LATEST ARTICLES

Uruguayan Independence Day Celebrated in The Hague

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Uruguayan Independence Day Celebrated in The Hague

The Embassy of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay marked his country’s Independence Day with a grand and festive reception. Held on August 27 at the Leonardo Royal Hotel in The Hague, the event drew over 200 distinguished guests from various sectors of Dutch society.

Ambassadors, chiefs of international missions, diplomats, academics, business leaders, and representatives from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, along with members of the Uruguayan community, all responded to H.E. Ambassador Dr. Álvaro González Otero’s invitation to celebrate ‘Día de la Independencia’—Uruguay’s National Day, commemorating its independence from Brazil in 1825.

H.E. Dr. Álvaro González Otero, Ambassador of Uruguay. National Day 2024 The Hague.

After nearly 200 years of conflict and civil unrest under Spanish and then Brazilian rule, Uruguay has emerged as a country renowned for its welcoming people, stunning landscapes, first-class meat production, and high-quality wine. In recent decades, Uruguayans have enjoyed a stable democracy, a steady improvement in living conditions, and overall well-being.

In a packed room with an animated audience, Ambassador González Otero took the microphone to thank all the attendees for their sincere affection for his people and country. He then proudly expressed:

“Two years have quickly passed since I arrived in this lovely kingdom. Since then, we have started to shift the focus of the Embassy, placing more emphasis on our bilateral relations. The Netherlands and Uruguay have more in common than people might imagine. We share international principles, landscapes, agricultural production, developed services, qualified exports, and a progressive lifestyle.

We also share strong commitments to the well-being of our citizens and visitors, the protection of human rights, environmental sustainability, progressive social policies, and significant efforts towards renewable energy and climate action. Both countries also emphasize education, democratic governance, and active participation in international organizations promoting peace and development. So, we will keep working to boost our bilateral relations.”

Uruguay National Day, August 27 at the Leonardo Royal Hotel in The Hague.
From the Embassy of Uruguay, Counsellor Pablo Bayarres, Ambassador Gonzalez Otero and Hans Akerboom, Deputy Director Protocol and Host Country Affairs from the Netherlands.

Ambassador González Otero then listed some of the most relevant initiatives undertaken by the Embassy over the last few months:

– Uruguayan participation in the World Hydrogen Summit 2024: Led by the Minister of Industry, Energy, and Mining, Ms. Elisa Facio, with over 50 representatives from various sectors of the public and private sectors.

– Active participation in the “26th World Energy Congress.”

– Cooperation Project with Delft Institute for Water Education: Since 2011, Uruguayan professionals specializing in water resources have participated in the Delft Institute program for advanced training. Initially, the program began with 40 scholarships, resulting in 37 professionals successfully completing their studies. This early success led to the program’s relocation and implementation at the Technological University of Uruguay, now featuring regional participation. The program has since had two new editions in 2022 and 2024, expanding to include 17 professionals from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, and Peru. This development has transformed Uruguay into a regional hub in the field of water resource education.

– Uruguay’s status as one of the 32 signing states of the Ljubljana – The Hague Convention in February 2024.

– Positioning Uruguay as a potential living and working destination for Dutch farmers.

– Interactions with RVO and Port of Rotterdam related to port cooperation.

– Exploring and initiating new cooperation projects with Westland Municipality and Wageningen University.

– Meetings with private sector actors related to agribusiness.

– Preparation for the Capitan Miranda’s visit to Amsterdam: Uruguay’s school tall ship has already confirmed its participation in Sail Amsterdam 2025.

– Multilateral achievements: The Embassy has made progress in multilateral areas, including ongoing contributions and work with international organizations based in The Hague: the ICJ, ICC, OPCW, HCCH, and the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Additionally, a closer relationship with The Hague Academy of International Law has been pursued. Significant advances have also been made through the coordinated work of the GRULAC Group in relation to various international organizations.

H.E. Mr. Fernando Arias, OPCW Director General , Ambassador Gonzalez Otero and Mr Arias spouse, Patricia van Oordt.

Following his remarks, Ambassador González Otero invited the audience to watch a short video about Uruguay, which made a great impression on those present. He expressed, “Uruguay is an exceptional country that has developed a dynamic and robust culture, shaped by a fascinating blend of gaucho traditions, European influences, and the unique Rioplatense spirit. Tango, folklore, candombe, and milonga are examples of its rich artistic musical expression. Uruguayan gastronomy, featuring high-quality meat, wine, and dairy products, especially the beloved ‘dulce de leche,’ delights palates and consistently wins prestigious awards worldwide.”

“The work we have done does not mean we are satisfied; we want to continue advancing in a deeper process. The bilateral relationship is already strong, but the potential to strengthen bonds in several key areas is even greater.”

The Ambassador of Uruguay, H.E. Alvaro Gonzalez Otero and the President of the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals, Judge Graciela Gatti Santana with her husband Mr Gustavo Segovia.

The event was conceived to showcase the rich and diverse culture of Uruguay, a nation with a population of approximately 3,495,527 as of 2022.

The national anthems of Uruguay and the Netherlands were performed by the Uruguayan opera singer Sara de los Campos. After the ambassador’s speech, the Embassy paid tribute to two influential musicians: José “El Sabalero” Carbajal and Jaime Roos, who both lived in the Netherlands. Jaime Roos settled in Amsterdam in 1978, where he played bass in several salsa, rock, and jazz groups. He had a son and remained in the Netherlands until 1984 when he returned to Uruguay.

Carbajal spent his days in the Netherlands with his wife, Anke van Haastrecht, and their two children. Anke was invited to share some special stories from their life together.

Uruguayan opera singer Sara de los Campos.
Uruguayan drummers Luis Gradin, Marcelo Terra, and Nicolás Sánchez.

The enthusiastic audience enjoyed an authentic performance by talented Uruguayan drummers Luis Gradin, Marcelo Terra, and Nicolás Sánchez. The celebration continued with Uruguayan wine, classic savory empanadas, and dulce de leche, which delighted the crowded room and completed the great celebration.

Ambassador González Otero concluded the event by thanking his Embassy team: Counselor Pablo Bayarres, Chancellor Gustavo Morales, his assistant Juan Diego, and Martha Hernández and Sofía Anastasiou. He then led a warm toast for the people of the Netherlands, Uruguay, and the necessary and desired peace in the world.

China: A New Actor in the Contemporary Multipolar World

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
China: A New Actor in the Contemporary Multipolar World

By Mariarosaria Iorio, Political Analyst

I. The post-cold war world  

International relations are nowadays characterised by major changes that started at the end of the 80s with the fall of the Berlin Wall.  Indeed, the end of the cold war was marked by the dislocation of the two main political blocks, namely the Soviet Union and the Western World. Such a dislocation resulted in the marginalization of the post-war multilateral system embodied in the United Nations, and the standstill of the multilateral trade negotiations in the late 90s in the context of the World Trade Organisation.  New lines of political thought have been facing each other since then, while reshaping the post-cold war world in a number of fragmented and variable sub-blocks of countries. 

The United States decided to put itself first by concentrating on its internal affairs, while withdrawing from international affairs.  

Europe, the old continent, looks for an efficient strategy towards autonomy from the United States.  Europe also tries, not without difficulty, to create a more cohesive internal and external political approach.  The reality is however evolving rather more towards fragmentation of Europe in favour of European National fragmented interests. Such a fragmentation is the natural consequence of the decadence of the European Institutional and collective actions to the advantage of individual Sates actions and interests.   In sum, what seemed to be a structured and coherent European Union block fighting for the promotion of its economic and political values all over the world has somehow become an alliance at variable geometry both internally and externally.  The disorganisation of the leadership results in a chaotic and unpredictable European External and Internal action. 

Thereof, the empty influence spaces left on the international relations scene has given new international actors the opportunity to emerge.  

Meanwhile, the fragmentation of the European Institutions has also impacted the EU-USA relations within NATO, and affected the security and peace sphere.  Security issues have been on and off on the European agenda.    

In this context, Russia that has lost its empire in the 80s looks now for a new power game. In spite of the disruption of the Soviet Union, Russia attempts either by influence or by force to exercise power in its ancient affiliate countries.  Russia that was supposed to be defeated with the fall of the Berlin Wall takes back its role of opponent to the Western World on the international scene at least as it concerns the international affairs philosophy.  Thus, creating a tension aimed at restoring its power in the world.   

The group of emerging and developing economies that constitute a new variable block with a large portion of population employed in agriculture have emerged as new actors in the world’s geo-political discourses.  At the head of this block on the international scene, there is China.  The shaky international leadership context has indeed given China a new space. China’s   communist past combined with its market-based economic strategy gives it a particular position.  

China is The One that can communicate to Russia. China is also The One that can have an influence on the Western economic and political scene as China owns a big part of Western Foreign Debt  

China embeds a horizontal strategy in both its trade and development policies, while producing at low wages.  Its production system coupled with its pragmatic political approach has reshaped the international power structure.  The top-down approach of the Western World faces now the competition created by the horizontal win-win approach proposed by China in both developing and industrialized countries.

Indeed, as a result of the decline of the Western World global hegemony based on market access and economic and social liberalism as a means to ensure economic growth and promote economic development, the vision promoted by China’s discourse, centred on the protection of livelihoods and local sovereign choices finds new adepts.  Furthermore, China has successfully attempted to promote a trade-off approach to international cooperation during the last 20 years.  A cooperation that does not interfere in internal affairs of partner countries as it has often reproached to the Western countries involved in international cooperation.  

As the developing countries leader, China positions itself as the spoke country for the poor.  As a new world powerful economic actor China plays as the guarantor of the Western Economic stability.  China positions itself as the bridge between the rich and the poor.  It is representing a different hegemonic game that only changes in its discourse, while still pursuing its own interests and influence zones.  Such a situation poses the question of the values that the international regime wants to embrace.  Indeed, this changing world results in an increased number of conflicts – be new or historical conflicts.  

The dislocation of the traditional leaders of the international relations has definitely created a chaotic and unpredictable scenario.  Chaos has in some cases been chosen as a political strategy to disrupt the post-1945 international regime. Such a disruption has benefitted new actors, and given space to new lines of thought.  These new lines of thought have attacked the existing international framework but has not yet succeeded in creating a new regime.  The increasing unbalance of power and the lack of leadership on the international political scene is risky. 

The reduction by choice of leadership of the United States has indeed resulted in the weakening of the values emerged as a result of the dramatic experience of Second World War, namely freedom of thought and freedom of speech to mention only a few.   We are now facing a much more authoritarian world with force used as a means to manage the political arena.  Dialogue seems to be a rather consuming exercise that has left its place to the use of force.  Force is no longer seen as the last option but rather the opening act for political dialogue.  Nationalism and individual interests are now at the centre of the political game. This trend is taking the world to instability and conflict.  

The peoples of the world are more and more questioning the existing system. People’s needs and expectations are not met.  The new emerged actors, such as China have given the hope of a possible change in the present international system without fundamentally questioning its rationale but rather trying to rip a slate of the cake.  

The struggle for influence among countries has not succeeded in building a peaceful and stable world. Citizens will have to face the challenge of building a new era of peace and stability worldwide.

Derrière les murs du Palais de la Paix : permanence et changements de la Cour internationale de Justice

Editor
-
0
Derrière les murs du Palais de la Paix : permanence et changements de la Cour internationale de Justice

S.E. M. Philippe Couvreur est arrivé à La Haye en avril 1982, où il a d’abord occupé le poste d’assistant spécial aux bureaux du greffier et du greffier adjoint de la Cour internationale de Justice.

Il a ensuite exercé les fonctions de Secrétaire, Premier Secrétaire et Secrétaire juridique principal, avant d’être élu Greffier de la Cour en 2000, et réélu en 2007 et 2014. Pour marquer l’anniversaire de ses débuts à la Cour, il y a 35 ans, Diplomat Magazine l’a invité à témoigner de son expérience unique au service de cette institution, des évolutions qu’il a pu y observer, et à partager le regard qu’il porte sur les changements qui ont marqué la Cour et La Haye au cours des trois dernières décennies.
Philippe Couvreur avec le Pape Jean-Paul II prise le 13 mai 1985.
Je suis arrivé à La Haye en avril 1982 — de façon aussi inattendue que j’avais entamé des études de droit treize ans auparavant (mais c’est là une autre histoire…) — pour occuper un poste temporaire à la Cour internationale de Justice. La Cour était alors la seule institution judiciaire internationale existante au plan universel. Son activité, particulièrement faible à la fin des années 1970, ne pouvait en ce temps-là guère laisser présager du succès que rencontrerait la Cour dans les décennies à venir. Mon bienveillant maître de Louvain, le professeur Paul de Visscher, fils du célèbre internationaliste Charles de Visscher, unique juge belge à la Cour, m’avait prédit des jours aussi sereins qu’heureux, écoulés à lire et à écrire des ouvrages dans la solitude des imposants murs de la bibliothèque du Palais de la Paix…
Les mémoires ont été dûment déposés dans l’affaire El Salvador c. Honduras dans la salle Bol le 1 juin 1988, l’affaire du Différend frontalier terrestre, insulaire et maritime.
En rejoignant la Cour, un frais matin d’avril, dont je garde un souvenir très précis, le jeune juriste que j’étais découvrit, non sans étonnement, une organisation de taille très modeste, le Greffe, qui en est l’organe administratif, alors composé de moins d’une quarantaine de fonctionnaires. Le fonctionnement de la Cour reposait entièrement sur cette équipe restreinte de personnel permanent, auquel s’ajoutait, selon que de besoin, un personnel temporaire pour faire face au surcroît de travaux linguistiques et de sténodactylographie lors des sessions (publiques et privées) de la Cour. Je me rappelle avoir été frappé par la personnalité haute en couleur de certains de ces traducteurs indépendants, dont la grande culture littéraire m’émerveillait. Cette structure très économique du Greffe impliquait une grande polyvalence de ses membres, et les Secrétaires de la Cour — ses fonctionnaires supérieurs — étaient appelés, en sus de leurs travaux de recherches juridiques, de préparation des documents de la Cour, et de rédaction de la correspondance diplomatique, à assumer eux-mêmes l’essentiel des tâches linguistiques (traduction et interprétation) et d’information, ainsi que la supervision de nombreuses activités administratives et logistiques.
La Grande salle de Justice, l’affaire Relative au Timor Oriental (Portugal c. Australie) Arrêt du 30 juin 1995.
Il n’était nullement rare qu’un nouveau venu comme moi ait à passer week-ends et nuits blanches au Palais de la Paix à effectuer les travaux les plus divers… allant jusqu’à imprimer et polycopier, sur de vieilles machines à stencils ronéotype, des décisions dont la Cour devait donner la lecture en séance publique le lendemain ! Dès mon arrivée au Greffe, j’ai eu le bonheur et le privilège d’être initié et associé à l’ensemble des fonctions de l’institution sous la patiente supervision de personnalités d’exception, tels que MM. Torres Bernárdez et Pillepich, alors respectivement Greffier et Greffier adjoint. J’en ai retiré le plus grand bénéfice, puisque cette immersion sans préparation dans toutes les facettes de l’activité du Greffe m’a permis d’acquérir de ce dernier une connaissance unique — de l’intérieur — et sous tous ses aspects —, un acquis particulièrement précieux au moment où j’ai été amené, bien des années plus tard, à assumer la délicate responsabilité d’en assurer la gestion au plus haut niveau. Devenir un fonctionnaire du Greffe au début des années 1980 signifiait accepter de se couler sans discussion dans un moule à tous égards exigeant, et se donner corps et âme, avec humilité et discrétion, à l’institution, sans penser à soi ni parler de soi. Depuis ces années d’initiation, j’ai été le témoin de profondes transformations de la Cour, rendues inévitables à la fois pour répondre à l’accroissement considérable de ses activités, avec la disparition du monde bipolaire qui avait relégué le règlement judiciaire à un rôle quelque peu marginal, et pour saisir les opportunités nouvelles offertes, notamment, par le progrès des technologies et de la communication. Entre 1982 et aujourd’hui, le nombre de fonctionnaires a ainsi presque triplé (il a quasiment doublé depuis l’an 2000, année de ma première élection en tant que Greffier). L’organisation du travail a été progressivement spécialisée entre les divers départements, juridique, linguistique et chargé de l’information, qui furent créés en 1997, et les services techniques. Par ailleurs, les Membres de la Cour ne disposèrent pas, pendant longtemps, de « référendaires » — ils s’y sont d’ailleurs longtemps refusés—, et l’assistance apportée aux juges en matière judiciaire était principalement répartie entre les fonctionnaires du Département des affaires juridiques.
H.E. Philippe Couvreur avec la Reine Beatrix photo prise pendant le 50 eme anniversaire de la Cour (18-04-1996).
Les cinq premiers postes de juristes référendaires ne furent obtenus de l’Assemblée générale et créés qu’en 2002, à l’issue de difficiles négociations que je me souviens avoir menées avec beaucoup de plaisir et d’intérêt ; le nombre de ces postes s’est progressivement accru, pour s’élever à quinze aujourd’hui. Les divers développements qui ont marqué le monde au cours des dernières décennies n’ont pas manqué de soulever pour la Cour de nouveaux défis. Comme c’est le cas pour toute institution, elle n’a pu les relever en faisant table rase des enseignements de son histoire ni, à l’inverse, en ne saisissant pas toutes les opportunités offertes par le temps présent. A ces différents égards, la Cour est certainement parvenue, au fil des ans, à assurer un équilibre, toujours délicat, entre changements et continuité. La continuité de la Cour est bien sûr inscrite dans son Statut, qui fait partie intégrante de la Charte des Nations Unies, et reflétée dans ses méthodes judiciaires, qui ont été très largement élaborées par sa devancière, la Cour permanente de Justice internationale, et héritées d’elle. Cette continuité historique était particulièrement présente lorsque j’ai rejoint le Greffe. Ainsi, en manière d’anecdote, divers hauts fonctionnaires alors en poste avaient eux-mêmes côtoyé, au début de leur carrière, d’anciens fonctionnaires de la Cour permanente. Tous nourrissaient à l’égard de cette dernière le plus grand respect. Il régnait d’ailleurs dans les couloirs du Palais de la Paix une atmosphère feutrée et délicieusement surannée, évocatrice de la défunte Société des Nations. Je me souviens en avoir encore utilisé maintes fournitures de bureau ! La continuité jurisprudentielle et procédurale entre les deux Cours constitue pour les Etats une garantie importante de sécurité et de prévisibilité juridiques. Cette continuité, juridique et historique, de même que l’expérience accumulée en plus de quatre-vingt-dix ans d’exercice de la fonction judiciaire, sont pour la Cour un facteur crucial de légitimité.
H.E. Philippe Couvreur vec le Roi Willem-Alexander photo prise pendant le 70 eme anniversaire de la Cour (20-04-2016).
En même temps, la Cour a eu, à l’évidence, à s’adapter aux changements du monde réel dans lequel elle opère, comme aux nécessités et opportunités nouvelles de chaque époque traversée. L’une des transformations notoires auxquelles j’ai assisté fut l’ouverture croissante de la Cour sur l’extérieur : longtemps à l’écart, à dessein, des organes politiques des Nations Unies, la Cour a souhaité se faire plus et mieux entendre de ces organes et des Etats membres. Elle a ainsi rompu avec ce qui était parfois perçu comme un « splendide isolement » au sein des Nations Unies, même si elle défend toujours jalousement son autonomie. La Cour doit en outre désormais également tenir compte des nombreuses autres juridictions, internationales ou régionales, qui ont été créées ces dernières années, et veiller, autant que possible, à assurer l’harmonie du « concert judiciaire » que permet ce foisonnement de cours et tribunaux sur la scène internationale. Davantage ouverte sur la communauté internationale et ses réalités, la Cour s’est montrée de plus en plus attentive, non seulement à sa place dans l’Organisation des Nations Unies, mais aussi à la poursuite des objectifs de celle-ci et à sa mission propre au service du règlement pacifique des différends internationaux. Des différends de plus en plus complexes, tant juridiquement que factuellement, en même temps que politiquement plus denses, lui ont été soumis. En révisant constamment, selon que de besoin, ses méthodes de travail, elle a su les résoudre rapidement et efficacement, à un coût particulièrement modeste pour la communauté internationale, tout en assurant le développement du droit. Enfin, pour conclure sur une note plus prosaïque, mais qui est loin d’être négligeable, je ne peux taire la chance que j’ai eue de connaître l’extraordinaire développement de la ville de La Haye au cours des 35 dernières années. Celle-ci offre aujourd’hui à la Cour, comme aux nombreuses institutions internationales qui s’y sont installées à sa suite, une qualité de vie et un cadre de travail uniques, qui sont très loin de ressembler à ce que j’ai trouvé en y arrivant. A l’image de l’imposante stature du Palais de la Paix où elle siège, symbole mondialement connu de la justice internationale, la Cour est une institution solidement établie. En dépit des périodes de doute ou de désaffection qu’elle a traversées par le passé, son rôle est unanimement salué au sein de la communauté internationale et le recours à ses services par les Etats n’a jamais été aussi soutenu. 35 ans après, je continue de mesurer chaque jour le privilège qui est le mien de servir au mieux de mes capacités l’organe judiciaire principal des Nations Unies. —– Les photos dans l’article sont une courtoisie de la Cour International de Justice.

Tanzania National Union Day Celebration 2025

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Tanzania National Union Day Celebration 2025

The Hague, Friday, May 9, 2026. The Ambassador of the United Republic of Tanzania, H.E. Ms. Caroline Kitana Chipera, warmly welcomed guests to a festive reception in honor of National Union Day. “This special day highlights the values of unity and cooperation, reminding all of us how important it is to come together to achieve our shared goals. It encourages the wonderful people of Tanzania to uphold solidarity and peace in their communities. National Union Day celebrates the beautiful union of the island of Zanzibar and Tanganyika. This historic partnership was inspired by the great vision of Mwalimu Julius Nyerere and Abeid Amani Karume, rooted in principles of equity, self-reliance (Ujamaa), and mutual respect for one another.”

In her welcome speech, Ambassador Kitana Chipera stated the following:

“Ambassador Jelte van Wieren, Director for Sub-Sahara Africa,  Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, Mr. Salvatory Mbilinyi, Director, Department of Diaspora of the  Ministry of Foreign Affairs and East African Cooperation, United Republic of Tanzania, Ms. Stijn Janseen, Special envoy for the Horn of Africa and Head of Division, East and Southern Africa, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, all representatives from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Excellencies, distinguished guests, a very good evening to you!

To my Tanzanian colleagues, Wakati tunaanza kwa kumshukuru Mwenyezi Mungu kwa kutujalia uhai na baraka zake kukutana katika siku hii muhimu, Nawasilimu kwa jina la Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania.

“It is with great honour, and on behalf of the Government and the People of The United Republic of Tanzania, I extend a very warm welcome to you all as we gather this evening to commemorate the 61st anniversary of the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar. In Tanzania, we would say, Karibuni sana. Director Jelte, and all representatives from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, I am humbled and grateful that you have taken time, a midst your busy schedules, to join us and grace this important occasion to Tanzania. Your presence here this evening is a clear testament to the enduring commitment you hold towards strengthening the cordial and long-standing diplomatic relations between the United Republic of Tanzania and the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

We gather with pride and reverence to mark a moment that forever altered the course of our nation’s history. April 26th, 1964, is not just a date on the calendar, it is a defining chapter in Tanzanian story. It is the day when two sovereign nations, Tanganyika and Zanzibar came together in unity, hope, and purpose, to form the United Republic of Tanzania. The country we proudly call our home.

This union was not just a political agreement; it represented a bold vision and an expression of shared values and mutual respect. In a world still healing from colonial divisions, Tanzania emerged as a beacon of solidarity and partnership. Our founding leaders, Mwalimu Julius Kambarage Nyerere and Sheikh Abeid Amani Karume, carved their names in history not for personal gain, but for their lasting legacy of unity, peace, and patriotism. Their wisdom and dedication laid the foundation for the nation we hold dear today. From Zanzibar to Mainland Tanzania, our diversity—encompassing 120 tribes and two major religions, Christianity and Islam—is a source of strength. Our cultures, Kiswahili language, and traditions unite us, fostering a commitment to cooperation and inclusive. These principles underpin our national journey. Today, we see the benefits of unity in our economic growth, social progress, gender equity, and good governance.

Ambassador Caroline Chipeta and Ambassador Jelte van Wieren, Director for Sub-Sahara Africa,  Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands.

According to an IMF report released in April 2025, our inflation has fallen to 3.3%, down from 4.9% last year, while our GDP growth has reached an impressive 5.9% in the past quarter. These figures not only underscore the resilience of our economy but also reflect the Sixth Government’s steadfast commitment to reforms that support an inclusive and prosperous future for all Tanzanians. Our democracy continues to deepen under the visionary leadership of Her Excellency, President Dr. Samia Suluhu Hassan. Through the 4Rs philosophy of Reconciliation, Resilience, Reform, and Rebuild, Tanzania has cultivated a more participatory and peaceful political culture. This renewed spirit of dialogue, championed by the Sixth-Phase Government, reaffirms our commitment to democratic principles and national harmony, which are crucial as we approach the upcoming general elections later this year.

For over six decades, our two nations have fostered a relationship built on mutual respect, shared values, and genuine collaboration. The Netherlands has stood beside Tanzania as a steadfast development partner, contributing meaningfully to key sectors such as agriculture, water, health, education, infrastructure, energy, and trade.

Part of the big group of ambassadors attending Tanzania National Day 2025 in The Hague.

The Netherlands ranks among the top ten countries with significant investments in Tanzania, a reflection of the confidence and commitment Dutch partners continue to place in our nation. Over 100 Dutch companies including Philips, Heineken, KLM, Unilever, Ballast Nedam, ZF DEVCO, Rabobank, BAM, Shell,  just to mention a few, have been actively engaged across diverse sectors in Tanzania. There are also a number of Dutch Tour Operators as well NGOs doing great work in Tanzania, working closely with the Government. These partnerships are not only driving economic progress, but also strengthen the bonds of friendship and cooperation between our peoples.

Director Jelte, It may be recalled that, among the points in the journey of our cordial  diplomatic relations took place when our then Minister for Foreign Affairs and East African Cooperation, paid a working visit to the Kingdom of the 5 Netherlands in November 2023 and during that landmark visit, he held constructive bilateral talks with his counterpart the then Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. As a result of the meaningful discussions and commitments made, we have witnessed notable surge in interest from Dutch companies seeking to invest in or expand their operations in Tanzania. Just this past March, the Embassy together with the Tanzania Investment Centre and the Netherlands–Africa Business Council successfully organized a multi sectoral Trade and Investment Mission to Tanzania. The mission further cemented our shared commitment to fostering sustainable, and mutually beneficial economic partnerships.

Since such high-level exchanges are vital in advancing our shared priorities and deepening strategic collaboration, as we build on these promising developments, we are very much looking forward to a return visit to Tanzania by the Minister for Foreign Affairs, of the Netherlands.

Under the visionary leadership of Her Excellency President Dr. Samia Suluhu Hassan, I assure you that these bonds of friendship and collaboration will not only endure but will continue to flourish, anchored in trust, shared prosperity, and global solidarity.

Equally, I would be remiss if I did not take this opportunity to recognize your invaluable contribution, and that of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, in nurturing and advancing the enduring ties between our nations. Through its various institutions including the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO), Invest International, NUFFIC/OKP, the Netherlands–Africa Business Council (NABC), and through a number Dutch universities, the Ministry has played a pivotal role in supporting impact, long-term partnerships.

H.E. Mr. Francis Danti Kotia, Ambassador of Ghana, H.E. Ms Caroline Chipeta, Ambassador of Tanzania and Mrs. Kotia.

These collaborations have transcended institutions and empowered individuals and communities, driving inclusive development and mutual prosperity. The Dutch commitment to knowledge-sharing, innovation, and private-sector engagement has enriched our cooperation and brought our two nations closer together, both in purpose and practice.

It is also my great pleasure to recognize representatives of some of the Dutch Companies that have chosen to invest in our country. We sincerely thank you for your confidence in our nation,our people and our future. We see you not just as investors, but as valued partners in our journey towards sustainable development and inclusive growth. Your investments have created jobs, transferred knowledge, stimulated innovation and strengthened our economic foundation. My Government remains committed to fostering a stable, transparent and welcoming environment for all who wish to contribute to our progress because we believe, together we are building a future shared success.

The Ambassador of Tanzania to the Netherlands, H.E. Caroline Chipeta.

Thank you for believing in our country

It is with great honour and deep respect, that I would like to extend heartfelt congratulations to His Majesty King Willem-Alexander on the occasion of his 58th birthday, celebrated on 26 April this year. We join the people of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in marking this joyous occasion and wish His Majesty continued good health, happiness, and fulfillment in his service to this great nation.

To my fellow Tanzanians residing in the Netherlands, you remain an essential and cherished part of our national fabric. The responsibility to safeguard the Union, uphold our shared values, and contributing to the building of our nation rests with each and every one of us, home and abroad. Let us carry forward the timeless ideals of unity, patriotism and brotherhood that defined the birth of our Union and continue to guide us on our national journey.

Let our being here as “Tanzanians” continue to symbolize unity, hope, and determination. Let us teach our children the meaning of our Union, not just as a historical fact, but as a living lesson in the power of unity and the promise of collective destiny. May we always stand together as one people, one nation, and one future. Importantly to remember is that, while in the Netherlands, you are the reflection of Tanzania and Tanzanians.

Mrs. Yvonne Madonsela, H.E. Ambassador Caroline Chipeta and the Ambassador of South Africa, H.E. Vusi Madonsela.

Please keep holding high that Flag

Our distinguished guests, Let me pause here to recognize with appreciation my colleagues at the Embassy and the Tanzanian diaspora community through their leaders who have worked tirelessly with the Embassy to make this event memorable. Among other activities, I believe you have taken time to taste Tanzanian Food prepared by Tanzanian ladies in the diaspora.

Happy Union Day! Asanteni sana. Dank u wel. Thank you so much.”

Ambassador Jelte van Wieren, Director for Sub-Sahara Africa, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, also delivered an address.

Looking back, Ambassador Caroline Kitana Chipera joyfully celebrated the 61st anniversary of Tanzania National Union Day  with a vibrant two-day event in The Hague and Rijswijk was truly a memorable occasion filled with joy and connection.

Why Destroy When We Can Build?

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Why Destroy When We Can Build?

By Ambassador Sheikh Mohammed Belal, CEO, Common Fund for Commodities

The math is simple: War = Poverty Investment in people = Prosperity

I write this from The Hague—a city whose very cobblestones echo with the footsteps of diplomats, jurists, and dreamers who believed that peace is not an ideal, but a duty. The same city where, over a century ago, nations gathered not to plan wars, but to prevent them.

The First International Peace Conference, The Hague, May-June 1899_HU67224

Today, as we weigh missiles against medicine, we might recall the haunting words posed to a soldier in an ancient tale: “If all are killed, who do you serve?”

As global leaders converge on The Hague—long hailed as the City of Peace and Justice—for the NATO summit, this question deserves an answer. Defence budgets are reaching historic highs, yet so too are poverty, hunger, and social inequality. The question is not whether nations have the right to defend themselves—it is whether the world can afford the cost of doing so in a way that erodes the very foundations of human dignity.

Once envisioned as a beacon of diplomacy, The Hague now risks being overshadowed by the machinery of militarism. As bombs are prioritized over bread, tanks over teachers, and drones over doctors, we must ask: are we protecting our societies, or impoverishing them?

Staggering Disparities

In 2024, NATO’s overall military spending rose by 11%, with European members increasing their budgets by 19%. Meanwhile, critical infrastructure crumbles. Germany is committing 2% of its GDP to defence even as 40% of its schools lack heating and digital tools. France allocates €50 billion to its military while 20,000 people sleep rough on the streets of Paris.

Globally, military expenditures have soared to an eye-watering $2.7 trillion per year—enough to fund the entire UN system for 75 years. The United States alone accounts for 37% of this, while Russia and Ukraine dedicate 7.1% and 34% of their GDPs respectively to military budgets. These figures are not just unsustainable—they are unjust.

In the Global South, the consequences are even more dire. Many developing countries now spend twice as much on defence as on healthcare. Ethiopia, for example, allocates 17% of its government budget to military spending and just 1% to health. These are not statistics—they are choices that sacrifice futures.

Weapons Over Wellbeing

The opportunity costs are devastating. One modern heavy bomber costs as much as:

  • Building 30 schools
  • Powering two towns
  • Equipping two fully operational hospitals

The war in Afghanistan has already cost the U.S. over $2 trillion, much of it in long-term liabilities like veterans’ care and debt interest. And still, the cycle of violence continues.

For every €1 invested in peacebuilding, the world spends €16 on war. We are allocating 200 times more to armies than to conflict prevention.

An Investment in Justice and Dignity

The Hague is home to the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court, and the OPCW—all institutions grounded in the belief that sustainable peace comes from justice, not domination. Yet these ideals are increasingly dwarfed by the shadow of militarized politics.

At the Common Fund for Commodities (CFC), we see daily how small investments can transform lives. Over the past three years, we have received 873 viable project proposals requesting $770 million—initiatives that could lift communities out of poverty through sustainable agriculture, inclusive finance, and climate-resilient development.

We were able to fund just 6% of them.

The shortfall represents just 0.06% of NATO’s annual budget—a rounding error for global security alliances, yet a lifeline for millions.

With similar modest reallocations:

  • $13 billion could provide clean water and sanitation to 100 million people
  • $5 billion could fund universal primary education in 20 developing nations
  • $500 million could create 2.6 million green jobs

And it’s not just the Global South that would benefit. Germany’s schools require $50 billion in upgrades—just two years’ worth of its new defence spending. France could resolve its housing crisis with a fifth of its military budget. The dividends of peace are local as well as global.

Toward a New Peace Compact

The current trajectory is not inevitable—it is a choice. A better path exists, and it begins here, in The Hague:

  • Launch a NATO Peace Dividend Initiative, earmarking at least 1% of defence budgets for development.
  • Create a Hague-based accountability mechanism to track defence spending versus human development outcomes.
  • Establish binding national commitments that no country spends more on military than on education and healthcare individually, not combined.

Security Rooted in Dignity

True security is not measured in missiles or military drills—it is measured in children who are fed, schools that are built, jobs that sustain dignity, and communities that thrive.

The Hague was not built to host summits of steel and sanctions. It was founded as a sanctuary for justice. It must now reclaim that mantle by advocating for a more just and equitable global order—one in which investment in peace and people outweighs the call to arms.

Let us not confuse deterrence with development. Let us not conflate security with superiority. The world does not need more weapons. It needs more wisdom.

As stewards of peace, we must ask: Why destroy when we can build? Why rob dignity, when we can restore it?

In this city of peace, the answer should be clear.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Common Fund for Commodities or any affiliated institution

The Forgotten Careers of Diplomatic and Military Spouses

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
The Forgotten Careers of Diplomatic and Military Spouses

By Rona Jobe

I remember it vividly. I was jetlagged and overwhelmed, sitting in an outdoor conference-style gathering area, a typical set-up in Brazil, in the U.S. Embassy welcome event. As the presenter pulled up his next slide he motioned to the predominantly female audience saying:

“…for those of you who are just trailing spouses…”

I couldn’t tell you what else he said. I didn’t hear him. Being reduced to a “just” has that effect on me. Initially, I wanted to stand up and yell, “I’m not ‘just’ a spouse. I had an exceptional career in America. I earned multiple degrees and had over a decade of hard-earned work experience. But not ‘just’ that, I am also a proud working mother and the spouse of a diplomat. I don’t trail anyone. I lead and have done so for the majority of my life.”

Despite the many clever comebacks that ran through my mind, I stayed quiet. It was at that moment that it hit me, my identity was now entirely connected to my husband. I was now his “plus one” on every invitation and the “eligible family member” (EFM) on all government documentation. In the eyes of the world, I was “just a trailing spouse.”

SOSA Awards Rona Jobe

As the meeting ended, I looked around and saw the faces of other spouses like me who had also willingly packed up their families and moved to a new country. They left behind extended family, friends, and their comfortable lifestyles to support their spouses’ careers. Many gave up burgeoning careers and pieces of their American dreams to embrace the unknown of an international life. The phrase “just a trailing spouse” didn’t reflect the reality in that room, like EFMs all over the world, these spouses were making significant personal and professional sacrifices, quietly serving their country to support their partner’s diplomatic or military service.

What no one tells you about being in the Foreign Service or military is that with each move—typically every two to three years—is that the spouse is primarily responsible for building the foundation of a new life in a new land. While the officer or service member immediately reports to work to start the role they were specifically hired and trained to do, the spouse is faced with uncertainty as they are tasked with settling the family’s home life. I was acclimating our family to life in an unfamiliar country while executing daily needs in a language I did not speak and trying to maintain some semblance of a career. Keeping things rolling smoothly was like keeping all the plates—school enrollment, paperwork, grocery shopping, learning cultural norms—spinning while walking barefoot on a floor covered with Legos. There is no checklist or onboarding for the spouse; just the expectation that the trailing spouse will figure it out for the entire family.

Despite all the challenges, I consider myself lucky. When we moved to Brazil, I could continue working remotely in my chosen field — a luxury not available to many diplomatic or military spouses. Many are often forced to resign from prestigious high-paying roles in finance, medicine, law, and government simply because they lack the opportunity to carry their careers with them to the new location. For many, the loss of a career isn’t just financial; they lose pieces of their identity, autonomy, and sense of purpose.

Rona Jobe

For those who are able to work remotely, each new country presents a unique set of challenges. Professional credentials don’t always transfer across borders, laws and work visa regulations vary, and a host of other logistical hurdles hinder our ability to work effectively in our host country. Some spouses embrace each relocation as an opportunity to redefine their careers or pursue personal passions without financial gain. They might delve into photography, become fitness instructors, or return to academic pursuits. Conversely, others confront the stark reality of limited job prospects within their professional domains. For these individuals, consulting or freelance work could be viable alternatives, provided they can find companies willing to hire remote employees who frequently relocate.

These obstacles represent a significant challenge for career-driven diplomatic and military spouses. However, it also presents an extraordinary opportunity for businesses. Diplomatic and military spouses possess a distinctive skill set that includes multitasking, drive, openness, innovation, and agility. They demonstrate a strong sense of responsibility, meticulous attention to detail, and—perhaps most importantly—an innate talent for diplomacy. They navigate diverse perspectives and opinions with grace and understand the cultural nuances that shape effective communication and collaboration.

Crafting sustainable career opportunities for EFMs and military spouses also enhances the U.S. government’s effectiveness and mission. When we have access to stable and meaningful remote employment opportunities, it significantly improves the quality of life for diplomatic and military families. This, in turn, directly bolsters the officer or service member’s ability to fulfill the government’s objectives and further incentivizes qualified individuals to join the State Department, military, and other agencies that advance the U.S. mission both at home and abroad.

The career trajectory of a “trailing spouse” need not include employment gaps if U.S. companies can recognize the tremendous value of hiring and retaining these spouses. Businesses stand to benefit greatly from having a globally dispersed workforce capable of operating and sustaining operations when U.S. offices are closed, all without the company having to build overseas infrastructure or pay taxes in those countries. As corporate America grapples with a pressing shortage of skilled workers and acknowledges the productivity and value of remote work, there is a compelling case for tapping into this highly qualified, diverse, and geographically dispersed network to expand global reach in the 21st century.

LVL-Up may be one of the few companies advocating for and providing consistent employment opportunities for diplomatic and military spouses, but they intend to make employment more accessible and flexible.

By training companies how to more effectively hire, train, and retain talented diplomatic and military spouses, they will open up the talent pool for hundreds of organizations while simultaneously providing more career pathways for the family members who support the men and women serving our country around the world.

About the author:

Rona Jobe is the CEO of LVL-Up Strategies. Founded in 2020, LVL-Up Strategies is an SBA 8(a) certified minority-owned, woman-owned small business based out of Arlington, Virginia. Specializing in helping small businesses grow to their potential, LVL-Up offers its clients strategic advisory, operations design and implementation, marketing plans and execution, and business development guidance. LVL-Up’s staff consists of military and Foreign Service spouses who are offered an opportunity to build sustainable careers while serving the United States all over the world.

Malaysia’s Chairmanship of ASEAN in 2025 – Inclusivity and Sustainability

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Malaysia’s Chairmanship of ASEAN in 2025 – Inclusivity and Sustainability

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is a regional organization made up of ten countries in Southeast Asia. Since its establishment in 1967, ASEAN has sought to promote peace, economic growth, and cultural development in a rapidly evolving global environment. With a population exceeding 680 million and a combined GDP of over US$3.6 trillion, ASEAN represents both a significant regional bloc and an important partner on the international stage. Its structure is built around three interconnected pillars: Political-Security, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Communities, united by a commitment to consensus and regional cooperation.


Malaysia’s 2025 Chairmanship: A Key Year

In this milestone year, Malaysia assumes the Chairmanship of ASEAN, coinciding with the 10th anniversary of the formal establishment of the ASEAN Community. Under the theme “Inclusivity and Sustainability,” Malaysia aims to collaborate closely with fellow Member States to foster peace, prosperity, and resilience across the region. The Chairmanship provides an opportunity to lead ASEAN through a period of growing complexity in global and regional affairs.

ASEAN in a Changing Global Landscape

The world today is marked by rapid interconnectedness as well as intensifying global disruptions, from pandemics to supply chain disruptions and rising geopolitical tensions. These developments underscore the growing importance of regional frameworks like ASEAN in supporting stability and multilateral cooperation. Malaysia’s chairmanship will seek to reinforce “ASEAN Centrality,” the guiding principle that places ASEAN at the centre of regional architecture and diplomacy.

Malaysia has identified three strategic priority areas for its chairmanship, reflecting both current global challenges and long-term aspirations for the ASEAN Community.

Priority Area 1: Promoting Regional Peace, Stability and Security

Malaysia will continue to emphasize trust-building, sustained diplomatic engagement, and constructive dialogue to foster a peaceful and stable regional order. During its ASEAN chairmanship, Malaysia aims to expand and deepen ASEAN’s partnerships with international partners and promote a cooperative framework anchored in mutual respect and pragmatic principles. In doing so, Malaysia seeks to reaffirm ASEAN’s role as a key player in regional peace and security.

Priority Area 2: Enhancing Trade and Investment

The second priority focuses on strengthening economic integration within ASEAN and enhancing ties with global partners. High-level events, such as the ASEAN-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Summit and the ASEAN-GCC-China Summit in Kuala Lumpur, will serve as platforms to boost economic collaboration.

In parallel, ASEAN will prioritize technological advancement and digital transformation as essential drivers of economic resilience. ASEAN will continue to capitalise on developments in science, technology, and innovation while maximising the benefits of digital transformation across Member States as means to achieve inclusive and sustainable economic growth.

Priority Area 3: Advancing Inclusivity and Sustainability in Regional Development

The third focus area highlights the importance of narrowing development disparities within ASEAN. Malaysia’s chairmanship will promote inclusive growth by addressing social and economic inequalities, improving living standards, and strengthening climate resilience.

Sustainability is at the heart of this agenda. ASEAN will work collectively to tackle climate change challenges to foster sustainable development, economic growth, and shared prosperity that benefits all segments of society.

ASEAN Community Vision 2045: Charting a Strategic Path Forward

A key outcome of Malaysia’s chairmanship will be the adoption of the ASEAN Community Vision 2045, a comprehensive roadmap guiding ASEAN community-building initiatives over the next two decades.

The Vision aims to transform ASEAN into a more resilient, innovative, dynamic, and people-centred Community. It will outline ASEAN’s approach to existing and emerging global trends through more effective and innovative responses, while simultaneously reinforcing ASEAN Centrality. On the international stage, the Vision will position ASEAN as a more influential global stakeholder capable of making substantive contributions to worldwide development efforts.

Fostering Trans-Regional Cooperation: ASEAN, Europe and the Netherlands

Malaysia’s ASEAN Chairmanship presents valuable opportunities for enhanced ASEAN-Netherlands cooperation. For a globally engaged nation like the Netherlands, stronger ASEAN integration offers mutual benefits in trade, innovation, climate action, and education. Malaysia deeply appreciates the European Union including the Netherlands’ support in working towards a successful ASEAN Chairmanship under Malaysia’s leadership.

Malaysia’s ASEAN Chairmanship in 2025 is both a responsibility and an opportunity to lead with vision and resolve. By championing inclusivity and sustainability, Malaysia will work to ensure that ASEAN remains a cohesive, dynamic, and forward-looking community. As ASEAN looks to the future, partnerships with international partners including the Netherlands will be crucial in promoting mutual growth, peace, and shared prosperity.

Italy: A Journey Between Innovation, Tradition, Art and Entertainment

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Italy: A Journey Between Innovation, Tradition, Art and Entertainment

By Roy LIe Atjam

On 15 April 2025, the National Made in Italy Day was celebrated at the Italian Cultural Institute in Amsterdam with an event entitled

“Italy: A Journey Between Innovation,Tradition, Art and Entertainment”

Made in Italy 2025

In his opening speech, the Italian Ambassador to the Netherlands H.E. Mr. Augusto Massari stressed the importance of Made in Italy as a symbol of passion for beauty, innovation and tradition. The choice to celebrate the event on April 15, the birthday of Leonardo da Vinci, is a tribute to the Italian genius.

Ambassador Massari also recalled that Made in Italy is synonymous with quality, creativity and elegance, thanks to the regulations that guarantee authenticity. In a competitive world, Italy is a key player, with more than 500 Italian companies in the Netherlands (29,000 jobs and a turnover of €19 billion) and trade with the Netherlands that amounted to €55 billion in 2024.

Made in Italy 2025

“The real value of Made in Italy,” said the Ambassador, “lies in the human capital that transforms natural resources into unique products and brings innovation to a wide range of sectors.” This is the secret of Italian success: doing things with passion, as Leonardo da Vinci did, who combined art and science.

During the event, art historian Matteo Fochessati outlined the history of Made in Italy in art, design and film, from Gio Ponti to the transatlanticists and the icons of the silver screen. The second part discussed sustainable water technologies, with speeches by RAI Amsterdam, EMEC and Atlas Filtri, leading Italian companies in the Netherlands and in the world.

Emec, Atlas e RAI representative. Made in Italy 2025.

A successful 2nd edition of the National Day of Made in Italy in Amsterdam.

Italy has very few natural resources of its own, yet the country ranks high in various industries. Italians ensure that their products are glamorous, stylish, and enjoyable, embodying the delightful essence of Italy. The focus on glamour is unique to Italian manufacturers, setting them apart from others in the market.

Atlas Filtri- Made in Italy 2025.

Copenhagen Democracy Summit

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Copenhagen Democracy Summit

The Copenhagen Democracy Summit 2025, held on May 13–14 at the Royal Danish Playhouse, convened global leaders, activists, and innovators to address the pressing challenges facing democracies worldwide.

Organized by the Alliance of Democracies Foundation, the summit emphasized themes such as defending democratic values, countering authoritarianism, and leveraging technology to bolster democratic institutions .(Copenhagen Democracy Summit 2025, Copenhagen Democracy Summit 2025).

Anders Fogh Rasmussen Founder and Chairman of The Alliance of Democracies Foundation David Cameron Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Photo Hasse Ferrold COPENHAGEN DEMOCRACY SUMMIT 13 05 2025 10.

Key Themes and Discussions

1. Democracy Under Pressure:
The summit highlighted the increasing threats to democratic systems, including the rise of authoritarian regimes and internal challenges within democratic nations. Discussions centered on the need for renewed commitment to democratic principles and the importance of international cooperation to uphold these values.

2. Technology and Democracy:
A significant focus was placed on the intersection of technology and democratic governance. Speakers addressed how technological advancements can both support and undermine democratic processes. Emphasis was placed on developing frameworks to ensure technology serves as a tool for enhancing transparency, civic engagement, and the protection of human rights.

3. Global Democratic Solidarity:
The summit underscored the importance of solidarity among democratic nations. Discussions included strategies for collective action against authoritarian influences and support for nations striving to establish or maintain democratic systems .(Via Ritzau, allianceofdemocracies.org)

The Ambassadors of Sweden (L), Fritz Schur (M), Ambassador of Finland (R). Photo Hasse Ferrold COPENHAGEN DEMOCRACY SUMMIT 13 05 2025 12

The summit featured a diverse lineup of speakers, including political leaders, activists, and experts from around the world. While the full list of speakers is extensive, some notable participants included:

  • Mette Frederiksen, Prime Minister of Denmark, who delivered opening remarks emphasizing Denmark’s commitment to democratic values.
  • Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Founder and Chairman of the Alliance of Democracies Foundation, who highlighted the need for a united front among democracies to address global challenges.(Copenhagen Democracy Summit 2025)
  • Jacob Mchangama, Executive Director of The Future of Free Speech, who discussed the role of free speech in the digital age.(LinkedIn)

These speakers, among others, contributed to a rich dialogue on the state of democracy and the paths forward .(Copenhagen Democracy Summit 2025)

The Copenhagen Democracy Summit 2025 served as a crucial platform for dialogue and collaboration among democratic stakeholders. By addressing current challenges and exploring innovative solutions, the summit reinforced the collective commitment to safeguarding and advancing democratic ideals in an increasingly complex global landscape.

Conscientious objection in war times

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Conscientious objection in war times

A Brussels-based NGO writes to the Constitutional Court

12 May 2025 

To the Acting Headof the Constitutional Court of Ukraine Petryshyn Oleksandr Volodymyrovych 

Dear Oleksandr Volodymyrovych, The international human rights organization “Human Rights Without Frontiers,” in cooperation with several European religious organizations, is closely following the proceedings regarding the constitutional complaint submitted by Ukrainian citizen Dmytro Zelinskyi.

This matter is of fundamental importance to all conscientious objectors in Ukraine, especially those whose religious beliefs do not allow them to bear arms or perform other forms of military work. 

Dmytro Zelinskyi was sentenced under Article 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine to three years of imprisonment for evading military conscription during mobilization in a special period. He justified his inability to serve in the military on the basis of his religious beliefs, as he has been a member of the “Christian community of the Seventh-day Adventist Church” for over 20 years.

He expressed his willingness to perform alternative non-military service, but such a right was denied due to the absence of relevant legal provisions allowing for alternative (non-military) service during mobilization in a special period. Dmytro Zelinskyi filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court of Ukraine requesting a review of the conformity of Part 1 of Article 1 of the Law of Ukraine “On Alternative (Non-Military) Service” with Part 4 of Article 35 of the Constitution of Ukraine. In his complaint, he states that “Part 4 of Article 35 of the Constitution of Ukraine pertains to the fulfillment of military duty in general.

Therefore, alternative (non-military) service should be introduced in place of all forms of military service, not only compuls service”; “however, the provisions of the Law allow alternative (non-military) service to substitute only for compulsory military service, which does not exist during martial law. This entirely nullifies the realization of the constitutional right provided by Part 4 of Article 35 of the Constitution of Ukraine and is thus unconstitutional.” 

Zelinskyi points out that “the Constitution of Ukraine guarantees exemption from military service for citizens whose religious beliefs do not allow them to bear arms. Moreover, no law has been adopted in accordance with Article 64 of the Constitution of Ukraine that would restrict the rights granted by Article 35 during martial law.” Therefore, he believes the current provisions of the Law contradict the Constitution, and the right to alternative (non-military) service must be guaranteed at all times. 

On 18 March 2025, the Venice Commission published an opinion prepared at the request of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. In this opinion, the Venice Commission thoroughly analyzes the issues raised in Zelinskyi’s constitutional complaint in light of international human rights standards.  The Venice Commission clearly stated that: – Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which concern freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, guarantee the right to conscientious objection to military service; – According to the European Convention on Human Rights, states must establish a system of alternative service that is separate from the military structure, is not punitive in nature, and remains within reasonable time limits.

Access to alternative service must be non-discriminatory and subject to fair and transparent mechanisms; – The very nature of conscientious objection implies that it cannot be entirely excluded during wartime; – The state cannot invoke national security as the sole justification for restricting the right of individuals or groups to practice their religion; – Any restrictions on the right to conscientious objection must be clearly prescribed by law, pursue a legitimate aim, be strictly limited to what is evidently necessary to achieve that aim, and be proportionate to that aim. 

The Commission also emphasizes that “under no circumstances can a conscientious objector be forced to carry or use weapons, even for self-defense.” We are deeply concerned by the fact that dozens of believers who refused military service during martial law solely for religious reasons are currently serving sentences in prison.

Other believers who refuse mobilization on religious grounds are being criminally prosecuted under Article 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. They were not provided with the right to alternative (non-military) service guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine and international human rights standards. This represents a serious human rights violation that requires urgent constitutional response. 

The Constitutional Court is now essentially tasked with ensuring that Ukrainian believers are able to exercise their constitutional rights and fulfill their duty to Ukraine in a way that does not involve imprisonment. 

We are gravely troubled by the fact that the case of Dmytro Zelinskyi has not yet been resolved, even though the six-month period provided by law has already expired. We call for a transparent, fair, and timely review of this case, which is of vital importance to many believers in Ukraine who wish to exercise their constitutional rights according to their conscience. 

In view of the above, we kindly request information regarding the scheduled date for consideration of this case by the Constitutional Court.

Respectfully, 
Willy Fautré 
Director and Co-Founder 
“Human Rights Without Frontiers International”

“Tea for Harmony – Yaji Cultural Salon” and “Jiangxi Day” Promotion Event Held in Morocco

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
“Tea for Harmony – Yaji Cultural Salon” and “Jiangxi Day” Promotion Event Held in Morocco

NANCHANG, China, May 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The “Tea for Harmony – Yaji Cultural Salon” and the “Unique Landscape in Jiangxi – Jiangxi Day in Morocco” promotion event were held on May 9 in Rabat, the capital of Morocco. More than 120 guests from various sectors in both China and Morocco attended the event.

The event was co-hosted by the Jiangxi Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism, the Chinese Culture Center in Rabat, and the Network of International Culturalink Entities, with special support from the Moroccan Tea and Coffee Industry Association.

Ye Jianchun, Governor of Jiangxi Province, delivered a speech highlighting three key cultural symbols: tea culture, ceramic art, and intangible cultural heritage. He introduced Jiangxi as a province with picturesque landscapes, a rich cultural legacy, and dynamic development. He expressed his belief that this cultural dialog between Jiangxi and Morocco would yield even more fruitful results. Governor Ye also expressed hope that both sides would leverage their unique strengths to further deepen cooperation and openness in the fields of culture and tourism.

Guests visiting the photo exhibition during Jiangxi – Jiangxi Day in Morocco.

Li Changlin, Chinese Ambassador to Morocco, also delivered a speech, inviting Moroccan guests to visit Jiangxi. He noted the positive momentum in China-Morocco relations and emphasized Jiangxi’s advantages in sectors such as aviation, electronic information, equipment manufacturing, traditional medicine, new energy, and new materials. He expressed hope for expanding cooperation opportunities with Morocco.

During the event, Chinese and Moroccan tea artists performed tea ceremonies together. Other highlights included a tourism promotion event titled “Unique Landscape in Jiangxi”, a photo exhibition “Picturesque Jiangxi with Unique Landscape”, a ceramic art exhibition “New Charm of Porcelain from Jiangxi,” a tea culture exhibition named “Orchid Charm Meets Jiangxi”, and live demonstrations of Jiangxi’s intangible cultural heritage.

Source: Jiangxi Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism

Denmark Remembers: 80 Years Since Liberation from Nazi Rule

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Denmark Remembers: 80 Years Since Liberation from Nazi Rule

This May marks 80 years since Denmark was liberated from Nazi occupation. The official commemorations for the 80th anniversary began at 15:30 with a special service at Vor Frue Kirke in Copenhagen. The Royal Family, members of the Danish Parliament, diplomats, and veterans of the resistance attended the service.

The event was broadcast on DR and TV2 from 19:30 to 21:00, and featured a performance by the Copenhagen Boys’ Choir (Københavns Drengekor).

Later, the Royal Family and veterans proceeded to Mindelunden in Ryvangen — a memorial park dedicated to Danish resistance fighters and civilians who died during the Nazi occupation. Originally a site for executions and burials, Mindelunden hosted a ceremony that included a speech by Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, musical performances by DR Pigekoret (DR’s Girls’ Choir), a community sing-along, and a wreath-laying.

Across Denmark, additional commemorations took place, including ceremonies, concerts, and public gatherings, all paying tribute to the nation’s journey from occupation to freedom.

Malaysia: VNM Talks – Perspectives on Malaysia

Diplomat Magazine
-
0
Malaysia: VNM Talks – Perspectives on Malaysia

By Roy LIe Atjam

The Embassy of Malaysia in the Netherlands, in collaboration with the Vereniging Nederland-Maleisië(VNM), proudly hosted the annual VNM Talks under the theme “Perspectives on Malaysia”at the Embassy of Malaysia in The Hague on April 11, 2025.

The lineup of speakers at Malaysia VNM Talks.

H.E. Dato’ Rosli Abdul, the Ambassador of Malaysia, warmly welcomed the guests and officially opened the event. The lineup of speakers was impressive and included: Introduction by Mr. Hans van de Bunte, Chairman of the Vereniging Nederland-Maleisië.

Hans van Bunte and Martijn Habers during Malaysia VNM Talks.

Presentation I “Malaysia’s ASEAN Chairmanship 2025” by Mohd Ishrin bin Mohd Ishak, Deputy Chief of Mission. –

Presentation II: “Sustainable Palm Oil in Malaysia” by Inke van der Sluijs, Director of Market Transformation at the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).

Presentation III: “The Grand Tour — A Study Trip to Malaysia” by Martijn Habers from the Technical University of Delft. –

Presentation IV: Book Discussion and Photo Presentation on “An Indonesian Woman in Malaysia” by Rick Honings and Coen van ’t Veer from Leiden .

The successful Perspectives on Malaysia event concluded with a traditional Malaysian hospitality treat.

A cross-section of the audience. Malaysia VNM Talks.
123...857Page 1 of 857