President Agius presents Mechanism’s Seventeenth Progress Report to UN Security Council

The President of the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (Mechanism), Judge Carmel Agius, presented the Mechanism’s seventeenth progress report to the United Nations Security Council (Council) by video-teleconference from The Hague.

At the outset, President Agius reflected on the tenth anniversary of the Mechanism’s establishment on 22 December, recalling the determination of the international community to continue fighting against impunity for serious violations of international humanitarian law by taking the bold step of creating a new kind of judicial institution. He also recalled the recent seventy-fifth anniversary of the United Nations, noting that: “Milestone events such as these remind us of our raison d’être and allow us to take stock of the progress we have made, as well as how much more remains to be done. By doing so, they encourage us to reaffirm the values that unite us and underlie our daily work […].”

Turning to ongoing challenges, President Agius reported on the Mechanism’s ability to remain operational and achieve significant results throughout the reporting period, despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, including by relying on its inherent and distinctive features, such as provisions allowing for the remote participation of Judges, parties or witnesses in court hearings. In this context, he acknowledged and sincerely thanked the Mechanism’s Judges and staff for their outstanding commitment.

With respect to the Mechanism’s pending judicial caseload, the President stated that a significant portion is anticipated to be completed by the end of May next year, confirming the Mechanism’s readiness and resolve in ensuring the completion of these cases by their projected dates.

President Agius informed the Council that the appeal hearing in the Mladić case took place in late August, while the case is expected to conclude in May 2021. He further confirmed that in the Stanišić & Simatović case, the evidentiary hearings concluded in October and the trial judgement is likewise expected by the end of May 2021.

In relation to the ongoing contempt cases, in the trial against Maximilien Turinabo et al. in Arusha, which commenced on 22 October, the President noted the conclusion of the presentation of Prosecution witnesses and the anticipated start of the Defence phase in the first part of 2021, with the trial judgement also expected in May 2021.

Regarding the contempt case against Petar Jojiæ and Vjerica Radeta, President Agius informed the Member States of a decision, issued on 8 December by the Single Judge seised of the matter, “reiterating the previous request to Serbia to comply with its obligation to transfer the accused to the seat of the Mechanism in The Hague without delay”.

Furthermore, the President briefed the Council on the start of the pre-trial proceedings in the Kabuga case, in which the accused’s initial appearance took place on 11 November, following his transfer to the Mechanism’s custody in The Hague in October. Finally, with the formal closure of the case against fugitive Augustin Bizimana on account of his death, the President noted that there are only six fugitives of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda remaining and underscored that the search for them continues to be a top priority for the Mechanism.  

The President then turned to the safety and well-being of all persons under the Mechanism’s supervision in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasising the system of heightened vigilance and strict measures in place at the Mechanism’s detention facilities in The Hague and Arusha under the supervision of the Mechanism’s new Registrar, Mr Abubacarr Tambadou. President Agius also expressed his heartfelt gratitude to each of the Mechanism’s 15 enforcement States for their generous cooperation and support in relation to the 50 convicted persons currently serving their sentences, including Belgium, which became the fifteenth enforcement State in September.

Speaking of cooperation more generally, the President reiterated that: “[T]he support of Member States is crucial to the Mechanism’s ability to effectively discharge its functions, and we will continue to rely on your valuable assistance in the months and years to come.”

In conclusion,  President Agius expressed his deep gratitude to the Members of the Council on behalf of the Mechanism, “for all the support provided since the Mechanism was brought into being ten years ago”, conveying his hopes that the Mechanism will make important headway during the coming reporting period, and ultimately be successful in fulfilling its mandate.

Oman establishes order of succession

Tuesday, 12 January 2020, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman: His Majesty Sultan Haitham bin Tariq bin Taimur Al Said issued a decree establishing an agnatic primogeniture order of succession, thereby making his eldest son, HH Sayyid Theyazin bin Haitham Al Said the country’s very first Crown Prince of Oman in history.  

Under Article 5 of the new Fundamental Law, the Sultanic throne “is passed on to the eldest of his sons, then to the eldest of the latter’s sons, and so forth”.

Oman’s constitution sets forth that the sultan ought to be a member of the ruling family as well as “Muslim, mature, rational and the legitimate son of Omani Muslim parents”.

Sultan Haitham took the throne in January 2020 after the death of his cousin Sultan Qaboos bin Said, who sired no children and designated no successor publicly during his 49-year reign.

Haitham’s move to designate a crown prince could strengthen the predictability of Omani politics, following the final years of Qaboos’s rule, when secrecy about the succession raised concerns for stability.

HH Sayyid Theyazin occupies the post of Minister of Culture, Sports and Youth since August 2020. He is the eldest son of HM Sultan Haitham bin Tariq, and HM Sultana Ahad bint Abdullah bin Hamad Al Busaidiya, a daughter of a former Undersecretary at the Ministry of Justice, Awqaf, and Islamic Affairs and former Governor of Musandam. He has three siblings, Sayyid Bilarab, Sayyida Thuraya and Sayyida Omaima. 

Sayyid Theyazin bin Haitham bin Tariq Al Said (b. Muscat, 21 August 1990), a diplomat who entered the Omani diplomatic service in 2013, and had been serving at the Omani Embassy in London (accredited to St James’s Court & Ireland) since 2014. He holds a Master’s degree in History from Oxford Brooks University.

Crown Prince Theyazin is engaged to his cousin, HH Sayyida Meyyan bint Shihab, daughter of Deputy Prime Minister for Defence Affairs, HH Sayyid Shihab bin Tariq Al Said. Sayyida Meyyan is an interior designer, and talented artist who has mastered the art of photography and digital art.

The House of Said rules since 1744 over Muscat, Oman and erstwhile over Zanzibar. Albeit the succession has normally gone down from father to son, there was no formal heir apparent until modifications in the Basic Law of the State. 

For further information: 
Ministry of Culture, Sports and Youth of Oman: https://omanportal.gov.om/wps/wcm/connect/en/site/home/gov/gov1/gov5governmentorganizations/mosa/mosa

62nd anniversary of the Cuban Revolution

Cubans celebrated on January 1, the 62nd anniversary of the triumph of the Revolution

A challenging year, marked by the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic, which in the case of Cuba, combined with the strengthening of the economic, financial and commercial blockade by the United States, causing a severe impact on the country’s economy.

However, the Cuban government has pursued with the 2030 National Strategic Economic and Social Plan, which starts on January 1, 2021 with the process of monetary and exchange regulations reforming salaries, worker pensions, State subsidies and the like.

In 2021, the investment plan has increased by 22% compared to 2020, with 60% of the resources concentrated in priority sectors such as food production, pharmaceutical products; defence, tourism; renewable energy, housing programs, cement and steel production plants. Its economic policy for 2021 also prioritizes import substitution, production incentives and direct foreign investment.

In parallel, Cuba continues the process of modernizing national legislation within the new Constitution from April 19, 2019,  allowing popular consultations and a referendum on the new Family Code.

In 2020, Cuba demonstrated a good management of Covid-19, with a high recovery rate thanks to effective treatments, the adoption of a comprehensive and multidisciplinary strategy including the support from the biopharmaceutical sector.  In addition, the Cuban government has adopted measures to help Cuban citiznes overseas.

The World Health Organization (WHO) included two Cuban vaccines in its program, which have already entered the clinical trial phases in the island. The “Finlay Institute” confirmed its ability to immunize the Cuban population against the SARS CoV-2 virus in the first semester of 2021. The WHO also included in its Vaccine Data System two additional Cuban candidates that are under development.

Cuba has sent more than 53 medical brigades to more than 39 countries and territories. 57 years of medical cooperation around the world has motivated the nomination of the Cuban Henry Reeve Medical Brigades, specialized in disasters and serious epidemics, for the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize.

In 2020 Cuba registered an infant mortality rate of 4.9 per thousand live births and in UNESCO’s World Education Monitoring Report 2020, it highlights 100% of preschool coverage.

Wales in Germany 2021

Welsh First Minister, The Rt Hon Professor Mark Drakeford.

Monday, 11 January 2020, Cardiff, Principality of Wales, United Kingdom & Federal Republic of Germany: Welcoming in the New Year, Welsh First Minister, The Rt Hon Professor Mark Drakeford announced plans for a year of activity to celebrate and strengthen the historic ties between Wales and Germany. 

‘Wales in Germany 2021’ will highlight a themed year of activity to showcase the relationship between Germany and Wales with events taking place throughout the year. The planned events will highlight Wales and Germany’s business networks, cultural ties and other partnerships. These events begin the Welsh Government’s renewed push to increase Wales’ international profile and increase collaboration post-EU membership. 

First Minister Mark Drakeford will begin the year of celebration by virtually meeting with the German Ambassador to the UK, Herr Andreas Michaelis on Monday 11 January. 

Welcoming the year of ‘Wales in Germany 2021’ First Minister Mark Drakeford said: 

“Our already deep ties with Germany have grown ever stronger, and now, more than ever, we want to celebrate these ties and see them flourish. We are not a nation defined by Brexit, but a nation that has always been outward looking, internationalist and welcoming.   

 “I’m delighted that we’re beginning 2021 with a celebration of our close historical ties between Wales and Germany. It’s a celebration of not just our economic ties to a major European ally, but of culture and globalisation. Our two nations have always worked closely together across a number of areas such as science, education and innovation as well as culture, tourism and the arts, and we have every intention that these close ties will continue to prosper.” 

As part of celebrating ‘Wales in Germany 2021’ Deputy Minister and Chief Whip Jane Hutt will attend a virtual panel event with the German diaspora in Wales, along with the Helga Rother-Simmonds, the German Honorary Consul to Wales, Professor Colin Riordan, President and Vice Chancellor at Cardiff University, on Monday 11 January. 

The First Minister finished by saying: 

“Many Welsh people call Germany their home and many Germans have chosen Wales to be theirs. From the firefighters of Ravensburg to the communities of Rhondda Cynon Taf, towns and cities across our nations are twinned and friendships have been forged. These ties will prosper, and as Wales starts a new journey on the world stage, we have made it clear that we’re open for business, that we are welcoming to new opportunities and our bonds of friendship remain steadfast. 

“We may have left the EU, however, the cultural and historical ties between Wales and our European partners will never be broken.” 

For further information 

Welsh Government: https://media.service.gov.wales/news/wales-in-germany-2021-is-a-celebration-of-our-historic-ties-that-wont-falter-because-of-brexit-welsh-first-minister-mark-drakeford
https://www.wales.com/de/wales-deutschland-2021?fbclid=IwAR2H-23gXnhpqkSEZ7d_de6WfwMuT1QiaMVLnze0J3Lv7xO0wXr2F4mluLI

UK Embassy in Germany, message by HE Ambassador Jill Gallardhttps://www.facebook.com/UKinGermany/posts/3719511321450389
About the First Minister of Wales: https://gov.wales/rt-hon-mark-drakeford-ms

—————–

Picture courtesy of the Welsh Government

AFCFTA comes into force

Botswana’s President, Dr Mokgweetsi Masisi_ AU Chair Moussa Faki and Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame – Picture by African Union

Friday, 1 January 2021, African Union: 2021 marks the outset of trading under African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement.

It is expected the AfCFTA ought to boost intra-African trade, promote industrialization and competitiveness as well as contribute to job creation. Likewise it shall unleash regional value chains that ought to facilitate Africa’s meaningful integration into the global economy.

This agreement was established under the Constitutive Act of the African Union of 2000, the Treaty Establishing the African Economic Community of 1991 and, where applicable the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organisation of 1994.AfCFTA covers a market of 1.2 billion people and a gross domestic product (GDP) of $2.5 trillion, across all 55 member States of the African Union.


For further information:
African Union: https://au.int/en/ti/cfta/about

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Continental_Free_Trade_Area

Slovenia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Visits OPCW

OPCW’s Director-General H.E. Fernando Arias, and The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Slovenia, H.E. Dr Anže Logar. Photography OPCW.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Slovenia, H.E. Dr Anže Logar, met December 15th with the Director-General of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), H.E. Mr. Fernando Arias, at OPCW Headquarters in The Hague.

The Director-General briefed the Minister of Foreign Affairs on the OPCW’s progress in implementing the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Organisation’s activities in addressing challenges to achieving a world free of chemical weapons. The meeting also focused on the opportunities to further strengthen cooperation between the Organization and Slovenia, particularly in light of the upcoming Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union in the second half of 2021.

Minister Logar congratulated the Director-General and the Technical Secretariat for their dedicated work despite the challenging conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic. Condemning the re-emergence of prohibited use of chemical agents in recent years, he stressed the importance of assuring accountability for such crimes. He further welcomed the new Centre for Chemistry and Technology, which Slovenia supported with a voluntary financial contribution.

The Minister remarked, “Slovenia resolutely supports the Chemical Weapons Convention as one of the pillars of disarmament, and will continue to offer every support to the work of OPCW”.  Director-General Arias expressed his gratitude for Slovenia’s support for the work of the Organisation and expressed: “Slovenia is an important partner in preserving an international consensus against chemical weapons.

We look forward to our continued cooperation in translating this consensus into effective action for the benefit of international peace and security.”H.E. Dr Anže Logar, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Slovenia and H.E. Mr Fernando Arias, Director-General of the OPCW look at the proposed design of the new OPCW ChemTech CentreBackgroundSlovenia has been an active member of the OPCW since the Chemical Weapons Convention entered into force

Can you change an employment contract unilaterally?

By Jan Dop, LL.M.

Working from home, less turnover, a hard lockdown, these are all current issues due to Covid-19. As a result, employers may need to amend employment contracts with their employees. Think, for example, of a travel allowance, a homeworking expense allowance or a bonus scheme, but also the obligation to take holidays, such as during the Christmas period, or a (temporary) reduction in salary. How can you arrange this?
 

Unilateral changes clause

One of the arrangements you can make in an employment contract is that as an employer you have the right to unilaterally change terms and conditions of employment. Without such a clause, you may not, in principle, change the employment contract without the employee’s consent.

In practice, it is also possible to unilaterally change the terms of employment without a unilateral changes clause, but in that case it is much more difficult. And even if you have agreed on a unilateral changes clause, this is not a licence to arbitrarily change arrangements made. An important question in this context is whether the coronavirus crisis can be regarded as a substantial interest of the employer to unilaterally change an employment contract. There has been a lot of jurisprudence on this subject. And if a works council has been set up in your company, it is important to check whether it has to be involved in the decision-making.
 

When can you unilaterally change terms of employment?

An employer can only successfully invoke a unilateral changes clause if the following four conditions are met:

1. The unilateral changes clause has been agreed in writing
The unilateral changes clause cannot be agreed orally. The clause must therefore be in writing, either in the employment contract or in a collective agreement or any other document that is part of the employment contract, such as a staff manual or a lease arrangement. In addition, the employee must have agreed to the clause.

2. The change concerns terms and conditions of employment that are included in the contract
The clause does not provide the employer with the opportunity to add new terms and conditions of employment, only to change existing arrangements. Although it is not ruled out that primary terms and conditions of employment (salary) can be changed unilaterally, in practice this will concern mainly terms and conditions of employment such as a leave scheme or travel expenses.

3. The employer must have a substantial interest in the change
A substantial interest of the employer can be a commercial or organisational interest. This could involve, for instance reduction of the operational costs or restructuring. The current coronavirus crisis can be a compelling reason to implement a (fundamental) change in the employment contract, such as the obligation to take holidays.

4. The interest of the employer outweighs the interest of the employee
When the employer has taken the abovementioned three hurdles, finally, there will be a balancing of interests. The interest of the employer in the change must be such that the interest of the employee in maintaining the existing situation must give way.
 

Changing terms and conditions of employment without unilateral change clause

If no unilateral changes clause has been included in the employment contract or collective agreement, the employer has to rely for changes on the employee’s approval. However, in some cases the employer can unilaterally change the agreement. In accordance with the law, an employee has to behave as a good employee. Therefore, he can only reject a reasonable proposal from his employer if he cannot reasonably be expected to agree to the change.

The main difference is that in case of a unilateral changes clause, the employee will have to demonstrate that the employer has wrongly invoked it. If there is no such clause, the burden of proof shall lie with the employer. He will have to prove that the proposal is reasonable and that the employee cannot simply reject it. In addition, the employer must indicate the changed conditions on the basis of which he, as a good employer, wishes to change the employment contract.
 

Changing terms and conditions of employment and the works council

If, for example, a change is made to the homeworking scheme or the holiday scheme, you must ask the works council’s permission. When doing so, remember that the cooperation of the works council does not mean that you do no longer have to ask your employees’ approval. In general, it is assumed that the employer does have a substantial interest if the works council has approved the change. Without this approval, it will be difficult for the employer to demonstrate a substantial interest in the change.
 

Our advice

  • Include a unilateral changes clause in an employment contract.
  • Consult with the works council on changes to the terms and conditions of employment.
  • Ask for legal advice if you want to change an employment contract unilaterally.

About the Author:

Jan Dop

Jan Dop from Russell Avocaten, assists national and international enterprises in all facets of their day-to-day business operations. He specializes in personnel, real estate and issues involving public authorities.

Jan is Head of Russell Avocaten’s Embassy Desk, that serves Embassies, Consulates, diplomats and expats. He has been a lawyer at Russell since 1995, and became a partner in 2011.
 

@: jan.dop@russell.nl | t: +31 20 301 55 55

Stop, Federal Agent!

By Alexandra Paucescu.

Stop, federal agent! … Who did not hear that phrase, at least once? Hollywood action movies, one of America’s best cultural diplomacy tools, are popular all over the world and fascinate us all. Men and women in dark blue uniforms, catching the ‘bad guys’ and saving the world from catastrophe, are kind of modern days heroes.

Kristine Celorio was until not too long ago one of them.

Beautiful Californian girl, with big dreams and high career goals, great at her job, she decided to follow a Master degree program in Spain and there… she lived one of those famous encounters, that changed her life 180 degrees. She met her future husband, Mexican born diplomat and what started as a long distance relationship turned later into a solid marriage. However, it took her six years to decide and make the move.

Being a federal agent and working in a team that specialized on investigating fraud and ‘white collar’ crimes was greatly rewarding and fulfilled Kristine’s early career aspirations, but eventually love won.

Kristine Celorio, US Federal agent – Diplomatic spouse

After all, most of us, diplomatic spouses, have been through this at one point in our life… facing this big dilemma: what should I do, is it worth it?

‘I really enjoyed my job’ she says. ‘It was exciting, different every day and I was helping people, making a difference. But one thing I loved more was travelling. So, leaving my job to marry a diplomat was like leaving a dream for another.’

She tried to find a way to transfer her previous highly trained skills into a corporate job, but it proved to be more difficult than imagined. She then decided to focus on family and her two adorable children.

Raising bilingual children is a rich and diverse experience. But she warns us: ‘Pay attention to what local traditions your kids are embracing, which may not be your own! As they grow up in a country different from yours, some things and customs become important to them, which normally wouldn’t even cross your mind. You have to constantly pay attention, get out of your normal comfort zone and immerse into a new day-to-day reality of a foreign country, where you are posted for just a limited time’.

While she is now ‘home in Mexico’, she started blogging. In her blog, ‘Irish I were Mexican’, she likes to present her beautiful adoptive country, which she says ‘is often unfairly portrayed in the media and has countless marvelous places and traditions to offer to the world’. Her blog also generously hosts other diplomatic spouses’ experiences from around the Globe, picturing beautiful places through the eyes of others and offering great travel tips, too.

‘Also, I have recently become interested in how foreign born spouses, like myself, help represent a country different from their own, often with zero guidance or training. I often argue that being a diplomat’s spouse is the only job that is not a job there is. You simply step into a role just based on your relationship alone’.

Her investigative nature and previous training determined her to run a survey and study the percentage of foreign born spouses into the diplomatic world. The results were quite surprising, showing a lot of our fellow diplomatic partners actually living this experience, sometimes quite demanding and delicate.

She says that she found the diplomatic community largely warm and welcoming and, although you often walk into a room where you don’t know anyone, you have to remember that most of the people there are probably in the same situation, having the same anxiety and fears.

‘People often equate diplomatic life to sticking to conventions, but we really constantly bend and flex to accommodate and celebrate difference’. I can imagine it wasn’t easy for her. Learning a new language, traditions and trying to be a good host on foreign territory, under foreign rules. But we all face our challenges at a certain point, once we started our way on this life long road.

Indeed, like snowflakes dancing with delicate moves into the wind, finding their way to the ground, we make our way graciously into the diplomatic world, often unknown, and try to be our best versions, reaching high expectations, to best represent our countries (of birth or not) and complete the greater diplomatic world puzzle, to which we all belong.

Celorio’s kids in Mexican traditional costumes during El Dia de los Muertos.

About the author:

Alexandra Paucescu

Alexandra Paucescu- Romanian, Management graduate with a Master in Business,  studied Cultural Diplomacy and International Relations.

She speaks Romanian,  English,  French,  German and Italian. Turned diplomatic spouse by the age of 30, she published a book about diplomatic life, writes articles and also gives lectures on intercultural communication.

Première randonnée. Brochettes et harissa

Par Alexander Khodakov.

Nous sommes trois à arriver à Alger en octobre 1972. L’avion se pose à Dar El Beïda à deux heures du matin. Les gens de l’ambassade nous emmènent dans un appartement en ville et nous laissent dormir. On s’occupera de nous plus tard.

 On se lève tard. Les volets étaient fermés et la lumière ne nous dérangeait pas. Nous sommes affamés. On a mangé pour la dernière fois dans l’avion, et c’était il y a douze heures au moins. Le réfrigérateur dans la cuisine est vide, comme on pouvait s’y attendre.

Nous ouvrons les volets de la cuisine… et nous sommes médusés. Juste devant la fenêtre se trouve un oranger, avec des fruits qui ne demandent qu’à être cueillis et dévorés. Si l’on enlève quelques oranges, cela ne va pas ruiner le propriétaire de la maison, décidons-nous. Mais dès que nous mordons dans la chair des fruits, une amertume infecte remplit nos bouches. On dirait de la quinine ! C’est comme ça que nous apprenons qu’il existe deux sortes d’oranges, cultivées et sauvages, ces dernières étant tout à fait immangeables. Pourtant, on en fait une merveilleuse confiture d’oranges amères !

Restés sur notre faim, nous nous décidons à sortir dans la rue. Quel choc culturel j’éprouve ! Impossible de donner une description – tous mes sens sont bouleversés. Des odeurs inconnues d’épices, les cris des marchands en arabe, les vêtements traditionnels que portent les gens… par ailleurs, les pantalons me rappellent la mode des cosaques ukrainiens d’il y deux siècles.

J’approche une boutique pour regarder de plus près la marchandise. Je reconnais des olives et des carottes, mais il y a des légumes et des fruits que je ne connais pas. Je montre du doigt un fruit et demande ce que c’est. « Des nèfles », – me dit-on. Ça ne me dit rien. Peu après, je vais découvrir et apprécier le goût des nèfles et les regretter après mon départ.

Je constate qu’il va y avoir un problème de communication. Quand je pose une question plus compliquée au marchand, lui, il me comprend. Par contre, moi, je ne comprends pas sa réponse. Et moi, je parle la langue mieux que mes compagnons.

Il nous fallait pourtant résoudre le problème urgent du moment – se procurer de la nourriture. En passant dans la rue on sent l’odeur de la viande grillée et on voit une porte obturée par un rideau de bambou. Nous voyons des brochettes de viande (il faudra qu’on nous dise encore comment cela s’appelle), nos bouches salivent et nous en commandons une dizaine pour chacun. Les brochettes sont pareilles à notre chachlik, mais en plus petit.

Le propriétaire met sur la table une soucoupe avec une sauce rouge. « Oh, du ketchup ! », décrète le Toutou[1] dans sa grande intelligence. Peu après, le patron apporte les brochettes. Vitaly en saisit une, étale la sauce là-dessus et met la moitié de la brochette dans la bouche. Sa bobine resplendit de plaisir ; pourtant cela ne dure pas, tout à coup il rougit, les larmes aux yeux, il n’arrive pas à parler – un râle impuissant sort de sa bouche… « Une bière, vite », – crie-t-on au patron. Une bière arrive, Vitaly l’engloutit d’un coup. Sa voix revenue, il en demande une autre. Après quoi il profère – heureusement en russe – des jurons à l’adresse de la sauce et du patron, qui ne l’avait pas prévenu que c’était si fort. Vladimir et moi goûtons à la sauce avec prudence. On vient de faire connaissance avec la harissa.

Assez vite je commence à apprécier le goût de la harissa. Jusqu’à présent j’en mets dans mes plats, parfois même d’une façon immodérée.


[1] Vitaly sera vite surnommé « Toutou », parce qu’il nous rappelait un chiot, qui ne connaît rien au monde et fait des bêtises.

Information sur l’auteur:

Alexander Khodakov

Né à Moscou en 1952, Alexander Khodakov fait ses études de droit  à  l’Institut de relations internationales de Moscou (MGIMO). Après trois ans à MGIMO, il fait un an d’études à l’université d’Alger. En 1974 il est recruté par le Ministère des affaires étrangères de l’URSS et part en poste au Gabon. Rentré à Moscou, il intègre le département juridique du Ministère. De 1985 à  1991 il travaille  à New York au sein de la mission permanente de l’URSS auprès des Nations unies. De retour à Moscou en 1991 il revient au département juridique, dont il devient directeur en 1994. Quatre ans plus tard il est nommé ambassadeur de Russie aux Pays-Bas et représentant permanent auprès de l’Organisation pour l’interdiction des armes chimiques (OIAC). En 2004 il passe au service de l’OIAC comme directeur des projets spéciaux et ensuite secrétaire des organes directifs. En 2011 il rejoint le greffe de la Cour pénale internationale et exerce pendant trois ans comme conseiller spécial pour les relations extérieures.

Depuis 2015 il vit  à La Haye, avec sa famille. Il a écrit Cuisine Diplomatique un vibrant récit des histoires inédites sur sa vie diplomatique.

The Abused Women of War

Interview with Vasfije Krasniqi Goodman: “For Me That Was My Day of Apocalypse – the Day That Felt like the Last of My Life”. In the picture Vasfije Krasniqi Goodman.

Mrs. Krasniqi Goodman, thank you for taking the time for this interview. As a new “face” in the Faces of Peace initiative, we would first like to ask you what “peace” means for you personally?

To begin with, I want to say thank you for taking the initiative and reaching out. I think peace is directly affected by two factors, those being the inner and outer factors.

Even though the outer factors are the ones with the bigger impact here, in terms of starting the process of building peace itself, in my opinion it all starts with inner peace. When an individual achieves peace within, this will ultimately lead to them resonating or transforming that into a general outer peace.

This, in turn, is a start to building world peace, a goal that seems too far away at the moment.

You were raped by two Serbs during the Kosovo War in 1999 – one of them was a police officer. What can you tell us about April 14, 1999? How did your life change in the days and weeks that followed?

For me, and surely many others, that was our “day of apocalypse”, the day that felt like the last of my life. As a 16-year-old child at the time, the fear I felt was terrifying and the lack of information about what was happening around me made it even worse. Sometimes we would watch BBC or CNN, and we would see the horrifying stories of massacres perpetrated by Serbian forces or the killings of infants. But I had little to no information about the rape cases that were occurring.

I remember when the officer took me by force while threatening me with a firearm. I was taken into his car and raped, I felt hopeless and devastated. After that he took me to a village, where a big group of people had gathered. They were laughing at me and threatening me, all while I was uncontrollably crying.

After that, another older man took me to a nearby house and I was raped there as well. He looked like a civilian but was carrying a handgun. Me and my family had already gone through a lot, and being raped only added to my emotional and physical wounds. That day broke my spirit and it felt like my life had lost meaning. For a long time I lived only because I had to!

You said in a TV interview two years ago: “I repeatedly begged the policeman to kill me, but he told me my suffering would be greater if he let me live”. Why would you have preferred to have died at the time?

It is true, after I was taken, I really believed they were going to kill me at first – they were doing that to a lot of people. I was already petrified; I knew bad things were going to happen, and they did. Begging to be killed was the best option I could think of. That option was better for me than all of the things and feelings I experienced. I just wanted it to end.

All the disgusting things they did to me that completely changed and broke my spirit. My virginity was taken away by a criminal; I just did not want to be alive in a reality where all this happened. But he had already made up his mind and, with truly evil purposefulness, he let me live knowing I would suffer more if I wasn’t dead. And I did!

Girls and women are being subjected to gender-based violence in armed conflicts worldwide. Why is it so important for courageous women, such as yourself, to speak out about it? Can you tell us what happened to the perpetrators?

Women in Kosovo were subjected to numerous crimes throughout the years. They were tortured by the Serbian forces, not because they were seen as the weaker sex, but because women are directly linked with the continuation of life and its prosperity.

The Serbian state apparatus targeted women repeatedly with the goal of affecting the population and causing them to flee the territories permanently. I believe this strategy is being employed in other parts of the world as well. In some places women are even taken as war prisoners by these terrifying “armies” and used to exercise their animalistic lusts.

In my case, I have repeatedly fought to bring those criminals to justice, but they still walk free, while I still seek justice.

While the physical scars heal at some point, the psychological ones linger for a much longer time. How have you processed the events of April 1999 – and are there moments when your past catches up with you?

My body wounds have healed. I did escape death, but my mind and spirit will never be able to fully rehabilitate, even though I always had support from my family and now from all over the world. Not a single morning goes by without me waking up and remembering that terrible event which happened to me – and over 20,000 other victims.

It is a heavy feeling to carry around and I can feel the tiredness of my soul. Being raped is something that imprisons you and it continues to hit you more and more every day. I can’t possibly imagine a more terrible comparable experience. Sometimes it feels that the life I lived was worthless because of it.

Now I have devoted my life to other men and women that have been through similar experiences to me, and me and my team will try as hard as we can to prevent such terrible crimes from ever happening again.

Hashim Thaçi announced his resignation as president of Kosovo in November 2020 following his indictment for war crimes by a Kosovo special court. In your opinion, are war criminals being pursued consistently enough?

Since the day after being raped, me and my family have been dealing with my case, we put a lot of faith in justice and actively pursued it. I would have never thought that an international organization such as UNMIK would not consider it their responsibility to bring justice for the crimes that happened in Kosovo.

They never even looked at our case, or any other cases for that matter. Even during EULEX’s mission in Kosovo later on, when we took my case to court in 2013, UNMIK stated they had lost my files. This resulted in EULEX finding the rapists not guilty, which was devastating for me and my family. I just want to say that during the UNMIK-EULEX period in Kosovo, we were not treated justly by these organizations.

The victims were further disappointed by “The Hague”, where not a single case was brought to justice. This is absurd! On the other hand, Kosovo has expressed a feeling of determination to bring the perpetrators of these crimes to justice. We, the victims of the war in Kosovo, will still wait for our justice to come, even though it looks as if it is not coming our way. It is sad to see this happen, while those criminals now hold state positions in Serbia.

Mrs. Krasniqi Goodman, in an interview Dr. Mukwege also criticized international politics and declared violence against women to be something that “shames our common humanity”. What are your expectations of politics?

In our case the Serbian forces used rape as a “systematic weapon” to achieve their goals in many ways. What they did brings shame to Europe. How could Europe have allowed another European country to commit such crimes against other defenseless populations under its jurisdiction? These crimes provide ample evidence of some countries’ desire to destroy other populations.

I stand here despite their attempts to do so, while never letting myself get filled with hate or allowing my soul to give up because of the suffering. And I will continue to take steps towards – and advocating for – justice. The world needs to take these steps with me and serve proper punishment for these crimes in order to prevent future war rapes.

Source: Faces of Peace initiative | Faces of Democracy

About the Faces of Democracy and Faces of Peace initiatives

With almost 100 prominent figures from politics, business, the media and society – including the former President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker, the Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Norway Erna Solberg, the President of the Republic of Estonia Kersti Kaljulaid, the German Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs Heiko Maas and OSCE Secretary General Thomas Greminger – the Faces of Democracy initiative is now in its fourth year of existence.

The first “faces” of the 2019 founded Faces of Peace initiative are SIPRI Director Dan Smith, the Chairman of the Atlantic Brücke e.V. Sigmar Gabriel, the OSCE CiO 2019 and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic Miroslav Lajčák and the Chief of Staff of the 69th Submarine Brigade of the Northern Fleet Vasili A. Arkhipov.

The Faces of Democracy and Peace in alphabetical order

Jean Asselborn, Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Thomas Bach, President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC)
Annalena Baerbock, Chairwoman of the Green Party of Germany
Bishop Dr. Georg Bätzing, Chairman of the German Bishops‘ Conference
Dr. Katarina Barley, Lead candidate for Germany’s Social Democrats
Gabriela Cuevas Barron, President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU)
Hubert Barth, Country Managing Partner EY Germany
Dominik Bartsch, Representative of UNHCR in Germany
Holger Beeck, Chief Executive Officer McDonald’s Germany
Jörg Biallas, Editor-in-chief of „Das Parlament“
Stef Blok, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands
Wolfgang Bosbach, CDU expert on internal security
Prof. Dr. Peter Brandt, German historian and the first son of former chancellor Willy Brandt
Michael Bröcker, Editor-in-Chief of „Media Pioneer“
Rolf Buch, Chief Executive Officer of Vonovia SE
Tom Buhrow, Chairman of the ARD network
Giovanni Buttarelli, European Data Protection Supervisor
Stephan-Andreas Casdorff, Publisher of the leading Berlin newspaper “Der Tagesspiegel”
Piotr Cywinski, Director of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial
Shirin David, YouTube star and “Germany’s Got Talent” jury member
Detlef Dzembritzki, Chairman of the United Nations Association of Germany (UNA)
Saskia Esken, Leader of Germany’s Social Democratic Party (SPD)
Georg Fahrenschon, President of the German Savings Banks Association (DSGV)
Peter Frank, Federal Public Prosecutor General at the Federal Court of Justice
Leonard Freier, Former RTL Bachelor
Fabrice Fries, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AFP
Dr. Clemens Fuest, President of the ifo Institute
Sigmar Gabriel, Chairman of the Atlantic Brücke e.V.
Yvonne Gebauer, Minister of School and Education in North Rhine Westphalia
Thomas Geisel, Mayor of Düsseldorf – the state capital of North Rhine-Westphalia
Tom Gerhard, Actor and comedian
Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović, President of the Republic of Croatia
Alice Greenwald, President and CEO of the National September 11 Memorial and Museum
Thomas Greminger, OSCE Secretary General
Maria Großbauer, Organizer of the Vienna Opera Ball
Christiane Grün, Managing Director 3M DACH countries
Dr. John Hamre, President and CEO of the Center for Strategic and International Studies
John Harris, Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief of POLITICO
Dr. Reiner Haseloff, Prime Minister of Saxony-Anhalt
LTG Ben Hodges, Retired Commander of the U.S. Army in Europe
Reiner Hoffmann, President of the German Confederation of Trade Unions (DGB)
Katrín Jakobsdóttir, Prime Minister of Iceland
Dr. Gunnar Jeremias, Head of the Interdisciplinary Research Group for the Analysis of Biological Risks
Hans-Ulrich Jörges, Editor-in-chief of „Stern“
Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission
Bruno Kahl, President of the Federal Intelligence Service (BND)
Kersti Kaljulaid, President of the Republic of Estonia
Anja Karliczek, German Federal Minister of Education and Research
Daniela Katzenberger, Soap opera star
Fritz Keller, President of the German Football Association (DFB)
Dr. Hubertus Kolster, Managing Partner of CMS Germany
Ingo Kramer, President of the Confederation of German Employers‘ Associations (BDA)
Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, Leader of Germany’s Christian Democrats (CDU)
Vasfije Krasniqi Goodman, Survivor of the Kosovo War and Activist
Miroslav Lajčák, OSCE CiO 2019 and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic
Prof. Dr. Norbert Lammert, Chairman of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung and Former President of the German Bundestag
Martina Larkin, Head of Europe and Member of the Executive Committee of the World Economic Forum Davos
Armin Laschet, Prime Minister of North-Rhine-Westphalia
Dr. Jürgen Linden, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Charlemagne Prize
Christian Lindner, Leader of the Free Democratic Party in Germany (FDP)
Dr. Christian Lutz, Chief Executive Officer of Deutsche Bahn AG
Heiko Maas, Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs
Dr. David Magerman, Managing Partner at Differential Ventures
Sandra Maischberger, Television journalist and talk show host
Aiman Mazyek, Secretary-General of the Central Council of Muslims in Germany
Ralf Martin Meyer, Police President of Hamburg
Clover Moore, Lord Mayor of Sydney
Benigna Munsi, Nuremberg Christkind 2019/2020
Namika, Singer-Songwriter
Dr. Irfan Ortac, Secretary-General of the Central Council of Yazidis in Germany
Boris Palmer, Lord Mayor of Tübingen
Prof. Dr. Volker Perthes, Director of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs
Ulf Poschardt, Editor-in-Chief WELT
Dr. Heribert Prantl, Member of the Chief Editorial Team of „Süddeutsche Zeitung“
Ernst Primosch, CEO of Edelman Germany
Q2/Grade 12 – Albert Einstein High School Kaarst
Alfred Theodor Ritter, Owner and Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Alfred Ritter GmbH & Co. KG
Dr. Daniel Röder, Founder of Pulse of Europe initiative
Annika Savill, Executive Head of the United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF)
Prof. Dr. Conrad Schetter, Director for Research at Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC)
Thomas Schnalke, CEO Düsseldorf Airport (DUS)
Olaf Schubert, Comedian and cabaret artist
Martin Schulz, German Social Democratic Party chancellor candidate 2017
Dr. Josef Schuster, President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany
Dan Smith, Director of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)
Erna Solberg, Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Norway
Prof. Dr. Anja Steinbeck, President of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Gabor Steingart, Founder and Publisher of the Media Pioneer Publishing GmbH
Dr. Johannes Teyssen, Chairman of the Board of Management of E.ON SE
Pia Tillmann, Actor and Influencer
Dr. Andreas Voßkuhle, President of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany
Dagmar Wöhrl, Investor at „The Cave of the Lions“
Joshua Wong, the Face of Hong Kong’s Democracy Movement
Brigitte Zypries, Former Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy