-Syrian who seeks international protection in Turkey will enjoy protection from refoulement, in line with international standards and in accordance with the applicable Law on Foreigners and International Protection. The Commission has continued to support Greece by providing it with all the elements to conclude that Turkey is a safe third country and/or a country of first asylum within the meaning of the Asylum Procedures Directive, for the purpose of returning irregular migrants from the Greek islands to Turkey under the terms of the EU-Turkey Statement. The Commission, as communicated to the Greek authorities on 5 May, finds that the legal framework in Turkey which establishes the protection status granted to Syrians (Temporary Protection Regulation) appears as sufficient protection or protection equivalent to that foreseen by the Geneva Convention. The Commission assess that Turkey has taken all the necessary measures in order to allow Greece to declare, on the basis of individual assessments, an application for asylum inadmissible in accordance with the Asylum Procedures Directive for both Syrian and non-Syrian applicants for asylum who had irregularly crossed into the Aegean Islands via Turkey as of 20 March 2016. Moreover, at the meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Council on 20 May 2016, Member States indicated that they share this assessment. What safeguards exist for asylum seekers? All applications need to be treated individually and due account must be given to the situation of vulnerable groups, in particular unaccompanied minors for whom all decisions must be in their best interests. All applicants will also be able to appeal the decision. Will asylum seekers remain in Greece during the appeal procedure? Yes. When applying the concept of “safe third country” and “first country of asylum”, any return decision is suspended automatically while the first appeal is being treated. A further judicial appeal does not have an automatic suspensive effect on the return process. Where will migrants be accommodated whilst they await return? Migrants will be accommodated either in open or in closed reception facilities on the Greek islands. The Asylum Reception Conditions Directive and the Return Directive contain rules on the possibility to detain asylum-seekers and irregular migrants, in particular if there is a risk of absconding. Detention must only ever be a means of last resort and must be proportionate. The Commission is therefore asking Greece to pay particular attention to the needs of vulnerable people and unaccompanied minors, who in principle should not be detained. How can you be sure that asylum seekers will be given protection in Turkey? Both the EU and Turkey agreed in their Statement of 18 March to respect the principle of non-refoulement. Turkey has agreed to allow the EU to monitor regularly the situation of Syrians and non-Syrians returned to Turkey, including access to refugee camps and centres, and has concluded an agreement with UNHCR to provide access to removal centres to notably monitor Turkey’s practices in relation to international protection procedures. In addition, the EU is speeding up the disbursement of funds from the €3 billion Facility for Refugees in Turkey. This funding will support Syrians in Turkey by providing access to food, shelter, education and healthcare. An additional €3 billion will be made available after this money is used to the full, up to the end of 2018. The UNHCR will be a key actor in the resettlement process to provide additional support and supervision. Who is coordinating the EU support to implement the EU-Turkey Statement? Heads of State or Government meeting in the European Council on 17-18 March 2016 agreed that “the Commission will coordinate and organise together with Member States and Agencies the necessary support structures to implement it effectively.” President Juncker appointed Maarten Verwey to act as the EU coordinator to implement the EU-Turkey Statement. Maarten Verwey is the Director-General of the European Commission’s Structural Reform Support Service. He is supported by a coordination team responsible for the overall strategic direction and relations with key stakeholders, an operations group responsible for analysing all relevant data, planning and deployment of Member State experts, and a team focused on resettlement. A steering committee, chaired by the Commission with Greece, the European Asylum Support Office (EASO), Frontex, Europol, and representatives of the Netherlands (Council Presidency), France, the United Kingdom and Germany, oversees the implementation of the Statement when it comes to returns and resettlement and addresses bottlenecks. The EU coordinator has at his disposal significant resources from relevant European Commission services and EU agencies (FRONTEX, EASO, Europol). What financial support is being provided to Greece? The Commission estimated the costs of the practical implementation of the Statement to be around €280 million over the next six months and it was agreed that the EU budget should finance these costs. The EU will support Greece to put in place the necessary human resources, infrastructure and reception capacity in order to carry out registrations appeals processes and large scale return operations. Emergency assistance Since the beginning of 2015, Greece has been awarded €262 million in emergency assistance. For 2016, the Commission has significantly increased the emergency assistance budget under the Asylum Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) and the Internal Security Fund (ISF) – the total amount of emergency funding available in 2016 for the refugee crisis now stands at €464 million of which €267 million had been earmarked for Greece. Since the last report on 20 April, the Commission has awarded a further EUR €56 million of emergency funding under AMIF to increase the capacity of the Greek authorities to register new arrivals and process asylum claims. This funding will create better conditions for vulnerable migrants and strengthen the process with additional human resources, better IT infrastructure, increased availability of interpreters and better access to information. Discussions are ongoing with Greek authorities on further emergency assistance requests, including a request from the Greek Ministry of Health. This final set of emergency assistance requests would complete the implementation of the emergency response plan for Greece set out in March 2016. On 19 April, the European Commission announced €83 million under the new Emergency Assistance Instrument, proposed by the Commission on 2 March, to improve living conditions for refugees in Greece, with funding made available immediately to the UNHCR, the International Federation of the Red Cross and six international NGOs. Thanks to these new projects, the Commission will help provide tens of thousands of refugees and migrants in Greece with primary health care, food, better hygiene conditions, child friendly spaces and construct temporary housing. Funding available under the Greek multiannual National Programmes The emergency funding comes on top of the €509 million already allocated to Greece under the national programmes for 2014-2020 (€294.5 million from AMIF and €214.7 million from ISF). Frontex funding €60 million euro is available in funding for return operations, including the reimbursement of the costs of Frontex return experts, the reimbursement of transport costs (including vessels made available through Frontex) and the reimbursement of police officers for return escorts (including police officers seconded by other Member States on the basis of bilateral police cooperation agreements). EASO funding Under the budget of the European Asylum Support Office, €1.9 million is available to support Member States under particular pressure in 2016 with the funding of, for example, asylum experts and mobile containers. On 24 May, the Commission awarded €25 million in emergency funding to EASO to enhance its capacity to support the Greek authorities. Emergency Assistance mechanism On 2 March, the Commission proposed an Emergency Assistance instrument, providing €700 million over the next three years, to be used within the European Union to provide a faster, more targeted response to major crises, including helping Member States cope with large numbers of refugees. The estimated needs for 2016 are €300 million with a further €200 million each for use in 2017 and 2018, respectively. What happens to migrants who were already in Greece before 20 March? The total number of persons relocated from Greece by 10 June stands at 1,503. Although this constitutes progress, it still falls far short of the Commission’s ambition for Member States to relocate 6,000 people per month. With the financial support of the Commission and support on the ground from EASO and UNHCR, the Greek asylum service launched a major pre-registration exercise on 8 June with the aim to pre-register 1,400 persons per day to accelerate the identification and full processing of relocation applicants. A significant number of additional asylum seekers will be ready for relocation within the following months. What is being done to prevent the development of new alternative migratory routes? For the moment there is no evidence that new routes are developing directly as a result of the EU-Turkey Statement and the efforts to control the flows on the Eastern Mediterranean route. However, the situation is being monitored closely by the Commission and Frontex In the framework of the European Border Surveillance System, Frontex shares incident reporting and operational information, and undertakes risk analysis, in order to quickly identify any possible shift in migratory routes. Different surveillance tools, including satellite monitoring, are being used for the Adriatic Sea and the Mediterranean. The Frontex operation Triton in the Central Mediterranean has also been extended to cover the part of the Adriatic Sea between Greece, Italy and Albania. Aerial surveillance between Italy and Albania under the Triton operation is also taking place. What is the state of play as regards visa liberalisation for Turkish citizens? On 4 May, the Commission published its Third Progress Report on the implementation of Turkey’s Visa Liberalisation Roadmap and proposed lifting the visa requirements for the citizens of Turkey, under the understanding that the Turkish authorities will fulfil, as a matter of urgency and as they committed to do on 18 March 2016, the outstanding seven benchmarks. While two of the seven outstanding benchmarks require a longer timeline for implementation, five benchmarks remain to be fulfilled: To adopt the measure to prevent corruption foreseen by the Roadmap, ensuring an effective follow-up to the recommendations issued by the Council of Europe’s Group of States against Corruption (GRECO); To align the legislation on personal data protection with EU standards, notably to ensure that the data protection authority can act in an independent manner and that the activities of law enforcement agencies fall within the scope of the law; To conclude an operational cooperation agreement with Europol; To offer effective judicial cooperation in criminal matters to all EU Member States; To revise the legislation and practices on terrorism in line with European standards, notably by better aligning the definition of terrorism in order to narrow the scope of the definition and by introducing a criterion of proportionality. For practical and procedural reasons, two of the seven outstanding benchmarks require a longer timeline for implementation: Fully implement the provisions of the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement; including those related to the third country nationals; Upgrading the existing biometric passport so as to include security features in line with the latest EU standards. Since 4 May, further progress has been made, notably with the entry into force on 1 June of the provisions related to third-country nationals under the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement which should be completed with a decision by the Turkish Council of Ministers as a matter of urgency to allow for actual readmission. The Commission will continue to support Turkey in the work that still needs to be done to fulfil the remaining benchmarks. What is the state of play as regards the implementation of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey? The Facility for Refugees in Turkey provides for a joint coordination mechanism for actions financed by the EU budget and national contributions made by the Member States, designed to ensure that the needs of refugees and host communities are addressed in a comprehensive and coordinated manner. The resources of the Facility will come from the EU budget and from EU Member States over 2016 and 2017, making a total so far of €3 billion over two years. In addition to €1 billion from the EU budget, all EU Member States have now sent in their contribution certificates for the €2 billion in national contributions pledged for 2016-2017. The Facility is now fully operational. So far, of the overall €3 billion, €740 million has been allocated, for both humanitarian and non-humanitarian assistance. Of the €740 million allocated, €150 million has been contracted. Of these €150 million contracted, €105 million has been disbursed so far. The Commission aims by before the end of the summer to have committed €2 billion of the Facility envelope for 2016-2017 and to have contracted €1 billion. Funding under the Facility for Refugees in Turkey supports refugees in the country – it is funding for refugees and not funding for Turkey. The support seeks to improve conditions for refugees in Turkey as part of the EU’s comprehensive approach to addressing the refugee crisis inside and outside the EU. Has the Commission presented a proposal to open Chapter 33 as referred to in the 18 March EU-Turkey Statement? Work is progressing on Chapter 33 (financial and budgetary provisions) as scheduled. The Commission submitted a Draft Common Position to the Council on 29 April. The examination of this document by the Council started on 3 May. This puts the Council in a position to complete the necessary procedures in time for the opening of this chapter during the Dutch presidency of the Council of the European Union, as referred to in the 18 March Statement.  

The fight against poverty is to be pursued worldwide

0
By Mariarosaria Lorio. The thoughts in this book show the red line that exists between the multilateral stall and a number of political and economic principles of liberal philosophy. Such a stall concerns developing and post-industrialized countries alike The first part of this book contains articles that highlight the main challenges to the structure of global governance, trade, and development, including World Trade Organization (WTO), United Nations (UN) and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) perspectives. The articles contained therein are based on empirical analysis resulting from the author’s own professional experience with both the United Nations’ system and during WTO trade negotiations. Her articles show and analyze the challenges that multilateral regimes face in maintaining their relevance in a constantly changing world. cover-44637 The second part of this book contains reflections on how the financial crisis has affected Europe and what I believe are the links with educational systems that have not been adapted to the new realities of the globalized world economy. Europe is stuck in fear and therefore does not manage to mobilize its creative potential to develop innovative solutions for youth and entrepreneurs. Europe looks at “what it used to be” rather than at “what it is to be” in the future. Education and training methodologies must be adapted to the new economic realities to encourage European youth to think creatively and innovate. Book ISBN number is 9781496995025. The book can be ordered from several websites, www.fnac.fr, www.amazon.com, www.feltrinelli.it. This book is available either in ebook or paperback version.      

Tanzania Oil & Gas sector

0
By H.E. Ms Irene Florence M. Kasyanju, Ambassador of the United Republic of Tanzania to the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Exploration of oil and gas in Tanzania started since 1954 when British Petroleum (BP) and SHELL International Oil Company undertook initial exploration activities in areas of onshore coastal basins and the islands of Zanzibar, Pemba and Mafia. The first gas discovery was made by AGIP in Songo Songo Island on 1974. In 1982 AGIP made another gas discovery in Mnazi Bay block. Due to factors such as low oil prices and over supply of oil in the World market, development of these discoveries took time to take place.
adimba Gas Processing Plant - Mtwara.
Madimba Gas Processing Plant – Mtwara.
In the year 2000, the Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation (TPDC) and its joint ventures partners acquired multi-client seismic data in the deep offshore area from the northern Boarder with Kenya to southern Boarder with Mozambique. The new data stimulated investment in the deep offshore area in Tanzania for the first time in history. The first well in the Deep Sea Pweza-1 was drilled in 2010 and turned out to be a successful discovery. 24 gas wells have been drilled to date in the deep offshore area, where only three (3) turned out to be dry. From 2008 to 2014, a total of 9 wells have been drilled onshore, of which 3 were gas wells. The total initial gas in place now stands at 57.25 TCF of which 47.08 TCF is offshore and 10.17 TCF is onshore.
Kinyerezi Gas Receiving Station - Dar Es Salaam.
Kinyerezi Gas Receiving Station – Dar Es Salaam.
Downstream Projects Gas production is mainly done from two blocks, Songo Songo and Mnazi Bay. The Songo Songo gas fields produce 105 million standard cubic feet of gas per day (mmscfd), which is transported to Dar es Salaam for power generation and for industrial and household use. The production of Songo Songo gas field started in 2004 through a Songo Songo Gas to Power project funded by World Bank. In 2006, the Mnazi Bay gas field commenced gas production to enable power production for Mtwara and Lindi regions. Following country’s demand for more power, in 2013, the Government initiated a new natural gas infrastructure project. The project includes a 542 km natural gas pipeline from Mtwara and Songo Songo Island to Dar es Salaam and two processing plants with capacity to process 350 mmscfd. The pipeline has a capacity to transport 784mmscfd. The project was commissioned in October 2015 and it is now up and running.
Gass Well Located At Mnazi Bay Mtwara
Gass Well Located At Mnazi Bay Mtwara
To cater for natural gas demand for industries and household, TPDC is currently pursuing various means to implement natural gas networking within Dar es Salaam, this project is known as Dar es Salaam Ring Main. The project aim at laying natural gas pipeline in main roads of Dar es Salaam and it targets to supply gas to about 30,000 households and 15 vehicle-refuelling stations. In support of industrialisation, TPDC has signed a joint venture agreement with international companies (Ferrostaal GMbH, Haldor Topsoe, Fauji Fertliser and Minjingu Fertiliser) for implementation of fertiliser project. The plant will be located in Kilwa district and it will produce Urea and Ammonia. The project is at its initial stage and the objective is to produce about 3,850 metric tonnes of Urea and 2,220 metric tonnes of Ammonia. 2 Upstream Projects As a National Oil Company (NOC), TPDC undertook airborne survey to add value to some of its blocks (Mandawa, Eyasi-Wembere and Lake Tanganyika). The initial data shows potential structures that can reserve hydrocarbon. The survey is part of TPDC campaign to add value to all of its blocks and the second phase of the campaign is underway. Investors are welcome to visit TPDC offices for data viewing and purchase. The Government also reserved two blocks for TPDC; these blocks are block 4/1B and 4/1C. Currently TPDC is planning to conduct 2D seismic survey to these blocks so as to establish their potentiality. The blocks are located near Mozambique where huge discoveries were made on the side of Mozambique and this signifies that the blocks could have the same amount of hydrocarbon. Huge discovery of natural gas in deep-sea area has also called for development of the discovered gas. TPDC and operators of deep-sea blocks, Statoil and BG/Shell and their partners, Ophir, ExxonMobil, are planning to implement a multi billion LNG project. The land for the project is already secured in Lindi region and now the initial activities such as Host Government Agreements (HGA) are been worked out. The LNG project will be developed using natural gas discovered in block 1 and 2 in deep-sea area. Fiscal Regime
  • Currently the sector is regulated/guided by the following fiscal regimes;
  • Petroleum Act, 2015 (PA, 2015)
  • The Oil & Gas Revenue Management Act, 2015 (RMA, 2015)
  • The Environmental Management Act, 2004 (EMA, 2015)
  • The Model Production Sharing Agreement, (MPSA, 2008 &2013)
  • The Natural Gas Policy, 2013
  • The Local Content Policy, 2015
Photography by the Embassy of Tanzania in The Hague.    

Africa on the Move

0
By Robert Kayinamura, First Counsellor, Embassy of Rwanda in the Netherlands. Africa ambassadors in The Hague recently organized and celebrated Africa Day. Africa Day is celebrated annually on 25 May within the African continent to mark the formation of the Organization of African Unity on 25 May 1963 and the African Union in 2002 and the progress made by the continent since then to advance democracy, peace, stability and socio-economic development. The African Union has brought together the continent of Africa to collectively address the challenges it has faced. Various festivals in honour of the African Diaspora were held in several countries including Slovenia, which I had an opportunity to attend, in the beautiful capital of Slovenia Ljubljana. According Slovenia leaders, Slovenia is exploring bilateral and development cooperation opportunities on the African continent and enhancing bilateral ties with African countries. Rwanda is pleased by the excellent bilateral relations that exist between Rwanda and Slovenia. Africa Day held by African Diasporas is an opportunity to celebrate African cultural diversity and unity as well as the economic, spiritual, moral, social and cultural contributions and successes of people of African descent wherever they live. Held this year under the theme: “Building a better Africa and a Better World” Rwanda like many other African countries reaffirmed support for the African Union’s Agenda 2063 and commitment of the country to playing its role within the AU to ensure the successful implementation of the vision and plan to build a better Africa.IMG_5683 What African history teaches us is that the newly liberated countries felt the need to express solidarity with one another and in May 1963, 32 African countries met in Addis Ababa to form the Organisation of Africa Unity (OAU). It was a major political force on the continent until the 1990s, and later the OAU became the African Union because of the increasingly economic, rather than political, nature of the challenges faced by the continent in the 1990s. Historically, in terms of relations with the West, African countries since independence did relate more with colonial master country than their neighbouring African country or countries. This kind relationship continued till present and it affected so much of there would be intra African trade. Trade has been between former colonial master and their colonies than between African countries amongst themselves. Also the West or colonial master (countries) were generous to share their break through medical discoveries and research but they didn’t share enough of industrial revolution break through and research with Africans. Whether on purpose or not, Africa did not benefit from the industrial revolution like it should have. Now that the discussion of 4th industrial revolution is on the centre stage, the role and commitment of government leaders in pursuing industrialization policies is critical. Today we live in an era of national visions with target dates to which we add international blue prints issued by the United Nations and countries must work to achieve these visions.
IMG_5712
Her Excellencies Ambassadors of Sudan, Tanzania, Cameroon and Senegal.
No doubt that Africa is a continent on the move. Peace prevails in most African countries. Extreme poverty is declining, income is rising and there have been important inroads against deadly diseases. Several African countries are among the world’s fastest growing economies, defying the global downturn. In light of the new context of globalization of which Africa is part and parcel and an actor, I am confident that efforts to concretise this dream of an independent, united, prosperous and peaceful Africa nurtured by the Founding Fathers will bear fruit. The appeal now is to all the Africa’s youth to assume their responsibilities, the challenges facing Africa in order to implement its development agenda in line with the Africa 2063 Vision.
Professor Dr. Inge Hutter and H.E. Jean Pierre Karabaranga.
Professor Dr. Inge Hutter and H.E. Jean Pierre Karabaranga.

Pakistan Ned-Pak Business Facilitation Forum

0
H.E. Moazzam Khan, Ambassador of Pakistan to the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Net -Pak Business Facilitation Forum and Dinner / M.O.U signing between ALKA Power and Green Quest Solutions   By Roy Lie A Tjam. Ned-Pak Business Facilitation Forum, which is part of Embassy of Pakistan, organised an event for the MOU signing ceremony between ALKA Power and Green Quest Solutions followed by a sumptuous dinner. Both activities, the signing, and dinner took place in style at the Hilton Hotel The Hague on Monday 27 June 2016.The evening was graced by pianist Fears Khouri and soprano Ms Mireille Bittar. Master of Ceremony of the evening was Mr Luuk de Ruijter, Director Legal and R&D of Alka Power. The program started with a reception in the foyer of the Hilton and was followed by a magnificent dinner. The welcome remarks were by GQS chairperson and founder Mr Bobby Wahi LLB, Green Quest Solutions, Mrs Raana Syed, Chairperson of Alka Power and H.E. Mr Moazzam Ahmad Khan Ambassador of Pakistan in the Netherlands. Ambassador Khan stressed the Pakistan Government offers incentives for the implementation of renewable and sustainable energy. The Pakistani Mission in The Hague is open for business; it is ready to assist and facilitate entrepreneurs. The Ambassador particularly thanked the commercial attaché Mr Zahid Abbasi and the staff of the Pakistan Embassy for their unwavering contribution and support. Ambassador Khan also welcomed the new Commercial Counsellor, Mr Hassan.
BASN1797
Mrs Raana Syed, chairperson of Alka Power.
After the signing of the M.O.U. the time had arrived for the cutting of the cake. The dinner consisted of an impressive selection of authentic savoury dishes, called Mezze. Mrs Raana Syed, chairperson of Alka Power, gave some background information on what Alka Power stands for. ‘This agreement will commit us to work together even more closely towards eliminating the hazards of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil or natural gas. I am positive that their zeal and commitment will continue, in a similar stride of our contributing partners. Therefore, Mr Bobby Wahi of our sister company Green Quest Solutions did the honours of elaborating on the MOU further.’ ‘Alka Power’ she explained ‘is a specialist in effectively evaluating and implementing unique renewable energy opportunities in developing countries. The service comes with the financial capabilities and know-how to directly approach governments for either part or Fully financed Solar, Hydro and Wind allocations.’ ‘The projects are socially focused, commercially feasible and offer sensible, sustainable solutions to answer the demands of today, with the foresight of the future, Alka Power focuses on utility-scale solar facilities, which are capable of generating large amounts of electricity; which in turn is transferred directly into the grid. Providing a fully comprehensive service for developing utility-scale solar generated projects.’ Mr Bobby Wahi, founder, and CEO of Green Quest Solutions (GQS) a renewable energy development company based in Spain and the UK. ‘We appreciate that some of you have flown great distances to be here and on behalf of the GQS team and our gracious hosts the Pakistan Embassy and our sister company in Netherlands Alka Power, your efforts are truly appreciated.’
BASN1781
Mr Luuk de Ruijter, Director Legal and R&D of Alka Power.
  ‘Following COP 21, it has become clear that Governments have signalled an end to the fossil fuel era, committing for the first time to a universal agreement to cut greenhouse gas emissions and to avoid the most dangerous effects of climate change. It is with this backdrop and with a sense of great pride that I am honoured here today to celebrate the historic signing of an MOU between GQS and Alka power. This union will allow for expansion into new regions under this is the umbrella, combining resources and finances. Green Quest expansion plans are currently focused in the CIS region with a particular focus along the silk route. By way of an update, GQS currently has 350 MW of Solar PV in development in Kazakhstan spread over 3 locations, namely 100mw Syrdaryinsk, 200mw Aktobe and 50mw Zhanakorgan. The overall appetite for international investment into these projects has been overwhelming with GQS having already secured full funding for the preliminary 3 solar PV projects to the tune of 350,000,000 USD. With this in mind, I am pleased to welcome and extend my gratitude to all the investors and partners that have been able to make it here today. GQS has also had the pleasure of signing an MOU with the government of Kyrgyzstan and a draft Proposal from Afghanistan. With this extensively confirmed pipeline of projects now in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Pakistan, it was only natural that when we were given the opportunity to provide assistance for the improvement of the transmission lines in Pakistan formally known as the “casa 1,000 project” we jumped at the opportunity. We look forward to working with the government of Pakistan in this respect. GQS has reached an understanding with an Asian investor who will provide financial support for 900 MW in the region which equates to an investment approximately 900,000,000 million dollars, specifically for our silk route pipelines.’
BASN1815
Mrs Raana Syed, Mr Hassan, Ambassador Moazzam Khan, Mr Bobby Wahi CEO and founder of Greenquest Solutions. and Mr Zahid Abbasi.
 Mr Wahi acknowledged the efforts of Mrs Raana Syed, Chair Person of Alka Power, who has worked and been instrumental in assisting GQS in its expansion plans. Finally, he addressed special thanks to the commercial attaché Zahid Abbasi of the Embassy of Pakistan and his efforts in making the event such a success. Them the Hilton salon full of diplomats, business people and Dutch functionaries welcome Mrs Syed for an again meaningful speech. She said: ‘We are quite confident that the people of Pakistan, together with other people in the South and East-Asia Region will benefit from this since Energy plays a vital role in the progress of the socio- economic sector in the development of a country. With this agreement we want to contribute to two of the most important goals of our companies: First: Our company’s objectives are, besides business, to provide opportunities to the people to grow and prosper so they can develop a strong Socio-economic fundament on which they can accelerate the wheel of the economy and improve their productivity in major economic sectors. And Second: In this Era, large-scale production of energy by using fossil fuels (such as coal, oil or natural gas) is outdated, it is soon to be obsolete, and moreover: it has become far too expensive.
BASN1849
Mr Bobby Wahi , Mr Hassan, Mr Zahid Abbasi, Ambassador Moazzam Khan and Mrs Raana Syed.
These two main goals happened to come together in Pakistan’s Energy Policy regarding doing business and the way we – Alka Power and Green Quest Solutions – have set up our business benefits from this policy beautifully. This new way of doing business contains the following points:
  • One-Window Policy;
  • Upfront Tariff;
  • Repatriation of the funds without having to pay Taxes over them;
  • No investments from the Local Government
  • No levy of sales tax on plant, machinery and equipment
  • Exemption from income tax including turnover rates tax and withholding tax on imports.
Our proposition of the Upfront Tariff was immediately accepted by the Sindh Government and the Pakistan Government. This makes Pakistan the first in the world to set out this Energy Business Policy, and it also means that the Alka new Upfront Tariff Proposition Approach on the Energy Business will become the new standard.BASN1837 Alka Power and Green Quest Solution have since the beginning held the idea that producing renewable energy is the only true alternative for both the environment and the people using this energy. investing in renewable energy is not only cost effective, it even opens the door to other new green and renewable investment possibilities that will in the end safeguard all people from health hazards; and we no longer stand alone in this view since the publication of the Bloomberg New Energy Outlook 2016, in which it was stated firmly that: Wind and Solar production costs will drop. These two technologies will become the cheapest way of producing electricity in many countries by 2020s and in most of the world by 2030s. Onshore wind-costs will have fallen by 41% and Solar Power (Photo-Voltaic to be precise) costs will have fallen by 60% in 2040.’BASN1824 Photography Alka Power. ——— Alka Power (www.alkapower.nl) is currently based in The Hague, Netherlands. It will open an office in De Meern (near Utrecht) shortly. Alka Power is a Dutch company with firm roots in Pakistan.  

Eight Member States against international VAT fraud

0
A coordination centre at Eurojust supported an international action day against a criminal network involved in international VAT fraud and money laundering defrauding EU citizens of approximately EUR 57 million in tax revenues via companies selling electronic items, hardware and software. Searches of homes and premises, seizures and arrests were carried out simultaneously in eight countries, starting in the early hours on June 29. The international cooperation leading to today’s joint action began in June 2015, when a German prosecutor at the Bielefeld Public Prosecution Office informed Eurojust about a preliminary investigation it has been carrying out regarding a complex VAT fraud case, and enquired whether France was also investigating the same companies as missing traders or knew of other investigations concerning those suspects. Three coordination meetings were held at Eurojust in The Hague to conclude four ongoing investigations at national level in Germany and France. All parties involved agreed, at an early stage, to coordinate their national activities, and to participate in a joint action day, making efforts to avoid both adversely affecting the ongoing investigations in the other Member States and possible conflicts of jurisdiction. This common action day was initiated by the Bielefeld Public Prosecutor’s Office, in close cooperation with the Paris National Financial Prosecutor’s Office and an investigative judge of the Paris court specialised in financial investigations. The German Authority for Fiscal Offences and the Tax Fraud Investigation Office of Bielefeld, the French National Directorate for Tax Investigation (DNEF) and the National Judicial Customs Department (SNDJ) participated. This coordination centre was set up by the German and French National Desks with Cyprus, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Poland and the UK. Europol deployed a mobile office at the coordination centre and a forensic analyst to Germany to facilitate real-time information exchange and cross-match analysis of the data collected. Letters of Request and other judicial instruments were facilitated on the spot. Figures at a glance
  • Number of arrests: 7
  • Number of freezing/seizure orders: 27
  • Number of searches: 57
  • Number of hearings of witnesses and suspects: 12
  • Assets seized: more than EUR 4.5 million, including seized IT products
Following this operation, Ms Gabriele Launhardt, Deputy National Member at the German Desk at Eurojust, said: ‘This operation sends a clear message that Eurojust and its partners help the national authorities of the Member States to join forces across national borders to pursue those we suspect of involvement in organised crime. Through our coordination meetings and the coordination centre, we contributed to preventing this group from hiding behind national borders and continuing to defraud taxpayers of huge amounts of tax money.’ Mr Michael Rauschenbach, Europol’s Head of Serious and Organised Crime, said: ‘Once again, decisive and co-ordinated action by the Member States, supported throughout by Europol and Eurojust, demonstrates to organised criminal gangs that their fraudulent activities will not be tolerated. Value Added Tax fraud is not a victimless crime, nor a ‘white collar’ theft from Governments; this money is stolen from the citizens of the European Union as it deprives our people of the means of investment for essential public services, such as hospitals, schools and infrastructure.’  

Draft EU Budget 2017

0
Draft EU Budget 2017: budget focused on priorities – growth, jobs and a response to the refugee crisis The Commission has proposed on June 30 the 2017 draft EU Budget of €134.9 billion in payments focusing on the two main policy priorities for Europe: supporting the ongoing recovery of the European economy and addressing the security and humanitarian challenges in our neighbourhood. Increased funding will go to investments in growth, jobs and competitiveness in the European Union as well as to securing the necessary resources to protect the external borders of the EU, to reinforce security inside and outside the Union, to provide support for the reception and integration of refugees, and to address the root causes of migration in the countries of origin and transit. European Commission Vice-President Kristalina Georgieva, in charge of budget and human resources, said: “The EU is facing massive challenges and in these difficult times a focused and effective EU budget is not a luxury but a necessity. It helps buffer against shocks, providing a boost to our economy and helping to deal with issues like the refugee crisis. As always, we continue to focus our budget on results, making sure that every euro from the EU budget is well spent.” The proposed budget operates within the tight limitations set by the European Parliament and Member States in the Multiannual Financial Framework. Boosting jobs, growth and investments The money specifically for supporting economic growth will total €74.6 billion in commitments in 2017, compared to €69.8 billion in 2016. This breaks down as follows: €21.1 billion on growth, employment and competitiveness. This includes €10.6 billion for research and innovation under Horizon 2020, €2.0 billion for education under Erasmus+, €299 million for small and medium sized-enterprises under the COSME programme, and €2.5 billion under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF). €2.66 billion for the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the vehicle behind the Investment Plan for Europe. This is a success story for Europe, which has secured €106.7 billion in investments in 26 EU Member States in less than a year. €53.57 billion to support productive investments and structural reforms to foster convergence among Member States and among regions via the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). Support to European farmers is proposed at €42.9 billion. Better managing the EU’s external borders and addressing the refugee challenges inside and outside the EU. The Draft EU Budget 2017 proposes €5.2 billion to reinforce the external borders of the Union and address the refugee crisis and irregular migration by funding stronger tools to prevent migrant smuggling and address the long-term drivers of migration in cooperation with countries of origin and transit, stronger policies for legal migration, including resettlement for persons in need of protection, and instruments to support Member States with respect to the integration of refugees inside the EU. The Draft EU Budget includes about €3 billion to fund actions within the EU, such as: The setting up of the European Border and Coast Guard; The proposal for a new Entry-Exit System to strengthen border management; The proposals to review the Common European Asylum System, including a reform of the Dublin mechanism; The establishment of an EU Agency for Asylum. It also includes €200 million for the new instrument to provide humanitarian assistance within the EU. Furthermore, the draft budget proposes €2.2 billion for actions outside the EU, in order to address in particular the root causes of the refugee flow. This includes in particular: €750 million under the Facility for Refugees in Turkey, to help reach the €1 billion contribution to this fund from the EU budget; The pledge for Lebanon and Jordan made at the UN London conference with €525 million from the EU budget, €160 million from the Syria Trust Fund and €200 million of macro-financial assistance. More funding for security In view of the growing security challenges the EU and its Member States are facing, the Draft EU Budget 2017 is also allocating significant resources for security: €111.7 million will go to support Europol and €61.8 million will be dedicated to enhancing the security of the EU institutions, together with an extra €16 million for security measures in 2016. The Commission is also proposing a preparatory action for research in the defence area with €25 million in 2017  

Queen Elizabeth II’s 90th birthday

0
Queen Elizabeth II and Her governor generals – Picture by Reuters. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Sovereign of 16 Commonwealth realms,  along with her spouse, HRH The Duke of Edinburgh, HRH The Prince of Wales and Princess of Wales, Duchess of Cornwall, hosted a reception for the governors general wherein Queen Elizabeth II is de facto head of state. The event was hosted as part of the monarch’s official birthday celebrations.  Governors general are the Sovereign’s personal representatives in the realms wherein she is not physically present most of the time; they perform the functions and duties reserved to the monarch acting as vice-regals.  In attendance were Sir Patrick Allen (Jamaica), Dame Pearlette Louisy (St Lucia), Sir Colville Young (Belize) Sir Frederick Ballantyne (St Vincent and the Grenadines), Sir Frank Kabui (Solomon Islands), Sir Rodney Williams (Antigua and Barbuda), Sir Peter Cosgrove (Australia), Sir Elliot Belgrave (Barbados), Sir Michael Ogio (Papua New Guinea), Sir Iakoba Italeli (Tuvalu), The Rt Hon David Johnston (Canada), Sir Jeremiah Mateparae (New Zealand), Dame Cecile la Grenade (Grenada), Dame Marguerite, Lady Pindling of the Bahamas and Sir Tapley Seaton (St Kitts and Nevis).  In the Benelux countries celebrations were organised in very British fashions by Her Britannic Majesty’s ambassadors, including receptions hosted on 8 June in Brussels by Ambassador Alison Rose and on 15 June in Luxembourg City by Ambassador John Marshall who only took up office in April, a few days before the Queen’s actual birthday on 21 April For more information British and Commonwealth realms’ Royal Family: https://www.royal.uk British Embassy to Belgium (HE Ambassador Alison Rose): https://www.gov.uk/government/people/alison-rose British Embassy to Luxembourg (HE Ambassador John Marshall): https://www.gov.uk/government/people/robert-john-marshall

First female president for China (Taiwan)

0
Tsai Ing-wen – Picture by newsnation.in By Baron Henri Estramant. Tsai Ing-wen was sworn  as the new President of China (Taiwan) on  May 20, 2016; thus becoming its first female head of state amidst calls for a “positive dialogue” with Beijing. President Tsai Ing-wen deemed as unassuming yet determined leader, led the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to a landslide electoral victory in January 2016.  The DPP has traditionally leaned towards “independence” from the whole of China because it views the country as entirely unique vis-à-vis the mainland, or People’s Republic of China (PRC). The two countries co-exist under the fiction that the Republic of China (Taiwan) represents the “legitimate” and republican system for the whole of China, whereas the PRC views Taiwan as a separate province with its own system similarly to Hong Kong or Macau.  China (Taiwan) is not an UN member since 1971 when its seat was occupied by the PRC, and nowadays enjoys the recognition of but 21 UN members and the Holy See. Nevertheless many countries, particularly European, entertain relations with Taiwan through representative offices or consulates.  For more information:  President of China (Taiwan): http://english.president.gov.tw Taipei Representative Office in the EU, Belgium and Luxembourg: http://web.roc-taiwan.org/be_en/index.html Taipei Representative Office to The Netherlands: http://web.roc-taiwan.org/nl_nl/index.html    

Israel’s Danny Danon at the UN 6th committee

0
For the first time in the history of the United Nations, an Israeli citizen has been appointed to head a permanent committee within its halls. In New York,  on June 14 June, HE Ambassador Danny Danon, Israel’s permanent representative to the UN since the summer 2015, received 109 out of a possible 193 ballots for his candidacy to the General Assembly’s sixth committee,  which deals with legal matters of international law. Danon’s appointment was supported by the Western European countries as well as the WEOG group.  “I am proud to be the first Israeli elected to this position,” uttered Ambassador Danon in an allocution after his election. “Israel is a world leader in international law and in fighting terrorism. We are pleased to have the opportunity to share our knowledge with the countries of the world.   For more information: Permanent Representation of Israel to the UN: http://embassies.gov.il/un/Pages/default.aspx Ambassador Danny Dannon: https://www.facebook.com/DanonDanny/photos/a.168301673193079.34894.112791015410812/1145350942154809/?type=3&theater