LATEST ARTICLES

Uruguayan Independence Day Celebrated in The Hague

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Uruguayan Independence Day Celebrated in The Hague

The Embassy of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay marked his country’s Independence Day with a grand and festive reception. Held on August 27 at the Leonardo Royal Hotel in The Hague, the event drew over 200 distinguished guests from various sectors of Dutch society.

Ambassadors, chiefs of international missions, diplomats, academics, business leaders, and representatives from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, along with members of the Uruguayan community, all responded to H.E. Ambassador Dr. Álvaro González Otero’s invitation to celebrate ‘Día de la Independencia’—Uruguay’s National Day, commemorating its independence from Brazil in 1825.

H.E. Dr. Álvaro González Otero, Ambassador of Uruguay. National Day 2024 The Hague.

After nearly 200 years of conflict and civil unrest under Spanish and then Brazilian rule, Uruguay has emerged as a country renowned for its welcoming people, stunning landscapes, first-class meat production, and high-quality wine. In recent decades, Uruguayans have enjoyed a stable democracy, a steady improvement in living conditions, and overall well-being.

In a packed room with an animated audience, Ambassador González Otero took the microphone to thank all the attendees for their sincere affection for his people and country. He then proudly expressed:

“Two years have quickly passed since I arrived in this lovely kingdom. Since then, we have started to shift the focus of the Embassy, placing more emphasis on our bilateral relations. The Netherlands and Uruguay have more in common than people might imagine. We share international principles, landscapes, agricultural production, developed services, qualified exports, and a progressive lifestyle.

We also share strong commitments to the well-being of our citizens and visitors, the protection of human rights, environmental sustainability, progressive social policies, and significant efforts towards renewable energy and climate action. Both countries also emphasize education, democratic governance, and active participation in international organizations promoting peace and development. So, we will keep working to boost our bilateral relations.”

Uruguay National Day, August 27 at the Leonardo Royal Hotel in The Hague.
From the Embassy of Uruguay, Counsellor Pablo Bayarres, Ambassador Gonzalez Otero and Hans Akerboom, Deputy Director Protocol and Host Country Affairs from the Netherlands.

Ambassador González Otero then listed some of the most relevant initiatives undertaken by the Embassy over the last few months:

– Uruguayan participation in the World Hydrogen Summit 2024: Led by the Minister of Industry, Energy, and Mining, Ms. Elisa Facio, with over 50 representatives from various sectors of the public and private sectors.

– Active participation in the “26th World Energy Congress.”

– Cooperation Project with Delft Institute for Water Education: Since 2011, Uruguayan professionals specializing in water resources have participated in the Delft Institute program for advanced training. Initially, the program began with 40 scholarships, resulting in 37 professionals successfully completing their studies. This early success led to the program’s relocation and implementation at the Technological University of Uruguay, now featuring regional participation. The program has since had two new editions in 2022 and 2024, expanding to include 17 professionals from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, and Peru. This development has transformed Uruguay into a regional hub in the field of water resource education.

– Uruguay’s status as one of the 32 signing states of the Ljubljana – The Hague Convention in February 2024.

– Positioning Uruguay as a potential living and working destination for Dutch farmers.

– Interactions with RVO and Port of Rotterdam related to port cooperation.

– Exploring and initiating new cooperation projects with Westland Municipality and Wageningen University.

– Meetings with private sector actors related to agribusiness.

– Preparation for the Capitan Miranda’s visit to Amsterdam: Uruguay’s school tall ship has already confirmed its participation in Sail Amsterdam 2025.

– Multilateral achievements: The Embassy has made progress in multilateral areas, including ongoing contributions and work with international organizations based in The Hague: the ICJ, ICC, OPCW, HCCH, and the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Additionally, a closer relationship with The Hague Academy of International Law has been pursued. Significant advances have also been made through the coordinated work of the GRULAC Group in relation to various international organizations.

H.E. Mr. Fernando Arias, OPCW Director General , Ambassador Gonzalez Otero and Mr Arias spouse, Patricia van Oordt.

Following his remarks, Ambassador González Otero invited the audience to watch a short video about Uruguay, which made a great impression on those present. He expressed, “Uruguay is an exceptional country that has developed a dynamic and robust culture, shaped by a fascinating blend of gaucho traditions, European influences, and the unique Rioplatense spirit. Tango, folklore, candombe, and milonga are examples of its rich artistic musical expression. Uruguayan gastronomy, featuring high-quality meat, wine, and dairy products, especially the beloved ‘dulce de leche,’ delights palates and consistently wins prestigious awards worldwide.”

“The work we have done does not mean we are satisfied; we want to continue advancing in a deeper process. The bilateral relationship is already strong, but the potential to strengthen bonds in several key areas is even greater.”

The Ambassador of Uruguay, H.E. Alvaro Gonzalez Otero and the President of the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals, Judge Graciela Gatti Santana with her husband Mr Gustavo Segovia.

The event was conceived to showcase the rich and diverse culture of Uruguay, a nation with a population of approximately 3,495,527 as of 2022.

The national anthems of Uruguay and the Netherlands were performed by the Uruguayan opera singer Sara de los Campos. After the ambassador’s speech, the Embassy paid tribute to two influential musicians: José “El Sabalero” Carbajal and Jaime Roos, who both lived in the Netherlands. Jaime Roos settled in Amsterdam in 1978, where he played bass in several salsa, rock, and jazz groups. He had a son and remained in the Netherlands until 1984 when he returned to Uruguay.

Carbajal spent his days in the Netherlands with his wife, Anke van Haastrecht, and their two children. Anke was invited to share some special stories from their life together.

Uruguayan opera singer Sara de los Campos.
Uruguayan drummers Luis Gradin, Marcelo Terra, and Nicolás Sánchez.

The enthusiastic audience enjoyed an authentic performance by talented Uruguayan drummers Luis Gradin, Marcelo Terra, and Nicolás Sánchez. The celebration continued with Uruguayan wine, classic savory empanadas, and dulce de leche, which delighted the crowded room and completed the great celebration.

Ambassador González Otero concluded the event by thanking his Embassy team: Counselor Pablo Bayarres, Chancellor Gustavo Morales, his assistant Juan Diego, and Martha Hernández and Sofía Anastasiou. He then led a warm toast for the people of the Netherlands, Uruguay, and the necessary and desired peace in the world.

China: A New Actor in the Contemporary Multipolar World

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
China: A New Actor in the Contemporary Multipolar World

By Mariarosaria Iorio, Political Analyst

I. The post-cold war world  

International relations are nowadays characterised by major changes that started at the end of the 80s with the fall of the Berlin Wall.  Indeed, the end of the cold war was marked by the dislocation of the two main political blocks, namely the Soviet Union and the Western World. Such a dislocation resulted in the marginalization of the post-war multilateral system embodied in the United Nations, and the standstill of the multilateral trade negotiations in the late 90s in the context of the World Trade Organisation.  New lines of political thought have been facing each other since then, while reshaping the post-cold war world in a number of fragmented and variable sub-blocks of countries. 

The United States decided to put itself first by concentrating on its internal affairs, while withdrawing from international affairs.  

Europe, the old continent, looks for an efficient strategy towards autonomy from the United States.  Europe also tries, not without difficulty, to create a more cohesive internal and external political approach.  The reality is however evolving rather more towards fragmentation of Europe in favour of European National fragmented interests. Such a fragmentation is the natural consequence of the decadence of the European Institutional and collective actions to the advantage of individual Sates actions and interests.   In sum, what seemed to be a structured and coherent European Union block fighting for the promotion of its economic and political values all over the world has somehow become an alliance at variable geometry both internally and externally.  The disorganisation of the leadership results in a chaotic and unpredictable European External and Internal action. 

Thereof, the empty influence spaces left on the international relations scene has given new international actors the opportunity to emerge.  

Meanwhile, the fragmentation of the European Institutions has also impacted the EU-USA relations within NATO, and affected the security and peace sphere.  Security issues have been on and off on the European agenda.    

In this context, Russia that has lost its empire in the 80s looks now for a new power game. In spite of the disruption of the Soviet Union, Russia attempts either by influence or by force to exercise power in its ancient affiliate countries.  Russia that was supposed to be defeated with the fall of the Berlin Wall takes back its role of opponent to the Western World on the international scene at least as it concerns the international affairs philosophy.  Thus, creating a tension aimed at restoring its power in the world.   

The group of emerging and developing economies that constitute a new variable block with a large portion of population employed in agriculture have emerged as new actors in the world’s geo-political discourses.  At the head of this block on the international scene, there is China.  The shaky international leadership context has indeed given China a new space. China’s   communist past combined with its market-based economic strategy gives it a particular position.  

China is The One that can communicate to Russia. China is also The One that can have an influence on the Western economic and political scene as China owns a big part of Western Foreign Debt  

China embeds a horizontal strategy in both its trade and development policies, while producing at low wages.  Its production system coupled with its pragmatic political approach has reshaped the international power structure.  The top-down approach of the Western World faces now the competition created by the horizontal win-win approach proposed by China in both developing and industrialized countries.

Indeed, as a result of the decline of the Western World global hegemony based on market access and economic and social liberalism as a means to ensure economic growth and promote economic development, the vision promoted by China’s discourse, centred on the protection of livelihoods and local sovereign choices finds new adepts.  Furthermore, China has successfully attempted to promote a trade-off approach to international cooperation during the last 20 years.  A cooperation that does not interfere in internal affairs of partner countries as it has often reproached to the Western countries involved in international cooperation.  

As the developing countries leader, China positions itself as the spoke country for the poor.  As a new world powerful economic actor China plays as the guarantor of the Western Economic stability.  China positions itself as the bridge between the rich and the poor.  It is representing a different hegemonic game that only changes in its discourse, while still pursuing its own interests and influence zones.  Such a situation poses the question of the values that the international regime wants to embrace.  Indeed, this changing world results in an increased number of conflicts – be new or historical conflicts.  

The dislocation of the traditional leaders of the international relations has definitely created a chaotic and unpredictable scenario.  Chaos has in some cases been chosen as a political strategy to disrupt the post-1945 international regime. Such a disruption has benefitted new actors, and given space to new lines of thought.  These new lines of thought have attacked the existing international framework but has not yet succeeded in creating a new regime.  The increasing unbalance of power and the lack of leadership on the international political scene is risky. 

The reduction by choice of leadership of the United States has indeed resulted in the weakening of the values emerged as a result of the dramatic experience of Second World War, namely freedom of thought and freedom of speech to mention only a few.   We are now facing a much more authoritarian world with force used as a means to manage the political arena.  Dialogue seems to be a rather consuming exercise that has left its place to the use of force.  Force is no longer seen as the last option but rather the opening act for political dialogue.  Nationalism and individual interests are now at the centre of the political game. This trend is taking the world to instability and conflict.  

The peoples of the world are more and more questioning the existing system. People’s needs and expectations are not met.  The new emerged actors, such as China have given the hope of a possible change in the present international system without fundamentally questioning its rationale but rather trying to rip a slate of the cake.  

The struggle for influence among countries has not succeeded in building a peaceful and stable world. Citizens will have to face the challenge of building a new era of peace and stability worldwide.

Derrière les murs du Palais de la Paix : permanence et changements de la Cour internationale de Justice

Editor
-
0
Derrière les murs du Palais de la Paix : permanence et changements de la Cour internationale de Justice

S.E. M. Philippe Couvreur est arrivé à La Haye en avril 1982, où il a d’abord occupé le poste d’assistant spécial aux bureaux du greffier et du greffier adjoint de la Cour internationale de Justice.

Il a ensuite exercé les fonctions de Secrétaire, Premier Secrétaire et Secrétaire juridique principal, avant d’être élu Greffier de la Cour en 2000, et réélu en 2007 et 2014. Pour marquer l’anniversaire de ses débuts à la Cour, il y a 35 ans, Diplomat Magazine l’a invité à témoigner de son expérience unique au service de cette institution, des évolutions qu’il a pu y observer, et à partager le regard qu’il porte sur les changements qui ont marqué la Cour et La Haye au cours des trois dernières décennies.
Philippe Couvreur avec le Pape Jean-Paul II prise le 13 mai 1985.
Je suis arrivé à La Haye en avril 1982 — de façon aussi inattendue que j’avais entamé des études de droit treize ans auparavant (mais c’est là une autre histoire…) — pour occuper un poste temporaire à la Cour internationale de Justice. La Cour était alors la seule institution judiciaire internationale existante au plan universel. Son activité, particulièrement faible à la fin des années 1970, ne pouvait en ce temps-là guère laisser présager du succès que rencontrerait la Cour dans les décennies à venir. Mon bienveillant maître de Louvain, le professeur Paul de Visscher, fils du célèbre internationaliste Charles de Visscher, unique juge belge à la Cour, m’avait prédit des jours aussi sereins qu’heureux, écoulés à lire et à écrire des ouvrages dans la solitude des imposants murs de la bibliothèque du Palais de la Paix…
Les mémoires ont été dûment déposés dans l’affaire El Salvador c. Honduras dans la salle Bol le 1 juin 1988, l’affaire du Différend frontalier terrestre, insulaire et maritime.
En rejoignant la Cour, un frais matin d’avril, dont je garde un souvenir très précis, le jeune juriste que j’étais découvrit, non sans étonnement, une organisation de taille très modeste, le Greffe, qui en est l’organe administratif, alors composé de moins d’une quarantaine de fonctionnaires. Le fonctionnement de la Cour reposait entièrement sur cette équipe restreinte de personnel permanent, auquel s’ajoutait, selon que de besoin, un personnel temporaire pour faire face au surcroît de travaux linguistiques et de sténodactylographie lors des sessions (publiques et privées) de la Cour. Je me rappelle avoir été frappé par la personnalité haute en couleur de certains de ces traducteurs indépendants, dont la grande culture littéraire m’émerveillait. Cette structure très économique du Greffe impliquait une grande polyvalence de ses membres, et les Secrétaires de la Cour — ses fonctionnaires supérieurs — étaient appelés, en sus de leurs travaux de recherches juridiques, de préparation des documents de la Cour, et de rédaction de la correspondance diplomatique, à assumer eux-mêmes l’essentiel des tâches linguistiques (traduction et interprétation) et d’information, ainsi que la supervision de nombreuses activités administratives et logistiques.
La Grande salle de Justice, l’affaire Relative au Timor Oriental (Portugal c. Australie) Arrêt du 30 juin 1995.
Il n’était nullement rare qu’un nouveau venu comme moi ait à passer week-ends et nuits blanches au Palais de la Paix à effectuer les travaux les plus divers… allant jusqu’à imprimer et polycopier, sur de vieilles machines à stencils ronéotype, des décisions dont la Cour devait donner la lecture en séance publique le lendemain ! Dès mon arrivée au Greffe, j’ai eu le bonheur et le privilège d’être initié et associé à l’ensemble des fonctions de l’institution sous la patiente supervision de personnalités d’exception, tels que MM. Torres Bernárdez et Pillepich, alors respectivement Greffier et Greffier adjoint. J’en ai retiré le plus grand bénéfice, puisque cette immersion sans préparation dans toutes les facettes de l’activité du Greffe m’a permis d’acquérir de ce dernier une connaissance unique — de l’intérieur — et sous tous ses aspects —, un acquis particulièrement précieux au moment où j’ai été amené, bien des années plus tard, à assumer la délicate responsabilité d’en assurer la gestion au plus haut niveau. Devenir un fonctionnaire du Greffe au début des années 1980 signifiait accepter de se couler sans discussion dans un moule à tous égards exigeant, et se donner corps et âme, avec humilité et discrétion, à l’institution, sans penser à soi ni parler de soi. Depuis ces années d’initiation, j’ai été le témoin de profondes transformations de la Cour, rendues inévitables à la fois pour répondre à l’accroissement considérable de ses activités, avec la disparition du monde bipolaire qui avait relégué le règlement judiciaire à un rôle quelque peu marginal, et pour saisir les opportunités nouvelles offertes, notamment, par le progrès des technologies et de la communication. Entre 1982 et aujourd’hui, le nombre de fonctionnaires a ainsi presque triplé (il a quasiment doublé depuis l’an 2000, année de ma première élection en tant que Greffier). L’organisation du travail a été progressivement spécialisée entre les divers départements, juridique, linguistique et chargé de l’information, qui furent créés en 1997, et les services techniques. Par ailleurs, les Membres de la Cour ne disposèrent pas, pendant longtemps, de « référendaires » — ils s’y sont d’ailleurs longtemps refusés—, et l’assistance apportée aux juges en matière judiciaire était principalement répartie entre les fonctionnaires du Département des affaires juridiques.
H.E. Philippe Couvreur avec la Reine Beatrix photo prise pendant le 50 eme anniversaire de la Cour (18-04-1996).
Les cinq premiers postes de juristes référendaires ne furent obtenus de l’Assemblée générale et créés qu’en 2002, à l’issue de difficiles négociations que je me souviens avoir menées avec beaucoup de plaisir et d’intérêt ; le nombre de ces postes s’est progressivement accru, pour s’élever à quinze aujourd’hui. Les divers développements qui ont marqué le monde au cours des dernières décennies n’ont pas manqué de soulever pour la Cour de nouveaux défis. Comme c’est le cas pour toute institution, elle n’a pu les relever en faisant table rase des enseignements de son histoire ni, à l’inverse, en ne saisissant pas toutes les opportunités offertes par le temps présent. A ces différents égards, la Cour est certainement parvenue, au fil des ans, à assurer un équilibre, toujours délicat, entre changements et continuité. La continuité de la Cour est bien sûr inscrite dans son Statut, qui fait partie intégrante de la Charte des Nations Unies, et reflétée dans ses méthodes judiciaires, qui ont été très largement élaborées par sa devancière, la Cour permanente de Justice internationale, et héritées d’elle. Cette continuité historique était particulièrement présente lorsque j’ai rejoint le Greffe. Ainsi, en manière d’anecdote, divers hauts fonctionnaires alors en poste avaient eux-mêmes côtoyé, au début de leur carrière, d’anciens fonctionnaires de la Cour permanente. Tous nourrissaient à l’égard de cette dernière le plus grand respect. Il régnait d’ailleurs dans les couloirs du Palais de la Paix une atmosphère feutrée et délicieusement surannée, évocatrice de la défunte Société des Nations. Je me souviens en avoir encore utilisé maintes fournitures de bureau ! La continuité jurisprudentielle et procédurale entre les deux Cours constitue pour les Etats une garantie importante de sécurité et de prévisibilité juridiques. Cette continuité, juridique et historique, de même que l’expérience accumulée en plus de quatre-vingt-dix ans d’exercice de la fonction judiciaire, sont pour la Cour un facteur crucial de légitimité.
H.E. Philippe Couvreur vec le Roi Willem-Alexander photo prise pendant le 70 eme anniversaire de la Cour (20-04-2016).
En même temps, la Cour a eu, à l’évidence, à s’adapter aux changements du monde réel dans lequel elle opère, comme aux nécessités et opportunités nouvelles de chaque époque traversée. L’une des transformations notoires auxquelles j’ai assisté fut l’ouverture croissante de la Cour sur l’extérieur : longtemps à l’écart, à dessein, des organes politiques des Nations Unies, la Cour a souhaité se faire plus et mieux entendre de ces organes et des Etats membres. Elle a ainsi rompu avec ce qui était parfois perçu comme un « splendide isolement » au sein des Nations Unies, même si elle défend toujours jalousement son autonomie. La Cour doit en outre désormais également tenir compte des nombreuses autres juridictions, internationales ou régionales, qui ont été créées ces dernières années, et veiller, autant que possible, à assurer l’harmonie du « concert judiciaire » que permet ce foisonnement de cours et tribunaux sur la scène internationale. Davantage ouverte sur la communauté internationale et ses réalités, la Cour s’est montrée de plus en plus attentive, non seulement à sa place dans l’Organisation des Nations Unies, mais aussi à la poursuite des objectifs de celle-ci et à sa mission propre au service du règlement pacifique des différends internationaux. Des différends de plus en plus complexes, tant juridiquement que factuellement, en même temps que politiquement plus denses, lui ont été soumis. En révisant constamment, selon que de besoin, ses méthodes de travail, elle a su les résoudre rapidement et efficacement, à un coût particulièrement modeste pour la communauté internationale, tout en assurant le développement du droit. Enfin, pour conclure sur une note plus prosaïque, mais qui est loin d’être négligeable, je ne peux taire la chance que j’ai eue de connaître l’extraordinaire développement de la ville de La Haye au cours des 35 dernières années. Celle-ci offre aujourd’hui à la Cour, comme aux nombreuses institutions internationales qui s’y sont installées à sa suite, une qualité de vie et un cadre de travail uniques, qui sont très loin de ressembler à ce que j’ai trouvé en y arrivant. A l’image de l’imposante stature du Palais de la Paix où elle siège, symbole mondialement connu de la justice internationale, la Cour est une institution solidement établie. En dépit des périodes de doute ou de désaffection qu’elle a traversées par le passé, son rôle est unanimement salué au sein de la communauté internationale et le recours à ses services par les Etats n’a jamais été aussi soutenu. 35 ans après, je continue de mesurer chaque jour le privilège qui est le mien de servir au mieux de mes capacités l’organe judiciaire principal des Nations Unies. —– Les photos dans l’article sont une courtoisie de la Cour International de Justice.

A Natural Partnership: Deepening New Zealand–Netherlands Cooperation in a Changing World

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
A Natural Partnership: Deepening New Zealand–Netherlands Cooperation in a Changing World


By H.E. Mrs. Charlotte Frater, Ambassador of New Zealand to the Kingdom of the Netherlands

I arrived in The Hague in January, travelling 18,00kms over two days and swapping summer sun for winter snow. Despite the distance and change of season, I’ve received an incredibly warm welcome, and the Netherlands already feels like a second home.

The Netherlands and New Zealand are natural partners with shared values: we are practical, open, hardworking, and adventurous – and we both eat a lot of cheese! People-to-people links remain the foundation of our relationship, and the steady stream of young people heading in both directions under our Working Holiday Schemes, strengthens our bonds, and enriches both societies. 

King Willem Alexander and Ambassador Charlotte Frater during the ceremony of credentials on February 4th, Noordeinde Palace, The Hague.

Our shared history dates back more than 380 years to Abel Tasman’s voyage to New Zealand, and has been shaped by significant experiences including shared campaigns and sacrifices during World War Two, and the large wave of Dutch migration to New Zealand in the post-war period. Consequently, thousands of New Zealanders trace their heritage back to the Netherlands. These connections underpin a vibrant relationship spanning political, economic and cultural spheres, and in 2025 we were delighted to celebrate 60 years of diplomatic relations.

Our societies are built on strong democratic institutions, respect for human rights, and a commitment to sustainable development and international cooperation. These principles guide policy choices at home and abroad, and matter deeply at a time of heightened geopolitical uncertainty.

During our Prime Minister’s visit to the Netherlands last year, our leaders recognised that prosperity cannot exist without security, and acknowledged the interconnected nature of Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific security. They also emphasised the importance of cooperation between New Zealand and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), including through the Indo-Pacific Four Group, comprising New Zealand, Australia, Japan, and South Korea.

Just as New Zealand values the Netherlands’ engagement in the Indo-Pacific, New Zealand stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the Netherlands in condemning, unequivocally, Russia’s illegal full-scale invasion of Ukraine. New Zealand has provided Ukraine with significant military and humanitarian assistance, and has implemented a broad range of sanctions in response to Russia’s actions. This reflects our commitment to upholding the rules-based international order that underpins global peace and prosperity.

Ambassador Charlotte Frater Credentials Ceremony February 4th, at Noordeinde Palace.

As someone who has spent much of my career working in international law and trade, I have seen first-hand how clear rules enable trade, investment, and innovation to flourish. In this context, New Zealand welcomed the entry-into-force of the EU–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement in 2024 which saw bilateral trade increase by 20% in its first year. The agreement is creating new business opportunities, and allowing ideas, talent, and capital to move across borders with confidence. The Netherlands remains New Zealand’s second most important export destination in Europe, and our leading source of European investment.  

Research partnerships through New Zealand’s association with Horizon Europe, provide another strong platform for growing the bilateral relationship. We are also modernising our Double Taxation Agreement, to provide greater certainty for businesses and investors in both markets.

It is easy to see why New Zealand companies such as Fonterra Dairy, Gallagher, Dawn Aerospace, and Mainfreight Logistics have chosen the Netherlands as their European base. With world-class logistics, English-speaking talent, agricultural expertise, and a thriving innovation ecosystem, the Netherlands is a natural gateway to the wider European market. More than fifty New Zealand businesses already operate here across sectors spanning agritech, food technology, advanced manufacturing, engineering, aerospace, logistics, and digital services.

For Dutch companies, New Zealand offers a stable democracy, transparent regulation, and an economy consistently ranked among the easiest places in the world to do business.  Distance can even be an asset, with New Zealand’s counter-seasonal production benefiting the Netherlands’ iconic bulb industry and wider horticultural sector. At a time when supply chain resilience matters more than ever, partnerships built on trust, quality, and sustainability are invaluable.

Diplomacy is ultimately about people and relationships. In my first weeks in the Netherlands, I have already seen how deeply our communities are connected – from a Dutch windmill in New Zealand to a Māori canoe in Leiden. These connections reflect something even more valuable: trust. As Ambassador, my goal is simple: to help ensure that New Zealand and the Netherlands continue to turn that trust into tangible results that contribute to both societies.

Farewell to Prof. Dr. Eddy Moors at IHE Delft

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Farewell to Prof. Dr. Eddy Moors at IHE Delft

At the IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, a significant chapter came to a close with the farewell of Prof. Dr. Eddy J. Moors, who served as Rector from 2017 to 2025. Widely respected in the fields of water and climate science, Moors leaves behind a strengthened institution and a global network of partnerships that continue to shape water policy, research, and capacity development worldwide.

Moors’ career reflects a deep commitment to addressing global water challenges through science, policy, and collaboration. He began at the World Meteorological Organization, working in Africa and the Caribbean, before contributing to applied research at Wageningen Environmental Research. Alongside his leadership at IHE Delft, he holds a professorship in Water and Climate at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

During his tenure, IHE Delft reinforced its role as a leading global centre for water education and capacity development, particularly for professionals from vulnerable regions. His leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic ensured continuity in education and research, while advancing the Institute’s international partnerships.

Reflecting on his departure, Moors emphasized the importance of renewal: “I have worked at IHE Delft with great pleasure and I am proud of what has been achieved in the last few years… I see the need for a different IHE Delft, to continue being the global leader on capacity development for the whole water sector.”

His decision to step down, he noted, is intended to allow new leadership to bring “new energy and ideas” to meet evolving global challenges.

At the heart of Moors’ work lies the concept of “wicked problems”—complex, interconnected challenges such as climate change, water scarcity, and inequality. Returning to this theme in his farewell address, he questioned whether sufficient progress has been made. While acknowledging improvements, including slowing groundwater depletion due to policy interventions, he warned that progress remains insufficient: “Water and climate trends show some signs of policies being effective, unfortunately, not yet enough to change the current negative trends into positive ones.”

He cautioned that international forums risk losing effectiveness if they delay concrete action, urging instead a more proactive approach: “Even if multilateral collaboration gets stuck, individual countries, institutions or persons can make a difference.”

A defining element of Moors’ legacy is his emphasis on water as a connector—linking disciplines, sectors, and nations. He consistently advocated for integrated approaches that bridge science with policy, business, and society, while fostering dialogue across sectors such as energy, agriculture, and urban development.

The Ambassador of Uruguay, H.E. Álvaro González Otero and Dr. Héctor García, professor IHE Delft and the Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay (UTEC).

Among the many tributes, the remarks by H.E. Álvaro González Otero highlighted the long-standing partnership between Uruguay and IHE Delft. Recalling the arrival of the first Uruguayan water professionals in Delft in 1961, he described how this collaboration has grown into a dynamic exchange of knowledge and expertise.

“As Ambassador of Uruguay, we stepped onto a bridge first built in 1961, when six Uruguayan water professionals arrived in Delft,” he said, noting that generations of graduates have since contributed to strengthening Uruguay’s water sector.

He emphasized that under Moors’ leadership, this relationship evolved into a more balanced and global partnership: “During his tenure, Eddy championed the idea that this connection could no longer be a one-way street—it had to become a true global exchange.”

A key milestone in this evolution was the co-creation of a Master’s programme in Sanitation with the Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay (UTEC), positioning Uruguay as a regional hub for Latin America. Concluding his tribute, the Ambassador noted: “You have served as a vital link in the evolution of IHE Delft… ensuring that the dialogue between this institute and global professional networks remains strong.”

The ceremony also highlighted IHE Delft’s extensive alumni network of more than 25,000 water professionals worldwide. Ambassadors from Mexico, Sint Maarten, Cuba, Tanzania, Pakistan, Costa Rica, Peru; Dutch ambassadors from UNESCO, Colombia, Senegal, Egypt, Iraq and Bangladesh praised Moors’ role in fostering this global community, committed to advancing sustainable water management and international cooperation.

Looking ahead, Moors stressed the urgent need to invest in the next generation of water professionals, particularly as the sector faces a growing workforce gap. He called for greater inclusivity and stronger educational pathways, emphasizing that capacity development remains essential to addressing global water challenges.

Closing the ceremony, Ambassador Meike van Ginneken, Water envoi of the Dutch Government, reflected on the broader meaning of Moors’ work: “Water management for you means not only engineering… Water means culture. Water means life… At IHE Delft, you have excelled in bridging different disciplines and cultures to tackle wicked problems.”

First Dutchman Knights of Rizal – Area Commander of The Netherlands, Sir Anton Lutter KCR

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
First Dutchman Knights of Rizal – Area Commander of The Netherlands, Sir Anton Lutter KCR

On the 7th of March the capital of Belgium became center of Knights of Rizal Europe Regional Assembly which is held every two years, during this important meeting the Area Commanders (national level) are taking there oath of office. Considering the fact that the Knights of Rizal is established by Philippine Act 646 in 1951 and thus state founded the oath taking was performed by H.E. Mr. Jaime Victor Ledda, himself a Knight of Rizal, ambassador of The Philippines to the European Union.  For the Netherlands Sir Anton Lutter, KCR was appointed by the Supreme Council in Manila thereby the first Dutchman to be appointed as Area Commander. This fact did’n went unnoticed by H.E. Mr. J. Eduardo Malaya, Philippines ambassador in The Hague.

During an appreciation dinner hoisted by the Philippines embassy on March 9, attended by CEOs, senior corporate executives, government officials, and members of the diplomatic and business communities and keynote speaker Undersecretary for International Trade Allan B. Gepty, the Philippines’ lead negotiator for the ongoing Philippines–European Union Free Trade Agreement talks, Anton Lutter was the first awardee of the Exemplary service in promoting Philippines-Netherlands Partnership Award, among other awardees which were exclusively businessleaders.

Sir Chris Kopp, deputy area commander Netherlands, Sir Johnny Villa, KGOR, Europe Regional commander and Sir Anton Lutter, KCR, area commander Netherlands.

In his welcoming speech H.E. Ambassador J. Eduardo Malaya, said “this year 2026 is special as we mark the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between our two countries. It has been 75 years of steady and growing partnership, and this has largely been on the back of robust business-to-business engagements… It is the fervent wish of the Philippine Government and the Philippine Embassy to convey our deep appreciation in meaningful ways for all their contributions to the robust and dynamic Philippines-Netherlands partnership.”  His remarks were especially in tone with Mr. Lutters contribution towards Philippine-Netherlands relations. He is the founder of the first Knights of Rizal chapter in the Netherlands in 2015 and since then has led in numerous events in cooperation with Philippines embassy in The Hague.

“Tonight, we likewise recognize certain individuals who have provided Exemplary Service in Promoting Philippines-Netherlands Partnership. Our first awardee under this category founded the Order of the Knights of Rizal in the Netherlands with the creation of The Hague Chapter in 2015. Recently, he became the first Dutch citizen to be appointed by the Supreme Council in Manila as the new Area Commander in The Netherlands for the Rizalian Year 2026-2027. Through him, the Embassy enjoys an active engagement with the Knights of Rizal, thus providing meaningful activities celebrating and embodying the life and work of the Philippines’ national hero. Thus, the Embassy is pleased to confer this Exemplary Service in promoting Philippines-Netherlands Partnership to Mr. Anton Lutter.

Ambassador J. Eduardo Malaya.

His support of the first ever Dutch translation of Philippines National Hero Jose Rizal’s most important literary work El Filibusterismo and a retranslation of the Noli Me Tangere are a significant contribution to promoting Philippines cultural heritage.

However Jubilee Year 2026 brought another significant Knights of Rizal appointment. Also a first. Sir Alexander Onia, KGOR – Lutters predecessor as area commander – became the first Dutch-Filipino to be elected in the Supreme Council in Manila, remarkable it has been for more over a decade that a person from Europe became Supreme Councillor.

The Knights of Rizal chartered by Republic Act 646 in 1951 is the state founded knightly order of The Philippines and with the Knights of Holy Sepulchre (Holy See) the sole  international organized order operating in The Netherlands. Soly dedicated and named after Philippines’ national hero Jose Rizal. He was born on June 19, 1861, in the town of Calamba, Laguna. In the hope of securing political and social reforms for his country and at the same time educate his countrymen, Rizal, the greatest apostle of Filipino nationalism, published, while in Europe, several works with highly nationalistic and revolutionary tendencies.

In March 1887, his daring book, Noli Me Tangere, a satirical novel exposing the arrogance and despotism of the Spanish clergy, was published in Berlin; on September 18, 1891, El Filibusterismo, his second novel and a sequel to the NOLI and more revolutionary and tragic than the latter, was printed in Ghent. Because of his fearless exposures of the injustices committed by the civil and clerical officials, Rizal provoked the animosity of those in power. This led himself, his relatives and countrymen into trouble with the Spanish officials of the country.

On 30th of  December 1896 he was executed, but instead of suppressing an uprising it unified the unified the Philippines people in their rebellion against the Spanish. This day a defining moment in Philippine history is nowadays known as Rizal Day and remembered in all Philippines embassies areoud the world with a solemn ceremony. The Dutch connection between Jose Rizal was significant for his revolutionary thought process, he was duly influenced by the Max Havelaar published by Multatuli in 1859. Rizal mentions the importance of this work – which he read in London in 1888 – in a letter to Ferdinand  Blumentritt

Though his novel “Max Havelaar” was published over a century and a half ago, Dekker remains one of the most celebrated Dutch writers. Historians and critics credit the book for radically overhauling Dutch colonial policy in the Dutch East Indies in the late 19th century. A  Remarkable feat, Multuli died the month before the magnificent Noli Me Tangere was published.A museum dedicated to Dekker’s writings and thoughts can be found in Amsterdam.

Bangladesh Celebrates 55 Years of Independence

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Bangladesh Celebrates 55 Years of Independence

By Roy Lie Atjam

The Embassy of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh in The Hague hosted a reception on 31 March 2026 at The Hague Marriott Hotel to celebrate the 55th Anniversary of the Independence and National Day of Bangladesh. The event was attended by members of the diplomatic corps, representatives of international organizations, government officials, members of the business community, academics, researchers, media, and NGO professionals.

Mr. Jan van Zanen, Hon’ble Mayor of The Hague, attended the event as the Guest of Honour.

National Day of Bangladesh 2026 The Hague.

The ceremony commenced with the national anthems of Bangladesh and the Kingdom of the Netherlands. In his address, Mr. Md Hasan Abdullah Towhid, Chargé d’Affaires of Bangladesh, paid tribute to the sacrifices of the martyrs of the Liberation War and highlighted Bangladesh’s progress since independence, including achievements in economic growth, poverty reduction, women’s empowerment, education, and climate resilience.

The Chargé d’Affaires emphasized the strong and growing partnership between Bangladesh and the Netherlands, particularly in areas such as water management, climate adaptation, agriculture, trade, and investment. He also underscored Bangladesh’s constructive engagement with international institutions based in The Hague, including cooperation in advancing peace, justice, accountability, and sustainable development. Referring to global humanitarian challenges, he reiterated Bangladesh’s commitment to multilateralism and called for continued international support for the safe and sustainable repatriation of forcibly displaced Rohingya people.

He also sought the support of the international community for Bangladesh’s candidature for the Presidency of the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly.

Mr. Jan van Zanen, Mayor of The Hague.

Mr. Jan van Zanen, Hon’ble Mayor of The Hague, as the Guest of Honour, delivered remarks highlighting the longstanding friendship between Bangladesh and the Netherlands. He recalled the early recognition of Bangladesh by the Netherlands in 1972 and noted the shared geographical realities of both delta nations.

The Mayor emphasized cooperation in water management, climate resilience, and sustainable development, and commended Bangladesh’s remarkable socio-economic progress. He expressed confidence that bilateral relations would continue to deepen based on shared values of peace, freedom, and justice.

Bangladeshi children presented a musical performance. Bangladesh National Day 2026 The Hague.

Following the formal addresses, three young Bangladeshi children presented musical instrument performances, which were warmly appreciated by the audience. The evening concluded with a reception dinner featuring traditional Bangladeshi cuisine and sweets, providing an opportunity for guests to interact and celebrate the enduring friendship between Bangladesh and the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The event was marked by a spirit of goodwill and reaffirmed Bangladesh’s commitment to strengthening bilateral cooperation and multilateral engagement from The Hague, the International City of Peace and Justice.

The 55th anniversary of Bangladesh’s independence was celebrated in an atmosphere of joy and pride. The evening concluded on a high note with a delectable Bangladeshi buffet, bringing people together in appreciation of Bangladesh’s rich heritage and vibrant culture.

Water Science as a Catalyst for Development and Business in Latin America and the Caribbean

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Water Science as a Catalyst for Development and Business in Latin America and the Caribbean

At the IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, a leading global centre for water knowledge, diplomacy and science converged for the high-level forum “Water Science: Applications for Development and Business in Latin America and the Caribbean.” The event, hosted by the Embassy of Panama on behalf of the Group of Latin American and Caribbean States, brought together scientists, policymakers, diplomats, and private sector leaders to explore how water science can drive sustainable development across the region.

H.E.Ms. Sally Loo Hui, Ambassador of Panama and GRULAC Coordinator.

A Platform for Science, Cooperation and Development

The forum opened with remarks from H.E. Ms. Sally Loo Hui, Ambassador of Panama and GRULAC Coordinator, who emphasized the collaborative spirit behind the initiative.

“This forum responds to a shared recognition: that science plays a central role in addressing the complex and interconnected challenges faced by Latin America and the Caribbean,” she noted.
“Water… reminds us of the fundamental role that natural resources play in shaping sustainable and resilient societies.”

She also highlighted the importance of international partnerships, thanking IHE Delft for its “longstanding leadership as a global reference in water education, research and capacity-building,” and acknowledging the contributions of the Netherlands Enterprise Agency and private partners in bridging science with real-world applications.

The Ambassador further underlined that the forum aims to showcase scientific excellence, also strengthen connections between Latin American and Caribbean researchers in the Netherlands and their countries of origin:

“Today’s discussions provide an opportunity to make these contributions more visible and to strengthen connections among researchers, institutions, diplomatic missions and the private sector.”

IHE Deflt – Water Science: Applications for Development and Business in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Strategic Vision: Water, Economy and Sustainability

The inaugural lecture by Dr. Silvia L. Saravia Matus, Economic Affairs Officer in charge of Water Resources Policy at ECLAC, set the tone for the forum. Her intervention connected water governance to economic transformation, emphasizing the need for integrated policies that link natural resource management with sustainable growth, climate resilience, and social inclusion.

Science, Innovation and Public Policy

The first high-level roundtable explored the intersection of science, innovation, and policymaking. Experts presented interdisciplinary approaches to water challenges—from advanced treatment technologies to urban design and development cooperation.

Moderator, Dr. Héctor García, professor of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering, IHE Delft and the Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay (UTEC).

Moderating the session was Dr. Héctor García, a distinguished professor of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering affiliated with both IHE Delft and the Universidad Tecnológica del Uruguay (UTEC). Dr. García is widely recognized for his expertise in wastewater treatment, resource recovery, and Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) technology. As Director of the Latin American Regional Hub of the Global Sanitation Graduate School, he plays an important role in advancing technical capacity and innovation in sanitation across the region.

Under his guidance, the discussion highlighted how scientific knowledge must translate into actionable public policy. Contributions from researchers such as Dr. Sergio Salinas Rodríguez (water treatment and desalination), Prof. Taneha Bacchin (urbanism and landscape), Ms. Sandra Megens (development cooperation), and Mr. Gabriel Cárdenas Belleza (innovation for development) illustrated the diversity of approaches needed to address water-related challenges.

H.E. Mr. Arnoldo Brenes Castro, Ambassador of Costa Rica, H.E. Ms. Franca Deza Ferreccio, Ambassador of Peru, H.E. Ms. Sally Loo Hui, Ambassador of Panama and coordinator from GRULAC, H.E. Ms. Carmen Moreno Toscano, Ambassador of Mexico, H.E. Mrs. Eva Yelina Silva Walker, Ambassador of Cuba, H.E. Fernando Simas Magalhães, ambassador of Brazil, H.E. Mr. Alvaro Gonzalez Otero, Ambassador of Uruguay and H.E. Mr. Jorge Carvajal, Ambassador of Chile.

Business and Private Sector Engagement

The second roundtable shifted focus to the role of the private sector in scaling scientific solutions. Moderated again by Dr. García, the session underscored how innovation, investment, and entrepreneurship are essential to translating research into tangible impact.

Experts including Dr. Vitalí Díaz Mercado (climate intelligence and drought monitoring), Mr. Frank Behrens (environmental project implementation and founder of River Impact), and Ms. Antonia Biggs (urban sustainability and resilience) shared insights on emerging technologies and business models that support water security and climate adaptation.

Their contributions reinforced a key message of the forum: that sustainable development requires strong collaboration between science and business, supported by enabling policy frameworks.

Strengthening Global Partnerships

The presence of H.E. Meike van Ginneken, Water Envoy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, highlighted the country’s long-lasting commitment to international water cooperation. The Netherlands’ expertise in water management continues to serve as a valuable partner for Latin America and the Caribbean in addressing shared challenges such as climate change, urbanization, and water scarcity.

The forum concluded with remarks by Professor Eddy Moors, Special Advisor on Partnerships at IHE Delft, who reiterated the importance of sustained collaboration across regions and sectors.

IHE Delft / Water Science Applications for development and business for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Building Bridges Through Knowledge

Beyond the formal sessions, the forum facilitated meaningful exchanges during networking moments, reinforcing its role as a platform for dialogue and partnership-building. Over 200 persons attended the event, among them representatives from universities of Santiago de Compostela, Chongqing University, Faculty or Archeology of Leiden University, Exter University, University of Antwerp, University of Twente, Universidad de El Valle, Utrecht University, Pontificia Universidad del Peru, Eotvos Lorand University, Escuela de postgrado de la Universidad Andina del Cusco, Czech Technical University in Prague, Wageningen University, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, Radboud University, University of Amsterdam, Universidad Mayor de San Andres, Radboud Universitiet, University of Nebraska – Lincoln. The Hague Institute for Geopolitics, Royal Danish Academy, VITENS Center for Water Expertise and Innovation,

Institutions, government representatives, ambassadors and diplomats from Embassies of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela, Dutch Embassy in Mexico. World Bank, Grupo de Trabajo Cambio Climatico y Justicia, UTEC, UPC, Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, Ministerio del Poder Popular para el Ecosocialismo, Casa Llena, Nijhuis Industries, 7VORTEX, River Impact, Lesnikov Consulting, RWS, Haskoning, Desolenador B.V. Future Water, Empresa Aymara, Rahiz, EcoCultivare, Meridian Social Inteligence, WASTER Foundation, Bluesddynamics, Grupo Islas, Flowes, Codepa, BD+P and the Blue Horizon Initiative, Ceva-Logistics, CIEPA, USFXCH, WUR, Sabesp, IFC, Field Factors, Waterschap Noorderzijlvest, Studio Noorden, Seft Sustainable Systems, RVK, Hoogheemraadschap van Rijnland, ABIS, Solaq, Deltares, UMSA, Specma B.V., van Essen Instruments B.V., Studio Berekbaar, Capgemini, Envision DR.

IHE Delft / Water Science Applications for development and business for Latin America and the Caribbean.

As Ambassador Loo Hui expressed:

“We hope that this forum will serve as a platform to deepen dialogue and cooperation—not only among scientists from Latin America and the Caribbean, but also with Dutch institutions and partners working at the forefront of water management and sustainable technologies.”

Central Europe Forum 4 FORB 

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Central Europe Forum 4 FORB 

KEY TOPIC: Legal Registration PoliciesThursday 16 April 2026
13:00-14:30 CET / 12:00-13:00 CET/ 7:00-8:30 am EST
Register through the QR Code below. If you have any problem, write to international.secretariat.brussels@hrwf.or

Welcoming remarks: Willy Fautré (HRWF)

• Introduction: Explanation of the concept and format of the Forum (Hans Noot)

Panel 1: FORB issues in Austria – Moderator: Hans Noot   ·       
Keynote speaker: Dr Brandon Taylorian – Topic: Registration System of Religions and Belief Communities in Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia·    
Peter Zoehrer: Topic: Registration issues faced by specific religious communities·       
An OSCE expert (TBC)

Panel 2: FORB issues in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia & Europe (Moderator: Attila Miklovicz)  
Short introduction about some major FORB issues having occurred in the previous three months in Central Europe and the rest of Europe (Willy Fautré)
Central Europe: Speakers from Hungary (Attila Miklovicz), Czech Republic (Kristyna Tomanova) & Slovakia (…)·       

European Union: Anja Tang-Hoffmann (Observatory of Intolerance and Discrimination Against Christians in Europe/ OIDAC) ·       
Other European countries: Open space for exchange of information on FORB issues in the whole of Europe. (Access to the microphone for those booking a time slot through our online form until 24 hours before the start of the webinar)

Panel 3: FORB issues in the World (Moderator: Eva Miskelova) Short introduction about some major FORB issues having occurred in the previous three months in the World (Willy Fautré) Open space for exchange of information on FORB issues in the World (Access to the microphone for those booking a time slot through our online form until 24 hours before the start of the webinar) 

Conclusions David Burrowes 



Disclaimer: Human Rights Without Frontiers (HRWF) publishes information from a variety of outside sources which express a wide range of viewpoints. The positions taken in these communications are not necessarily those of HRWF.
HRWF does not consider the merits of religions or beliefs, neither align itself with any specific religion, theology or non-religious worldview. HRWF does not defend any particular religion or belief system, but instead defends freedom of religion or belief for ALL as guaranteed by Article 18 of the UN Universal Declaration.

AI Impact Summit 2026: World Leaders Unite to Shape the Future of AI

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
AI Impact Summit 2026: World Leaders Unite to Shape the Future of AI

“Artificial Intelligence marks a transformative chapter in human history”: Prime Minister Narendra Modi

With a population of 1.4 billion, India’s growing importance in the field of AI cannot be overlooked.  It is for this reason, the India AI Impact Summit 2026, held in New Delhi from 16–20th February at the iconic Bharat Mandapam, brought together not only 22 Heads of State/Government but also policy makers, tech tycoons, and innovators. The fourth in a series of such summits – Bletchley Park (UK, 2023), Seoul (2024), and Paris (2025) – its magnitude was unmatched with 100+ participating countries, 500+ sessions, 3,250+ speakers and 300+ exhibitors.

Amongst the many prominent political figures attending the event were French President Emmanuel Macron, and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.  The bigwigs of the tech industry included Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, Matthew Prince, CEO of Cloudflare, Mukesh Ambani, Chairman of Reliance Industries.

M.A.N.A.V. Vision 

Inaugurating the Summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressed that India’s vision for AI is ‘Sarvajana Hitaya, Sarvajana Sukhaya’ (Welfare for All, Happiness of All).  

To translate this vision into action, PM Modi presented MANAV, the Hindi word for “human”, which serves as an acronym representing five core principles for  human-centric AI governance: M – Moral and Ethical Systems: AI should be based on ethical guidelines; A – Accountable Governance: Transparent rules and robust oversight; N – National Sovereignty: Respect for national rights over data; A – Accessible and Inclusive: AI should be a multiplier, not a monopoly; V – Valid and Legitimate: AI should be lawful and verifiable.

AI Summit

Major Investment Announcements

Significant investment commitments across the AI value chain which were announced during the Summit include the following:

  • Over USD 200 billion in AI-related investments are expected across infrastructure, foundation models, hardware and applications.
  • Reliance Industries pledged USD 110 billion over seven years towards AI-focused infrastructure.
  • Tata Group & OpenAI announced a partnership to scale AI-ready data centres.
  • Adani Enterprises announced plans to invest USD 100 billion by 2035.
  • General Catalyst announced a USD 5 billion investment commitment over five years, while Lightspeed Venture Partners announced USD 10 billion in investments.
  • Google announced investments including new India–US subsea cable routes and a USD 15 billion AI hub in Andhra Pradesh; support for AI innovation and digital skills development.
  • Larsen & Toubro joined Nvidia to build one of India’s largest AI computing facilities.

Adoption of New Delhi Declaration

Endorsed by 92 countries and international organisations, the India AI Impact Summit 2026 Declaration set a shared global vision for an equitable, ethical, and inclusive AI. Inspired by the motto “Sarvajan Hitaya, Sarvajan Sukhaya”, it lays out a comprehensive framework built on seven key pillars, including democratising AI resources, utilising AI for economic growth and social good, ensuring secure and trusted AI, expanding AI in science, enabling social empowerment, developing human capital, and building resilient and energy-efficient systems.  

The Legacy of the Summit

The Summit truly democratised AI. Unlike prior global AI gatherings confined to small rooms of CEOs and experts, it brought students, youth and common citizens into the conversation — providing them with direct access to the world’s leading AI thinkers. This inclusive outreach is the defining legacy of the AI Impact Summit 2026, promoting fresh and innovative ideas.

AI Summit -CEO

India in the Global AI Spotlight

India brings unparalleled scale and energy to everything it does and this Summit was no exception. With the presence of world leaders, major technology companies, and innovative startups, the event clearly demonstrated the country’s capability to convene global conversations on the future of technology.

Hosting one of the world’s largest youth populations and technology talent driven by its diversity, democracy and demographic dynamism, India’s energy capacity and policy clarity uniquely position it to harness AI’s full potential.

Ambassador Consuelo Femenía Honors Women Leaders in Arts and Diplomacy

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Ambassador Consuelo Femenía Honors Women Leaders in Arts and Diplomacy

On the occasion of International Women’s Day, the Ambassador of Spain to the Netherlands, H.E. Mrs. Consuelo Femenía Guardiola, hosted a distinguished luncheon at her residence in The Hague. The gathering paid tribute to the vital contributions of women in the fields of international relations and cultural diplomacy, bringing together an accomplished group of professionals from across the arts and diplomatic communities.

The event highlighted the remarkable scope and diversity of the participants’ responsibilities. Each guest represented a unique and inspiring journey, combining demanding professional roles with personal commitments and leadership in their respective fields.

Following a warm and engaging reception, guests were invited to introduce themselves, sharing insights into their work, the challenges of balancing professional and family life, and the sources of their inspiration. The conversation evolved into an enriching dialogue, where experiences, perspectives, and practical wisdom were exchanged. Themes such as resilience, leadership, motherhood, and the pursuit of meaningful careers were reflected around the table.

H.E. Ambassador Mrs. Consuelo Femenia Guardiola with her guests.

Ambassador Femenía created an atmosphere of openness, reinforcing the importance of dialogue and mutual understanding among women from diverse backgrounds. This gathering is part of a tradition she has upheld since the beginning of her tenure in the Netherlands—dedicating an annual luncheon to recognize and celebrate the achievements of women across different sectors.

Her initiative continues to build new ties within the international community while honoring the impact of women’s leadership.

Participants included:

  • Ms. Mayelinne De Lara, Publisher of Diplomat Magazine
  • H.E. Madeleine Liguemoh Ondoua, Ambassador of Cameroon
  • H.E. Odette Melono, Deputy Director-General of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
  • Ms. Virginia Pablos, Amsterdam Spanish Film Festival
  • H.E. Lizeth Pena, Ambassador of Angola
  • Ms. Gabriella Sancisi, Director of Protocol and Host Country Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands
  • Ms. Helene Stergiou, Foreign Affairs Advisor and Defence Coordinator
  • H.E. Bibi van Zuylen van Nijevelt, Mistress of the Robes of the Royal Household of the Netherlands
  • Ms. Leontien Wiering, General Director of Amare
  • Ms. Marion Wolff, Director of STRAAT Museum

When Information is no Longer Enough: Intelligence and the Degradation of Strategic Truth

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
When Information is no Longer Enough: Intelligence and the Degradation of Strategic Truth

“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge.”
— Daniel J. Boorstin

By Major General (Two Stars) (retd) Corneliu Pivariu

In the current context, characterized by strategic complexity and narrative competition, the role of intelligence can no longer be assessed exclusively through the lens of information collection, but through its capacity to support decision-making based on an unaltered evaluation of reality.

The relationship between the politico-military elite and the intelligence community represents one of the critical nodes of state functioning in the security domain. Within this space, not only is information produced, but what may be called strategic truth is constructed—a form of knowledge that is inherently incomplete, probabilistic, and permanently subjected to political and narrative pressure.

Intelligence does not provide certainties, and the politico-military elite (PME) is not merely a passive recipient. Between the two lies an essential process: the transformation of information into strategic courses of action. The quality of this process ultimately determines the quality of political decision-making.

Intelligence as the Raw Material of Decision-Making

The fundamental function of intelligence is to reduce uncertainty, not eliminate it. No intelligence community, regardless of available resources, can provide a complete and definitive picture of strategic reality. Assessments are probabilistic, scenarios are conditional, and warnings are often uncomfortable.

Within this framework, the PME occupies a critical intermediary position. It must interpret information, correlate it with political, military, economic, and alliance dimensions, and transform it into intelligible courses of action. This process is not mechanical; it requires professional judgment, experience, and risk assumption.

In most cases, the problem does not arise from a lack of information, but from how it is used. When intelligence becomes a justificatory backdrop or, conversely, is perceived as a threat to a pre-existing political agenda, the decision-making process degrades and strategic truth becomes distorted.

Strategic Truth: Nature and Limits

Strategic truth is not an objective truth in the classical sense, but an operational construct resulting from the aggregation of incomplete information, competing interpretations, and political and institutional constraints.

It is neither fixed nor definitive. It is dynamic, revisable, and dependent on the institutional capacity to integrate information and to correct initial assumptions. The difference between a high-performing state and a vulnerable one lies not in access to information, but in the ability to construct and maintain a strategic truth as close to reality as possible.

In this sense, strategic truth is not given—it is produced. And the process through which it is produced becomes itself a critical variable of national security.

The Political Filtering of Information

One of the most frequent failures of the strategic decision-making process is not the absence of information, but its biased selection.

In most cases, relevant information exists, but it is filtered: data that confirms already assumed political options is privileged, while contradictory information is marginalized or reinterpreted. This is not necessarily falsification, but a subtle and systematic distortion.

This process may be defined as a form of politicization of strategic truth, in which the evaluation of reality is adapted to the decision objective, rather than the reverse.

Under these conditions, intelligence loses its warning function, and strategic decision-making becomes an exercise in validation, not orientation.

At this point, the PME becomes the critical link. It can function either as a protective filter of strategic truth or as a mechanism for adapting it to the political preferences of the moment.

Its role is not merely to organize information, but to decide what reaches the level of political decision and in what form. Responsibility thus becomes structural, not merely technical.

PME: Beneficiary or Obstacle to Strategic Truth

The quality of a politico-military elite is reflected in its relationship with strategic truth.

A mature PME treats intelligence as a critical resource, encourages analytical pluralism, and accepts professional disagreement as a normal component of the decision-making process. It understands that repeated warnings, even if they do not immediately materialize, are not failures, but expressions of strategic prudence.

By contrast, a defensive or politicized PME tends to penalize analysis that contradicts the dominant line. In such contexts, analytical self-censorship emerges: analysts avoid uncomfortable scenarios in order not to be perceived as alarmist or disloyal.

A PME that penalizes uncomfortable analysis not only reduces its performance but loses its fundamental strategic function. Instead of protecting the state from surprise, it becomes a mechanism of self-confirmation.

Lessons from Recent Failures

The experience of recent conflicts and crises[1] reveals a constant pattern: strategic surprise does not occur because intelligence has completely failed, but because warnings were not integrated into the decision-making process. The problem is not the absence of signals, but the inability to transform them into decisions.

Early warning signals exist, but they are ignored, reinterpreted as improbable, or adapted to an already established narrative.

Each time, the PME stands at the center of this process. It decides which information is considered relevant, how it is framed, and what options are built around it. Responsibility is both strategic and moral, even when it is not formally sanctioned.

The Tension Between Loyalty and Honesty

The relationship between PME and intelligence is marked by a structural tension between institutional loyalty and analytical honesty.

Loyalty to the state and to political leadership is essential. But when loyalty is reinterpreted as the obligation to confirm political expectations, it becomes a form of strategic irresponsibility.

Institutional loyalty must not be confused with analytical conformism.

When critical analysis is discouraged or penalized, intelligence loses its warning function, and the PME becomes an instrument of validation rather than strategic protection. The ability to uphold uncomfortable truths becomes, in this context, a strategic resource in itself.

Strategic Truth in the Era of Narrative Competition

In the current context, strategic truth is subject to an additional pressure: global narrative competition.

Information is no longer only evaluated internally but is integrated into a space of perception confrontation, where legitimacy, morality, and credibility become strategic weapons. The PME must distinguish between the need to protect sensitive information and the temptation to adapt reality to a desired public narrative.

The greatest risk is not external manipulation, but strategic self-deception.

When narrative becomes more important than realistic assessment, the state begins to operate on the basis of a constructed reality rather than an existing one. Under such conditions, strategic error is no longer accidental, but inevitable.

The role of the PME is to maintain a functional separation between communication and analysis, between public messaging and internal assessment. Confusion between the two inevitably degrades decision quality.

Conclusion

The relationship between the politico-military elite and the intelligence community is not merely technical, but fundamental to the functioning of the state.

States do not fail because they lack information, but because they are unable to accept the truth contained within it.

A mature PME leverages warnings, protects analytical pluralism, and accepts uncertainty as a structural element of decision-making. A PME that filters, sanitizes, or instrumentalizes information dramatically reduces its strategic relevance.

Ultimately, the quality of a politico-military elite is measured not only by professional competence, but by its ability to protect strategic truth—even when it contradicts the interests, perceptions, or political comfort of the moment.

The fundamental issue is not whether states possess sufficient information, but whether they are capable of using it without distorting it. In this sense, strategic truth becomes not only a product of intelligence, but a condition for the functioning of the state.

Brașov, March 19, 2026

[1] Recent examples of dysfunctions in the relationship between intelligence, the politico-military elite, and political decision-making illustrate the structural nature of the problem:

In the case of the intervention in Iraq (2003), intelligence regarding the existence of weapons of mass destruction was profoundly distorted in the decision-making process. Subsequent investigations showed that intelligence assessments were selectively used, reinterpreted, and, in some cases, presented in a manner that supported an already formed political option. The problem was not merely one of analytical error, but of the deliberate adaptation of information to a political objective, which compromised the integrity of the strategic decision-making process.

In the context of Afghanistan (2021), numerous intelligence community assessments signaled the institutional fragility of the Afghan state and its dependence on external support. Nevertheless, the pace and form of the withdrawal indicated a discrepancy between existing assessments and the way they were integrated into political decision-making, leading to the rapid collapse of the previously supported system.

In the case of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022), warnings regarding the imminence of the conflict existed and were communicated, including publicly, by certain Western states. However, at the European level, part of the political and analytical elites assessed the risk as low or unlikely, highlighting the difficulty of integrating scenarios perceived as having low probability but high strategic impact.

These examples indicate that strategic failures do not predominantly derive from the absence of information, but from the way in which it is filtered, reinterpreted, or adapted within the decision-making process.

Recent developments in Iran (2026) provide an additional example of these dysfunctions, still in the process of clarification. The sequence of precision strikes against sensitive objectives and command levels suggests the existence of significant vulnerabilities in information protection and risk assessment. In this case, the issue does not appear to be the absence of signals, but the difficulty of correctly assessing the extent of adversarial penetration and integrating these assessments into the decision-making process. Thus, the distortion of strategic truth does not necessarily arise as the result of deliberate intervention, but as an effect of limitations in the capacity for interpretation and anticipation.

These examples, drawn from different strategic contexts, indicate that strategic failures do not predominantly derive from the absence of information, but from the way in which it is filtered, reinterpreted, or adapted within the decision-making process.

“Elegy of Eternal Echoes”: A Cultural Evening at the Grote Kerk in The Hague

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
“Elegy of Eternal Echoes”: A Cultural Evening at the Grote Kerk in The Hague

H.E. Mr. Mammad Ahmadzada, Ambassador of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the Kingdom of the Netherlands, hosted a distinguished classical music concert entitled “Elegy of Eternal Echoes” at the historic Grote Kerk in The Hague.

The concert featured the acclaimed Chamber Ensemble I Bricconcello, which presented a rich repertoire of masterpieces by renowned Azerbaijani and international composers. The ensemble brought together exceptional musicians: violinist Timotej Willewaldt, cellist and founder Pierluigi Ruggiero, and pianist Alexandra Di Gennaro—virtuosos whose performances reflect both technical excellence and artistic depth. Their program ranged from great classical works to compositions influenced by popular music and contemporary classical traditions.

Chamber Ensemble I Bricconcello

With an extensive international career, I Bricconcello has performed in numerous tours, festivals, and concerts across Italy, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Germany, Lithuania, Poland, the Netherlands, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Azerbaijan. The ensemble has enjoyed over fifteen years of artistic collaboration with Azerbaijan, strengthened during Ambassador Ahmadzada’s tenure in Italy, where he initiated and supported several cultural projects and concerts in both countries—creating a lasting artistic bridge.

The evening’s repertoire included iconic pieces such as themes from La Forza del Destino and Schindler’s List, alongside celebrated Azerbaijani compositions, including selections from Seven Beauties by Gara Garayev, works by Sevda Ibrahimova, and Shusha by Farhad Badalbeyli.

Bricconcello’s founder, Pierluigi Ruggiero, pianist Alexandra Di Gennaro and violinist Timotej Willewaldt.

In his remarks, Ambassador Ahmadzada expressed his appreciation to the distinguished guests attending the concert and reflected on the significance of cultural diplomacy. Held during the holy month of Ramadan, the evening symbolized the unifying power of music beyond borders and promoted mutual respect and understanding through the universal language of culture.

Ambassadors from numerous countries, members of the diplomatic community, and Dutch friends of Azerbaijan attended the event. The concert was followed by light refreshments, allowing guests to continue the exchange in a warm and convivial atmosphere.

123...895Page 1 of 895