The Slovak Republic 25 years After

0

By H.E. Roman Buzek, Ambassador of Slovakia in the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

On the 1st of January 2018, it has been already 25 years since the amicable, well-negotiated and smooth dissolution of the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic brought into existence two successor democratic states: the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Many doubted whether the separation of two countries was going to be successful. Many feared the separation would bring yet another bloody conflict in the heart of Europe. But these fears proved groundless as the split was truly peaceful and friendly.

Just like two siblings who grew up together under one roof and then decided to set up their own houses, two countries remain remarkably close in spite of their independent domiciles. Since 1993 Slovakia and the Czech Republic represent an unparalleled example of good neighborly relations and friendship based on the same values and principles.

Spis Castle, Slovakia.

The Slovak Republic at age of 25 is a stable and prosperous country. Still young, but ambitious, it is a reliable and trustworthy member of the international community who takes its share of responsibility for maintaining international peace and prosperity, be it as a growing donor of international assistance or as an active participant in various peacekeeping operations. Holding its first ever Presidency of the Council of the European Union in 2016, Slovakia proved its established position in the international community. Miroslav Lajčák, Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic, is currently presiding over the 72nd session of the United Nations General Assembly. From July 2018, once again Slovakia will chair the Visegrad 4 Group. Furthermore, Slovakia is now preparing for its presidency of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe in 2019.

National Theatre

Throughout the years the Kingdom of the Netherlands has been one of the partners that provided Slovakia with instrumental support and assistance in various fields of socio-economic development and in joining both the European Union and NATO 14 years ago. The current relationship between the two countries is based on the same European values and perspectives for the common future in the European Union.

The Netherlands has been and still is one of the most prominent foreign investors in Slovakia. The cooperation develops very well in all fields. The state visit of Her Majesty Queen Beatrix to Slovakia in 2007 reciprocated by the visit of President of the Slovak Republic Ivan Gašparovič to the Netherlands in 2012 proved the excellent relations between the two countries as well as the potential for their further development. The two countries currently enjoy vibrant and growing cooperation in all fields: politics, trade and business; education and research; and culture.

During its 25 years of independence, Slovakia has undergone series of challenging economic reforms to become a successful and prosperous country joining the single European currency in 2009. The automotive industry is the backbone of the country´s economy with over 1 million cars produced last year. Land Rover / Jaguar is expected to start its production in Nitra later this year joining already existing production facilities of Volkswagen in Bratislava, Peugeot/Citroen in Trnava and Kia in Žilina.

Another perspective branch with huge development potential is mountain tourism which might be particularly interesting for foreign tourists – both in summer and winter time. Slovakia located in the very heart of Europe offers lots of other recreational possibilities, including welldeveloped spa network providing relief with various illnesses; many opportunities for relaxing, enjoying the nature or historical architecture and last but not least tasting traditional Slovak cuisine and various local wine and beer production.

Young and modern, Slovakia at its age of 25 is full of confidence and visions for the years to come.

Priorities and challenges of the Bulgarian Presidency of the EU Council

0

Main priorities and challenges of the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union.

By H.E.  Rumen Alexandrov, Ambassador of Bulgaria in the Kingdom of the Netherlands. 

Taking over the rotating Presidency of the Council of the EU is both a privilege challenge and responsibility for us. Bulgaria joined the EU 11 years ago and today it has the chance to shape the EU’s policies in key areas.

For us, the Presidency is also a chance to show our partners a different side of Bulgaria: 

  • A country in which the cohesion funds are bringing about visible change and contributing to the year-on-year economic growth of 4%.
  • A country which is protecting the EU’s external border as responsibly as any Schengen area member, without in fact being part of Schengen.
  • A country whose currency is governed under the same rules as the euro, whose macroeconomic indicators are impeccable even though it is not part of the Eurozone.
  • A country where different religions and ethnicities live together in peace. In the Bulgarian capital, Sofia, a church, a mosque and a synagogue lie less than 500 meters apart.

I hope that over the next six months many people across Europe will get to know more of these multiple faces of Bulgaria – the good student, the strong economic performer, the model for ethnic tolerance.

We approach the EU Presidency with full awareness that our citizens expect from us effective solutions to concrete problems. After the crises that Europe has faced in recent years it is time to be pragmatic and result-oriented in order to regain the confidence of our citizens. The time until the end of the current term of the European Parliament and the European Commission is running short and we need to move fast. That is why the program of our Presidency is ambitious while remaining realistic.

H.E.  Rumen Alexandrov, Ambassador of Bulgaria.

What are our strategic goals? We will work for a stable and secure Europe of solidarity.

  • Stable Europe because our citizens expect that the European Union takes care of their prosperity and well-being.
  • Secure Europe because the migration crisis and the terrorist attacks in the recent years showed how vulnerable we are.
  • Solidarity because the main challenges we face can only be resolved by common actions.

To achieve our goals, we work in four main strands:

1. Economic growth, social cohesion, and youth.

In order to boost economic growth, the Bulgarian Presidency will work towards strengthening the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). We will promote open and inclusive discussion on the EMU architecture. In the area of the Banking Union, we will focus our efforts on risk reduction measures.

We are putting great emphasis on stable EU finances and we will contribute to the discussions on the new Multiannual Financial Framework of the EU (MFF). Bulgaria will endeavor for an honest and open political debate on the future of the Cohesion Policy and maintain its important role in the budget of the European Union post-2020. The Cohesion policy has a clear added value as it fosters growth and jobs and has a direct benefit to the citizens.

Next, we believe that young people are key to the development of the European economy and society, therefore, the level of European investment in education and research is to be increased. We will put an emphasis on the mid-term review of the Erasmus + programme as well as on finalizing the legislative work on the European Solidarity Corps.

2. Security and stability for a stronger and United Europe

For the security of the Union as a whole, it is crucial to complete the reform of the Common European Asylum System, based on the principles of responsibility and genuine solidarity. The Bulgarian Presidency will work for more coordinated European measures in the field of Return policy.

Another important task for our presidency is to improve the interoperability of the EU information systems and databases.

In Justice area, we will focus our efforts on the institutionalization of the European Public Prosecutor‘s Office as well as on the Cross-border access to electronic evidence.

Within the priority for a stronger and more secure European Union, we will work towards regional cooperation, energy connectivity, protection of critical energy infrastructure and ensuring the security of gas supply through diversification of sources and routes within the framework of a stable Energy Union.

3. European perspective of the Western Balkans

There is a window of opportunity for concrete progress on the EU path of the Western Balkans’ countries in 2018 and we hope that the countries from the region will take advantage of it. As Presidency of the Council, we will fully respect the principles of individual and merit-based assessment, and the fulfillment of the established criteria.

We hope that during the Bulgarian Presidency new negotiation chapters with Serbia and Montenegro could be opened, progress could be made in view of opening negotiations with FYROM and Albania, and the European perspective of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo could be further consolidated.

The EU will continue to encourage the implementation of ambitious reforms which are indispensable for the European integration of the countries in the region. We see huge potential in bringing the region closer to the Union by building missing energy, digital and transport infrastructure. A key initiative which we already started to promote is the gradual decrease in roaming prices.

On 17 May 2018, Bulgaria will host an EU-Western Balkans Summit, which is to send a positive message to all the 6 countries in the region on their European integration.

4. Digital Economy and skills of the future

The Digital Single Market is a source of growth and competitiveness and greater share of online service users and the rapid penetration of information and communication technologies across all sectors of the economy is needed.

Our efforts are aimed at providing clear, transparent and balanced transport legislation, that takes into account the national specificities of the EU Member States transport sector, with focus on advancing the legislative proposals from the so-calledRoad Package”.

We share the need for Fair and efficient taxation of corporate profits and preventing tax evasion.

As regards the social dimension of the European Union the focus of the Presidency will be on 4 major topics: The Future of Work” in the digital and shared economy; European Social Fund (ESF) support in the post 2020 programming period; the concept of early childhood development; and people with disabilities as members of society with equal rights.

By way of concluding just let me mention that the motto of the Bulgarian Presidency is “United we stand strong“.

The motto reflects our historical experience – the same words are inscribed at the entrance of our National Assembly and are at the core of our democracy. Our national history has taught us that the more united, the stronger we are.

We believe that this experience of ours is relevant for the EU in this particular moment of time. “Unity” and “integrity” are essential to respond to the common challenges and deliver for our citizens.

Etapas del desarrollo, crisis vitales y familias migrantes 3/4

With the release of the bestseller Traslados, Silvia Korenblum, psychologist and diplomatic spouse, describe and explore the transitory migration of diplomatic life and its impact on the family. Diplomat Magazine decided to publish this powerful companion book designed for diplomats and their families, in its original language. Por Silvia Korenblum. Las etapas del desarrollo con sus crisis vitales son esperables para todos los individuos. Surgen desde la naturaleza misma de la biología y de la sociedad y atraviesan la estructura familiar. Adultez. Emancipación de los hijos. Nido vacío La adolescencia de los hijos coincide con la edad madura o adultez de los padres (abuelos). Crisis por los dos lados. Para dar curso a los cambios durante las transiciones en el ciclo vital de la familia, los adultos tienen que confrontar las antiguas experiencias que tuvieron, como hijos, con sus padres, y las que tienen actualmente con sus hijos en su calidad de padres. En el desarrollo normal de una familia, el crecimiento incluye la pérdida de viejas pautas de relación y la adquisición de nuevos aprendizajes. La etapa de la adultez es un momento de transición, de replanteo de la vida y de duelo por varias pérdidas. Los hijos ya son más independientes. Comienza la etapa universitaria, y con ella las separaciones, que se dan, por lo general, por causas prácticas (la universidad se empieza y termina en un país y puede ser que no coincida con la nueva residencia de los padres). En este caso la separación no es producto de una consecuencia gradual madurativa. Los hijos se quedan solos, a veces, demasiado pronto y los padres experimentan un síndrome de nido vacío precoz, antes de que estén listos, ellos y sus hijos, a que los pichones salgan a volar.

Este “nido vacío” se ve forzado por la situación, ya que si los hijos tienen que quedarse estudiando en otro país se separan de los padres antes de que unos u otros, o ambos, estén listos. Aquí se da una situación complicada ya que en general, cuando se trata de un funcionario hombre, la mujer se siente tironeada entre el hijo o los hijos que quedan solos y su pareja y su carrera. Hasta no entender para qué se sigue acompañando a su pareja, si los hijos están tan lejos y la necesitan.

Catalina G. atraviesa una depresión enorme al tener que dejar a una hija que estaba en la universidad en su país de origen y partir junto a su marido y a su hija menor a otro país. Si bien sabía que su hija había quedado bien cuidada en casa de una hermana suya, no podía dejar de sentir la fractura de su familia, cayendo en una grave depresión y viajando todo el tiempo de un país al otro sin estar en ningún lado, viviendo literalmente en tránsito. Aquí, comienza un tiempo complicado para el matrimonio que se encuentra solo por segunda vez. Se puede observar un dilema en la pareja: en este momento el funcionario , ha progresado en estatus y posición y se vuelve más atractivo para las mujeres jóvenes, mientras que las mujeres de la misma edad, cuya autoestima depende más de la apariencia física, se pueden encontrar menos atractivas que los hombres, aquellos a los que sienten que han seguido por el mundo, les han criado los hijos, y que se han olvidado de ellas. Empieza una etapa de balance y replanteo, sobre todo para las mujeres, que sienten que han dejado su vida en manos de otro. La mujer se encuentra con el marido, solos. Han pasado años, muchas experiencias. Se hace una revisión del pasado. Se analiza cómo ha transcurrido la propia vida y cómo se quiere continuar. Si bien la ausencia de los hijos afecta al padre y a la madre, es en la mujer en quien repercutirá de manera estrepitosa. En el caso en el que es la mujer la que acompaña al marido funcionario, ésta madre en tránsito, por lo general, no ha podido desarrollar su profesión y sólo se ha dedicado a los hijos y al marido. El trabajo de las adaptaciones familiares ha caído casi completamente en sus manos, y eso la ha mantenido ocupada, casi olvidada de sí misma. Las mudanzas no le han permitido continuar con su profesión. Toda una vida se ha ido construyendo en torno a sus hijos, atenta a sus etapas evolutivas, a sus horarios, estados emocionales, a sus éxitos y fracasos. La salida dependerá de la pareja y de cómo estructure esta nueva realidad. El éxito o el fracaso de esta fase se verá muy influido por lo que haya ocurrido en las precedentes, de cómo sea el nivel de diferenciación en esa familia, y de cómo se hayan atravesado los distintos estadios evolutivos, que en las familias migrantes son muy recortables. Cuando uno se despide de un lugar se despide de una etapa de la vida. Para la familia en tránsito, las fases de crecimiento están muy marcadas, ya que se llega a un país con determinadas características en lo evolutivo, y se parte a otro en otra etapa de la evolución. Entonces, cada etapa de la vida se encuentra claramente asociada a un lugar diferente, a una geografía, hasta a un olor diferente. Las despedidas y los duelos evolutivos se encuentran muy mezclados. Dejar un país implica dejar a unos hijos que llegaron siendo bebés y se van siendo niños, o llegaron niños y se van adolescentes. Las transiciones, entonces, se ven forzosamente marcadas por las geografías. Las familias que nacen y se desarrollan siempre en el mismo lugar no perciben con tanta claridad el paso del tiempo, de una etapa a la otra en el ciclo vital. En las familias en tránsito esto se evidencia en una cantidad de “detalles” que se ponen de relieve y demanifiesto al hacer la mudanza. Todos sabemos que, cuando se hace una mudanza, se hace una limpieza profunda, que implica una revisión de nuestras cosas, de lo que sirve o no, de lo que irá a la nueva casa. De alguna manera uno siente que empieza una limpieza de su propia vida, dejando cosas, que cree que ya no va a necesitar, con la ilusión de “empezar de nuevo”. Los objetos guardan gran parte de nuestra historia. Cuando uno se deshace de una cuna es evidente que ya no habrá más bebés en una casa. Lo mismo sucede con los libritos, o el triciclo. Estos objetos nos recuerdan lugares, personas, momentos, íntimamente ligados a los ciclos vitales, a sus crisis y variaciones. Marcelo , de 40 años, entre su tercer y cuarto destino se deshizo de un montón de cartas que guardaba celosamente desde su adolescencia; en ese momento sintió que ya nunca más las necesitaría. Luego, en el nuevo destino, se dio cuenta con tristeza que se había desprendido de un testimonio muy querido de su pasado. Al realizar una mudanza cada 2, 3 ó 4 años, estas etapas se delimitan con mucha claridad. Cada pocos años se realiza una “limpieza profunda” se revisan hasta el último de los cajones y con ello hasta el último recuerdo, con la certeza absoluta de que hay algo que ya no se repetirá mas. Ya no se estará allí, ya no estará el vecino e inevitablemente, esta marca del paso del tiempo se manifiesta con tal concretud, como si se pudiera tocar el pasar de los años en cada centímetro crecido. Crisis vitales intergeneracionales Otra variable a tener en cuenta dentro del ciclo vital, es la interge- neracional, la relación en que se encuentren los progenitores con sus familias de origen. La familia en tránsito está lejos, y llega un momento en el que un padre de uno u otro cónyuge, enferma y/o muere. Sabemos que dentro de la adultez esto sucede. Nuestros padres se ponen viejos. Y ello no se ve gradualmente: se va viendo como de a golpes. Forma parte de nuestro ser adulto. Aunque visitaba a sus padres una vez al año, a Adriana C. siempre la perseguía la incertidumbre de cómo los iba a encontrar. Si bien hablaba por teléfono con ellos semanalmente, tuvo una impresión muy fuerte: “Un día nos bajamos del avión y eran unos viejitos”.

La autora Silvia Korenblum, nació en Buenos Aires y es Licenciada en Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Tiene un Post grado en terapias de familias y parejas, además de un Magister en psiconeuroendocrinologia. 

Es Especialista en problemas de desarraigo y adaptación, ha ejercido su práctica clínica en diversas instituciones clínicas y hospitalarias. Ha trabajado dictando seminarios y coordinando talleres de orientación a padres de niños y adolescentes atravesados por la problemática de la migración, en diferentes países. Es Autora de numerosas ponencias y artículos sobre su especialidad y del libro Familias en Transito, Lumen humanitas 2003. Casada desde hace 25 años con un diplomático. Actualmente vive en Bruselas, ejerciendo su practica clinica, terapia y coaching on line. ——- Fotografia por Pablo Grinspun.

Our Culture…our Brand?

0
By Mara Lemanis.  It happens automatically. As soon as we start interacting with the world, we’re inducted into the Hall of Names and branded. We become Brands. Some will make a heated response: “Excuse me! I am not a Brand—I have a Brand. Maybe you don’t know the difference!” Do those rejoinders point out a subtle difference? What is the difference? Because if we have a Brand that we pitch and associate with our Self, aren’t we pitching Ourselves? As we hype our Self on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc., in order to get attention for what we have and do–for what we ARE–suddenly that Brand has US. But this is the point where it becomes necessary to consider how specious, how phony that claim really is. Because whatever brand we put out about ourselves, it can never encompass us, never describe what we really are. Besides showing off the products we’re selling, or the talents we’re highlighting, does the brand signal our reactions? Can it provide a clue, for instance, about the kind of personal visions we prize, how kind and selfless we are; or if we lust after strange, exotic fruit, crave kinky moments, delirious activities; and whether we hoard money or spend wantonly? Even if we identify with our product, is the product our identity—our culture?…Does my brand turn me into a commodity? Is the culture that surrounds me a reflection of what I commodify? Each time we sell something of ourselves, maybe we skim a little something off our psyche, letting it evaporate like water as we boil it down, reducing the prime part of our vitality. If this be our life’s goal, our manifest destiny, it means we are selling ourselves both on the outside but also from inside ourselves as a particular, singular Brand. At the same time those clients who “like” us are also marketing themselves to us. And however great a range of “likes” and clients we muster for our product, we narrow the focus of who we are. This is inevitable because we tether ourselves to the acceptability, the like-ability of our brand. It becomes addictive.—And just as an addict has many more layers of Life and Being that he can’t use because he’s tied to his addiction, so we too start to atrophy away from the many turns and tacks that animate our Being. Then we no longer live at the center of our being; we stop being whole and integrated. We become the by-product of our brand and our surrounding culture is flattened by our self-diminishment.

Yet we’re not one-dimensional!

Before we burn our souls with branding irons that show who owns us; before our minds stamp in a catchphrase like one that’s gleamed at us for nearly 70 years–“A Diamond is Forever”; before we think ourselves pink as Owens-Corning’s fiberglass and swell with the epic assurance of Reebok affirming “I Am What I Am,” we can still pull away from the names, logos, slogans that zap our brains and egos. We can tune to the frequencies in the variety of thought, sense, action we have stored up in our gut and mind. We can free our cells and neurons to boost our native vigor. Then like the people in Plato’s Cave–who suddenly see the light, or those whose souls have withered into a single dogma and suddenly see a wealth of views, a wide spectrum of possibilities–we break away from the bonds that brand. –And are reborn into prisms that burnish our potential and our culture, giving zest and wonder to our world.  

The Empathic Impulse that Girds all Nations

0

Gustav Klimt, The Tree of Life. Stoclet Frieze-c-1909

By Mara Lemanis.

The golden rule for ethical conduct that prescribes we should “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is a mandate in many religions. One of the oldest edicts inherited by Judaism and Christianity comes from the Hitopadesha section in Sanskrit, c. 1373 BCE—“One should always treat others as they themselves wish to be treated.” Such gold would seem to pave the way for a moral universe.

And such a universe is the happy perspective religious traditions uphold and promote. But if we consider the endless tyranny, savagery, greed, chicanery, and extortion among nations and peoples on this particular planet, we are at wit’s end to believe that perspective could logically be right or wise.  

A historical review does suggest humanity has enlarged its moral compass.

Instead of St. Paul admonishing runaway slaves to return to their masters, we decry enslavement; instead of religious persecutions, the torture and slaying of heretics, witches, atheists, etc., we praise religious tolerance. We reprove allegiances that protect only our family and our community and shortchange groups to which we don’t belong. We try to provide some economic subsidies for disenfranchised peoples and extend civil liberties and justice toward ethnic groups different from our own.

Yet the arc of that moral compass has crept forward at the pace of geologic time, still crumbling, time after time, backward into barbarity.

 The great 19th-century poet and cultural critic, Matthew Arnold, despaired over “ignorant armies that clash by night,” leaving us with the feeble consolation: “Ah, love, let us be true to one another! For the world…Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light…”

His misery swelled at the prospect of civilization doomed without the buttress of religion.

However, it is instructive to realize that violent crime rates in the least religious countries in the world, such as Sweden and Denmark, also exhibit generically lower crime rates along with a much lower corruption index than do highly religious countries, such as the U.S.

In “Terror and Just Response,” linguist/philosopher Noam Chomsky claims “… if we adopt the principle of universality: if an action is right (or wrong) for others, it is right (or wrong) for us… If something’s right for me, it’s right for you; if it’s wrong for you, it’s wrong for me. Any moral code that is even worth looking at has that at its core somehow.”

But if we construe morality as behavior that arouses empathy and compassion for the condition of other beings and creatures, we would come to some unusual, if tentative, conclusions. Sobering and wondrous studies have been conducted on the response to suffering among various species in the animal kingdom, including dolphins rescuing humans from shark attacks and dogs responding to the depression and distress of strangers who are not even their owners, nuzzling and licking in sympathy to salve human suffering.  

These findings and those contrasting religious vs. non-religious groups strongly suggest that religious beliefs and devotions are not the prime factors nurturing compassion and emotional empathy.

Over the past 20 years, through a process that uses fMRI (the function of Magnetic Resonance Imaging), neuroscientists have found that areas of the brain are activated when watching someone else’s reactions, especially if s/he seems to be in pain. When we see other people undergoing stress or grief, we tend to feel their plight as if it were our own.

According to neural fMRI results, a particular part of the brain, the anterior cingulate, imagines how that agony feels and experiences it personally. We are endowed with neurons that mirror pain in others as pain in oneself.  

It’s fascinating to consider the golden rule as the gift of an empathic imagination instead of a religious duty. Because if animal species react with solicitude, though they have no religion, then we can presume that an incipient version of the golden rule has been built into their brain cells.

And if agnostic, atheistic, and religious people routinely show generosity and loving care toward all of life at least as much as do their religious brethren, a striking premise rises: Religious doctrines may give us laws and primers, spark ideologies of worship and salvation, but the inspiration to feel into the soul of other living beings may be a seed uncoiling from the universal Ground of Being, religious verdicts notwithstanding.

Empathic, compassionate morality might well be the offspring of an evolving spiritual imagination—cross-cultural and independent of religion.      

Rolls-Royce Studios in Berlin

0
From October 2017 a Rolls-Royce Studio was opened in the heart of Berlin’s luxury quarter of Kurfürstendamm 31, in the capital of Europe’s largest economy. The noble and richly adorned studio, allows customers and visitors alike to discover the opulence and history of this luxury automobile producer. This “Bespoke Atelier” shows how every single production leaving manufacturing in Goodwood in West Sussex, England, is unique, and personalised to fit every customer desires. Rolls-Royce Studio is itself a piece of art; exclusively decorated by the Belgian artist and designer Charles Kaisin, hired by the BMW Haus, features exquisite silver shining sculptures. Amongst the historical models on display, a Phantom IV, which erstwhile belonged to the Aga Khan IIISir Sultan Mohammed Shah, 48th Imam of the Nizari Ismaili Muslims, and grandfather to the philanthropist and incumbent Aga Khan IV, Prince Karim Al Husseini. The latter model hails from the 1950s and is characterised by a plethora of customised elements such as seats cover in red Connolly-leather, a hidden silver brush, and comb as well as a built-in voice recorder and a complete picnic set. For further information: https://rolls-roycemotorcars.de https://www.presseportal.de/pm/116117/3745647

AmCham New Year’s event in Frankfurt

0
On the picture Bernhard Mattes, President AmCham, Germany and MEP Elmar Brok. Friday, 26 January 2018, Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany: Chairman of the European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs, MEP Elmark Brok from the European People’s Party fraction, was the keynote speaker at the annual New Year’s reception held in Frankfurt and hosted by the US American Chamber of Commerce to Germany.
Dr. Jung – CMS, Count Marsilius von Ingelheim, Michael Fabich – Capitalmind. Pictures by Stefan Krutsch/AmCham.
For further information: AmCham: https://www.amcham.de https://www.amcham.de/medialibrary/event-galleries/?tx_yag_pi1%5Bc1787%5D%5BalbumUid%5D=108&tx_yag_pi1%5Bc1787%5D%5BgalleryUid%5D=2&tx_yag_pi1%5BitemListc1787%5D%5BpagerCollection%5D%5Bpage%5D=1&tx_yag_pi1%5Baction%5D=list&tx_yag_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=ItemList&cHash=3b0327c8aac6d597eaf05336a9d303c6 ————————- Neujahrsempfang AmCham Frankfurt/M, 26.01.2018 Copyright by Stefan Krutsch Photographie 60389 Frankfurt am Main

Gandhi Center – Free classes

0
The Gandhi Center conducts Yoga, Hindi and Tabla classes. These classes are open to everyone and are FREE of charge. The classes are designed to cater to all age groups and levels, from beginners to advanced. Mr. Amit Khanna is a Yoga therapist and expert who has more than 8 years of experience in Yoga therapy. He holds degrees in Physiotherapy and Yoga and is an expert in imparting and designing yoga therapy protocol based on various medical conditions and lifestyle disorders. Yoga is a science and art of healthy living with origins in ancient India. It is a potent stress management tool and its practice increases immunity and contributes to overall personality development. ———-

The Gandhi Center, Embassy of India, The Hague.

Parkstraat 99 (1st floor), 2514 JH DEN HAAG

Speech of HM King Felipe VI of Spain at WEF 2018

0
Wednesday, 24 January 2018, Davos, Swiss Confederation: Merely a few days before his festive 50th birthday being marked discreetly in his native Spain, the head of state delivered a highly lauded allocution before the statesmen and women, business people and dignitaries attending the 2018 48th World Economic Forum. For further information: http://www.casareal.es/ES/Actividades/Paginas/actividades_actividades_detalle.aspx?data=13431  

Beyond Duty exhibitions, a Holocaust remembrance

0
Ambassador of Israel to Germany, H.E. Jeremy Issacharoff – during Beyond Duty ‘ speech. On International Holocaust Remembrance Day, Israel honored the righteous diplomats who rescued hundreds of Jews during the Holocaust, in an exhibition to be held in Jerusalem and further 70 Israeli missions around the world. On 27 January 2018, the United Nations and countries around the world marked the International Holocaust Remembrance Day, commemorating the six million Jews who perished during the Holocaust. This year, through an exhibition called “Beyond Duty”, Israel will honor the righteous diplomats who risked their lives and the safety of their families to rescue hundreds of Jews. The exhibition will be displayed at the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Jerusalem and at seventy Israeli missions around the world in twenty different languages. In Berlin, on Monday, 29 January 2018 the exhibition was inaugurated by Israel’s top envoy to Germany, HE Ambassador Jeremy Issacharoff and Vice-Chancellor and Foreign Minister of Germany, Sigmar Gabriel. The latter is extraordinarily being held at the German Foreign Office and is open to the public until 26 February 2018 Ambassador Issacharoff remarked during his speech that he personally shall endeavor to “ensure that the burden of our history can actually be transformed into a unique bond that strengthens our bilateral ties”. 
The Holocaust was an unprecedented genocide perpetrated by Nazi Germany and its collaborators, with the aim of annihilating the Jewish people. Between 1933 and 1941, Nazi Germany pursued a policy that dispossessed the Jews of their rights and their property, followed by the branding and concentration of the Jewish population. This policy gained broad support in Germany and much of occupied Europe. In 1941, following the invasion of the Soviet Union, the Nazis and their collaborators launched the systematic extermination of the Jews. By the end of 1941, the policy had developed into an overall comprehensive, systematic murder operation that the Nazis called “The Final Solution to the Jewish Question.” 
By the war’s end in 1945, some six million Jews had been murdered. Grappling with the loss and the moral collapse during the Holocaust and preserving the memory of those who perished is an ongoing challenge and obligation for humanity.
Beyond Duty
 
The Beyond Duty exhibition is dedicated to the Righteous Among the Nations and to the Holocaust survivors whose courage and resilience continues to inspire us. The term “Righteous Among the Nations” refers to gentiles who risked their lives to rescue Jews during the Holocaust.  Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center, has recognized more than twenty-six thousand individuals as Righteous Among the Nations, including thirty-six diplomats.
“So what can we do? They were queuing up outside the embassies, pleading for help. What could we do? There was nothing in our books of instructions telling us how we could save people of other nationalities.”- Per Anger, Swedish diplomat in German-occupied Hungary recognized as Righteous Among the Nations
 
Many countries of the free world were reluctant to help Jewish refugees during the Holocaust and most diplomats continued operating according to these guidelines. Only very few felt that extraordinary times required extraordinary action, and were willing to act against their governments’ policies to save Jews. This small minority mustered the necessary courage to recognize the significance and consequences of blindly following procedures. When faced with the plight of the Jews, they decided that although they were of a different nationality and religion, they were unable to continue with their professional routine, and hence chose to defy their superiors and if necessary, suffer the consequences.
The United Kingdom: Captain Francis (Frank) Foley
 
“We in this office are the daily witnesses of the sufferings of old and broken people under orders to leave this country. They beseech us to join their children in Palestine”- Captain Francis Foley, May 26, 1939
The persecution of Jews in Germany drove many to seek refuge in the United Kingdom and British Mandatory Palestine. By 1936, British authorities began to restrict entry to the Mandate in response to the Arab revolt, and in 1939 – when the need to leave Germany had become most urgent – the British Government introduced the White Paper, all but ceasing legal Jewish entry into the Mandate. In the wake of the Kristallnacht pogrom in November 1938, Britain permitted the entry of nearly 10,000 unaccompanied refugee children, most of them Jewish, into the United Kingdom – a rescue operation known as the Kindertransport. Some 50,000 Jewish refugees reached the UK between 1933-1939, and 53,000 were admitted into the Mandate territories.
Captain Francis (Frank) Foley, a veteran of World War I, served in the British Intelligence Service MI6 and was stationed in Berlin from 1922 to 1939 as Passport Control Officer at the British Embassy. Beginning in 1935, an ever-growing number of Jews appealed to his office in order to obtain immigration visas to British Mandatory Palestine, the United Kingdom, and other parts of the British Empire. Defying the Foreign Office, Foley bent the rules to issue visas even to people who did not meet Britain’s stiff conditions for entry. During the Kristallnacht pogrom in November 1938, Foley sheltered Jews overnight in his apartment, including Leo Baeck, Chairman of the Association of German Rabbis. When the war broke out and Foley departed Germany, he left behind a thick wad of already approved visas for distribution to people in need.
Francis Foley was recognized as Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem in 1999.
Japan: Chiune Sugihara
 
“I may have to disobey the government, but if I don’t, I would be disobeying God.”- Chiune Sugihara
Following the German attack on Poland on September 1, 1939, some 15,000 Jews fled Poland to Lithuania. Caught between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, they desperately sought ways to emigrate. Travelling westwards was no longer possible, and crossing the Soviet Union required proof that they had entry visas for their final destinations. Jan Zwartendijk, the Acting Dutch Consul, provided them with statements that Curacao – a Dutch colony – required no entry visas: now all they required in order to leave Lithuania were transit visas through Japan.
Chiune Sugihara, served as Japan’s consul in Kovno, Lithuania. In 1940, the Soviet Union annexed Lithuania, and all foreign diplomats were ordered to leave. As Sugihara was packing his belongings, a Jewish delegation arrived and begged him to issue them transit visas to Japan, which would enable them to cross the Soviet Union. Sugihara cabled the foreign ministry in Tokyo for permission to deviate from the standing orders; however, troubled by the refugees’ plight, he began issuing visas at his own initiative. Nine days later, the Japanese Foreign Ministry rejected any change in the conditions for issuing transit visas. Although many of the Jews did not fall within the required criteria, Sugihara went on and issued visas to over 2,000 Jews. When Nazi Germany invaded Lithuania in June 1941, this small window of escape slammed shut, and almost all the Jews remaining in Lithuania were murdered.
Chiune Sugihara was recognized as Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem in 1984.
Czechoslovakia: Vladimír Vochoč 
 
“During the said period, in the years 1940–1941 in Marseilles, I acted to save foreign nationals even if I did not have the assurance that I had the backing of my foreign ministry, and even if it was not initially the policy of the Czechoslovakian government.” – Vladimír Vochoč
Following the 1938 Munich Agreement and the subsequent partition of Czechoslovakia, the Czechoslovakian diplomatic delegations ceased to exist and Vladimír Vochoč, the Czechoslovak consul in Marseilles, lost his diplomatic immunity. Nevertheless, Vochoč returned to the abandoned consulate in July 1940 and began issuing passports to refugees, among them many Jews who had escaped from Germany and were now stranded in southern France, frantically trying to leave the country. When Vochoč ran out of documents, he had passports printed by a local printing shop. In March 1941, the French police arrested Vochoč. He managed to escape, reaching Lisbon a few months later.
Vladimír Vochoč was recognized as Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem in 2016.
Portugal: Aristides De Sousa Mendes
 
“I would rather stand with God against man than with man against God.”- Aristides de Sousa Mendes
 
With the occupation of Western Europe by Nazi Germany in the spring and summer of 1940, thousands of refugees tried to flee to the Iberian Peninsula in an attempt to find refuge. The Portuguese dictator, António de Oliveira Salazar, permitted holders of visas for overseas to transit through Portugal but closed the borders to those without visas. Some 15,000-20,000 Jewish refugees were able to enter Portugal, and Jewish organizations working in Lisbon, such as the Joint, HIAS-HICEM, and the Jewish Agency, facilitated the refugees’ departure. In 1943-1944, Portugal rescued several hundred Portuguese Jews from Greece and France, but did not help 4,303 Dutch Jews of Portuguese origin, who were consequently deported to the extermination camps.
Following the German invasion of France in May 1940, Aristides de Sousa Mendes, Portugal’s consul general in Bordeaux, France, was faced with thousands of refugees congregating around his consulate. Seeing their terrible plight, Sousa Mendes decided to disobey his government’s explicit instructions, and issued transit visas to everyone in need, waiving the visa fees for those who could not pay. Setting up an “assembly line process,” Sousa Mendes issued visas to several thousand refugees. When Lisbon learned of Sousa Mendes’ actions, he was summarily ordered to return home. He was brought before a disciplinary panel and dismissed from the Foreign Office, leaving him destitute and unable to support his large family. Sousa Mendes died penniless in 1954. Only in 1988 did Portugal’s government grant him total rehabilitation.
Aristides de Sousa Mendes was recognized as Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem in 1966.
Germany: Georg Ferdinand Duckwitz 
 
Wishing to foster the cooperation of the Danes, and fearing that persecuting the Jews would result in widespread opposition, Nazi Germany did not enact anti-Jewish legislation in the first years of its occupation of Denmark. However, in the fall of 1943, following a sharp increase in Danish strikes and sabotage attempts, the policy changed, and preparations were made to deport the country’s 7,800 Jews.
News of the planned roundup reached the Jewish population, and, thanks to the proximity of Sweden, 7,200 Jews and some 700 of their non-Jewish relatives were brought to safety in the course of three weeks in October of 1943. 482 Jews, mostly the elderly and infirm, were caught and deported to the German detention camp of Thereisentadt
In 1939, Georg Ferdinand Duckwitz was appointed as the German Maritime Attaché in Denmark. Duckwitz enjoyed good connections with Danish leaders and became a close confidant of the Nazi Plenipotentiary for Denmark, Werner Best. When, in September 1943, Hitler demanded an iron-fist policy toward the increasingly rebellious country and an immediate implementation of the “Final Solution,” Best tipped off his confidante about the plan for the deportation of Denmark’s Jewish community. At great personal risk, Duckwitz proceeded to inform his Danish Social-Democratic friends, who, in turn, alerted the leadership of the Danish Jewish community. This made the great rescue operation, in which over 90 percent of Danish Jewry were saved from the Nazi clutches, possible.
Georg Ferdinand Duckwitz was recognized as Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem in 1971.
Spain: Sebastián De Romero Radigales
 
“Being released during the war from a Nazi camp was an unbelievable event. It happened thanks to an outstandingly courageous and humane man.” Holocaust survivor Isaac Revah. 
 
In the first two years of World War II, tens of thousands of Jewish refugees were able to reach Spain en route to other countries. Spain did not enact anti-Jewish laws, but only permitted refugees to transit through their country, and harshly treated stateless Jews who had entered illegally. When the deportations began, the Germans agreed to exempt Jews with citizenship of neutral countries, including Spain, from deportation, on condition that they would be repatriated. However, the Spanish government did not feel responsible for the Jews with Spanish citizenship residing in Greece or in other countries under Axis rule. Thus their return was radically restricted, and only several hundred reached Spain.
 Following the deportation of 48,000 Jews from Salonika in Greece in March 1943, Sebastián de Romero Radigales, who headed the Spanish diplomatic delegation in Athens, asked Madrid to facilitate the repatriation of Spanish Jews. Despite his superiors’ refusal, Radigales repeated the request, prompting Spanish Foreign Minister Jordana to instruct the diplomat in Athens “to maintain a passive approach, avoid any personal initiative, and refrain from issuing collective passports.” Nevertheless, Radigales persisted and tried to broaden the circle of people who received his protection. Radigales strove to protect 367 Jews with Spanish citizenship who had been deported to Bergen-Belsen until the Spanish government permitted their transfer to Spanish Morocco. He also helped Jews in Athens, trying to get them released from Haidari detention camp, and looked after the belongings of arrested Jews.
Sebastián de Romero Radigales was recognized as Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem in 2014.
Turkey: Selahattin Ülkümen
“If I could [have], I would [have] save[d] all of them. But unfortunately, that was beyond my competence.” Selahattin Ülkümen, in a letter to Yad Vashem, March 30, 1989 
 
In the 1930s, Turkey withdrew the citizenship of many Turkish Jews living abroad, and in 1938, a decree was enacted that prevented persecuted Jews from entering Turkey. When, in October 1942, Nazi Germany instructed neutral countries to repatriate their Jewish citizens, Turkey annulled the citizenship of additional Turkish Jews and instructed its delegations to restrict repatriation. Only a small number of Jews were able to return to Turkey with the help of Turkish diplomats. Approximately 2,500 Jews of Turkish origin living in different European countries were murdered in the Holocaust.
Selahattin Ülkümen was the Turkish Consul General on the island of Rhodes. When, in late July 1944, the Germans began to round up the island’s 1,700 Jews, Ülkümen managed to save approximately 40 Jews from deportation to Auschwitz. In fact, only 13 of these Jews were Turkish citizens. Some had a Turkish connection through marriage or had lost their citizenship due to the Turkish state policy; others, such as Alberto and Renata Amato and their daughter Lina, who were Italian citizens, had no connection whatsoever to Turkey. Nevertheless, Ülkümen falsely claimed that they all were Turkish citizens and therefore eligible for his protection. He even managed to obtain the release of Albert Franko, who was already on a deportation train to Auschwitz, under the pretext that his wife was Turkish. The remaining Jews of Rhodes were herded into three boats and deported to Auschwitz. The Jewish community of Rhodes was almost completely decimated.
Selahattin Ülkümen was recognized as Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem in 1989.
Sweden: Raoul Wallenberg 
 
“I’ve taken on this assignment, and I will never be able to return to Stockholm without knowing that I’d done all a man could do to save as many Jews as possible.” Raoul Wallenberg 
 
On March 19, 1944, Germany occupied Hungary. Within 56 days – from May to July – the German and Hungarian regimes had deported 437,000 Jews from the Hungarian provinces to Auschwitz. By the end of July 1944, the only Jewish community left in Hungary was that of its capital city, Budapest.
Soon the Swedish legation in Budapest reported that they were under enormous pressure by Jews seeking protection, and requested a special envoy whose principal task would be to deal with passports and visas. The Swedish government decided to work with the newly created American War Refugee Board and appointed Raoul Wallenberg as the Secretary in the Swedish Embassy in Budapest with full diplomatic privileges.
Wallenberg arrived in Budapest on July 9, 1944 with a list of Jews whom he was to help, and 650 protective passports for Jews who had some connection with Sweden. However, he soon widened the scope of his work and began to issue thousands of protective letters and to place buildings housing Jews under the Swedish flag. Jewish youngsters joined these rescue efforts and distributed the protective papers.
When the fascist Arrow Cross movement seized power in October 1944 and instilled a reign of terror in Budapest, Wallenberg and some of his colleagues abandoned all diplomatic routine and set out to save Jews from executions and death marches. They followed the columns of Jews who were marched to the Austrian border, and freed them by claiming they were under Swedish protection.
When the Soviets entered the city, Wallenberg was taken away by Russian soldiers, never to be seen again. His fate in Soviet captivity is still shrouded in mystery.
Raoul Wallenberg was recognized as Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem in 1963.
For further information: Allocution of Ambassador Jeremy Issacharoff at the opening of “Beyond Duty” in Berlin: http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/israel-germany-transforming-the-burden-of-our-history-into-a-unique-bond/ Exhibition in Berlin: https://www.facebook.com/events/189773178274315/ Picture by Embassy of the State of Israel to the Federal Republic of Germany